Abstract

Cellular lightweight concrete (CLC) block masonry has gained popularity in the masonry market with the growing demand in the modern construction industry due to its various advantages, including a positive impact on the environment. Subsequently, the detailed characterization of its vital engineering properties should be studied for the development of the mathematical model, analysis, evaluation, and design of structures made of CLC block masonry. The present study investigates the variability in two important strength properties of CLC block masonry and proposes the most appropriate models for their statistical distribution to support probability-based structural analysis and design. This study shows that the assumption of a normal distribution in the absence of an appropriate uncertainty model can result in an inaccurate estimate of the seismic risk of an RC frame building infilled with CLC block masonry. The paper further assesses the seismic safety of a typical RC framed building infilled with CLC block masonry in relation to traditional brick masonry, considering the proposed uncertainty model. Although CLC block masonry results in a higher seismic risk compared with traditional brick masonry, it can be used as an infill material in high seismic areas because it results in a probability of failure within the acceptable limit.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request (OpenSEES modeling files and generated outputs).

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2013. Guide for testing reinforced concretestructural elements under slowly applied simulated seismic loads. ACI 374.2R. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Aliabdo, A. A., A. E. M. Abd-Elmoaty, and H. H. Hassan. 2014. “Utilization of crushed clay brick in cellular concrete production.” Alexandria Eng. J. 53 (1): 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2013.11.005.
ANSI (American National Standard Institute). 2019. American national standard specifications for modified dry-set cement mortar. ANSI A118.4. New York: ANSI.
Aryana S. A. 2006. “Statistical analysis of compressive strength of clay brick masonry prisms.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas.
ASCE/SEI. 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofitof existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prism. ASTM C1314. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 2012. Guidelines for seismic performance assessment of buildings. ATC-58. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Basha, S. H., and H. B. Kaushik. 2015. “Evaluation of nonlinear material properties of fly ash brick masonry under compression and shear.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (8): 04014227. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001188.
Basha, S. H., and H. B. Kaushik. 2016. “Suitability of fly ash brick masonry as infill in reinforced concrete frames.” Mater. Struct. 49 (9): 3831–3845. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0757-5.
Benjamin, J. R., and C. A. Cornell. 2014. Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bhosale, A., N. P. Zade, P. Sarkar, and R. Davis. 2020. “Mechanical and physical properties of cellular lightweight concrete block masonry.” Constr. Build. Mater. 248 (Jul): 118621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118621.
Bhosale, A. S., R. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2018. “Seismic safety of vertically irregular buildings: Performance of existing indicators.” J. Archit. Eng. 24 (3): 04018013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000319.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1987. Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. Part 1: Dead loads—Unit weights of building materials and stored materials. IS 875. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2000. Plain and reinforced concrete—Code of practice. IS 456: 2000. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Part 1: General provisions and buildings. IS 1893. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2002. Methods of test for masonry. Determination of initial shear strength. BS EN 1052-3. London: BSI.
Celarec, D., P. Ricci, and M. Dolsek. 2012. “The sensitivity of seismic response parameters to the uncertain modelling variables of masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames.” Eng. Struct. 35 (Feb): 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.007.
Celik, O. C., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2010. “Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames—Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.” Struct. Saf. 32 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003.
Chandrappa, A. K., and K. P. Biligiri. 2017. “Flexural-fatigue characteristics of pervious concrete: Statistical distributions and model development.” Constr. Build. Mater. 153 (Oct): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.081.
Chen, X., S. Wu, and J. Zhou. 2014. “Variability of compressive strength of concrete cores.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (4): 06014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000513.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
Crisafulli F. J. 1997. “Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury.
Dhir, P. K., N. P. Zade, A. Basu, R. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2020. “Implications of importance factor on seismic design from 2000 SAC-FEMA perspective.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 6 (2): 04020016. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001048.
Ellingwood, B., and A. Tallin. 1985. “Limit states criteria for masonry construction.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (1): 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:1(108).
Fardis, M. N. 1996. Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic response of RC infilled frames and recommendations for code provisions. Lisbon, Portugal: Laboratorio Nacional de Engenharia Civil.
FEMA. 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA P-695. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Haran, P. D., R. Davis, and P. Sarkar. 2015. “Reliability evaluation of RC frame by two major fragility analysis methods.” Asian J. Civ. Eng. 15 (1): 47–66.
