Features
Jul 20, 2021

Building Envelope Issues within Construction-Defect Litigation

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 13, Issue 4

Abstract

Construction defect litigation has a large effect on contractors, home builders, and engineers. This research builds on previous research that identified common construction defects and suggested the majority of common construction defects generally relate to keeping water out of or flowing away from a building or structure. The focus of this follow-up research is an inventory and analysis of defects specifically related to building envelope issues. The authors analyze 46 construction defect cases litigated between 2011 and 2019 that include issues related to building envelope design and construction to more accurately assess the most commonly cited building envelope issues, their details, and their associated trends. Findings reveal improper sealing of penetrations, improper integration and lapping of the weather resistant barrier (WRB), improper flashing, and improper weep mechanisms, all of which involve water penetration and are the most prominent and high impact defects. Findings also reveal that the most prominent alleged defects occur where water can infiltrate and damage the building envelope. Finally, the findings indicate that the cited alleged defects relative to the building envelope are more numerous and complex than cited alleged defects in other disciplines, specifically civil or mechanical engineering. The contribution of this research is (1) to identify and create detailed description of building envelope–related defects, and (2) to inform design and construction professionals of their responsibilities and liabilities of these building envelope–related defects with the goal of helping to reduce future construction defect litigation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (information from publicly available sources).
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. Some case study information is from active cases and is confidential in nature.

