Application of Kent Muhlbauer Method to Risk Assessment of Urban Gas Pipelines
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13, Issue 1
Abstract
Oil and gas revenues play an important role in the Iranian economy and are the main source of government spending and a major part of commodity exports. Therefore, safe transport of these products by pipelines and risk assessment are of great importance. The objective of this study was to determine the parameters affecting risk, assess the risks of urban gas transmission lines and gas transmission equipment, and identify high-risk areas to prioritize control measures. Risk assessment was performed using the Kent Muhlbauer method on a 19-km pipeline. The studied pipeline was divided into 94 separate sections. To calculate the relative risk, the index sum and leakage impact factor were used. The range of risks was classified into five areas: very high (0–1), high (1–2), medium (2–3), low (3–4), and very low (4–5). The average risk score for all 94 items was 2.92. The results indicated that 58.5% of the risks were moderate. The highest relative risk score was 1.67, whereas the minimum risk score was 4.19. According to the results, focusing on corrosion index and increasing the score of this index can be one of the important priorities for implementing control programs and maintenance measures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank East Azerbaijan Province Gas Company for financial support and all the people who helped the study team with their valuable information.
References
Amir-Heidari, P., M. Ebrahemzadih, H. Farahani, and J. Khoubi. 2014. “Quantitative risk assessment in Iran’s natural gas distribution network.” Open J. Saf. Sci. Technol. 4 (1): 59.
Aryanpour, M. M., Z. Almassi, and M. Nasrabadi. 2017. “Environmental risk assessment of gas condensates transmission pipeline with Kent Muhlbauer method and fuzzy TOPSIS model. (Case study: Gas transmission pipeline within Naiband National Park and Hormod Protected Area).” Eurasian J. Biosci. 11 (1): 45–51.
Bianchini, A., F. Donini, A. Guzzini, M. Pellegrini, and C. Saccani. 2015. “Natural gas pipelines distribution: Analysis of risk, design and maintenance to improve the safety performance.” In Proc., 20th Summer School Francesco Turco, 243–248. Naples, Italy: Industrial Systems Engineering.
Daquan, F. B. L. 2008. “Improved experts graded method of pipeline risk assessment.” Oil Gas Storage Transp. 2008 (1): 11.
DOT. 2017. “Guidance manual for operators of small natural gas systems: PHMSA.” Accessed January 1, 2017. https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/training/pipeline/small-natural-gas-operator-guide-january-2017-pdf.
Gallagher, J. E. 2013. Natural gas measurement handbook. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Gharabagh, M. J., H. Asilian, S. Mortasavi, A. Z. Mogaddam, E. Hajizadeh, and A. Khavanin. 2009. “Comprehensive risk assessment and management of petrochemical feed and product transportation pipelines.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 (4): 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.03.008.
Goodarzi, M., H. R. Jafari, and S. GivehChi. 2017. “Environmental risk assessment of gas transmission pipelines using the Kent Muhlbayer method.” J. Environ. Geolog. 7 (23): 81–94.
Mohammadi, H., and A. Baratzadeh. 2013. “The effect of oil revenue shocks on government expenditure and liquidity in Iran economy.” Iran. Energy Econ. 2 (7): 129–145.
Mohhammadfam, I., M. Abdoli, and F. Ghasemi. 2013. “Risk assessment and management of gas transmission lines, in Alamout natural gas pipeline.” Jundishapur J. Health Sci. 5 (3): 175–182.
Montiel, H., J. A. Vílchez, J. Arnaldos, and J. Casal. 1996. “Historical analysis of accidents in the transportation of natural gas.” J. Hazard. Mater. 51 (1–3): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(96)01819-5.
Moradi, A., E. Najafi Kani, and M. Parvini. 2017. “Risk assessment of municipal natural gas pipeline networks using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for Sanandaj city.” Iran Occup. Health 14 (4): 1–12.
Motamedzadeh, M., I. Mohamadfam, and Y. Hamidi. 2009. “Health, safety and environment risk assessment in gas pipelines by indexing method: Case of Kermanshah Sanandaj oil pipeline.” Iran Occup. Health 6 (3): 58–66.
Muhlbauer, W. K. 2004. Pipeline risk management manual: Ideas, techniques, and resources. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Rezaian, S., S. A. Jozi, and M. Irankhahi. 2015. “The presentation of environmental risk assessment pattern for gas pipeline project by using of indexing system and AHP methods. (Case study: Transportation pipelines 24 inches, Tasuj-Salmas project).” J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16 (3): 11–23.
Ruizhong, L. Z., and Z. Jinyang. 2008. “Application of W Kent Muhlbauer pipeline risk assessment in natural gas transportation pipeline safety assessment.” Chem. Prod. Technol. 1 (1): 3.
Saffari, B., A. Ameri, N. Majidian, M. Pellegrini, and M. M. Saccani. 2015. “Environmental risk assessment by Muhlbauer method, case study: The first global gas transmission pipeline.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Environment and Natural Resources. Vienna, Austria: International Conference on Environment and Natural Resources.
Shayegani, A. M., A. Pasha, and A. Ahmadi. 2018. “Failure analysis of an 8-inch urban gas distribution steel pipeline.” Pet. Res. 27 (99): 59–68.
Urbanik, M., B. Tchórzewska-Cieślak, and K. Pietrucha-Urbanik. 2019. “Analysis of the safety of functioning gas pipelines in terms of the occurrence of failures.” Energies 12 (17): 3228. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173228.
Uzoh, C. A. 2011. “Quantitative analysis of risk factors affecting transportation of natural gas using pipelines.” Accessed March 24, 2011. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/11844.
Washani, K. W. 2017. “Risk assessment of gas pipelines using index method (Kent Muhlbauer).” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Industrial Management and Engineering. Barcelona, Spain: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management.
Wu, J., R. Zhou, S. Xu, and Z. Wu. 2017. “Probabilistic analysis of natural gas pipeline network accident based on Bayesian network.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 46 (Mar): 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.01.025.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13 • Issue 1 • February 2022
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 15, 2020
Accepted: Jun 15, 2021
Published online: Nov 9, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 9, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Mehdi Eskandarzade, Meysam Najafi Ershadi, Behzad Abbaszadeh, Seyed Mohammad Arab, R. M. Chandima Ratnayake, Consequence Assessment of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Using Gray Relational Analysis, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000691, 14, 1, (2023).