Evaluating Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Aggregates Using the New Miniature Concrete Prism Test and Other Standard Test Methods
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 8
Abstract
The alkali-silica reaction (ASR) has been recognized as a major distress in concrete for nearly a century. In the US, ASR is a major cause of the deterioration of highway concrete structures (i.e., bridges and pavements). A research study was recently undertaken in the state of Idaho to evaluate the advantages associated with implementing the miniature concrete prism test (MCPT) from current standards for various reactive aggregates. A total of 11 different aggregate materials (both coarse and fine fractions), including a nonreactive reference aggregate, were collected from various sources and tested using the 56-days MCPT as well as the commonly used accelerated mortar bar test (AMBT). In addition, selected aggregate samples were tested using the 1-year long concrete prism test (CPT) and the 6-month accelerated concrete prism test (ACPT). The results demonstrated that the 56-day MCPT method resulted in higher percent expansion compared with the 14-day AMBT and 1-year CPT methods for the fine fractions of the test aggregates. The coarse fractions of the test aggregates, on the other hand, exhibited a lower percent expansion during the 56-day MCPT compared with the 14-day AMBT. Overall, the MCPT test results were found to correlate well with the 14-day AMBT and 1-year CPT test results. In addition, the 6-month ACPT method showed similar results to the ones of the 1-year CPT method, with high correlation between both methods. Recommendations were made based on the findings from this study to facilitate the implementation of the MCPT into practice by state and local highway agencies for better assessment of the ASR potential of aggregates.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by ITD. The authors wish to express their sincere appreciation for all support provided by the ITD personnel in collecting materials and related information essential for this research.
References
AASHTO. 2014. Standard method of test for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates and effectiveness of ASR mitigation measures (miniature concrete prism test). AASHTO TP 110. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2019. Standard method of test for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates and effectiveness of ASR mitigation measures (miniature concrete prism test, MCPT). AASHTO T 380. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Arowojolu, O., E. Fanijo, and A. Ibrahim. 2019. “Behavior of kernelrazzo floor finish in aggressive chloride environment. A terrace gravels.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 11 (2): e00256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00256.
ASTM. 2018. Standard guide for petrographic examination of aggregates for concrete. ASTM C295/C295M-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test method for determination of length change of concrete due to alkali-silica reaction. ASTM C1293-20a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2021a. Standard practice for use of apparatus for the determination of length change of hardened cement paste, mortar, and concrete. ASTM C490/C490M-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2021b. Standard specification for portland cement. ASTM C150/C150M-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2021c. Standard test method for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates (mortar-bar method). ASTM C1260-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Bach, F., T. S. Thorsen, and M. P. Nielsen. 1993. “Load-carrying capacity of structural members subjected to alkali-silica reactions.” Constr. Build. Mater. 7 (2): 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(93)90040-J.
Berra, M., T. Mangialardi, A. E. Paolini, and R. Turriziani. 1991. “Critical evaluation of accelerated test methods for detecting the alkali-reactivity of aggregates.” Adv. Cem. Res. 4 (13): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.1991.4.1.29.
Bérubé, M.-A., J. Duchesne, J. F. Dorion, and M. Rivest. 2002. “Laboratory assessment of alkali contribution by aggregates to concrete and application to concrete structures affected by alkali–silica reactivity.” Cem. Concr. Res. 32 (8): 1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00766-4.
Bérubé, M.-A., and B. Fournier. 1993. “Canadian experience with testing for alkali-aggregate reactivity in concrete.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 15 (1–2): 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(93)90037-A.
Diamond, S. 1992. Alkali aggregate reactions in concrete: An annotated bibliography 19391991. Washington, DC: Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council.
Fanijo, E. 2019. Evaluation and mitigation of alkali silica reaction (ASR) in cementitious materials. Moscow, ID: Univ. of Idaho.
Fanijo, E., A. J. Babafemi, and O. Arowojolu. 2020. “Performance of laterized concrete made with palm kernel shell as replacement for coarse aggregate.” Constr. Build. Mater. 250 (Mar): 118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118829.
Fanijo, E. O., E. Kassem, and A. Ibrahim. 2021a. “ASR mitigation using binary and ternary blends with waste glass powder.” In Vol. 280 of Construction and building materials, 122425. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122425.
Fanijo, E. O., J. T. Kolawole, and A. Almakrab. 2021b. “Alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in concrete structures: Mechanisms, effects and evaluation test methods adopted in the United States.” Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 15 (Mar): e00563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00563.
Farny, J. A., and S. H. Kosmatka. 1997. Diagnosis and control of alkali-aggregate reactions in concrete. Skokie, IL: Portland Cement Association.
Folliard, K. J., R. Barborak, T. Drimalas, L. Du, S. Garber, J. Ideker, T. Ley, S. Williams, M. Juenger, and B. Fournier. 2006. Preventing ASR/DEF in new concrete: Final report. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Fournier, B., A. Bilodeau, and V. M. Malhotra. 1997. High-volume fly ash concrete using Canadian fly ashes—Phase II: Effectiveness of high volumes of fly ash in concrete to control alkali-silica reactions. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Gillerman, V. S., and K. N. Weppner. 2014. Lithologic characterization of active ITD aggregate sources and implications for aggregate quality. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Gillott, J. E., and E. G. Swenson. 1969. “Mechanism of the alkali-carbonate rock reaction.” Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 2 (1): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1969.002.01.02.
