Technical Papers
Jul 17, 2020

Intelligent Approaches for Predicting Failure of Water Mains

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11, Issue 4

Abstract

Water mains are indispensable infrastructures in many countries around the world. Several factors may be responsible for the failure of these essential pipelines that negatively impact their integrity and service life. The purpose of this study is to propose models that can predict the average time to failure of water mains by using intelligent approaches, including artificial neural network (ANN), ridge regression (l2), and ensemble decision tree (EDT) models. The developed models were trained by using collected data from Quebec City water mains, including records of the possible factors, such as the materials, length, and diameter of pipes, that contributed to the failure. The ensemble learning model was applied by using a boosting technique to improve the performance of the decision tree model. All models, however, were able to predict reasonably the failure of water mains. A global sensitivity analysis (GSA) was then conducted to test the robustness of the model and to show clearly the relationship between the input and output of the model. The GSA results show that gray cast iron (CI), hyprescon/concrete (Hy), and ductile iron with lining (DIL) are the most vulnerable materials for the model output. The results also indicate that the failure of water mains mostly depends on pipe material and length. It is hoped that this study will help decision makers to avoid unexpected water main failure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, and codes used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Data provided by the municipality of Sainte-Foy, Quebec cannot be shared as it is confidential.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). Financial support provided by McGill-UAE fellowships in Science and Engineering to the first author is highly appreciated.

