Development of Two-Step Secant Method to Interpret the Flow Number Test Data of Asphalt Mixtures
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 32, Issue 4
Abstract
The flow number test is widely utilized as a routine test for assessing the rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures. The objective of this study is to propose a novel method of determining the flow number of asphalt mixtures with better accuracy. The Dynamic Testing System (DTS) was employed to perform the flow number tests on four types of asphalt mixtures at multiple temperatures. With respect to the test data, the existing flow number calculation methods are firstly evaluated in terms of the accuracy of the determined flow number values. It is demonstrated that none of the existing methods are recommended to determine the flow number of asphalt mixtures. The two-step secant method is then developed based on the curve shape of the permanent strain versus load cycles graph. The characteristics of concavity and convexity shown in such a graph are utilized to determine the onset of the secondary stage and that of the tertiary stage. As the kernel of the two-step secant method, the secant method is employed twice to determine the load cycle at the minimum slope of secant line for selected permanent strain data. The two load cycles determined by the second step of the two-step secant method are demonstrated to be the onset of the secondary stage and tertiary stage. The termination criterion of flow number tests is then established based on the test data of four asphalt mixtures so that the two-step secant method can be applicable. In conclusion, the proposed two-step secant method is capable of determining the initiation points of the secondary stage and tertiary stage with better accuracy for different types of asphalt mixtures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request, including the permanent strain data of four asphalt mixtures measured at each temperature.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the 973 Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Project No. 2015CB060100). Special thanks are given to the 1,000-Youth Elite Program of China for the start-up funds for purchasing the laboratory equipment that is crucial to this research.
References
AASHTO. 2011. Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt mixture performance tester. AASHTO TP 79. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Ameri, M., A. H. Sheikhmotevali, and A. Fasihpour. 2014. “Evaluation and comparison of flow number calculation methods.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 15 (1): 182–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2013.868819.
Archilla, A. R., L. G. Diaz, and S. H. Carpenter. 2007. “Proposed method to determine the flow number in bituminous mixtures from repeated axial load tests.” J. Transp. Eng. 133 (11): 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:11(610).
Bausano, J., and R. C. Williams. 2010. “Energy-based approach for determining flow number.” J. Test. Eval. 38 (1): 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE102115.
Bhasin, A., J. W. Button, and A. Chowdhury. 2004. “Evaluation of simple performance tests on hot-mix asphalt mixtures from south central United States.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1891 (1): 174–181. https://doi.org/10.3141/1891-20.
Biligiri, K., K. Kaloush, M. Mamlouk, and M. Witczak. 2007. “Rational modeling of tertiary flow for asphalt mixtures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2001 (1): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.3141/2001-08.
Faheem, A., H. Bahia, and H. Ajideh. 2005. “Estimating results of a proposed simple performance test for hot-mix asphalt from Superpave gyratory compactor results.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1929 (1): 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105192900113.
Goh, S. W., and Z. You. 2009. “A simple stepwise method to determine and evaluate the initiation of tertiary flow for asphalt mixtures under dynamic creep test.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (11): 3398–3405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.020.
Goh, S. W., Z. You, H. Wang, J. Mills-Beale, and J. Ji. 2011. “Determination of flow number in asphalt mixtures from deformation rate during secondary state.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2210 (1): 106–112. https://doi.org/10.3141/2210-12.
Huang, B., X. Shu, and J. Bass. 2008. “Investigation of simple performance characteristics of plant-produced asphalt mixtures in Tennessee.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2057 (1): 140–148. https://doi.org/10.3141/2057-17.
Kanitpong, K., N. Charoentham, and S. Likitlersuang. 2012. “Investigation on the effects of gradation and aggregate type to moisture damage of warm mix asphalt modified with Sasobit.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 13 (5): 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2011.565058.
Lytton, R. L. 2000. “Characterizing asphalt pavements for performance.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1723 (1): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.3141/1723-02.
Mogawer, W. S., A. J. Austerman, J. S. Daniel, F. Zhou, and T. Bennert. 2011. “Evaluation of the effects of hot mix asphalt density on mixture fatigue performance, rutting performance and MEPDG distress predictions.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 12 (02): 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2010.546857.
Mohammad, L., Z. Wu, S. Obulareddy, S. Cooper, and C. Abadie. 2006. “Permanent deformation analysis of hot-mix asphalt mixtures with simple performance tests and 2002 mechanistic-empirical pavement design software.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1970 (1): 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106197000114.
Witczak, M., K. Kaloush, T. Pellinen, M. El-Basyouny, and H. Von Quintus. 2002. Simple performance test for Superpave mix design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Witczak, M. W. 2007. Specification criteria for simple performance tests for rutting: Volume I: Dynamic modulus (E*) and volume II: Flow number and flow time. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Yao, H., Z. You, L. Li, C. H. Lee, D. Wingard, Y. K. Yap, X. Shi, and S. W. Goh. 2012. “Rheological properties and chemical bonding of asphalt modified with nanosilica.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (11): 1619–1630. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000690.
Yin, F., E. Arambula, R. Lytton, A. Martin, and L. Cucalon. 2014. “Novel method for moisture susceptibility and rutting evaluation using Hamburg wheel tracking test.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2446 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3141/2446-01.
Zhang, Y., R. Luo, and R. L. Lytton. 2011. “Characterizing permanent deformation and fracture of asphalt mixtures by using compressive dynamic modulus tests.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 24 (7): 898–906. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000471.
Zhang, Y., R. Luo, and R. L. Lytton. 2012. “Mechanistic modeling of fracture in asphalt mixtures under compressive loading.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (9): 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000667.
Zhou, F., and T. Scullion. 2002. “Discussion: Three stages of permanent deformation curve and rutting model.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 3 (4): 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/1029843021000083676.
Zhou, F., T. Scullion, and L. Sun. 2004. “Verification and modeling of three-stage permanent deformation behavior of asphalt mixes.” J. Transp. Eng. 130 (4): 486–494. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:4(486).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 32 • Issue 4 • April 2020
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 20, 2019
Accepted: Aug 27, 2019
Published online: Jan 22, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 22, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.