Interface Shear Strength of EPS-Concrete Elements of Various Configurations
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 6
Abstract
The prevailing method to separate an expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam (geofoam block) roadway embankment and its pavement is the use of cast-in-place reinforced concrete as a load-distribution slab. However, this technique delays the project completion time due to required curing. This study investigates the use of precast concrete panels as an alternative load-distribution slab which promises reduction in construction time and effort. In addition to traditional EPS-precast concrete interface, the effect of interlocking mechanism of various interlock configurations was quantified. In addition to the effects of interface geometry the effect of material hardness on the interface stress-strain behavior was investigated by using two different densities of geofoam blocks. All of the interface shear strength (ISS) tests were also performed using cast-in-place concrete for comparison purposes. Shearing resistance between the EPS and precast concrete was found to be higher than that of the flat EPS-EPS interface recommended by the design guideline. Interlocking improved the interface shear behavior and changed the interface shear mechanism of EPS-precast concrete from purely frictional to frictional-adhesional.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The ISS tests were conducted at İstanbul Okan University Civil Engineering Laboratory, İstanbul, Turkey. The authors acknowledge the contribution of Halis Şahin, former laboratory technician, and Erdal Usturbelli, former Master’s student, during the experimental program.
References
Aabøe, R., S. F. Bartlett, M. Duškov, T. E. Frydenlund, J. N. Mandal, D. Negussey, A. T. Özer, H. Tsukamoto, and J. Vaslestad. 2019. “Geofoam blocks in civil engineering applications.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications (EPS2018), edited by D. Arellano, A. T. Özer, S. Bartlett, and J. Vaslestad, 3–38. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Abdelrahman, G., A. Duttine, and F. Tatsuoka. 2008. “Interface friction properties of EPS geofoam blocks from direct shear tests.” In Proc., of Research Symp. on Characterization and Behavior of Interfaces, edited by D. Frost, 113–118. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
AbdelSalam, S. S., and A. Azzam. 2016. “Reduction of lateral pressures on retaining walls using geofoam inclusion.” Geosynth. Int. 23 (6): 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.16.00005.
AFM Corporation. 1994. “AFM gripper plate. Lakeville, Minnesota, USA.” Accessed June, 20, 2020. https://www.achfoam.com/ACH/media/ACH/docs/Geofoam/GeoGripper.pdf?ext=.pdf.
Amini, Z. A. 2014. “Dynamic characteristics and seismic stability of expanded polystyrene geofoam embankments.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Arellano, D., T. D. Stark, J. S. Horvath, and D. Leshchinsky. 2011. Guidelines for geofoam applications in slope stability projects. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
ASTM. 2011. Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained condition. ASTM D3080-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017a. Standard specification for rigid cellular polystyrene geofoam. ASTM D6817-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017b. Standard test method for density (unit weight), yield, and air content (gravimetric) of concrete. ASTM C138-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020a. Standard terminology for geosynthetics. ASTM D4439-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020b. Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear. ASTM D5321-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Atmatzidis, D. K., E. G. Missirlis, and E. B. Theodorakopoulos. 2001. “Shear resistance on EPS geofoam block surfaces.” In Proc., EPS Geofoam 2001: 3rd Annual Conf. Patras, Greece: Univ. of Patras.
Barrett, J. C. 2008. “Effectiveness of connectors in geofoam block construction.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of New Brunswick.
Barrett, J. C., and A. J. Valsangkar. 2009. “Effectiveness of connectors in geofoam block construction.” Geotext. Geomembr. 27 (3): 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.010.
Bartlett, S. F., and E. C. Lawton. 2008. “Evaluating the seismic stability and performance of freestanding geofoam embankment.” In Proc., 6th Seismic National Conf. on Bridges and Highways (6NSC), edited by M. Keever and L. Mesa. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Beju, Y. Z., and J. N. Mandal. 2019. “California bearing ratio (CBR) behaviors of EPS geofoam: Experimental and numerical studies.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications (EPS2018), edited by D. Arellano, A. T. Özer, S. Bartlett, and J. Vaslestad, 185–196. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2000. Methods of test for mortar for masonry—Part 3: Determination of consistence of fresh mortar (by flow table). EN 1015-3. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2016. Methods of testing cement determination of strength. EN 196-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Duškov, M. 1997. “EPS as a light-weight sub-base material in pavement structures.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Delft Univ.
Farnsworth, C. B., S. F. Bartlett, D. Negussey, and A. W. Stuedlein. 2008. “Rapid construction and settlement behavior of embankment systems on soft foundation soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. 134 (3): 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:3(289).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1987. Pavement design—Principles and practices (a training course, participant notebook). Washington, DC: USDOT.
Geocomp Corporation. 2011. Shear user’s manual, control and report software for fully automated direct and residual shear tests on ShearTrac-II systems using Windows®XP/Vista/7. Acton, MA: Geocomp Corporation.
Horvath, J. S. 2010. “Emerging trends in failures involving EPS-block geofoam fills.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (4): 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000114.
Khan, M. I., and M. A. Meguid. 2018. “Experimental investigation of the shear behavior of EPS geofoam.” Int. J. Geosynth. Ground. Eng. 4 (2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-018-0129-7.
