Hardness Variation in Driven Rivets for Bridge Evaluation
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 10
Abstract
Analysis and load rating of historic, riveted steel structures typically requires an assumption of rivet shear strength. The AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation (MBE) provides rivet shear strengths based on the year of construction; however, the values provided are more conservative than legacy test data. Following the 2007 collapse of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis, MN, riveted gusset plate connections, primarily on older structures, became a national concern. Many owners found using the MBE prescribed shear strength values resulted in some connections not satisfying load rating requirements. In such cases, some have elected to remove a number of rivets and perform destructive laboratory testing to obtain actual material properties. This alternative can be an expensive and time-consuming process. As an alternative, some have performed hardness testing on in-situ rivets to estimate the strength of the rivet using known hardness-to-ultimate strength correlations. The following study was performed to evaluate the variability of hardness throughout a rivet to establish if in-situ hardness measurement and correlation with the hardness of the shank is a reasonable method to estimate the strength of a rivet. Hardness testing is an economical and efficient process easily conducted in the field using handheld devices. However, questions have arisen regarding whether measurements made on the surface of the driven rivet are representative of the hardness of the shank, which was not mechanically worked as compared to the button head or head that was created during the driving process. For the current study, rivets were removed from seven structures of varying age and the hardness was measured. In addition, modern driven and undriven rivets were tested to compare historic results to modern materials. Hardness was measured on both the shop and driven rivet heads as well as at several locations throughout the shank of the rivet and compared to historical specification requirements. Variation in hardness throughout the rivet was analyzed to determine if the hardness measurement on the head could be correlated with the rivet shear strength. Measured rivet head hardness was found to have good correlation with hardness measurements throughout the rivet shank.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. 2011. The manual for bridge evaluation. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AREA (American Railway Engineering Association). 1905. “Tests of riveted joints.” In Proc., Sixth Annual Convention of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association, 272–484. Chicago: Blakely Printing Copmany.
ASTM. 1900. Proposed standard specifications for structural steel for bridges and ships. ASTM A7. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 1932. Tentative specifications for structural rivet steel. ASTM A141-32T. West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM.
ASTM. 1936. Tentative specifications for high-strength structural rivet steel. ASTM A195. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 1959. Tentative specification for high-strength structural alloy rivet steel. ASTM A406. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 1976. Standard specification for steel structural rivets. ASTM A502. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 1998. A century of progress. ASTM 1898–1998. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for Rockwell hardness of metallic materials. ASTM E18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. ASTM A370-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Berman, J. W., C. W. Roeder, B. Wang, A. W. Olson, and D. E. Lehman. 2010. In Triage evaluation of gusset plates in steel truss bridges. Seattle: Washington State Transportation Center.
Brinell, J. A. 1900. “Way of determining the hardness of bodies and some applications of the same.” Teknisk Tidskrift 5: 69.
Brockenbrough, R. L. 2003. AISC rehabilitation and retrofit guide. Chicago: AISC.
Collette, Q., I. Wouters, M. D’Aniello, and R. Landolfo. 2016. “Impact of the hot-driving process on the strength and ductility of steel rivets.” In Proc., Structural Analysis of Historical Connections, 1308–1315. Leuven, Belgium: WIT Press.
Collette, Q., I. Wouters, and L. Lauriks. 2011. “Evolution of historical riveted connections: Joining typologies, installation techniques and calculation methods.” In Vol. 118 of Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Structural Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture, 295–306. Chianciano Terme, Italy: WITT Press.
Davis, R. E., G. B. Woodruff, and H. E. Davis. 1940. “Tension tests of large riveted joints.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 195 (1): 1193–1295.
Gee, K. W. 2008. Load-carrying capacity considerations of gusset plates in non-load-path-redundant steel truss bridges. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Hebdon, M. H., F. J. Bonachera Martin, C. Korkmaz, and R. J. Connor. 2017. “Fracture resilience of steel built-up members subjected to flexure.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (7): 1–10.
Kulak, G. L., J. W. Fisher, and J. H. A. Struik. 2001. Guide to design criteria for bolted and riveted joints. 2nd ed. Chicago: AISC.
Munse, W. H., and H. L. Cox. 1956. The static strength of rivets subjected to combined tension and shear. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station.
Ocel, J. M. 2013. Guidelines for the load and resistance factor design and rating of riveted and bolted gusset-plate connections for steel bridges. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
O’Neill, B. 2011. “History of hardness testing.” Accessed April 28, 2017.http://www.qualitymag.com/articles/88218-50-years-of-quality-history-of-hardness-testing.
Schaefer, R. J., W. S. Johnsen, and J. Laird. 2011. “Delaware river turnpike bridge: Riveted connection analysis and retrofit.” In Modern techniques in bridge engineering, edited by K. M. Mahmoud, 171–184. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Talbot, A. N., and H. F. Moore. 1911. Tests of nickel-steel riveted joints. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station.
Wilson, W. M., W. H. Bruckner, and J. T. H. McCrackin. 1942. Tests of riveted and welded joints in low-alloy structural steels. Champaign, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
Wilson, W. M., and F. P. Thomas. 1938. Fatigue tests of riveted joints. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois Experiment Station.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 24, 2017
Accepted: Mar 19, 2018
Published online: Jul 14, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 14, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.