Technical Papers
Mar 22, 2022

Moisture, Rutting, and Fatigue-Cracking Susceptibility of Water-Carrying, Wax-Based, and Chemical-Based Warm Mix Asphalt Systems

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 6

Abstract

The type of the manufacturing technology as well as the reduced production temperatures of warm mix asphalt (WMA) always raise controversy about the early life and long-term performance of WMA mixtures, more specifically concerning the resistance to stripping, permanent deformation, and fatigue cracking. The present paper is primarily oriented to evaluate such major controversial aspects of WMA moisture, rutting, and fatigue-cracking susceptibility. For this purpose, an experimental campaign and indices were developed to discern the properties among WMA systems in comparison to reference hot mix asphalt (HMA) system. The bonding strength (BS) test was developed to quantify the unconditioned and conditioned failures at the adhesive scale. In addition, the evolutions of the mechanical damage and air voids of asphalt mixtures under the effects of multiple freeze–thaw cycles (FTCs), were evaluated. The rutting susceptibility of mixes was assessed using a developed measure, namely, strain index (SI), which is based on strain/deformation results of the creep-recovery test. Continuous and intermittent fatigue tests were employed to determine fatigue life as well as the healing potential of the mixes. The zeolite-, wax-, and chemical-based WMA technologies provided comparable-to-better BS when compared with the HMA systems. Based on the results of unconditioned and retained tensile strength after multiple FTCs, moisture-induced degradation showed that HMA mixes can withstand more FTCs than WMA mixes. The results of SI indicated that the zeolite WMA produced at low temperature is more susceptible to rutting performance (i.e., lower SI), however the chemical-based mixtures are on par with that of HMA, but wax-based additive is more beneficial to mitigate such distress. The unfavorable influence of reduced production temperature (from 145°C to 120°C) was distinguishable for the rutting results only. The three WMA products produced asphalt mixes at reduced temperatures with better or comparable fatigue life. Using the intermittent fatigue tests, both the hot and warm mixes showed better healing efficiency.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