References

Ana, E. V., and W. Bauwens. 2010. “Modeling the structural deterioration of urban drainage pipes: The state-of-the-art in statistical methods.” Urban Water J. 7 (1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620903447597.
ASCE. 2017. “2017 infrastructure report card.” Accessed July 10, 2019. https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/.
Basheer, I. A., and M. Hajmeer. 2000. “Artificial neural networks: Fundamentals, computing, design, and application.” J. Microbiol. Methods 43 (1): 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00201-3.
Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer.
Botchkarev, A. 2018. “Performance metrics (error measures) in machine learning regression, forecasting and prognostics: Properties and typology.” Accessed June 16, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.03006.
Bühlmann, P., and T. Hothorn. 2007. “Boosting algorithms: Regularization, prediction and model fitting.” Stat. Sci. 22 (4): 477–505. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-STS242.
Christodoulou, S. E. 2011. “Water network assessment and reliability analysis by use of survival analysis.” Water Resour. Manage. 25 (4): 1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9679-8.
CIRC (Canadian Infrastructure Report Card). 2016. “Canadian infrastructure report card.” Accessed July 22, 2019. http://canadianinfrastructure.ca/en/index.html.
Demissie, G., S. Tesfamariam, and R. Sadiq. 2017. “Prediction of pipe failure by considering time-dependent factors: Dynamic Bayesian belief network model.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A Civ. Eng. 3 (4): 04017017. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000920.
Drucker, H. 1997. “Improving regressors using boosting techniques.” In Proc., 14th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, 107–115. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
El-Abbasy, M. S., A. Senouci, T. Zayed, F. Mirahadi, and L. Parvizsedghy. 2014. “Artificial neural network models for predicting condition of offshore oil and gas pipelines.” Autom. Constr. 45 (Sep): 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.003.
El Chanati, H. 2014. “Performance assessment of water network infrastructure.” Ph.D. dissertation, Building Engineering, Concordia Univ.
Elith, J., J. R. Leathwick, and T. Hastie. 2008. “A working guide to boosted regression trees.” J. Anim. Ecol. 77 (4): 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x.
Fares, H. A. 2008. Evaluating the risk of water main failure using a hierarchical fuzzy expert system. Montreal: Concordia Univ.
Farmani, R., K. Kakoudakis, K. Behzadian, and D. Butler. 2017. “Pipe failure prediction in water distribution systems considering static and dynamic factors.” Procedia Eng. 186: 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.217.
Folkman, S. 2018. Water main break rates in the USA and Canada: A comprehensive study. Logan, UT: Buried Structure Laboratory, Utah State University.
Francis, R. A., S. D. Guikema, and L. Henneman. 2014. “Bayesian belief networks for predicting drinking water distribution system pipe breaks.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 130: 1–11.
Freund, Y., and R. E. Schapire. 1996. “Experiments with a new boosting algorithm.” In Proc., 13th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, 148–156. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Garavaglia, S., and A. Sharma. 1998. “A smart guide to dummy variables: Four applications and a macro.” Proc., Northeast SAS Users Group Conf., 43. Murray Hill, NJ: Dun & Bradstreet.
Haykin, S. 1994. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. 2nd ed. Toledo, OH: Elsevier.
Homma, T., and A. Saltelli. 1996. “Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 52 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(96)00002-6.
Ismaeel, M. 2016. Performance based budget allocation model for water networks. Montréal, QC: Concordia Univ.
Jafar, R., I. Shahrour, and I. Juran. 2010. “Application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to model the failure of urban water mains.” Math. Comput. Modell. 51 (9–10): 1170–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.12.033.
Kabir, G., S. Tesfamariam, and R. Sadiq. 2015. “Bayesian model averaging for the prediction of water main failure for small to large Canadian municipalities.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 43 (3): 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0374.
Kaddoura, K., and T. Zayed. 2018. “Erosion void condition prediction models for buried linear assets.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 10 (1): 04018029 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000357.
Kamel, S., and M. A. Meguid. 2012. “Investigating the effects of local contact loss on the earth pressure distribution on rigid pipes.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 31 (1): 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9580-8.
Karimian, S. F. 2015. Failure rate prediction models of water distribution networks. Montréal, QC: Concordia Univ.
Kaushik, G., A. Manimaran, A. Vasan, V. Sarangan, and A. Sivasubramaniam. 2017. “Cracks under pressure? Burst prediction in water networks using dynamic metrics.” In Proc., 29th IAAI Conf. San Francisco: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
Kettler, A., and I. Goulter. 1985. “An analysis of pipe breakage in urban water distribution networks.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 12 (2): 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1139/l85-030.
Khalaf, G., and G. Shukur. 2005. “Choosing ridge parameter for regression problems.” Comm. Stat.-Theory Methods 34 (5): 1177–1182. https://doi.org/10.1081/STA-200056836.
Kishawy, H. A., and H. A. Gabbar. 2010. “Review of pipeline integrity management practices.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 87 (7): 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.04.003.
Kleiner, Y., and B. Rajani. 2001. “Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: Statistical models.” Urban Water 3 (3): 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00033-4.
Li, Z., B. Zhang, Y. Wang, F. Chen, R. Taib, V. Whiffin, and Y. Wang. 2013. “Water pipe condition assessment: A hierarchical beta process approach for sparse incident data.” Mach. Learn. 95 (1): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-013-5386-z.
Liu, Z., and Y. Kleiner. 2014. “Computational intelligence for urban infrastructure condition assessment: Water transmission and distribution systems.” IEEE Sens. J. 14 (12): 4122–4133. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2336240.
Makar, J., R. Desnoyers, and S. McDonald. 2001. “Failure modes and mechanisms in gray cast iron pipe.” In Proc., Underground Infrastructure Research, 1–10. Kitchener, ON: A.A. Balkema.
