Allowable External Loading of Buried Smooth-Wall Steel Piping: Parametric Evaluation Using the Latest Guidance
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13, Issue 1
Abstract
Buried steel pipelines see wide use in municipal, industrial, and power plant settings. Methodologies exist for evaluating buried smooth-wall steel pipes for external loading such as soil load and live load, which have been successfully used for decades. This paper reviews the existing methodologies, demonstrates the robust external load capacity of buried steel piping, and also gives several design tables and charts to rapidly increase the speed with which buried smooth-wall steel pipelines may be designed. Similar to buried polyethylene piping, where the American Water Works Association has identified a Basic Installation (previously called the Design Window) allowing for minimal calculations on such pipe, the author identifies similar conditions for buried steel piping where calculations can be minimized or omitted.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank his colleague Michael P.H. Marohl, P.E. (Sargent & Lundy) for providing helpful feedback on this paper and also the peer reviewers for reviewing this paper and providing constructive comments.
References
AASHTO. 2020. LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2001. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. Washington, DC: FEMA.
API (American Petroleum Institute). 2007. Recommended practice 1102: Steel pipelines crossing railroads and highways. 7th ed. Washington, DC: API.
AREMA (American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way). 2018. Manual for railway engineering. Lanham, MD: AREMA.
ASCE. 2009. “Buried flexible steel pipe: Design and structural analysis.” In ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice no. 119. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASME. 2013. “Properties (Customary).” In Boiler and pressure vessel code, section II, Part D. New York: ASME.
ASME. 2018a. Stainless steel pipe. ASME B36.19M-2018. New York: ASME.
ASME. 2018b. Welded and seamless wrought steel pipe. ASME B36.10M-2018. New York: ASME.
ASTM. 2019. Standard specification for seamless carbon steel pipe for high-temperature service. ASTM A106-19a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard guide for use of maxi-horizontal directional drilling for placement of polyethylene pipe or conduit under obstacles, including river crossings. ASTM F1962-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
AWWA (American Water Works Association). 2004. Manual of water supply practices M11: Steel pipe—A guide for design and installation. 4th ed. Denver: AWWA. https://doi.org/10.12999/awwa.m11ed5err.
AWWA (American Water Works Association). 2017. Manual of water supply practices M11: Steel pipe—A guide for design and installation. 5th ed. Denver: AWWA. https://doi.org/10.12999/awwa.m55ed2.
AWWA (American Water Works Association). 2020. Manual of water supply practices M55: PE Pipe—Design and installation. 2nd ed. Denver: AWWA.
Bureau of Reclamation. 2019. Method for prediction of flexible pipe deflection. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
CSX Transportation. 2018. Design and construction standard specifications: Pipeline occupancies. Jacksonville, FL: CSX Transportation.
Frazee, G. R. 2021. “New formulations of Boussinesq solution for vertical and lateral stresses in soil.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 26 (2): 06021001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000567.
Hartley, J., and J. Duncan. 1982. Evaluation of the modulus of soil reaction and its variation with depth. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Howard, A. 1977. Modulus of soil reaction () values for buried flexible pipe. Washington, DC: Bureau of Reclamation.
ICC (International Code Council). 2018. International building code. Country Club Hills, IL: ICC.
Luscher, U. 1966. “Buckling of soil-surrounded tubes.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 92 (6): 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000920.
Marohl, M. P. H. 2014. “PVP2014-28766: Through-wall bending stress equations for the design of safety-related buried piping.” In Proc., ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conf. New York: ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2014-28766.
Moore, I. D., A. Haggag, and E. T. Selig. 1994. “Buckling strength of flexible cylinders with nonuniform support.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 31 (22): 3041–3058. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(94)90040-X.
Watkins, R. K., and L. R. Anderson. 2000. Structural mechanics of buried Pipes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420049572.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13 • Issue 1 • February 2022
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 13, 2021
Accepted: Sep 30, 2021
Published online: Dec 11, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 11, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Jin-Hong Yu, He-Gao Wu, Chang-Zheng Shi, Zhu Ma, Wen-Tao Xu, Behavior and innovative design model on soil pressure at the top of large-diameter buried steel pipes, Soils and Foundations, 10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101153, 62, 3, (101153), (2022).