Technical Papers
Feb 12, 2019

Effects of Using EPS Geofoam as Compressible Inclusion on HDPE Pipe Behavior

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 10, Issue 2

Abstract

This paper presents the results obtained from an experimental study investigating the effects of using expanded polystyrene (EPS) as compressible inclusion on buried high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe behavior. A series of full-scale tests were conducted using a laboratory testing facility to investigate the effects of using EPS on the behavior of a 300-mm-nominal-diameter lined corrugated-wall HDPE pipe buried in a poorly graded sand medium. For this purpose, five different compressible inclusion geometries were designed. EPS with 10  kg/m3 nominal density was used as the compressible material. In order to simulate geostatic stresses imposed by shallow and high soil fills, vertical surcharge stresses up to 200 kPa were applied on surface of the burial medium. Comprehensive instrumentation was implemented in order to measure the pipe deflections, soil stresses on the pipe, and soil settlements in the pipe zone. In terms of performance and cost-efficiency, it is concluded that a single EPS panel above the pipe crown, which is as wide as one pipe outside diameter and as thick as 1/6 of pipe nominal diameter, offers the best solution. This solution provided a reduction in vertical stress at the pipe crown up to of 76% and in horizontal stress on the pipe walls at the springline up to of 65%. Vertical and horizontal pipe deflections are reduced by 87% and 60%, respectively, under 200-kPa surcharge stress. This solution also provided near-zero pipe deflections in the 100–125 kPa surcharge stress range.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project No. 110M673) and Yildiz Technical University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Department (Project No. 2014-05-01-DOP01).