Mavin, K. 1996. Predicting the failure performance of individual water mains. Melbourne, Australia: Urban Water Research Association of Australia.
Mirza, S. 2007. Danger ahead: The coming collapse of Canada’s municipal infrastructure. Ottawa: Federation of Canadian Municipalities.
Mohammed, A. U. 2016. Integrated reliability assessment of water distribution networks. Montréal, QC: Concordia Univ.
Ormsby, C. M. 2009. “A framework for estimating the total cost of buried municipal infrastructure renewal projects.” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ.
Parvizsedghy, L., I. Gkountis, A. Senouci, T. Zayed, M. Alsharqawi, H. El Chanati, M. El-Abbasy, and F. Mosleh. 2017. “Deterioration assessment models for water pipelines.” Int. J. Civ. Environ. Eng. 11 (7): 1013–1022.
Pianosi, F., F. Sarrazin, and T. Wagener. 2015. “A Matlab toolbox for global sensitivity analysis.” Environ. Modell. Software 70 (Aug): 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.04.009.
Rajani, B., and Y. Kleiner. 2001. “Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: Physically based models.” Urban Water 3 (3): 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00032-2.
Ramakrishnan, N., and C. Bailey-Kellogg. 2007. Encyclopedia of GIS. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Rogers, P. D., and N. S. Grigg. 2009. “Failure assessment modeling to prioritize water pipe renewal: Two case studies.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 15 (3): 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:3(162).
Sarsam, S. M. 2019. “Reinforcing the decision-making process in chemometrics: Feature selection and algorithm optimization.” In Proc., 2019 8th Int. Conf. on Software and Computer Applications, 11–16. New York: ACM.
Sattar, A. M., Ö. F. Ertuğrul, B. Gharabaghi, E. McBean, and J. Cao. 2019. “Extreme learning machine model for water network management.” Neural Comput. Appl. 31 (1): 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2987-7.
Shirzad, A., M. Tabesh, and R. Farmani. 2014. “A comparison between performance of support vector regression and artificial neural network in prediction of pipe burst rate in water distribution networks.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 18 (4): 941–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0537-8.
Shrestha, D. L., and D. P. Solomatine. 2006. “Experiments with AdaBoost. RT, an improved boosting scheme for regression.” Neural Comput. 18 (7): 1678–1710. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1678.
Sipos, C. 2010. “GIS-inventory and condition rating of water supply system at McGill downtown campus.” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil Engineering, McGill Univ.
Snider, B., and E. A. McBean. 2018. “Improving time to failure predictions for water distribution systems using extreme gradient boosting algorithm.” In Proc., WDSA/CCWI Joint Conf. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Kingston.
Sobol, I. M. 1993. “Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models.” Math. Modell. Comput. Exp. 1 (4): 407–414.
Sobol, I. M. 2001. “Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates.” Math. Comput. Simul 55 (1–3): 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6.
Song, X.-M., F.-Z. Kong, C.-S. Zhan, J.-W. Han, and X.-H. Zhang. 2013. “Parameter identification and global sensitivity analysis of Xin’anjiang model using meta-modeling approach.” Water Sci. Eng. 6 (1): 1–17.
Tarantola, S., D. Gatelli, and T. A. Mara. 2006. “Random balance designs for the estimation of first order global sensitivity indices.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 (6): 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.06.003.
Tibshirani, R. 1996. “Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso.” J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series B (Methodol.) 58 (1): 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x.
Wang, Y. 2006. Deterioration and condition rating analysis of water mains. Montréal, QC: Concordia Univ.
Wang, Y., T. Zayed, and O. Moselhi. 2009. “Prediction models for annual break rates of water mains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 23 (1): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2009)23:1(47).
Wilson, D., Y. Filion, and I. Moore. 2017. “State-of-the-art review of water pipe failure prediction models and applicability to large-diameter mains.” Urban Water J. 14 (2): 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2015.1080848.
Winkler, D., M. Haltmeier, M. Kleidorfer, W. Rauch, and F. Tscheikner-Gratl. 2018. “Pipe failure modelling for water distribution networks using boosted decision trees.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (10): 1402–1411. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1443145.
Witten, I. H., E. Frank, M. A. Hall, and C. J. Pal. 2016. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Yamijala, S., S. D. Guikema, and K. Brumbelow. 2009. “Statistical models for the analysis of water distribution system pipe break data.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 (2): 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.011.
Zangenehmadar, Z. 2016. Asset management tools for sustainable water distribution networks. Montréal, QC: Concordia Univ.
Zhan, C.-S., X.-M. Song, J. Xia, and C. Tong. 2013. “An efficient integrated approach for global sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters.” Environ. Modell. Software 41 (Mar): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.10.009.
Zhou, J., and F. Chen. 2018. Human and machine learning: Visible, explainable, trustworthy and transparent. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Zou, H., and T. Hastie. 2005. “Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net.” J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series B (Stat. Methodol.) 67 (2): 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11Issue 4November 2020

History

Received: Aug 28, 2019
Accepted: Apr 24, 2020
Published online: Jul 17, 2020
Published in print: Nov 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Dec 17, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zainab Almheiri [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H2X 3P7 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Mohamed Meguid, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Chair, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H2X 3P7. Email: [email protected]
Tarek Zayed, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Construction and Environment, Dept. of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Kowloon, Hong Kong. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share