Technical Papers
Sep 29, 2015

Interface Shear Strength Characteristics of Interlocked EPS-Block Geofoam

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 4

Abstract

Lightweight fills constructed by the use of expanded polystyrene block (EPS-block) geofoam (geofoam block) is known to be susceptible to horizontal loading since the vertical pressure which enhances the shear resistance along the interface of individual blocks is low. Therefore, research has focused on the methods to increase the interface shear resistance of geofoam blocks. This study investigated the use of interlocking mechanisms by conducting direct shear tests on four different interlock configurations. An interlock configuration utilized a number of ledges and notches to interrupt the continuous horizontal shearing plane in-between geofoam blocks. Two different densities of geofoam blocks (EPS19 with a minimum density of 18.4kg/m3 and EPS29 with a minimum density of 28.8kg/m3) were used in order to investigate the effect of material hardness on stress-strain behavior and interface friction properties. The results of this study showed that the interlocking mechanism improved the interface shearing resistance of geofoam blocks. The number of ledges and notches used in an interlocked configuration had an effect on the interface shear strength properties, and higher numbers raised the interface failure envelope to the level of internal shear strength of monoblock EPS. In conclusion, implementing an interlocked configuration changed the EPS/EPS interface friction mechanism from purely frictional to frictional-adhesional.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The direct shear tests were conducted at Okan University Civil Engineering Laboratory, Istanbul, Turkey. The authors acknowledge the contributions of geofoam block manufacturer BASAŞ A.Ş., member of the Turkish EPS Industry Association (EPSDER), for providing the geofoam block specimens used in this study.