References

Akınay, E. 2017. “Investigating the effect of using compressible bedding material on the behavior of buried flexible pipes.” [In Turkish.] Ph.D. thesis, Science and Technology Institute, Yildiz Technical Univ.
Akınay, E., and H. Kılıç 2019. “Improving the behavior of buried HDPE pipe by using EPS geofoam.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications, edited by D. Arellano, A. Özer, S. Bartlett, and J. Vaslestad. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
ASTM. 2015. Standard specification for rigid cellular polystyrene geofoam. ASTM D6817/D6817M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Atmatzidis, D. K., E. G. Missirlis, and D. A. Chrysikos. 2001. “An investigation of EPS geofoam behavior in compression.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications. Salt Lake City.
Brachman, R. W. I., I. D. Moore, and R. K. Rowe. 2001. “The performance of a laboratory facility for evaluating the structural response of small-diameter buried pipes.” Can. Geotech. J. 38 (2): 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-102.
Brachman, R. W. I., I. D. Moore, and S. M. Munro. 2008. “Compaction effects on strains within profiled thermoplastic pipes.” Geosynthetics Int. 15 (2): 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2008.15.2.72.
Chun, B. S., H. Lim, M. Sagong, and K. Kim. 2004. “Development of a hyperbolic constitutive model for expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam under triaxial compression tests.” Geotext. Geomembr. 22 (4): 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.03.005.
CPPA (Corrugated Polyethylene Pipe Association). 2006. Recommended installation practices for corrugated polyethylene pipe and fittings, 25–26. Washington, DC: CPPA.
Dhar, A. S., and I. D. Moore. 2006. “Evaluation of local bending in profile-wall polyethylene pipes.” J. Transp. Eng. 132 (11): 898–906. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:11(898).
Dhar, A. S., I. D. Moore, and T. J. McGrath. 2004. “Two-dimensional analysis of thermoplastic culvert deformations and strains.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (2): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:2(199).
Jeyapalan, J. K., and S. W. Ethiyajeevakaruna. 1987. “Behavior and design of buried very flexible plastic pipes.” J. Transp. Eng. 113 (6): 642–657. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1987)113:6(642).
Kang, J., F. Parker, and C. H. Yoo. 2007. “Soil-structure interaction and imperfect trench installations for deeply buried corrugated polyvinyl chloride pipes.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2028 (1): 192–202. https://doi.org/10.3141/2028-21.
Kang, J., F. Parker, Y. J. Kang, and C. H. Yoo. 2008. “Effects of frictional forces acting on sidewalls of buried box culverts.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 32 (3): 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.628.
Kılıç, H., and E. Akınay. 2017. “Numerical analysis of buried high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe behavior.” [In Turkish.] In Proc., 3rd Int. Soil-Structure Interaction Symp. Izmir, Turkey.
Kim, H., B. Choi, and J. Kim. 2010. “Reduction of earth pressure on buried pipes by EPS geofoam inclusions.” Geotech. Test. J. 33 (4): 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ102315.
Kim, K., and C. H. Yoo. 2002. Design loading for deeply buried box culverts. Auburn, AL: Auburn Univ.
Liedberg, N. S. D. 1997. “Load reduction on a rigid pipe: Pilot study of a soft cushion installation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1594 (1): 217–223. https://doi.org/10.3141/1594-25.
Marston, A. 1922. Second progress report to the joint concrete culvert pipe committee. Ames, IA: Iowa Engineering Experimental Station.
Marston, A. 1930. The theory of external loads on closed conduits in the light of the latest experiments. Ames, IA: Iowa State College.
Masada, T., S. Sargand, and G. Hazen. 2002. Field verification of structural performance of thermoplastic pipe under deep backfill conditions. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
McAffee, R. P., and A. J. Valsangkar. 2005. “Performance of an induced trench installation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1936 (1): 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193600126.
McAffee, R. P., and A. J. Valsangkar. 2008. “Field performance, centrifuge testing, and numerical modelling of an induced trench installation.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (1): 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-086.
McGrath, T. J. 1998. “Pipe-soil interactions during backfill placement.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Massachusetts.
McGuigan, B. L., and A. J. Valsangkar. 2010. “Centrifuge testing and numerical analysis of box culverts installed in induced trenches.” Can. Geotech. J. 47 (2): 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-085.
McGuigan, B. L., and A. J. Valsangkar. 2011. “Earth pressures on twin positive projecting and induced trench box culverts under high embankments.” Can. Geotech. J. 48 (2): 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1139/T10-058.
Meguid, M. A., M. R. Ahmed, M. G. Hussein, and Z. Omeman. 2017. “Earth pressure distribution on a rigid box covered with u-shaped geofoam wrap.” Int. J. Geosynthetics Ground Eng. 3 (2): 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0088-4.
Mert, B. 2014. “Determination of stiffness of sand by using geogauge.” [In Turkish.] M.Sc. thesis, Science and Technology Institute, Yildiz Technical Univ.
Moser, A. P. 1998. “Structural performance of buried profile-wall high-density polyethylene pipe and influence of pipe wall geometry.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1624 (1): 206–213. https://doi.org/10.3141/1624-24.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). 1999. HDPE pipe: Recommended material specifications and design requirements. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Oshati, O. S., A. J. Valsangkar, and A. B. Schriver. 2012. “Earth pressure exerted on an induced trench cast-in-place double-cell rectangular box culvert.” Can. Geotech. J. 49 (11): 1267–1284. https://doi.org/10.1139/t2012-093.
Parker, B. A., R. P. McAffee, and A. J. Valsangkar. 2008. “Field performance and analysis of 3-m-diameter induced trench culvert under a 19.4-m soil cover.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2045 (1): 68–76. https://doi.org/10.3141/2045-08.
Rude, L. C. 1983. “Load reductions on buried rigid pipe.” J. Transp. Eng. 109 (1): 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1983)109:1(107).
Sargand, S. M., and T. Masada. 2007. Long term monitoring of pipe under deep cover. Athens, OH: Ohio Univ.
Sladen, J. A., and J. M. Oswell. 1988. “The induced trench method: A critical review and case history.” Can. Geotech. J. 25 (3): 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1139/t88-059.
Spangler, M. G. 1950. Field measurements of the settlement ratios of various highway culverts. Ames, IA: Iowa State College.
Sun, L., T. C. Hopkins, and T. L. Benkham. 2009. Reduction of stresses on buried rigid highway structures using the imperfect ditch method and expanded polystyrene (geofoam). Lexington, KY: Univ. of Kentucky.
Sun, L., T. C. Hopkins, and T. L. Beckham. 2011. “Long-term monitoring of culvert load reduction using an imperfect ditch backfilled with geofoam.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2212 (1): 56–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/2212-06.
Terzaghi, K. 1943. Theoretical soil mechanics. New York: Wiley.
Tognon, A. R. M., R. K. Rowe, and R. W. I. Brachman. 1999. “Evaluation of side wall friction for a buried pipe testing facility.” Geotext. Geomembr. 17 (4): 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(99)00004-7.
TS (Turkish Standards). 2007. Thermal insulation and light weight fill products for civil engineering applications: Factory made products of expanded polystyrene (EPS)—Specification. TS EN 14933. Ankara, Turkey: TS.
TS (Turkish Standards). 2016. Thermoplastics pipes: Determination of ring stiffness. TS EN ISO 9969. Ankara, Turkey: TS.
Vaslestad, J., M. S. Sayd, T. H. Johansen, and L. Wiman. 2011. “Load reduction and arching on buried rigid culverts using EPS geofoam: Design method and instrumented field tests.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications, 10–36. Lillestrøm, Norway.
Wong, L., and C. J. Leo. 2006. “A simple elastoplastic hardening constitutive model for EPS geofoam.” Geotext. Geomembr. 24 (5): 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.03.007.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 10Issue 2May 2019

History

Received: Feb 14, 2018
Accepted: Sep 26, 2018
Published online: Feb 12, 2019
Published in print: May 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jul 12, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Havvanur Kılıç [email protected]
Associated Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical Univ., Esenler, Istanbul 34220, Turkey (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Emre Akınay, Ph.D. [email protected]
Civil Engineering Applications Executive, Austrotherm Turkey, Orhan Veli Kanık St., No. 3/5, Kavacık 34810, Turkey. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share