Abstract

Construction logistics centers (CLCs) are gaining increasing interest among academics and practitioners as an alternative method for managing material deliveries in congested urban centers with increasing environmental challenges. Because of their novelty and limited implementation, there is a lack of studies that address CLCs’ environmental impact, particularly concerning materials transportation in the construction phase. Thus, this paper aims to evaluate the contribution of CLCs to emissions from materials transportation. It compares emissions from material transportation in a residential project that consists of 111 condos in the greater region of Paris following a standard design widely used and replicated by the industrial partner when CLCs are used and when they are not. In this comparison, we use actual data collected from a finished project where a CLC was used and historical data from previous projects with identical architectural and engineering designs. In both scenarios, the assessment process included collecting material quantities, trades information, suppliers, and vehicle characteristics to generate the number of deliveries and compute the traveled distances. That information is then used to assess the environmental impact using COPERT, a software that assesses vehicles’ emissions in Europe. The study shows that using CLCs, while all other factors remain the same, can reduce 9%, 12%, 10%, 18%, 19%, and 9% of carbon dioxide (CO2), Particulate matter 2.5 (PM 2.5), Particulate matter (PM 10), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, respectively. However, (1) the dependence on assumptions and historical data to assess the conventional construction emissions, (2) the limited number of traders who transported their materials through the CLC, and (3) the reliance on only one completed project to evaluate the CLC’s environmental performance make the results inconclusive and suggest further investigation. This work advances knowledge concerning construction transportation’s environmental performance and provides management researchers and practitioners with an approach to examine the environmental potentials of deliveries’ consolidation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

This research was carried out as part of the Industrial Research Chair Construction 4.0, funded by Centrale Lille, Bouygues Construction, the Métropole Européenne de Lille (MEL), and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). We are grateful to Bouygues Construction, especially Smart Fabrik’s Team, for facilitating and cooperating in this research.

