Technical Papers
Jan 17, 2019

Experimental Investigation of Response of Different Granular Soil–3D Geogrid Interfaces Using Large-Scale Direct Shear Tests

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 31, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of reinforcement forms on the interface shear strength of geosynthetic-reinforced granular soil by conducting a set of large-scale direct shear tests. Three sands of different size (fine, medium, and coarse) and fine gravel of particle size between 0.075 and 10 mm were used for the study. Planar and three-dimensional (3D) geogrids of triangular and rectangular forms were adopted as the reinforcing material. The tests were performed at three different normal stresses of 100, 150, and 200 kPa. The interface shear-strength parameters of different granular soil–reinforcement interfaces were quantified in terms of interface friction angle, apparent cohesion, and interface shear-strength coefficient. The effect of position of the 3D geogrid in the upper or lower shear box on the interface shear behavior was also studied. The tests results show that 3D geogrid–reinforced soil provides higher interface shear-strength coefficients compared with unreinforced and planar geogrid–reinforced soil. The highest interface shear-strength coefficient was observed with 3D geogrid–reinforced medium sand (1.25), which shows minimum unreinforced shear strength. It was also observed that the interface shear-strength coefficients were higher for 3D geogrids with rectangular form compared with the triangular form. The results of the present investigation encourage the usability of 3D geogrids in reinforced soil structures.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdi, M. R., A. Sadrnejad, and M. A. Arjomand. 2009. “Strength enhancement of clay by encapsulating geogrids in thin layers of sand.” Geotext. Geomembr. 27 (6): 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.06.001.
Abdi, M. R., and A. R. Zandieh. 2014. “Experimental and numerical analysis of large scale pull out tests conducted on clays reinforced with geogrids encapsulated with coarse material.” Geotext. Geomembr. 42 (5): 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.07.008.
Abu-Farsakh, M., J. Coronel, and M. Tao. 2007. “Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil-geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19 (7): 540–549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:7(540).
Anubhav, S., and P. K. Basudhar. 2010. “Modeling of soil-woven geotextile interface behavior from direct shear test results.” Geotext. Geomembr. 28 (4): 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.005.
ASTM. 2008. Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear. ASTM D5321. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Athanasopoulos, G. A. 1993. “Effect of particle size on the mechanical behaviour of sand-geotextile composites.” Geotext. Geomembr. 12 (3): 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(93)90029-N.
Athanasopoulos, G. A. 1996. “Results of direct shear tests on geotextile reinforced cohesive soil.” Geotext. Geomembr. 14 (11): 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(97)00002-2.
Bakeer, R. M., S. M. Sayed, P. Cates, and R. Subramanian. 1998. “Pullout and shear tests on geogrid reinforced lightweight aggregate.” Geotext. Geomembr. 16 (2): 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(97)10025-5.
Bathurst, R. J., and F. M. Ezzein. 2016. “Geogrid pullout load–strain behaviour and modelling using a transparent granular soil.” Geosynth. Int. 23 (4): 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00051.
Bergado, D. T., J. C. Chai, H. O. Abiera, M. C. Alfaro, and A. S. Balasubramaniam. 1993. “Interaction between cohesive-frictional soil and various grid reinforcements.” Geotext. Geomembr. 12 (4): 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(93)90008-C.
Cardile, G., N. Moraci, and L. S. Calvarano. 2016. “Geogrid pullout behaviour according to the experimental evaluation of the active length.” Geosynth. Int. 23 (3): 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00042.
Ferreira, F. B., C. S. Vieira, and M. L. Lopes. 2015. “Direct shear behaviour of residual soil–geosynthetic interfaces—Influence of soil moisture content, soil density and geosynthetic type.” Geosynth. Int. 22 (3): 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.15.00011.
Harikumar, M., N. Sankar, and S. Chandrakaran. 2015. “Behaviour of cohesionless soil reinforced with three dimensional inclusions under plane strain conditions.” J. Inst. Eng. Ser. A 96 (3): 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-015-0120-4.
Harikumar, M., N. Sankar, and S. Chandrakaran. 2016. “Behaviour of model footing resting on sand bed reinforced with multi-directional reinforcing elements.” Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (4): 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.03.008.
Infante, D. J. U., G. M. A. Martinez, P. A. Arrua, and M. Eberhardt. 2016. “Shear strength behavior of different geosynthetic reinforced soil structure from direct shear test.” Int. J. Geosynthetics Ground Eng. 2 (2): 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0058-2.
Jewell, R. A. 1996. Soil reinforcement with geotextiles. London: Thomas Telford.
Khedkar, M. S., and J. N. Mandal. 2009. “Pullout behaviour of cellular reinforcements.” Geotext. Geomembr. 27 (4): 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.12.003.
Khoury, C. N., G. A. Miller, and K. Hatami. 2011. “Unsaturated soil-geotextile interface behavior.” Geotext. Geomembr. 29 (1): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.009.
Lawton, E. C., M. V. Khire, and N. S. Fox. 1993. “Reinforcement of soils by multioriented geosynthetic inclusions.” J. Geotech. Eng. 119 (2): 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:2(257).
