Features
Jan 10, 2022

Recovering Loss of Productivity in Engineering

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14, Issue 2

Abstract

Engineering costs account for a significant portion of the total project cost in construction projects, and the output of engineering work directly affect both the construction and operation of the permanent work. An important factor affecting engineering costs is engineering productivity. Since the engineering output is not as tangible as the constructed product, it is challenging to properly measure engineering productivity, which makes contemporaneous productivity loss tracking even more difficult. Under a design-build contract, the contractor is responsible for both the design and construction of a project. If the contractor’s engineering work is disrupted by events for which the owner/employer is responsible, the contractor can recover the lost engineering productivity based on the establishment of entitlement, causation, and credible quantification. This paper discusses issues related to recovering lost engineering productivity. In particular, this paper discusses various methods applicable to the quantification of engineering productivity loss under design-build contracts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.

References

List of Cases

Appeal of P. J. Dick, Inc., VABCA Nos. 6080–6082, 01-2 BCA (CCH) (2001).
Bell BCI Company v. United States, No. 03-1613C, 81 Fed. Cl. 617 (2008).
Centex Bateson Construction Co. VABCA Nos. 4613, 5162–5265, 99–1 BCA 30,153, 149,261 (1999).
Clark Concrete Contractors, Inc. v. General Services Administration, 99-1 BCA 30,280 (1999).
Triple “A” South, ASBCA No. 46886, 94-3 BCA 27,194 (1994).

Works Cited

AACE (Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering). 2004. Estimating lost labor productivity in construction claims. Morgantown, WV: AACE.
AlChaer, E., and C. A. Issa. 2020. “Engineering productivity measurement: A novel approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (8): 04020087. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001875.
Arditi, D., and K. Mochtar. 2000. “Trends in productivity improvement in the US construction industry.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 18 (1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900370915.
Barbosa, F., J. Woetzel, J. Mischke, M. Ribeirinho, M. Sridhar, M. Parsons, N. Bertram, and S. Brown. 2017. Reinventing construction: A route to higher productivity. New York: McKinsey & Company.
Chang, A. S., and C. W. Ibbs. 2006. “System model for analyzing design productivity.” J. Manage. Eng. 22 (1): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:1(27).
Chang L. M., M. E. Georgy, and L. Zhang. 2001. Engineering productivity measurement. Austin, TX: Construction Research Institute.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 2003. Engineering productivity measurements II. Austin, TX: CII.
Cushman, R. F., J. D. Carter, D. F. Coppi, and P. J. Gorman. 2000. Proving and pricing construction claims. New York: Aspen.
Drucker, P. F. 1974. Management. London: Harper Row.
Ebrahimy, Y., and S. Rokni. 2010. “Validity of industry benchmarks and metrics for engineering productivity.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2010: Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice, 1057–1063. Reston, VA: ASCE.
FIDIC (International Federation of Consulting Engineers). 2017. Conditions of contract for plant and design-build. Geneva: FIDIC.
Hastak, M. 2015. “Skills and knowledge of cost.” In Engineering, 6th ed. Morgantown, WV: AACE International.
Ibbs, C. W. 1997. “Quantitative impacts of project change: Size issues.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 123 (3): 308–311. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:3(308).
Ibbs, C. W., and W. E. Allen. 1995. Quantitative impacts of project change. Austin, TX: CII.
Kim, I. 2007. “Development and implementation of an engineering productivity measurement system (EPMS) for benchmarking.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas.
Liao, P. C. 2008. Influence factors of engineering productivity and their impact on project performance. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas.
Liao, P. C., W. J. O’Brien, S. R. Thomas, J. Dai, and S. P. Mulva. 2011. “Factors affecting engineering productivity.” J. Manage. Eng. 27 (4): 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000059.
Rosenberg, K., E. M. Rankin, and B. Dayton. 2020. Dealing with delay and disruption on construction projects. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Salem, S., R. Miller, and A. Despande. 2008. Best practices for design in fast track projects. Austin, TX: CII.
Song, L., and S. M. AbouRizk. 2005. “Quantifying engineering project scope for productivity modeling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (3): 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:3(360).
Song, L., M. Allouche, and S. AbouRizk. 2003. “Measuring and estimating steel drafting productivity.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress: Wind of Change: Integration and Innovation, 1–9. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Thomas, H. R., Q. C. Korte, V. E. Sanvido, and M. K. Parfitt. 1999. “Conceptual model for measuring productivity of design and engineering.” J. Archit. Eng. 5 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1999)5:1(1).
Wall, R. 2018. “Want to make your engineering firm more profitable? Focus on your people.” In Civil engineering source. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Yates, J. K. 2014. Productivity improvement for construction and engineering: Implementing programs that save money and time. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zhao, T., and J. M. Dungan. 2012. “Proving engineering productivity loss.” In Proc., AACE International Transactions. Morgantown, WV: AACE International.
Zhao, T., and J. M. Dungan. 2013. “Avoiding the pitfalls in implementing the measured mile method.” In Proc., AACE International Transactions. Morgantown, WV: AACE International.
Zhao, T., and J. M. Dungan. 2018. “Quantifying lost labor productivity in domestic and international claims.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (3): 04518013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000269.
Zhao, T., and J. M. Dungan. 2019. “Loss of productivity analysis using project-specific curves.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (4): 04519027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000324.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 14Issue 2May 2022

History

Received: Aug 10, 2021
Accepted: Nov 10, 2021
Published online: Jan 10, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jun 10, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tong Zhao, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Senior Director, Delta Consulting Group, Inc., 4330 Prince William Pkwy., Ste 301, Woodbridge, VA 22192 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
J. Mark Dungan, M.ASCE [email protected]
Executive Vice President and Co-Founding Partner, Delta Consulting Group, Inc., 4330 Prince William Pkwy., Ste 301, Woodbridge, VA 22192. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share