References

Abergel, T., J. Dulac, H. Ian, J. Maxine, and A. Pradeep. 2019. Global status report for buildings and construction. Nairobi, Kenya: UN Environment.
Adalberth, K., A. Almgren, and E. H. Petersen. 2001. “Life-cycle assessment of four multi-family buildings.” Int. J. Low Energy Sustainable Build. 2 (Jun): 1–21.
ADEME (French Agency for Ecological Transition). 2018. “Les impacts environnementaux.” Accessed March 19, 2021. https://www.ademe.fr/expertises/consommer-autrement/elements-contexte/impacts-environnementaux.
Ahn, C., H. Xie, S. Lee, S. Abourizk, and F. Peña-Mora. 2010. “Carbon footprints analysis for tunnel construction processes in the preplanning phase using collaborative simulation.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2010, 1538–1546. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41109(373)154.
Balasubramanian, S., and V. Shukla. 2017. “Green supply chain management: An empirical investigation on the construction sector.” Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 22 (1): 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2016-0227.
Balm, S., C. Macharis, L. Milan, and H. Quak. 2016. “A city distribution impact assessment framework.” In Towards innovative freight and logistics, 353–367. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Barbosa, F., J. Woetzel, J. Mischke, M. J. Ribeirinho, M. Sridhar, N. Bertram, and S. Brown. 2017. Reinventing construction: A route to higher productivity. New York: McKinsey Global Institute.
Belussi, L., et al. 2019. “A review of performance of zero energy buildings and energy efficiency solutions.” J. Build. Eng. 25 (Apr): 100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100772.
Björklund, M., and H. Johansson. 2018. “Urban consolidation centre—A literature review, categorisation, and a future research agenda.” Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 48 (8): 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0050.
Bu Hamdan, S. 2018. “A framework for multi-criteria lifecycle assessment of building systems in the construction industry.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta.
BuHamdan, S., A. Alwisy, B. Barkokebas, A. Bouferguene, and M. Al-Hussein. 2019. “A multi-criteria lifecycle assessment framework for evaluating building systems design.” J. Build. Eng. 23 (May): 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.02.010.
BuHamdan, S., A. Alwisy, and A. Bouferguene. 2020. “Explore the application of reinforced learning to support decision making during the design phase in the construction industry.” Procedia Manuf. 42 (Jan): 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.068.
Dakhli, Z., and Z. Lafhaj. 2018. “Considering materials management in construction: An exploratory study.” Logistics 2 (1): 7.
Ekeskär, A., and M. Rudberg. 2016. “Third-party logistics in construction: The case of a large hospital project.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 34 (3): 174–191.
El Moussaoui, S., Z. Lafhaj, F. Leite, J. Fléchard, and B. Linéatte. 2021. “Construction logistics centres proposing kitting service: Organization analysis and cost mapping.” Buildings 11 (3): 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030105.
European Environment Agency. 2021a. “Emissions of air pollutants from transport.” Accessed March 18, 2021. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/transport-emissions-of-air-pollutants-8/transport-emissions-of-air-pollutants-8.
European Environment Agency. 2021b. “Greenhouse gas emissions from transport in Europe.” Accessed March 18, 2021. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/transport-emissions-of-greenhouse-gases/transport-emissions-of-greenhouse-gases-12.
Florides, G. A., and P. Christodoulides. 2009. “Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences.” Environ. Int. 35 (2): 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.07.007.
Fredriksson, A., M. Berden, and W. P. Van Amstel. 2018. Smart construction logistics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam Univ. of Applied Sciences.
Giampoldaki, E., M. Madas, V. Zeimpekis, and M. Vlachopoulou. 2021. “A state-of-practice review of urban consolidation centres: Practical insights and future challenges.” Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 1–32.
Guerlain, C., S. Renault, and F. Ferrero. 2019. “Understanding construction logistics in urban areas and lowering its environmental impact: A focus on construction consolidation centres.” Sustainability 11 (21): 6118. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216118.
Han, S., S. Na, and N. G. Lim. 2020. “Evaluation of road transport pollutant emissions from transporting building materials to the construction site by replacing old vehicles.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 (24): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249316.
Harker, A., W. Allcorn, and D. Taylor. 2007. Material logistics plan good practice guidance. London: Waste & Resources Action Programme.
Hong, T., S. Sung, H. Kang, J. Hong, H. Kim, and D.-E. Lee. 2022. “Advanced real-time pollutant monitoring systems for automatic environmental management of construction projects focusing on field applicability.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (1): 04021075. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000980.
Huang, Z., and H. Fan. 2022. “A novel quantitative model for determining subsidy levels to accelerate the replacement of in-use construction equipment for emissions reduction.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (2): 04021100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001007.
Jang, W., S. K. Lee, and S. H. Han. 2018. “Sustainable performance index for assessing the green technologies in urban infrastructure projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (2): 04017056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000582.
Janné, M., and A. Fredriksson. 2019. “Construction logistics governing guidelines in urban development projects.” Constr. Innovation 19 (1): 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-03-2018-0024.
Kousoulidou, M., G. Fontaras, L. Ntziachristos, P. Bonnel, Z. Samaras, and P. Dilara. 2013. “Use of portable emissions measurement system (PEMS) for the development and validation of passenger car emission factors.” Atmos. Environ. 64 (Jan): 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.062.
Leon, H., H. Osman, M. Georgy, and M. Elsaid. 2018. “System dynamics approach for forecasting performance of construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (1): 04017049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000575.
London Construction Consolidation Centre. 2008. London construction consolidation centre, final report. London: Transport For London.
Lovins, L. H., S. Wallis, A. Wijkman, and J. Fullerton. 2018. A finer future: Creating an economy in service to life. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
Lundesjo, G. 2011. Using construction consolidation centres to reduce construction waste and carbon emissions. London: Kogan Page.
Lundesjo, G. 2015. Supply chain management and logistics in construction: Delivering tomorrow’s built environment. London: Kogan Page.
Matti Maricq, M. 2007. “Chemical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: A review.” J. Aerosol Sci. 38 (11): 1079–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.08.001.
Mensink, C., I. De Vlieger, and J. Nys. 2000. “An urban transport emission model for the Antwerp area.” Atmos. Environ. 34 (27): 4595–4602.
Muerza, V., and C. Guerlain. 2021. “Sustainable construction logistics in urban areas: A framework for assessing the suitability of the implementation of construction consolidation centres.” Sustainability 13 (13): 7349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137349.
Muhaimin, A. M. M., L. Zhang, S. Dhakal, X. Lv, N. Pradhananga, V. S. Kalasapudi, and A. Azizinamini. 2021. “Identification and analysis of factors affecting the future of bridge design, construction, and operation.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (5): 04021049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000943.
Nässén, J., J. Holmberg, A. Wadeskog, and M. Nyman. 2007. “Direct and indirect energy use and carbon emissions in the production phase of buildings: An input-output analysis.” Energy 32 (9): 1593–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.002.
Ntziachristos, L., D. Gkatzoflias, C. Kouridis, and Z. Samaras. 2009. COPERT: A European road transport emission inventory model, 491–504. Berlin: Springer.
Ortiz, O., F. Castells, and G. Sonnemann. 2009. “Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (1): 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012.
Pandey, D., M. Agrawal, and J. S. Pandey. 2011. “Carbon footprint: Current methods of estimation.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 178 (1–4): 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y.
Reşitoğlu, İ. A., K. Altinişik, and A. Keskin. 2015. “The pollutant emissions from diesel-engine vehicles and exhaust after treatment systems.” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 17 (1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0793-9.
Ruiz, A., and J. Guevara. 2020. “Environmental and economic impacts of road infrastructure development: Dynamic considerations and policies.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (3): 04020006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000755.
Sullivan, G., S. Barthorpe, and S. Robbins. 2010. Managing construction logistics. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Sundquist, V., L. E. Gadde, and K. Hulthén. 2018. “Reorganizing construction logistics for improved performance.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 36 (1): 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1356931.
Szamocki, N., M.-K. Kim, C. R. Ahn, and I. Brilakis. 2019. “Reducing greenhouse gas emission of construction equipment at construction sites: Field study approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (9): 05019012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001690.
Tsakyrellis, E. M. 2011. City logistics for sustainability the case of Stockholm. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology.
United Nations DESA (Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs). 2018. “68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050.” United Nations News. Accessed March 17, 2021. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html.
van Heeswijk, W. J. A., M. R. K. Mes, J. M. J. Schutten, and W. H. M. Zijm. 2020. “Evaluating urban logistics schemes using agent-based simulation.” Transp. Sci. 54 (3): 651–675. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2019.0971.
Wikipedia. 2020. “European emission standards.” Accessed May 25, 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_emission_standards#cite_note-21.
Yan, H., Q. Shen, L. C. H. Fan, Y. Wang, and L. Zhang. 2010. “Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: A case study of One Peking in Hong Kong.” Build. Environ. 45 (4): 949–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.09.014.
Zhang, X., L. Shen, and L. Zhang. 2013. “Life cycle assessment of the air emissions during building construction process: A case study in Hong Kong.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 17 (Jan): 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.024.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 38Issue 5September 2022