AASHTO. 2002. Standard method of test for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine. AASHTO T 96. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021a. Standard method of test for resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. AASHTO T 283. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021b. Standard method of test for specific gravity and absorption of coarse aggregate. AASHTO T 85. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Alavi, M. Z., E. Y. Hajj, A. Hanz, and H. U. Bahia. 2012. “Evaluating adhesion properties and moisture damage susceptibility of warm-mix asphalts: Bitumen bond strength and dynamic modulus ratio tests.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2295 (1): 44–53. https://doi.org/10.3141/2295-06.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for marshall stability and flow of asphalt mixtures. ASTM D6927-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2016. Standard practice for viscosity-temperature chart for asphalt binders. ASTM D2493/D2493M-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for indirect tensile (IDT) strength of asphalt mixtures. ASTM D6931-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Bennert, T., A. Maher, and R. Sauber. 2011. “Influence of production temperature and aggregate moisture content on the initial performance of warm-mix asphalt.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2208 (1): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.3141/2208-13.
Cheraghian, G., A. Cannone Falchetto, Z. You, S. Chen, Y. S. Kim, J. Westerhoff, K. H. Moon, and M. P. Wistuba. 2020. “Warm mix asphalt technology: An up to date review.” J. Cleaner Prod. 268 (Sep): 122128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122128.
Chowdhury, A., and J. W. Button. 2008. A review of warm mix asphalt. Springfield, VA: Texas Transportation Institute.
Clements, T. M., P. B. Blankenship, and K. C. Mahboub. 2012. “The effect of loose mix aging on the performance of warm mix asphalt.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 81 (Apr): 541–567.
Diefenderfer, S. D., and A. J. Hearon. 2008. Laboratory evaluation of a warm asphalt technology for use in Virginia. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
Dinis-Almeida, M., and M. L. Afonso. 2015. “Warm mix recycled asphalt–A sustainable solution.” J. Cleaner Prod. 107 (Nov): 310–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.065.
Doyle, J. D., M. Mejias-Santiago, E. Brown, and I. L. Howard. 2011. “Performance of high RAP-WMA surface mixtures.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 80 (Mar): 419–458.
Dukatz, E. L., Jr., and R. S. Phillips. 1987. “The effect of air voids on the tensile strength ratio.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 56: 517–554.
Enieb, M., L. Shbeeb, I. Asi, X. Yang, and A. Diab. 2020. “Effect of asphalt grade and polymer type (SBS and EE-2) on produced PMB and asphalt concrete mix properties.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32 (12): 04020385. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003479.
Garcia Cucalon, L., E. Kassem, D. N. Little, and E. Masad. 2017. “Fundamental evaluation of moisture damage in warm-mix asphalts.” Supplement, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 18 (S1): 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1266765.
Ghuzlan, K. A., and O. S. Ar’ar. 2016. “Performance of warm asphalt mixtures using Sasobit.” Pet. Sci. Technol. 34 (14): 1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2016.1190756.
Habal, A., and D. Singh. 2021. “Effects of warm mix asphalt additives on bonding potential and failure pattern of asphalt-aggregate systems using strength and energy parameters.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 22 (4): 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1623399.
Haggag, M. M., W. S. Mogawer, and R. Bonaquist. 2011. “Fatigue evaluation of warm-mix asphalt mixtures: Use of uniaxial, cyclic, direct tension compression test.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2208 (1): 26–32. https://doi.org/10.3141/2208-04.
Hurley, G. C., and B. D. Prowell. 2006. “Evaluation of potential processes for use in warm mix asphalt.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 75 (Mar): 41–90.
Ingrassia, L. P., X. Lu, F. Canestrari, and G. Ferrotti. 2018. “Tribological characterization of bituminous binders with warm mix asphalt additives.” Constr. Build. Mater. 172 (May): 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.275.
Kandhal, P. S., and R. B. Mallick. 2001. “Effect of mix gradation on rutting potential of dense-graded asphalt mixtures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1767 (1): 146–151. https://doi.org/10.3141/1767-18.
Kataware, A. V., and D. Singh. 2018. “Effects of wax-based, chemical-based, and water-based warm-mix additives on mechanical performance of asphalt binders.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (10): 04018237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002441.
Kheiry, P. T., T. Qiu, and M. Solaimanian. 2015. “Characterization of warm mix asphalt through resonant column testing.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 27 (10): 05015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001253.
Krambeck, H. 2009. Draft GHG emissions calculator for asphalt production. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Leng, Z., I. L. Al-Qadi, and R. Cao. 2018. “Life-cycle economic and environmental assessment of warm stone mastic asphalt.” Transportmetrica A: Transp. Sci. 14 (7): 562–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2017.1390707.