Lee, K. M., and V. R. Manjunath. 2000. “Soil-geotextile interface friction by direct shear tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 37 (1): 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-124.
Liu, C., J. G. Zornberg, T. Chen, Y. Ho, and B. Lin. 2009a. “Behavior of geogrid-sand interface in direct shear mode.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (12): 1863–1871. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000150.
Liu, C. N., Y. H. Ho, and J. W. Huang. 2009b. “Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PET-yarn geogrid interfaces.” Geotext. Geomembr. 27 (1): 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.03.002.
Lopes, M. J., and M. L. Lopes. 1999. “Soil-geosynthetic interaction–Influence of soil particle size and geosynthetic.” Geosynth. Int. 6 (4): 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.6.0153.
Lopes, M. L., and M. Ladiera. 1996. “Influence of the confinement, soil density and displacement rate on soil-geogrid interaction testing equipment.” Geotext. Geomembr. 10 (14): 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(97)83184-6.
Lopes, M. L., and R. Silvano. 2010. “Soil/geotextile interface behaviour in direct shear and pullout movements.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 28 (6): 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9339-z.
Makkar, F. M., S. Chandrakaran, and N. Sankar. 2017a. “Behaviour of model square footing resting on sand reinforced with three-dimensional geogrid.” Int. J. Geosynthetics Ground Eng. 3 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0083-1.
Makkar, F. M., S. Chandrakaran, and N. Sankar. 2017b. “Performance of 3-D geogrid-reinforced sand under direct shear mode.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1336297.
Miura, N., and K. Watanabe. 1995. “Pullout interaction mechanism of geogrid strip reinforcement.” Geosynth. Int. 2 (4): 679–698. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2.0030.
Moraci, N., and P. Recalcati. 2006. “Factors affecting the pullout behaviour of extruded geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil.” Geosynth. Int. 23 (3): 220–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.03.001.
Mosallanezhad, M., M. C. Alfaro, N. Hataf, and S. H. Sadat Taghavi. 2016. “Performance of the new reinforcement system in the increase of shear strength of typical geogrid interface with soil.” Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (3): 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.07.005.
Ochiai, H., J. Otani, S. Hayashic, and T. Hirai. 1996. “The pull-out resistance of geogrids in reinforced soil.” Geotext. Geomembr. 14 (1): 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(96)00027-1.
Palmeira, E. M., and G. W. E. Milligan. 1989. “Scale and other factors affecting the results of pull-out tests of grids buried in sand.” Geotechnique 39 (3): 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1989.39.3.511.
Sridharan, B. A., B. R. S. Murthy, and K. Revanasiddappa. 1992. “Technique for using fine-grained soil reinforced earth.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (8): 1174–1190. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:8(1174).
Sugimoto, M., A. M. N. Alagiyawanna, and K. Kadoguchi. 2001. “Influence of rigid and flexible face on geogrid pullout tests.” Geotext. Geomembr. 19 (5): 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00011-5.
Tanchaisawat, T., D. T. Bergado, P. Voottipruex, and K. Shehzad. 2010. “Interaction between geogrid reinforcement and tire chip–sand lightweight backfill.” Geotext. Geomembr. 28 (1): 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.07.002.
Vangla, P., and M. Latha Gali. 2016. “Effect of particle size of sand and surface asperities of reinforcement on their interface shear behaviour.” Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (3): 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.11.002.
Vieira, C. S., C. S. Lopes, and L. Caldeira. 2013a. “Soil-geosynthetic interface shear strength by simple and direct shear tests.” In Proc., 18th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Geotechical Engineering, 3497–3500. Paris: Presses des Ponts.
Vieira, C. S., M. L. Lopes, and L. M. Caldeira. 2013b. “Sand-geotextile interface characterisation through monotonic and cyclic direct shear tests.” Geosynth. Int. 20 (1): 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.12.00037.
Vieira, C. S., and P. M. Pereira. 2016. “Interface shear properties of geosynthetics and construction and demolition waste from large-scale direct shear tests.” Geosynth. Int. 23 (1): 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00030.
Weerasekara, L., B. Hall, and D. Wijewickreme. 2017. “A new approach for estimating internal stability of reinforced soil structures.” Geosynth. Int. 24 (4): 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.17.00012.
Zhang, M. X., A. A. Javadi, and X. Min. 2006. “Triaxial tests of sand reinforced with 3D inclusions.” Geotext. Geomembr. 24 (4): 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.03.004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 31Issue 4April 2019

History

Received: Jan 24, 2018
Accepted: Sep 13, 2018
Published online: Jan 17, 2019
Published in print: Apr 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jun 17, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Femy M. Makkar, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Kerala 673601, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
S. Chandrakaran, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Kerala 673601, India. Email: [email protected]
N. Sankar, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Kerala 673601, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share