Development of Evaluation Framework for the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soils Based on the Fundamental Soil Parameters Using Gene Expression Programming and Deep Learning Methods
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 2
Abstract
The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of soils is essential for both researchers and practitioner geotechnical engineers. UCS is well-understood and standardized for laboratory and field tests. Nevertheless, the large number of environmental and physical governing factors makes the reasonable prediction of UCS complicated. In this paper, a deep learning approach using the multilayer perceptron regressor (MLP) method along with the genetic expression programming (GEP) are used to assess nine variables that contribute to form a reflective multivariate formulation of the UCS. These variables include clay mineral percent (CF), specific gravity (), dry unit weight (), saturated unit weight (), natural unit weight (), moisture content (MC), void ratio (), degree of saturation (), and porosity (). MLP and GEP are implemented to classify, correlate, rank, and reduce the number of variables that govern the UCS through the application of classification algorithms, importance analysis, interrelations and interdependency analysis of the variables, and functional indicators that shape the UCS. The changes of UCS in line with the variations of void ratio are analytically formulated according to both the critical state soil mechanics and the inverse proportionality between the voided area and soil strength. Moreover, the validity of the UCS principle is examined as opposed to the variation of the clay percent in the soil. Findings show that there shall be a breakpoint (clay percentage) after which the concept of UCS is radically changed due to the presence of a significant amount of frictional and drainable materials in the soil. The breakpoint appears to be centralized between 40% and 55%. The study is concluded by identifying the fundamental soil parameters, providing practical models to evaluate UCS, developing fundamental relationships between UCS and void ratio, and defining the breakpoint of clay content.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Alavi, A. H., and A. H. Gandomi. 2011. “A robust data mining approach for formulation of geotechnical engineering systems.” Eng. Comput. 28 (3): 242–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644401111118132.
Bjerrum, L., and T. H. Wu. 1960. “Fundamental shear-strength properties of the Lilla Edet clay.” Géotechnique 10 (3): 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1960.10.3.101.
Chen, Y. J., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1993. “Undrained strength interrelationships among CIUC, UU, and UC tests.” J. Geotech. Eng. 119 (11): 1732–1750. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:11(1732).
Eid, H. T., and T. D. Stark. 1998. “Undrained shear strength from cone penetration test.” In Vol. 98 of Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Site Characterization—ISC, edited by P. K. Robertson and P. W. Mayne, 1021–1025. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Ferreira, C. 2006. “Automatically defined functions in gene expression programming.” In Genetic systems programming, 21–56. Berlin: Springer.
Gunaydin, O., A. Gokoglu, and M. Fener. 2010. “Prediction of artificial soil’s unconfined compression strength test using statistical analyses and artificial neural networks.” Adv. Eng. Software 41 (9): 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.06.008.
Hanzawa, H. 1983. “Three case studies for short term stability of soft clay deposits.” Soils Found. 23 (2): 140–154. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.23.2_140.
Hanzawa, H. 1992. “A new approach to determine soil parameters free from regional variations in soil behavior and technical quality.” Soils Found. 32 (1): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.71.
Holtz, D. R, W. D. Kovacs, and T. C. Sheahan. 2011. An introduction to geotechnical engineering. London: Pearson.
Jin, Y. F., and Z. Y. Yin. 2020. “An intelligent multi-objective EPR technique with multi-step model selection for correlations of soil properties.” Acta Geotech. 15 (8): 2053–2073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00929-5.
Jin, Y. F., Z. Y. Yin, W. H. Zhou, J. H. Yin, and J. F. Shao. 2019. “A single-objective EPR based model for creep index of soft clays considering L2 regularization.” Eng. Geol. 248 (Jan): 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.12.006.
Kalkan, E., S. Akbulut, A. Tortum, and S. Celik. 2009. “Prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of compacted granular soils by using inference systems.” Environ. Geol. 58 (7): 1429–1440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1645-x.
Kaydelen, C. 2011. “Soil liquefaction modeling by genetic expression programming and neuro fuzzy.” Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (4): 4080–4087.
