Optimization of a Subsea Pipeline Route Profile with the Elimination of Free Spans
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 10, Issue 2
Abstract
The selected route for a subsea pipeline is usually uneven and requires extensive preparation. In the case of a relatively stiff pipeline, free spans that are too long may occur even on the prepared route (causing design issues like fatigue). To solve this problem, an optimization procedure has been developed to minimize route preparation costs and to eliminate free spans. The procedure is based on the Euler-Bernoulli beam and the quartic spline used for modeling the route profile in the vertical plane. The seabed is considered to be rigid and without friction. In the procedure, the contact load between the pipeline and the seabed is constrained. A minimum limit of contact load is set to ensure that the pipeline is in contact with the seabed for its whole length so that free spans do not occur. The effectiveness of the procedure is tested in a narrow sea channel with a relatively large diameter steel pipeline for oil transportation. Optimization results are compared with the static response obtained by the nonlinear finite element method (NFEM). The comparison shows that the use of a contact load constraint leads to a significant reduction or to the elimination of free spans.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ANL (Argonne National Laboratory). 2007. Overview of the design, construction, and operation of interstate liquid petroleum pipelines. Argonne, IL: ANL.
Baioco, J. S., P. Stape, M. Granja, C. H. Albrecht, B. S. L. P. Lima, and B. P. Jacob. 2014. “Incorporating engineering criteria to the synthesis and optimization of submarine pipeline routes: On-bottom stability, viv-induced fatigue and multiphase flow.” In Proc., 33rd Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2014), 2014–24151. New York: ASME.
Bauchau, O. A., and J. I. Craig. 2009. Structural analysis: With applications to aerospace structures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Baudin, M. 2010. Introduction to Scilab. Le Chesnay Cedex, France: Scilab Consortium–Digiteo.
Belytschko, T., L. Schwer, and M. J. Klein. 1977. “Large displacement, transient analysis of space frames.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 11 (1): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620110108.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2010. On-bottom stability design of submarine pipelines. DNV-RP-F109. Oslo, Norway: DNV.
DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2012. Submarine pipeline systems. DNV-OS-F101. Oslo, Norway: DNV.
Fernandes, D. H., B. P. Jacob, B. S. L. P. Lima, A. R. Medeiros, and C. H. Albrecht. 2009. “A proposal of multi-objective function for submarine rigid pipelines route optimization via evolutionary algorithms.” In Proc., Rio Pipeline Conf. and Exposition. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Brazilian Petroleum, Gas and Biofuels Institute.
Gao, Y. M., H. H. Wang, B. Wang, L. Yang, and Z. Shi. 2009. “Submarine pipelines routing planning based on GIS and dynamic programming.” In Vol. 7840 of Proc., SPIE, 6th Int. Symp. on Digital Earth: Models, Algorithms, and Virtual Reality. Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
Giannessi, F., L. Jurina, and G. Maier. 1979. “Optimal excavation profile for a pipeline freely resting on the sea floor.” Eng. Struct. 1 (2): 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(79)90017-8.
Giannessi, F., L. Jurina, and G. Maier. 1982. “A quadratic complementarity problem related to the optimal design of a pipeline freely resting on a rough sea bottom.” Eng. Struct. 4 (3): 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(82)90008-6.
Gokkus, U., and A. Akyarli. 1994. “Optimum design of submarine pipeline.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 4th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., 33–40. Cupertino, CA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
Hallquist, J. O. 1998. LS-DYNA: Theoretical manual. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
Jacovazzo, B. M., and B. P. Jacob. 2013. “Numerical tool for automatic identification of free spans on submarine pipelines.” In Proc., 32nd Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2013), 2013–11342. New York: ASME.
Kanakoudis, V. K. 2004. “A troubleshooting manual for handling operational problems in water pipe networks.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. -AQUA 53 (2): 109–124. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2004.0010.
Kreyszig, E. 1993. Advanced engineering mathematics. 7th ed. New York: Wiley.
Li, G., C. Yang, P. Pan, and W. Zhang. 2017. “Record setting 3, 300-m distance by horizontal directional drilling of a 711-mm-diameter pipeline crossing the Yangtze River.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 8 (1): 05016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000247.
Lima, M. H. A., Jr., J. S. Baioco, C. H. Albrecht, B. S. L. P. Lima, B. P. Jacob, D. M. Rocha, and C. O. Cardoso. 2011. “Synthesis and optimization of submarine pipeline routes considering on-bottom stability criteria.” In Proc., 30th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2011), 2011–49373. New York: ASME.
Lucena, R. R., J. S. Baioco, B. S. L. P. Lima, C. H. Albrecht, and B. P. Jacob. 2014. “Optimal design of submarine pipeline routes by genetic algorithm with different constraint handling techniques.” Adv. Eng. Software 76: 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.06.003.
Nocedal, J., and S. J. Wright. 2006. Numerical optimization. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.
Pranesh, M. R., and A. S. Johnson. 1995. “Submarine pipeline routing software.” Comput. Struct. 57 (2): 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)00618-D.
Pulici, M. 1996. “Gibraltar strait crossing: Free span analysis optimizes subsea pipeline.” In Vol. 5 of Proc., 15th Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 195–202. New York: ASME.
Usmani, R. A. 1992. “The use of quartic splines in the numerical solution of a fourth-order boundary value problem.” J. Comput. Appl. Math. 44 (2): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(92)90010-U.
Wierzbicki, T. 2013. “2.080J structural mechanics.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare. Accessed March 21, 2018. https://ocw.mit.edu.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., R. L. Taylor, and F. David. 2005. The finite element method for solid and structural mechanics. London: McGraw-Hill.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 10 • Issue 2 • May 2019
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 12, 2017
Accepted: Oct 9, 2018
Published online: Feb 18, 2019
Published in print: May 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jul 18, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.