Technical Papers
Oct 29, 2022

A Retrospective Study Quantifying the Effects of Mixture Design and Constituent Properties on Asphalt Pavement Roughness

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 1

Abstract

Given the importance of pavement surface, many transportation agencies have developed technical specifications to serve as a baseline for ensuring the quality of initial pavement roughness after paving works, monitoring it over time as an indicator of serviceability, and then referring to it as a threshold for strategic scheduling of pavement repair and maintenance works. Past studies have shown that various external factors are involved in determining pavement roughness; however, how principal asphaltic design parameters may affect initial pavement roughness has not been examined so far. To close this gap, this study investigated the contribution of the basic concepts of the Marshall mixture design method and individual constituent properties by analyzing the international roughness index (IRI) values of the asphalt wearing course of nine different roads with a total length of 435 km. The evidence from this study suggested that the strongest relationship at the mixture level was observed between Marshall stability and IRI, whereas optimum bitumen content had no influence on IRI. At the ingredient level, among various material properties, the specific gravity of fine aggregate was found to have the most pronounced effect on IRI. Consequently, particular attention should be devoted to these two factors to further improve IRI values at the mixture design stage.

Practical Applications

Once put into service, asphaltic pavements experience detrimental deteriorations because of repeated load-based stress and environmental conditions that result in an increase in pavement roughness. Defined as “irregularities of pavement surface,” roughness is used for rating road serviceability, assessing paving quality, monitoring network condition, and optimizing investments in preservation, rehabilitation, and reconstruction of pavements. Furthermore, roughness is known to affect pillars of riding safety and driving costs. Correspondingly, most transportation agencies around the world developed technical guidelines to determine the initial roughness of the pavements newly opened to service. To improve these guidelines, more factors affecting initial pavement roughness should be uncovered. Bearing this in mind, the study presented in this paper strives to examine the comprehensive factors of asphalt design parameters and material properties to elaborate on what affects initial pavement roughness at the design level. The study results demonstrated that the strength of the paving mixture and the density of fine particles used in the mixture are of great importance for initial pavement roughness. Hence, in order to construct sustainable and cost-effective road pavements with desirable roughness, the impact of these two factors should be considered when designing asphalt mixtures.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Abdelaziz, N., R. T. Abd El-Hakim, S. M. El-Badawy, and H. A. Afify. 2020. “International roughness index prediction model for flexible pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 21 (1): 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1441414.
Al-Suleiman (Obaidat), T. I., and A. M. S. Shiyab. 2003. “Prediction of pavement remaining service life using roughness data—Case study in Dubai.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 4 (2): 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430310001634834.
ASTM. 2018a. Standard test method for measuring the longitudinal profile of traveled surfaces with an accelerometer-established inertial profiling reference. ASTM E950/E950M-09. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018b. Standard test method for soundness of aggregates by use of sodium sulfate or magnesium sulphate. ASTM C88. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bilgin, E., A. H. Lav, and A. Gedik. 2019. “An approach for the determination of optimal speed hump/table profiles by field tests and simulation stage.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 51 (Nov): 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101716.
Bilodeau, J. P., L. Gagnon, and G. Doré. 2017. “Assessment of the relationship between the international roughness index and dynamic loading of heavy vehicles.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 18 (8): 693–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1121780.
Chin, A., and M. J. Olsen. 2015. “Evaluation of technologies for road profile capture, analysis, and evaluation.” J. Surv. Eng. 141 (1): 04014011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000134.
Deniz, M. T., A. H. Lav, and A. Gedik. 2021. “Experimental investigation into the impact of compaction energy level on thickness of flexible pavement.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 19 (3): 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00570-z.
Elhadidy, A. A., S. M. El-Badawy, and E. E. Elbeltagi. 2021. “A simplified pavement condition index regression model for pavement evaluation.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 22 (5): 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1633579.
Fwa, T. F. 2005. The Handbook of highway engineering. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press.
Gedik, A. 2019. “Laboratory study to assess impact of sulphur-added binder on flexible pavements: Case of binder course.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (6): 04019062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002688.
Gedik, A. 2021. “An exploration into the utilization of recycled waste glass as a surrogate powder to crushed stone dust in asphalt pavement construction.” Constr. Build. Mater. 300 (Sep): 123980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123980.
Gedik, A., and A. H. Lav. 2016. “Morphological evaluation and quantitative effect of sulphuric extension on B160/220 rheological behaviour at high temperatures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 127 (Nov): 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.050.
Gedik, A., S. Selcuk, and A. H. Lav. 2021. “Investigation of recycled fluorescent lamps waste as mineral filler in highway construction: A case of asphaltic pavement layers.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 168 (May): 105290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105290.
Gong, H., Y. Sun, W. Hu, P. A. Polaczyk, and B. Huang. 2019. “Investigating impacts of asphalt mixture properties on pavement performance using LTPP data through random forests.” Constr. Build. Mater. 204 (Apr): 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.198.
Gong, H., Y. Sun, X. Shu, and B. Huang. 2018. “Use of random forests regression for predicting IRI of asphalt pavements.” Constr. Build. Mater. 189 (Nov): 890–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.017.