Khalid, U., Z. Rehman, K. Farooq, and H. Mujtaba. 2015. “Prediction of unconfined compressive strength from index properties of soils.” Sci. Int.(Lahore) 27 (5): 4071–4075.
Kingma, D. P., J. R. Danilo, M. Shakir, and W. Max. 2014. “Semi-supervised learning with deep generative models.” Adv. Neural Inform. Proc. Sys. 4 (Jan): 3581–3589.
Kiran, S., B. Lal, and S. Tripathy. 2016. “Shear strength prediction of soil based on probabilistic neural network.” Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9 (41): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i41/99188.
Krizhevsky, A., I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. 2017. “ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.” Communications ACM 60 (6): 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386.
Lek, S., M. Delacoste, P. Baran, I. Dimopoulos, J. Lauga, and S. Aulagnier. 1996. “Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology.” Ecol. Modell. 90 (1): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(95)00142-5.
Narendra, B. S., P. V. Sivapullaiah, S. Suresh, and S. N. Omkar. 2006. “Prediction of unconfined compressive strength of soft grounds using computational intelligence techniques: A comparative study.” Comput. Geotech. 33 (3): 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2006.03.006.
Ojuri, O. O. 2013. “Predictive shear strength models for tropical lateritic soils.” J. Eng. 2013: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/595626.
Olson, M., A. J. Wyner, and R. Berk. 2018. “Modern neural networks generalize on small data sets.” In Proc., 32nd Int. Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems, 3623–3632. Montréal: NeurIPS Foundation.
Patel, H. S. 2013. “Laboratory assessment to correlate strength parameter from physical properties of subgrade.” Procedia Eng. 51: 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.029.
Polidori, E. 2007. “Relationship between the Atterberg limits and clay content.” Soils Found. 47 (5): 887–896. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.47.887.
Rajeev, J., S. Pramod, and B. Sanja. 2013. “Unconsolidated undrained shear strength of remolded clays by ANNs technique.” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2 (6): 2827–2832.
Ratananikom, W., S. Yimsiri, and S. Likitlersuang. 2015. “Undrained shear strength of very soft to medium stiff Bangkok clay from various laboratory tests.” Geotech. Eng. 46 (1): 64–75.
Schofield, A. N., and P. Wroth. 1968. Vol. 310 of Critical state soil mechanics. London: McGraw-Hill.
Shibuya, S., and L. T. Hanhh. 2001. “Estimating undrained shear strength of soft clay ground improved by pre-loading with PVD—Case history in Bangkok.” Soils Found. 41 (4): 95–101. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.41.4_95.
Srivastava, N., G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov. 2014. “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15 (1): 1929–1958.
Sunitha, L., M. BalRaju, J. Sasikiran, and E. V. Ramana. 2014. “Automatic outlier identification in data mining using IQR in real-time data.” Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 3 (6): 7255–7257.
Tanaka, H., J. Locat, S. Shibuya, T. T. Soon, and D. R. Shiwakoti. 2001. “Characterization of Singapore, Bangkok, and Ariake clays.” Can. Geotech. J. 38 (2): 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-106.
Tarawneh, B. 2020. “Gene expression programming model to predict driven pipe piles set-up.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 14 (5): 538–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1460964.
Vogrig, M., A. McDonald, S. K. Vanapalli, J. Siekmeier, R. Roberson, and E. Garven. 2013. “A laboratory technique for estimating the resilient modulus of unsaturated soil specimens from CBR and unconfined compression tests.” In Proc., 56th Canadian Geotechnical Conf. Montréal: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Yin, Z. Y., Y. F. Jin, H. W. Huang, and S. L. Shen. 2016. “Evolutionary polynomial regression based modelling of clay compressibility using an enhanced hybrid real-coded genetic algorithm.” Eng. Geol. 210 (Aug): 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.06.016.