Liu, S., S. Zhou, and A. Peng. 2020. “Analysis of moisture susceptibility of foamed warm mix asphalt based on cohesion, adhesion, bond strength, and morphology.” J. Cleaner Prod. 277 (Dec): 123334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123334.
Liu, Y., A. Apeagyei, N. Ahmad, J. Grenfell, and G. Airey. 2014. “Examination of moisture sensitivity of aggregate–bitumen bonding strength using loose asphalt mixture and physico-chemical surface energy property tests.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 15 (7): 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2013.855312.
Mehrara, A., and A. Khodaii. 2016. “Quantification of damage recovery of asphalt concrete as a consequence of rest time application using dissipated energy.” Mater. Struct. 49 (7): 2947–2960. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0697-0.
Nakhaei, M., K. Naderi, A. A. Nasrekani, and D. H. Timm. 2018. “Moisture resistance study on PE-wax and EBS-wax modified warm mix asphalt using chemical and mechanical procedures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 189 (Nov): 882–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.216.
Raghavendra, A., M. S. Medeiros, M. M. Hassan, L. N. Mohammad, and W. B. King. 2016. “Laboratory and construction evaluation of warm-mix asphalt.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (7): 04016023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001506.
Saberi, K., F. M. Fakhri, and A. Azami. 2017. “Evaluation of warm mix asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement and crumb rubber.” J. Cleaner Prod. 165 (Nov): 1125–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.079.
Sharma, A., M. S. Mir, and M. A. Farooq. 2019. “Performance of WMA additives under freeze–thaw action.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 20 (6): 1468–1480. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2018.1444668.
Sol-Sánchez, M., A. Fiume, F. Moreno-Navarro, and M. C. Rubio-Gámez. 2018. “Analysis of fatigue cracking of warm mix asphalt. Influence of the manufacturing technology.” Int. J. Fatigue 110 (May): 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.029.
Sukhija, M., and N. Saboo. 2021. “A comprehensive review of warm mix asphalt mixtures-laboratory to field.” Constr. Build. Mater. 274 (Mar): 121781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121781.
Tatari, O., M. Nazzal, and M. Kucukvar. 2012. “Comparative sustainability assessment of warm-mix asphalts: A thermodynamic based hybrid life cycle analysis.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 58 (Jan): 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.07.005.
Texas DOT. 2005. “Static creep test, test method tex-231-F.” In Manual of testing procedures. Austin, TX: Texas DOT.
Van de Loo, P. 1978. “Creep test: A key tool in asphalt mix design and in the prediction of pavement rutting.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 47 (Sep): 522–557.
Varveri, A., S. Avgerinopoulos, C. Kasbergen, A. Scarpas, and A. Collop. 2014. “Influence of air void content on moisture damage susceptibility of asphalt mixtures: Computational study.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2446 (1): 8–16. https://doi.org/10.3141/2446-02.
Wasiuddin, N. M., N. E. Saltibus, and L. N. Mohammad. 2011. “novel moisture-conditioning method for adhesive failure of hot- and warm-mix asphalt binders.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2208 (1): 108–117. https://doi.org/10.3141/2208-14.
Wen, H., S. Wu, L. N. Mohammad, W. Zhang, S. Shen, and A. Faheem. 2016. “Long-term field rutting and moisture susceptibility performance of warm-mix asphalt pavement.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2575 (1): 103–112. https://doi.org/10.3141/2575-11.
Yan, J., F. Ni, M. Yang, and J. Li. 2010. “An experimental study on fatigue properties of emulsion and foam cold recycled mixes.” Constr. Build. Mater. 24 (11): 2151–2156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.044.
Yin, F., L. G. Cucalon, A. E. Martin, E. Arambula, A. Chowdhury, and E. S. Park. 2013. “Laboratory conditioning protocols for warm-mix asphalt.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 82 (Apr): 177–212.
Yin, F., L. G. Cucalon, A. E. Martin, E. Arambula, and E. S. Park. 2015. “Performance evolution of hot-mix and warm-mix asphalt with field and laboratory aging.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 83 (Mar–Jun): 109–141.
You, L., Z. You, Q. Dai, S. Guo, J. Wang, and M. Schultz. 2018a. “Characteristics of water-foamed asphalt mixture under multiple freeze-thaw cycles: Laboratory evaluation.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (11): 04018270. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002474.
You, L., Z. You, X. Yang, D. Ge, and S. Lv. 2018b. “Laboratory testing of rheological behavior of water-foamed bitumen.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30 (8): 04018153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002362.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Aug 9, 2021
Accepted: Oct 15, 2021
Published online: Mar 22, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 22, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Aswan Univ., Aswan 81542, Egypt (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2843-0099. Email: [email protected]
Nikhil Saboo, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. Email: [email protected]
Lingyun You, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong Univ. of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Investigation of the Effect of Combined Nanosilica and Iranian Natural Binder on the Rheological Behavior of Mastics and Performance of Asphalt Mixtures, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004695, 35, 4, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share