Jones, M. R., and A. McCarthy. 2005. “Preliminary views on the potential of foamed concrete as a structural material.” Mag. Concr. Res. 57 (1): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2005.57.1.21.
Jos, R., and M. Llukito. 2011. “Influence of water absorption on properties of AAC and CLC lightweight concrete brick.” In Proc., 4th ASEAN Civil Engineering Conf. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Kearsley, E. P., and P. J. Wainwright. 2002. “The effect of porosity on the strength of foamed concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (2): 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00665-2.
Kilinc, K., A. O. Celik, M. Tuncan, A. Tuncan, G. Arslan, and O. Arioz. 2012. “Statistical distributions of in situ micro core concrete strength.” Constr. Build. Mater. 26 (1): 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.038.
Lawrence, S. J. 1985. “Random variations in brickwork properties.” In Proc., 7th Int. Brick Masonry Conf., 537–547. Melbourne, Australia: Univ. of Melbourne.
Mamun, A. A., and M. Saatcioglu. 2017. “Seismic fragility curves for reinforced concrete framebuildings in Canada designed after 1985.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 44 (7): 558–568. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2016-0388.
McKenna, F. 2016. “OpenSees [Computer software], Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center a framework for earthquake engineering simulation.” Accessed December 16, 2018. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
Mistri, A., P. Sarkar, and R. Davis. 2019. “Column–beam moment capacity ratio and seismic risk of reinforced concrete frame building.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 172 (3): 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.17.00100.
Montazerolghaem, M. 2015. “Analysis of unreinforced masonry structures with uncertain data.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Architecture, Technische Universität Berlin.
Nath, S. K., and K. K. S. Thingbaijam. 2012. “Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of India.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 83 (1): 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.83.1.135.
Rasheed, M. A. 2018. “Mechanical characterisation of fiber reinforced cellular lightweight concrete for structural application of masonry.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad.
RILEM. 1993. Autoclaved aerated concrete: Properties, testing, and design. London: Taylor and Francis.
Sahoo, K., P. K. Dhir, P. R. R. Teja, P. Sarkar, and R. Davis. 2020. “Variability of silica fume concrete and its effect on seismic safety of reinforced concrete buildings.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32 (4): 04020024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003072.
Sahu, S., P. Sarkar, and R. Davis. 2019. “Quantification of uncertainty in compressive strength of fly ash brick masonry.” J. Build. Eng. 26 (Nov): 100843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100843.
Sahu, S., P. Sarkar, and R. Davis. 2020. “Uncertainty in bond strength of unreinforced fly-ash brick masonry.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32 (3): 06020003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003095.
Schueremans, L. 2001. “Probabilistic evaluation of structural unreinforced masonry.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Catholic Univ. of Leuven.
Singhal, V., and D. C. Rai. 2014. “Suitability of half-scale burnt clay bricks for shake table tests on masonry walls.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (4): 644–657. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000861.
Sorrentino, L., P. Infantino, and D. Liberatore. 2016. “Statistical tests for the goodness of fit of mortar compressive strength distributions.” In Proc., 16th Int. Brick and Block Masonry Conf. (IBMAC), 1921–1928. Rome: Taylor and Francis.
Stephens, M. A. 1974. “EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69 (347): 730–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1974.10480196.
Stewart, M. G., and S. J. Lawrence. 2007. “Model error, structural reliability and partial safety factors for structural masonry in compression.” Masonry Int. 20 (3): 107–116.
Vamvatsikos, D. 2013. “Derivation of new SAC/FEMA performance evaluation solutions with second-order hazard approximation.” Earthquake. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (8): 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2265.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Wijaya, H., P. Rajeev, E. Gad, and A. Amirsardari. 2020. “Effect of infill-wall material types and modeling techniques on the seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 21 (3): 04020031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000395.
Yue, L., and C. Bing. 2014. “New type of super-lightweight magnesium phosphate cement foamed concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (1): 04014112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001044.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Natural Hazards Review
Natural Hazards Review
Volume 22Issue 4November 2021

History

Received: Aug 14, 2020
Accepted: Apr 20, 2021
Published online: Jul 19, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 19, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nikhil P. Zade [email protected]
Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India. Email: [email protected]
Avadhoot Bhosale [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology and Science, Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh 517325, India. Email: [email protected]
Prateek Kumar Dhir [email protected]
Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Strathclyde, Glasgow G11XQ, UK (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1031-4479. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Kozhikode, Kerala 673601, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-5393. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Strain-Rate Dependence of the Mechanical Properties of Cellular Lightweight Concrete: Experimental Study and Analytical Modeling with Multigene Genetic Programming, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1270, 28, 4, (2023).
  • Microhardness variability assessment of Copper-Grit-Concrete (CGC), Materials Today: Proceedings, 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.034, 62, (6156-6162), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share