References

Aabøe, R. (2011). “40 years of experience with the use of EPS geofoam blocks in road construction.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications, The Norwegian Public Roads Administration and Secretariat: Tekna—The Norwegian Society of Chartered Technical and Scientific Professionals Oslo, Norway.
AFM. (2004). “R-control geogripper plate.” 〈http://www.achfoam.com/ACH/media/ACH/docs/Geofoam/gripper.pdf〉 (Aug. 31, 2015).
Akay, O., Özer, A. T., Fox, G. A., Bartlett, S. F., and Arellano, D. (2013). “Behavior of sandy slopes remediated by EPS-block geofoam under seepage flow.” Geotext. Geomembr., 37(Apr.), 81–98.
Amini, Z. A. (2014). “Dynamic characteristics and seismic stability of expanded polystyrene geofoam embankments.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Anubhav, S., and Basudhar, P. K. (2010). “Modeling of soil-woven geotextile interface behavior from direct shear test results.” Geotext. Geomembr., 28(4), 403–408.
Arellano, D., Stark, T. D., Horvath, J. S., and Leshchinsky, D. (2011). “Guidelines for geofoam applications in slope stability projects: Final report. NCHRP project no. 24-11(02).” 〈http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP24-11(02)_FR.pdf〉 (Dec. 17, 2014).
ASTM. (2010). “Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics.” ASTM D1621, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011). “Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained condition.” ASTM D3080, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2013). “Standard specification for rigid cellular polystyrene geofoam.” ASTM D6817, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2014). “Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear.” ASTM D5321, West Conshohocken, PA.
Atmatzidis, D. K., Missirlis, E. G., and Theodorakopoulos, E. B. (2001). “Shear resistance on EPS geofoam block surfaces.” Proc., EPS Geofoam 2001: 3rd Annual Conf., Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory, Univ. of Patras, Greece.
Bacas, B. M., Konietzky, H., Berini, J. C., and Sagaseta, C. (2011). “A new constitutive model for textured geomembrane/geotextile interfaces.” Geotext. Geomembr., 29(2), 137–148.
Barrett, J. C. (2008). “Effectiveness of connectors in geofoam block construction.” M.Sc. thesis, Univ. of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, Canada.
Barrett, J. C., and Valsangkar, A. J. (2009). “Effectiveness of connectors in geofoam block construction.” Geotext. Geomembr., 27(3), 211–216.
Bartlett, S. F., and Lawton, E. C. (2008). “Evaluating the seismic stability and performance of freestanding geofoam embankment.” Proc., 6th National Seismic Conf. on Bridges and Highways, Federal Highways Administration (FHA) and Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Resarch (MCEER), Buffalo, NY.
Bartlett, S. F., Negussey, D., Kimble, M., and Sheeley, M. (2000). “Use of geofoam as super-lightweight fill for I-15 reconstruction.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 79th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
DeJong, J. T., and Westgate, Z. J. (2005). “Role of overconsolidation on sand-geomembrane interface response and material damage evolution.” Geotext. Geomembr., 23(6), 486–512.
Deng, A., and Xiao, Y. (2010). “Measuring and modeling proportion-dependent stress-strain behavior of EPS-sand mixture.” Int. J. Geomech., 214–222.
Duskov, M. (1997). “Materials research on EPS20 and EPS15 under representative conditions in pavement structures.” Geotex. Geomembr., 15(1-3), 147–181.
Edinçliler, A., and Özer, A. T. (2014). “Effects of EPS bead inclusions on stress-strain behaviour of sand.” Geosynthetics Int., 21(2), 89–102.
Eid, H. T. (2011). “Shear strength of geosynthetic composite systems for design of landfill liner and cover slopes.” Geotext. Geomembr., 29(3), 335–344.
Elragi, A. F. (2000). “Selected engineering properties and applications of EPS geofoam.” Ph.D. dissertation, State Univ. of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY.
Ertugrul, O., and Trandafir, A. (2011). “Reduction of lateral earth forces acting on rigid nonyielding retaining walls by EPS geofoam inclusions.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng.,.1711–1718.
Farnsworth, C. B., Bartlett, S. F., Negussey, D., and Stuedlein, A. W. (2008). “Rapid construction and settlement behavior of embankment systems on soft foundation soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 289–301.
Fleming, I. R., Sharma, J. S., and Jogi, M. B. (2006). “Shear strength of geomembrane-soil interface under unsaturated conditions.” Geotext. Geomembr., 24(5), 274–284.
Frost, J. D., and Han, J. (1999). “Behavior of interfaces between fiber-reinforced polymers and sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 633–640.
Geocomp Corporation. (2011). Shear user’s manual, control and report software for fully automated direct and residual shear tests on ShearTrac-II systems using Windows XP/Vista/7, Acton, MA.
Horvath, J. S. (2010). “Emerging trends in failures involving EPS-block geofoam fills.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 365–372.
Jones, D. R. V., and Dixon, N. (1998). “Shear strength properties of geomembrane/geotextile interfaces.” Geotext. Geomembr., 16(1), 45–71.
Khoury, C. N., Miller, G. A., and Hatami, K. (2011). “Unsaturated soil-geotextile interface behavior.” Geotext. Geomembr., 29(1), 17–28.
Koerner, R. M. (2012). Designing with geosynthetics, 6th Ed., Xlibris Corporation, Bloomington, IN.
Kurose, M., and Tanaka, T. (1996). “EPS block with H or C shape cross section for embankment.” Proc., Int. Symp. on EPS Construction Material, EPS Tokyo’96 Conf., EPS Development Organization (EDO), Tokyo, 190–199.
Lin, L. K., Chen, L. H., and Chen, R. H. L. (2010). “Evaluation of geofoam as a geotechnical construction material.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 160–170.
Liu, C. N., Ho, Y. H., and Huang, J. W. (2009a). “Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PET-yarn geogrid interfaces.” Geotext. Geomembr., 27(1), 19–30.
Liu, C. N., Zornberg, J. G., Chen, T. C., Ho, Y. H., and Lin, B. H. (2009b). “Behavior of geogrid-sand interface in direct shear mode.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1863–1871.
Miao, L., Wang, F., Han, J., Lv, W., and Li, J. (2013). “Properties and applications of cement-treated sand-expanded polystyrene bead lightweight fill.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 86–93.
Negussey, D., Anasthas, N., and Srirajan, S. (2001). “Interface Friction Properties of EPS Geofoam.” Proc., EPS Geofoam 2001: 3rd Int. Conf., Salt Lake City, UT.
NRRL (Norwegian Road Research Laboratory). (1992). “Use of expanded polystyrene in road embankments–Design, construction and quality assurance.” Public Roads Administration, Oslo, Norway.
Özer, A. T., and Akay, O. (2014). “Use of interlocked EPS block geofoam for sandy slopes subjected to seepage flow.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Geosynthetics, German Geotechnical Society, Essen, Germany.
Özer, A. T., Akay, O., Fox, G. A., Bartlett, S. F., and Arellano, D. (2014). “A new method for remediation of sandy slopes susceptible to seepage flow using EPS-block geofoam.” Geotext. Geomembr., 42(2), 166–180.
Padade, A. H., and Mandal, J. N. (2012). “Direct shear test on expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam.” Proc., 5th European Geosynthetic Congress, International Geosynthetics Society, Jupiter, FL.
Sheeley, M. (2000). “Slope stabilization utilizing geofoam.” M.Sc. thesis, Syracuse Univ., New York.
Sheeley, M., and Negussey, D. (2000). “An investigation of Geofoam interface strength behavior.” Geotechnical Special Publication No. 112, Proc., Soft Ground Technology Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA, 292–303.
Stark, T. D., Arellano, D., Horvath, J. S., and Leshchinsky, D. (2004). “Guideline and recommended standard for geofoam applications in highway embankments.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Trandafir, A. C., Bartlett, S. F., and Lingwall, B. N. (2010). “Behavior of EPS geofoam in stress-controlled cyclic uniaxial tests.” Geotext. Geomembr., 28(6), 514–524.
Trandafir, A. C., and Erickson, B. A. (2012). “Stiffness degradation and yielding of EPS geofoam under cyclic loading.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 119–124.
Tsuchida, T., Porbaha, A., and Yamane, N. (2001). “Development of a geomaterial from dredged bay mud.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 152–160.
Wasti, Y., and Özüdüzgün, Z. B. (2001). “Geomembrane-geotextile interface shear properties as determined by inclined board and direct shear box tests.” Geotext. Geomembr., 19(1), 45–57.
Xenaki, V. C., and Athanasopoulos, G. A. (2001). “Experimental investigation of the interface mechanism at the EPS geofoam-sand interface by direct shear testing.” Geosynthetics Int., 8(6), 471–499.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 28Issue 4April 2016

History

Received: Dec 19, 2014
Accepted: Jul 7, 2015
Published online: Sep 29, 2015
Discussion open until: Feb 29, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

A. Tolga Özer, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Okan Univ., Tuzla Campus, Istanbul 34959, Turkey (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Onur Akay, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor and Department Chair, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Okan Univ., Tuzla Campus, Istanbul 34959, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share