Zhang, F., Y. Cui, L. Zeng, J. C. Robinet, N. Conil, and J. Talandier. 2018. “Effect of degree of saturation on the unconfined compressive strength of natural stiff clays with consideration of air entry value.” Eng. Geol. 237 (Apr): 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.013.
Zhang, H., J. Zhou, D. Jahed Armaghani, M. M. Tahir, B. T. Pham, and V. V. Huynh. 2020a. “A combination of feature selection and random forest techniques to solve a problem related to blast-induced ground vibration.” Appl. Sci. 10 (3): 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030869.
Zhang, P., Z. Y. Yin, Y. F. Jin, and T. H. Chan. 2020b. “A novel hybrid surrogate intelligent model for creep index prediction based on particle swarm optimization and random forest.” Eng. Geol. 265 (Feb): 105328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105328.
Zhang, P., Z. Y. Yin, Y. F. Jin, T. H. Chan, and F. P. Gao. 2021. “Intelligent modelling of clay compressibility using hybrid meta-heuristic and machine learning algorithms.” Geosci. Front. 12 (1): 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.02.014.
Zumrawi, M. M. 2016. “Correlation of placement conditions and soil intrinsic properties with shear strength of cohesive soils.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 7th Annual Conf. for Postgraduate Studies and Scientific Research—Basic Sciences and Engineering Studies. Khartoum, Sudan: Univ. of Khartoum.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34 • Issue 2 • February 2022
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 27, 2020
Accepted: Jun 18, 2021
Published online: Nov 26, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 26, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Ruba Odeh, Roaa Alawadi, Robust Prediction of Shear Strength of SFRC Using Artificial Neural Networks, Sustainability, 10.3390/su14148516, 14, 14, (8516), (2022).
- Muhammad Naqeeb Nawaz, Sana Ullah Qamar, Badee Alshameri, Steve Karam, Merve Kayacı Çodur, Muhammad Muneeb Nawaz, Malik Sarmad Riaz, Marc Azab, Study Using Machine Learning Approach for Novel Prediction Model of Liquid Limit, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12101551, 12, 10, (1551), (2022).
- Yazeed S. Jweihan, Roaa J. Alawadi, Yazan S. Momani, Ahmad N. Tarawneh, Prediction of Marshall Test Results for Dense Glasphalt Mixtures Using Artificial Neural Networks, Frontiers in Built Environment, 10.3389/fbuil.2022.949167, 8, (2022).
- Bara’ W. Al-Mistarehi, Ahmad H. Alomari, Rana Imam, Tasneem K. Alnaasan, Investigating the Factors Affecting Speeding Violations in Jordan Using Phone Camera, Radar, and Machine Learning, Frontiers in Built Environment, 10.3389/fbuil.2022.917017, 8, (2022).
- Shadi Hanandeh, Ahmad Hanandeh, Mohammad Alhiary, Mohammad Al Twaiqat, Application of Soft Computing for Estimation of Pavement Condition Indicators and Predictive Modeling, Frontiers in Built Environment, 10.3389/fbuil.2022.895210, 8, (2022).
- Shadi Hanandeh, Evaluation Circular Failure of Soil Slopes Using Classification and Predictive Gene Expression Programming Schemes, Frontiers in Built Environment, 10.3389/fbuil.2022.858020, 8, (2022).
- Muhammad Naqeeb Nawaz, Sana Ullah Qamar, Badee Alshameri, Muhammad Muneeb Nawaz, Waqas Hassan, Tariq Ahmed Awan, A robust prediction model for evaluation of plastic limit based on sieve # 200 passing material using gene expression programming, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0275524, 17, 10, (e0275524), (2022).
- Shadi Hanandeh, Introducing mathematical modeling to estimate pavement quality index of flexible pavements based on genetic algorithm and artificial neural networks, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00991, 16, (e00991), (2022).
- Shadi M. Hanandeh, Wassel A. Al-Bodour, Mustafa M. Hajij, A Comparative Study of Soil Liquefaction Assessment Using Machine Learning Models, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 10.1007/s10706-022-02180-z, 40, 9, (4721-4734), (2022).