Scholarly Papers
Oct 31, 2022

Uncertainty Analysis of Key Schedule Performance Indicators in Design, Procurement, and Construction Phases of Heavy Industrial Projects

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 1

Abstract

Construction is a dynamic industry due to the existence of uncertainties surrounding evolving technologies, budgets, resources, and the development process. Because construction environments are relatively complicated, project managers may face significant challenges in delivering timely and effective project outcomes. Delays may occur throughout the design, procurement, and construction (DPC) phases of all construction projects, including those involving heavy industry; however, indicators of schedule delays can be identified early in a project’s life cycle, and appropriate strategies can be applied. This purpose of this study was to identify indicators that lead to the poor schedule performance of a project during the DPC phases and to examine the robustness of each schedule performance indicator. To accomplish this objective, a survey questionnaire was designed and sent to a diverse group of experienced construction professionals. Statistical methods, such as the chi-squared test, the two-sample t-test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test, were employed to evaluate and screen the DPC schedule performance indicators of heavy industrial projects, and a list of schedule delay indicators was developed using the all-possible combination regression analysis approach. The extreme bound analysis (EBA) technique was used to determine the robustness of each indicator’s relationship to the model. The results revealed nine robust schedule performance indicators in each of the DPC phases. The findings of this study can be used by the decision makers in construction projects to emphasize more reliable factors and minimize the number of revisions required during a project’s execution.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

Works Cited

Abbas, M. I. 2006. Causes and effects of delays in Aceh construction industry. Johor, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Assaf, S. A., and S. Al Hejji. 2006. “Causes of delay in large construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (4): 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.010.
Chanegriha, M., C. Stewart, and C. Tsoukis. 2017. “Identifying the robust economic, geographical and political determinants of FDI: An extreme bounds analysis.” Empirical Econ. 52 (2): 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1097-1.
Chang, K., T. Shin, and G. Klein. 2010. “User commitment and collaboration: Motivational antecedents and project performance.” Inf. Software Technol. 52 (6): 672–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.02.003.
El-Razek, M. E. A., H. A. Bassoioni, and A. M. Mobarak. 2008. “Causes of delay in building construction projects in Egypt.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (11): 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:11(831).
Enshassi, A., S. Mohamed, and S. Abushaban. 2009. “Factors affecting the performance of construction projects in the Gaza strip.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 15 (3): 269–280. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.269-280.
Fortune, J., D. White, K. Jugdev, and D. Walker. 2011. “Looking again at current practice in project management.” Int. J. Project Manage. 4 (4): 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371111164010.
Habibi, M., and S. Kermanshachi. 2018. “Phase-based analysis of key cost and schedule performance causes and preventive strategies: Research trends and implications.” J. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 25 (8): 1009–1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2017-0219.
Habibi, M., S. Kermanshachi, and E. Safapour. 2018. “Engineering, procurement and construction cost and schedule performance leading indicators: State-of-the-art review.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.037.
Iyer, K. C., and K. N. Jha. 2008. “Factors affecting cost performance: Evidence from Indian construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 23 (4): 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.10.003.
Kaliba, C., M. Muya, and K. Mumba. 2009. “Cost escalation and schedule delay in road construction projects in Zambia.” Int. J. Project Manage. 27 (5): 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.07.003.
Kermanshachi, S., B. Dao, J. Shane, and S. Anderson. 2016. “Project complexity indicators and management strategies—A Delphi study.” Procedia Eng. 145 (Jan): 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.048.
Kermanshachi, S., B. Dao, J. Shane, and S. Anderson. 2017. “Uncertainty analysis of procurement phase performance indicators using extreme bounds analysis (EBA).” In Proc., 6th CSCE Int. Construction Specialty Conf. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Larsen, R. J., and M. L. Marx. 1981. An introduction to mathematical statistics and its application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Leamer, E. E. 1983. “Sensitivity analysis would help, American economic review.” Am. Econ. Assoc. 57 (3): 308–313.
Leamer, E. E., and H. Leonard. 1983. “Reporting the fragility of regression estimates.” Rev. Econ. Stat. 65 (2): 306–317. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924497.
Lechler, T. 1998. “When it comes to project management, it’s the people that matter: An empirical analysis of project management in Germany.” In The nature and role of projects in the next 20 years: Research issues and problems, edited by F. Hartman, G. Jergeas, and J. Thomas, 205–215. Calgary, AB, Canada: Univ. of Calgary.
Luu, D. T., S. T. Ng, and S. E. Chen. 2003. “Parameters governing the selection of procurement system-an empirical survey.” J. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 10 (3): 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980310478458.
Mohamad, M. I., M. A. Nekooie, A. B. S. Al-Harthy, and B. Amur. 2012. “Design changes in residential reinforced concrete buildings: The causes, sources, impacts and preventive measures.” J. Constr. Dev. Countries 17 (2): 23–44.
Papke-Shields, K. E., C. Beise, and J. Quan. 2010. “Do project managers practice what they preach, and does it matter to project success?” Int. J. Project Manage. 28 (7): 650–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.002.
Safapour, E., S. Kermanshachi, and I. Ramaji. 2018. “Entity-based investigation of project complexity impact on size and frequency of construction phase change orders.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.066.
Sala-i-Martin, X. 1997. “I just ran two million regressions, American economic review.” Am. Econ. Assoc. 87 (2): 178–183.
Sambasivan, M., and Y. W. Soon. 2007. “Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (5): 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.007.
Tummalapudi, M., M. Harper, T. R. Taylor, S. Waddle, and R. Catchings. 2022. “Causes, implications, and strategies for project closeout delays in highway construction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2676 (9): 03611981221087229. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221087229.
Tummalapudi, M., J. Killingsworth, C. Harper, and M. Mehaney. 2021. “US construction industry managerial strategies for economic recession and recovery: A Delphi study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (11): 04021146. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002175.
Tummalapudi, M., J. Killingsworth, and C. M. Harper. 2020. “Evaluation of construction surety bonding criterion for changing economic conditions.” In Construction research congress 2020: Project management and controls, materials, and contracts, 535–544. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Turner, J. R. 2009. The handbook of project-based management. 3rd ed. Glasgow, UK: McGraw-Hill Publishing.
Wright, J. N. 1997. “Time and budget: The twin imperatives of a project sponsor.” Int. J. Project Manage. 15 (3): 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00059-2.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15Issue 1February 2023

History

Received: Apr 6, 2022
Accepted: Aug 13, 2022
Published online: Oct 31, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 31, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Sharareh Kermanshachi, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, 425 Nedderman Hall, 416 Yates St., Arlington, TX 76019 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Apurva Pamidimukkala, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, 425 Nedderman Hall, 416 Yates St., Arlington, TX 76019. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Advancing Airport Project Delivery: A Comparison of Design–Build and Traditional Methods in Terms of Schedule and Cost Performance, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5490, 39, 6, (2023).
  • Analysis of the Factors Affecting Construction Project Cost during COVID-19, International Conference on Transportation and Development 2023, 10.1061/9780784484883.062, (718-727), (2023).
  • Evaluation of Challenges to the Construction Industry’s Project Efficiency Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic, International Conference on Transportation and Development 2023, 10.1061/9780784484883.058, (674-682), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share