Grattan-Bellew, P. E., and L. Mitchell. 2002. “Institute for research in construction, national research council of Canada.” In Preventing concrete deterioration due to alkali-aggregate reaction. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada.
Hooton, R. D. 1991. New aggregates alkali-reactivity test methods. Toronto: Ministry of Transportation.
Ideker, J. H., B. L. East, K. J. Folliard, M. D. A. Thomas, and B. Fournier. 2010. “The current state of the accelerated concrete prism test.” Cem. Concr. Res. 40 (4): 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.030.
Islam, M. S. 2010. Performance of Nevada’s aggregates in alkali-aggregate reactivity of Portland cement concrete. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univ.
Islam, M. S., and N. Ghafoori. 2011. “Comparison of concrete expansion and stiffness due to alkali-silica reactivity.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Concrete Repair of Concrete Solution Series, 243–250. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Konduru, H., P. Rangaraju, and O. Amer. 2020. “Reliability of miniature concrete prism test in assessing alkali-silica reactivity of moderately reactive aggregates.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (4): 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120912247.
Latifee, E. 2013. Miniature concrete prism test-A new test method for evaluating the ASR potential of aggregates, the effectiveness of ASR mitigation and the job mixture. Clemson, SC: Clemson Univ.
Latifee, E. R., S. Akther, and K. A. Hasnat. 2015. “Critical review of the test methods for evaluating the ASR potential of aggregates.” In Proc., 10th Global Engineering, Science and Technology Conf., 2–3. Dhaka, Bangladesh: BIAM Foundation.
Latifee, E. R., and P. R. Rangaraju. 2015. “Miniature concrete prism test: Rapid test method for evaluating alkali-silica reactivity of aggregates.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (7): 4014215. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001183.
Lu, D., B. Fournier, P. E. Grattan-Bellew, Z. Xu, and M. Tang. 2008. “Development of a universal accelerated test for alkali-silica and alkali-carbonate reactivity of concrete aggregates.” Mater. Struct. 41 (2): 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9232-2.
Naik, T. R. 2008. “Sustainability of concrete construction.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 13 (2): 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:2(98).
Nixon, P., and I. Sims. 1996. “Testing aggregates for alkali-reactivity.” Mater. Struct. 29 (6): 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486340.
Ono, K. 1988. “Damaged concrete structures in Japan due to alkali silica reaction.” Int. J. Cem. Compos. Lightweight Concr. 10 (4): 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0262-5075(88)90055-3.
Rangaraju, P., A. Kaveh, S. Enugula, and E. Latifee. 2016. “Evaluation of alkali-silica reaction potential of marginal aggregates using miniature concrete prism test (MCPT).” In Proc., 15th Int. Conf. on Alkali-Reaction in Concrete, 4–7. Corvallis, OR: ICAAR Concrete.
Rivard, P., M. A. Bérubé, J. P. Ollivier, and G. Ballivy. 2007. “Decrease of pore solution alkalinity in concrete tested for alkali-silica reaction.” Mater. Struct. 40 (9): 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9191-z.
Rivard, P., M.-A. Bérubé, J.-P. Ollivier, and G. Ballivy. 2003. “Alkali mass balance during the accelerated concrete prism test for alkali–aggregate reactivity.” Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (8): 1147–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00020-6.
Stanton, T. E. 2008. “Expansion of concrete through reaction between cement and aggregate.” Proc. ASCE 66 (10): 1781–1811.
Swamy, R. N. 1992. The alkali-silica reaction in concrete. London: Blackie and Son.
Thomas, M., B. Fournier, K. Folliard, J. Ideker, and M. Shehata. 2006. “Test methods for evaluating preventive measures for controlling expansion due to alkali–silica reaction in concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 36 (10): 1842–1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.014.
Thomas, M. D. A., B. Fournier, and K. J. Folliard. 2012. Selecting measures to prevent deleterious alkali-silica reaction in concrete: Rationale for the AASHTO PP65 prescriptive approach. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Touma, W., D. W. Fowler, and R. L. Carrasquillo. 2001. Alkali-silica reaction in Portland cement concrete: Testing methods and mitigation alternatives. New York: Aggregates Foundation for Technology, Research and Education.
Wang, Q., P. Yan, and J. Feng. 2011. “A discussion on improving hydration activity of steel slag by altering its mineral compositions.” J. Hazard. Mater. 186 (2): 1070–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.109.
Wang, X., M. Nguyen, M. G. Stewart, M. Syme, and A. Leitch. 2010. “Analysis of climate change impacts on the deterioration of concrete infrastructure–Part 1: Mechanisms, practices, modelling and simulations–A review.” Canberra 9780 (4310365): 8.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34 • Issue 8 • August 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 9, 2021
Accepted: Nov 22, 2021
Published online: May 20, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 20, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.