Kurose, M., and T. Tanaka. 1996. “EPS block with H or C shape cross section for embankment.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Application (EPS1996), 190–199. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Li, Z. 2011. Advanced concrete technology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Negussey, D., N. Anasthas, and S. Srirajan. 2001. “Interface friction properties of EPS geofoam.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Application (EPS2001). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Neto, J. O. A., and B. Bueno. 2012. “Laboratory research on EPS blocks used in geotechnical engineering.” Soils Rock 35 (2): 169–180.
NPRA (Norwegian Public Roads Administration). 1992. Use of expanded polystyrene in road embankments—Design, construction and quality assurance. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Road Research Laboratory.
Özer, A. T. 2019. “Evaluation of interface shear strength between interlocked geofoam blocks and precast concrete.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications (EPS2018), edited by D. Arellano, A. T. Özer, S. Bartlett, and J. Vaslestad, 171–183. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Özer, A. T., and O. Akay. 2014. “Use of interlocked EPS block geofoam for sandy slopes subjected to seepage flow.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Geosynthetics, Austin, TX: International Geosynthetics Society.
Özer, A. T., and O. Akay. 2016. “Interface shear strength characteristics of interlocked EPS-block geofoam.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (4): 04015156. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001418.
Özer, A. T., and O. Akay. 2021. “Shear strength characteristics of interlocked EPS-block geofoam-sand interface.” Geosynth. Int. 28 (5): 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.21.00009.
Özer, A. T., O. Akay, and E. Ateş. 2015. “Effect of displacement rate on the interface shear strength properties of interlocked EPS-block geofoam.” In Proc., 1st IRF Europe and Central Asia Regional Congress. Geneva: International Road Federation.
Özer, A. T., O. Akay, and Y. Ateş. 2016. “Shear strength properties of interlocked EPS-block geofoam–Ottawa Sand.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on New Developments in Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Conf. ICNDSMGE—ZM2016, 293–300. Nicosia, North Cyrus: Near East Univ.
Özer, A. T., and E. Akinay. 2019. “First geofoam roadway embankment application of Turkey.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications (EPS2018), edited by D. Arellano, A. T. Özer, S. Bartlett, and J. Vaslestad, 71–80. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Özer, A. T., and Ö. Ekincioğlu. 2019. “Evaluation of interface shear strength between interlocked geofoam blocks and cast-in-place concrete.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications (EPS2018), edited by D. Arellano, A. T. Özer, S. Bartlett, and J. Vaslestad, 207–218. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Padade, A., and J. Mandal. 2014. “Interface strength behavior of expanded polystyrene EPS geofoam.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 8 (1): 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1179/1938636213Z.00000000056.
PCI (Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute). 2010. PCI design handbook. 7th ed. Chicago: PCI.
Puppala, A. J., P. Ruttanaporamakul, and S. S. C. Congress. 2019. “Design and construction of lightweight EPS geofoam embedded geomaterial embankment system for control of settlements.” Geotext. Geomembr. 47 (3): 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.015.
Refsdal, G. 1987. EPS—Design considerations, 17–20. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Road Research Laboratory.
Shafikhani, A., T. V. Bheemasetti, and A. J. Puppala. 2017. “Effect of seasonal changes on a hybrid soil–geofoam embankment system.” Int. J. Geosynthet. Ground. Eng. 3 (4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0116-4.
Sheeley, M. 2000. “Slope stabilization utilizing geofoam.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Syracuse Univ.
Sheeley, M., and D. Negussey. 2000. “An investigation of geofoam interface strength behavior.” In Proc., Soft Ground Technology Conf., 292–303. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Stark, T. D., D. Arellano, J. S. Horvath, and D. Leshchinsky. 2004. Guideline and recommended standard for geofoam applications in highway embankments. NCHRP Rep. No. 529. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Taneichi, K., T. Konami, H. Tsukamoto, T. Kubota, and K. Yasuhara. 2019a. “Development of joint metal binder for improving earthquake resistance of EPS embankment.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications (EPS2018), edited by D. Arellano, A. T. Özer, S. Bartlett, and J. Vaslestad, 361–365. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Taneichi, K., T. Nishi, T. Konami, T. Kubota, J. Koseki, H. Kyokawa, and K. Yasuhara. 2019b. “Shaking table test of scaled 1/5 EPS embankment model.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications (EPS2018), edited by D. Arellano, A. T. Özer, S. Bartlett, and J. Vaslestad, 367–373. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Vaslestad, J., S. F. Bartlett, R. Aabøe, H. Burkart, T. Ahmed, and D. Arellano. 2019. “Bridge foundations supported by EPS geofoam embankments on soft soil.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications (EPS2018), edited by D. Arellano, A. T. Özer, S. Bartlett, and J. Vaslestad, 281–294. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Xanaki, V. C., and G. A. Athanasopoulos. 2001. “Experimental investigation of the interface mechanism at the EPS geofoam-sand interface by direct shear testing.” Geosynth. Int. 8 (6): 471–499.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34 • Issue 6 • June 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 16, 2021
Accepted: Oct 21, 2021
Published online: Mar 22, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 22, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Jin Xia, Keyu Chen, Shuting Hu, Jiejing Chen, Renjie Wu, Weiliang Jin, Experimental and numerical study on the microstructure and chloride ion transport behavior of concrete-to-concrete interface, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130317, 367, (130317), (2023).