Irfan, M., Y. Ali, S. Ahmed, and I. Hafeez. 2018. “Performance evaluation of crumb rubber-modified asphalt mixtures based on laboratory and field investigations.” Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 43 (4): 1795–1806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2729-2.
Jiang, Y., and S. Li. 2005. “Gray system model for estimating the pavement international roughness index.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 19 (1): 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:1(62).
Jiménez, J. R., J. Ayuso, F. Agrela, M. López, and A. P. Galvín. 2012. “Utilisation of unbound recycled aggregates from selected CDW in unpaved rural roads.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 58 (Jan): 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.012.
KGM (Turkey General Directorate of Highways). 2013. Turkey General Directorate of Highways (KGM), Turkish highway technical specification. [In Turkish.] Ankara, Turkey: KGM.
KGM (Turkey General Directorate of Highways). 2021a. “Turkey general directorate of highways (KGM), divisions in Turkey.” Accessed July 22, 2021. https://www.kgm.gov.tr/Sayfalar/KGM/SiteTr/Bolgeler/Bolgeler.aspx.
KGM (Turkey General Directorate of Highways). 2021b. “Turkey general directorate of highways (KGM), 8th division (Elazig province), highway map.” Accessed July 22, 2021. https://www.kgm.gov.tr/Sayfalar/KGM/SiteTr/Bolgeler/8Bolge/Harita.aspx.
Khattak, M. J., M. A. Nur, M. R. U. K. Bhuyan, and K. Gaspard. 2014. “International roughness index models for HMA overlay treatment of flexible and composite pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 15 (4): 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2013.842237.
Li, J., Z. Zhang, and W. Wang. 2018. “International roughness index and a new solution for its calculation.” J. Transp. Eng. Part B Pavements 144 (2): 06018002. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000052.
Meegoda, J. N., and S. Gao. 2014. “Roughness progression model for asphalt pavements using long-term pavement performance data.” J. Transp. Eng. 140 (8): 04014037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000682.
Meininger, R. 2002. “Validity of the sulfate soundness test.” Accessed August 15, 2021. http://rockproducts.com/mag/rock_validity_sulfate_soundness.
Múčka, P. 2016. “Current approaches to quantify the longitudinal road roughness.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 17 (8): 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1011782.
Múčka, P. 2019. “Influence of profile specification on international roughness index.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (2): 04019005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000478.
Múčka, P. 2020. “Vibration dose value in passenger car and road roughness.” J. Transp. Eng. Part B Pavements 146 (4): 04020064. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000200.
Park, K., N. E. Thomas, and K. W. Lee. 2007. “Applicability of the international roughness index as a predictor of asphalt pavement condition.” J. Transp. Eng. 133 (12): 706–709. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:12(706).
Perera, R. W., S. D. Kohn, and S. D. Tayabji. 2005. Achieving a high level of smoothness in concrete pavements without sacrificing long-term performance. McLean, VA: Office of Infrastructure Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration.
Pérez-Acebo, H., H. Gonzalo-Orden, D. J. Findley, and E. Rojí. 2021. “Modeling the international roughness index performance on semi-rigid pavements in single carriageway roads.” Constr. Build. Mater. 272 (Feb): 121665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121665.
Rahim, A. M., G. Fiegel, K. Ghuzlan, and D. Khumann. 2009. “Evaluation of international roughness index for asphalt overlays placed over cracked and seated concrete pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 10 (3): 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430802342773.
Raymond, C. M., S. L. Tighe, R. Haas, and L. Rothenburg. 2003. “Analysis of influences on as-built pavement roughness in asphalt overlays.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 4 (4): 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430310001653077.
Sidess, A., A. Ravina, and E. Oged. 2022. “A model for predicting the deterioration of the international roughness index.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 23 (5): 1393–1403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1804062.
Vázquez, V. F., F. Terán, and S. E. Paje. 2020. “Dynamic stiffness of road pavements: Construction characteristics-based model and influence on tire/road noise.” Sci. Total Environ. 736 (Sep): 139597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139597.
Wang, G. C. 2016. The utilization of slag in civil infrastructure construction, 10—Slag use in asphalt paving. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-03995-0.
Ward, C. C., and K. Iagnemma. 2009. “Speed-independent vibration-based terrain classification for passenger vehicles.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 47 (9): 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110802450193.
Wei, L., T. F. Fwa, and Z. Zhe. 2005. “Wavelet analysis and interpretation of road roughness.” J. Transp. Eng. 131 (2): 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:2(120).
Wen, H. 2011. “Design factors affecting the initial roughness of asphalt pavements.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 4 (5): 268–273.
Wen, H., and C. Chen. 2007. “Factors affecting initial roughness of concrete pavement.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 21 (6): 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:6(459).
Whiteoak, D. 1991. The shell bitumen handbook. London, UK: Thomas Telford.
Wikimedia Commons. 2021. “Turkey (orthographic projection)-Red version.svg.” Accessed July 22, 2021. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Turkey_(orthographic_projection)-Red_version.svg.
Yildirim, Y., and G. Saygili. 2019. “Pavement smoothness of asphalt concrete overlays.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 20 (1): 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1258245.
Yoon, H. H., and A. R. Tarrer. 1988. “Effect of aggregate properties on stripping.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1171 (May): 37–43.
Zhang, M., H. Gong, X. Jia, R. Xiao, X. Jiang, Y. Ma, and B. Huang. 2020. “Analysis of critical factors to asphalt overlay performance using gradient boosted models.” Constr. Build. Mater. 262 (Nov): 120083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120083.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Feb 16, 2022
Accepted: May 2, 2022
Published online: Oct 29, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 29, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate of Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Istanbul 34469, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1429-034X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share