History

Received: Sep 21, 2021
Accepted: Mar 25, 2022
Published online: Jun 17, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 17, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Soufiane El Moussaoui [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Unité Mixte de Recherche 9013—LaMcube—Laboratoire de Mécanique, Multiphysique, Multi-échelle, Centrale Lille, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Univ. of Lille, Lille F-59000, France. Email: [email protected]
Zoubeir Lafhaj, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Unité Mixte de Recherche 9013—LaMcube—Laboratoire de Mécanique, Multiphysique, Multi-échelle, Centrale Lille, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Univ. of Lille, Lille F-59000, France (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Construction Engineering and Project Management Program, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1094. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7789-4474. Email: [email protected]
Youssef Laqdid [email protected]
Research Student, Unité Mixte de Recherche 9013—LaMcube—Laboratoire de Mécanique, Multiphysique, Multi-échelle, Centrale Lille, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Univ. of Lille, Lille F-59000, France. Email: [email protected]
Research Associate, Unité Mixte de Recherche 9013—LaMcube—Laboratoire de Mécanique, Multiphysique, Multi-échelle, Centrale Lille, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Univ. of Lille, Lille F-59000, France. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9608-7814. Email: [email protected]
Fanny Brunet [email protected]
Engineer, Bouygues Construction, 1 Avenue Eugène Freyssinet, 78280 Guyancourt, France. Email: [email protected]
Julien Fléchard [email protected]
Project Manager, Bouygues Construction, 1 Avenue Eugène Freyssinet, 78280 Guyancourt, France. Email: [email protected]
Bruno Linéatte [email protected]
R&D Director, Bouygues Construction, 1 Avenue Eugène Freyssinet, 78280 Guyancourt, France. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Circular Bioeconomy in the Amazon Rainforest: Evaluation of Açaí Seed Ash as a Regional Solution for Partial Cement Replacement, Sustainability, 10.3390/su142114436, 14, 21, (14436), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share