Abstract

As ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) becomes more widely used, the need for good concrete tensile tests for fiber-reinforced concrete has become apparent. However, there is not yet one universally used test method. This research compares the results between standard direct tension, four-point flexure, and double-punch tests. Each test method was run on batches of UHPC made with two fiber types each at five different doses by percent volume, resulting in a testing matrix of 10 different mixes. The results of each test method were plotted to see how well different outcomes, such as peak strength and toughness, would reflect differences in fiber content. The results of the two indirect tension tests were then compared to the results of the direct tension test to see how well they correlated. Results showed that the average maximum stresses of each test method did not have good correlation but that measures of toughness or postcracking strength did have reliable correlation between the direct tension test and both of the simpler test methods.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This includes:
Graphs of stress versus strain or stress versus displacement for each of the 130 specimens tested;
Numeric results of toughness, maximum stress, and stress at specified displacements for each of the 130 specimens tested; and
Averages, standard deviations, and coefficients of variation for each of the 30 sets of replicates.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Florida Department of Transportation for funding this work under Contract No. BDV31 977-105. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation. For donation of materials used in this research, the authors thank Argos US, LLC, Sika US, and Edgar Minerals. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Taylor Rawlinson, Joshua Halford, and Dr. Eduardo Torres for assistance with specimen fabrication and testing.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2014. Building code requirements for structural concrete. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ASTM. 2015. Standard practice for design of journal bearing supports to be used in fiber reinforced concrete beam tests. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard practice for fabricating and testing specimens of ultra-high performance concrete. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for flexural performance of fiber-reinforced concrete (using beam with third-point loading). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Biswas, R. K., F. Bin Ahmed, E. Haque, A. A. Provasha, Z. Hasan, F. Hayat, and D. Sen. 2021. “Effects of steel fiber percentage and aspect ratios on fresh and harden properties of ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete.” Appl. Mech. 2 (3): 501–515. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech2030028.
Chao, S. H., J.-S. Cho, N. Karki, D. R. Sahoo, and N. Yazdani. 2011. “FRC performance comparison: Uniaxial direct tensile test, third-point bending test, and round panel test.” ACI Symp. Publ. 276 (Mar): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14359/51682363.
Chao, S.-H., N. B. Karki, J.-S. Cho, and R. N. Waweru. 2012. “Use of double punch test to evaluate the mechanical performance of fiber reinforced concrete.” In High performance fiber reinforced cement composites, 27–34. Berlin: Springer.
Choumanidis, D., E. Badogiannis, P. Nomikos, and A. Sofianos. 2017. “Barcelona test for the evaluation of the mechanical properties of single and hybrid FRC, exposed to elevated temperature.” Constr. Build. Mater. 138 (May): 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.115.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Concrete materials and methods of concrete construction. Ottawa: CSA.
FDOT (Florida DOT). 2019. “Prepackaged ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC).” Accessed February 25, 2022. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/programmanagement/otherfdotlinks/developmental/files/dev927uhpc.pdf?sfvrsn=8c88df82_6.
Galeote, E., A. Blanco, S. H. P. Cavalaro, and A. de la Fuente. 2017. “Correlation between the Barcelona test and the bending test in fibre reinforced concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 152 (Oct): 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.028.
Graybeal, B., and F. Baby. 2013. “Development of direct tension test method for ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete.” ACI Mater. J. 110 (2): 177–186. https://doi.org/10.14359/51685532.
Graybeal, B., F. Baby, P. Marchand, and F. Toutlemonde. 2012. “Direct and flexural tension test methods for determination of the tensile stress-strain response of UHPFRC.” In Proc., Hipermat 2012 3rd Int. Symp. on UHPC and Nanotechnology for High Performance Construction Materials. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press.
Kanakubo, T. 2006. “Tensile characteristics evaluation method for ductile fiber-reinforced cementitious composites.” J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 4 (1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.4.3.
MCS-EPFL (Structural Maintenance and Safety Laboratory) Lausanne. 2016. Recommendation: Ultra-high performance fibre reinforced cement-based composites (UHPFRC). Zurich, Switzerland: MCS-EPFL.
Molins, C., A. Aguado, and S. Saludes. 2009. “Double punch test to control the energy dissipation in tension of FRC (Barcelona test).” Mater. Struct. 42 (4): 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9391-9.
Nogueira, A. B., L. de Carvalho Ribeiro Simao, R. Monte, R. P. Salvador, and A. D. de Figueiredo. 2021. “Evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of the double punch test.” Constr. Build. Mater. 268 (Jan): 121145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121145.
Qian, S., and V. C. Li. 2008. “Simplified inverse method for determining the tensile properties of strain hardening cementitious composites (SHCC).” J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 6 (2): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.6.353.
Sarfarazi, V., and W. Schubert. 2017. “Numerical simulation of tensile failure of concrete in direct, flexural, double punch tensile and ring tests.” Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng. 61 (2): 176–183. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.9028.
Simão, L., C. R. de, A. B. Nogueira, R. Monte, R. P. Salvador, and A. D. de Figueiredo. 2019. “Influence of the instability of the double punch test on the post-crack response of fiber-reinforced concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 217 (Aug): 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.062.
Su, Y., J. Li, C. Wu, P. Wu, and L. Zhong-Xian. 2016. “Effects of steel fibres on dynamic strength of UHPC.” Constr. Build. Mater. 114 (Jul): 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.007.
Tuladhar, S., and S.-H. Chao. 2019. “A simple tensile testing method for UHP-FRC based on double-punch test.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Interactive Symp. on UHPC. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Digital Press.
UNE (Spanish Association for Standardisation). 2010. Fiber reinforced concrete. determination of cracking strength, ductility and residual tensile strength. Madrid, Spain: UNE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34Issue 9September 2022

History

Received: Sep 8, 2021
Accepted: Jan 14, 2022
Published online: Jun 28, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 28, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, 365 Weil Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1234-6802. Email: [email protected]
Kyle A. Riding, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, 365 Weil Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611. Email: [email protected]
Raid S. Alrashidi [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, 365 Weil Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611. Email: [email protected]
Christopher C. Ferraro, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, 365 Weil Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611. Email: [email protected]
Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida, P.O. Box 116550, Gainesville, FL 32611. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7224-2883. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Quantitative analysis of steel fibers on UHPFRC uniaxial tensile behavior using X-CT and UTT, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130349, 368, (130349), (2023).
  • Applicability of Large-Scale Direct Tension Specimens to Quantify Tensile Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Ultra-High-Performance Concrete, Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, 10.1520/ACEM20220054, 11, 1, (20220054), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share