References

Works Cited

Abdou, A., M. Haggag, and O. Al Khatib. 2016. “Use of building defect diagnosis in construction litigation: Case study of a residential building.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 8 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000177.
Ahzahar, N., N. A. Karim, S. H. Hassan, and J. Eman. 2011. “A study of contribution factors to building failures and defects in construction industry.” Procedia Eng. 20: 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.162.
Aljassmi, H., and S. Han. 2013. “Analysis of causes of construction defects using fault trees and risk importance measures.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (7): 870–880. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000653.
Aljassmi, H., S. Han, and S. Davis. 2014. “Project pathogens network: New approach to analyzing construction-defects-generation mechanisms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (1): 04013028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000774.
Aljassmi, H., S. Han, and S. Davis. 2016. “Analysis of the complex mechanisms of defect generation in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001042.
Alshehri, A. M. 2019. “Tracing the roots of construction conflicts: Explaining problems, preferences, and process.” J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 6 (2): 40–47. https://doi.org/10.5455/jeas.2019090104.
Assaf, S., A.-M. Al-Hammad, and M. Al-Shihah. 1996. “Effects of faulty design and construction on building maintenance.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 10 (4): 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1996)10:4(171).
ASTM. 2007. Standard practice for installation of exterior windows, doors and skylights. ASTM E2112-07. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard specification for asphalt-saturated organic felt used in roofing and waterproofing. ASTM D226/D226M-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Atkinson, A. 1998. “Human error in the management of building projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 16 (3): 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461998372367.
Auchterlounie, T. 2009. “Recurring quality issues in the UK private house building industry.” Struct. Surv. 27 (3): 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800910971365.
Beasley, K. J. 2010. “Identification and diagnosis of building façade failures.” In Proc., Congress Forensic Engineering, 74–84. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Brogan, E., W. McConnell, and C. M. Clevenger. 2018. “Emerging patterns in construction defect litigation: Survey of construction cases.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (4): 03718003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000277.
Cheng, Y., W. D. Yu, and Q. Li. 2015. “GA-based multi-level association rule mining approach for defect analysis in the construction industry.” Autom. Constr. 51 (Mar): 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.12.016.
Cheung, S. 1999. “Critical factors affecting the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (3): 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00027-1.
Chong, W.-K., and S.-P. Low. 2006. “Latent building defects: Causes and design strategies to prevent them.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20 (3): 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:3(213).
Donnan, D. 2010. “Forensic investigation of building envelope defects.” Aust. J. Struct. Eng. 11 (1): 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2010.11465054.
Fang, C., and F. Marle. 2013. “Dealing with project complexity by matrix-based propagation modelling for project risk analysis.” J. Eng. Des. 24 (4): 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2012.720014.
Forcada, N., M. Macarulla, M. Gangolells, and M. Casals. 2016. “Handover defects: Comparison of construction and post-handover housing defects.” Build. Res. Inf. 44 (3): 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1039284.
Forcada, N., M. Macarulla, M. Gangolells, M. Casals, A. Fuertes, and X. Roca. 2013. “Posthandover housing defects: Sources and origins.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (6): 756–762. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000368.
Forcada, N., M. MacArulla, M. Gangolells, and M. Casals. 2014. “Assessment of construction defects in residential buildings in Spain.” Build. Res. Inf. 42 (5): 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.922266.
Georgiou, J. 2010. “Verification of a building defect classification system for housing.” Struct. Surv. 28 (5): 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801011089164.
Gerber, P., and D. Serra. 2011. “Construction litigation—Are we doing it better?” Melbourne Univ. Law Rev. 35: 938–970.
Ilozor, B. D., M. I. Okoroh, and C. E. Egbu. 2004. “Understanding residential house defects in Australia from the state of Victoria.” Build. Environ. 39 (3): 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.07.002.
International Code Council. 2018. International building code. Washington, DC: International Code Council.
Jagannathan, M., and V. S. K. Delhi. 2020. “Litigation in construction contracts: Literature review.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 03119001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000342.
Josephson, P. E., and Y. Hammarlund. 1999. “Causes and costs of defects in construction a study of seven building projects.” Autom. Constr. 8 (6): 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00114-9.
Komurlu, R., and D. Arditi. 2017. “The role of general conditions relative to claims and disputes in building construction contracts.” New Arch-Int. J. Contemp. Archit. 4 (2): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.14621/tna.20170203.
Lee, J. S. 2018. “Value engineering for defect prevention on building façade.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (8): 04018069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001500.
Lee, S., Y. Cha, S. Han, and C. Hyun. 2019. “Application of association rule mining and social network analysis for understanding causality of construction defects.” Sustainability 11 (3): 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030618.
Lee, S., S. Lee, and J. Kim. 2018. “Evaluating the impact of defect risks in residential buildings at the occupancy phase.” Sustainability 10 (12): 8–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124466.
Liu, Q., G. Ye, Y. Feng, C. Wang, and Y. Peng. 2020. “Case-based insights into rework costs of residential building projects in China.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 20 (4): 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484856.
Love, P., and D. J. Edwards. 2004. “Forensic project management: The underlying causes of rework in construction projects.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 21 (3): 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286600412331295955.
Love, P. E., and L. I. Heng. 2000. “Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 18 (4): 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190050024897.
Love, P. E. D. 2002a. “Auditing the indirect consequences of rework in construction: A case based approach.” Managerial Auditing J. 17 (3): 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900210419921.
Love, P. E. D. 2002b. “Influence of project type and procurement method on rework costs in building construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 128 (1): 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(18).
Macarulla, M., N. Forcada, M. Casals, M. Gangolells, A. Fuertes, and X. Roca. 2013. “Standardizing housing defects: Classification, validation, and benefits.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (8): 968–976. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000669.
Mills, A., P. E. D. Love, and P. Williams. 2009. “Defect costs in residential construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (1): 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:1(12).
Noble-Allgire, A. M. 2009. “Notice and opportunity to repair construction defects: An imperfect response to the perfect storm.” Real Property Probate Trust J. 43 (4): 729–796.
Pan, W., and R. Thomas. 2015. “Defects and their influencing factors of posthandover new-build homes.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (4): 04014119. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000618.
Quapp, U., and K. Holschemacher. 2020. “Further legal training for architects, civil engineers, and construction managers.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 05019009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000347.
Sassu, M., and A. De Falco. 2014. “Legal disputes and building defects: Data from Tuscany.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (4): 04014017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000520.
Schultz, C. S., K. Jørgensen, S. Bonke, and G. M. G. Rasmussen. 2015. “Building defects in Danish construction: Project characteristics influencing the occurrence of defects at handover.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 11 (6): 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2014.990352.
Shirkavand, I., J. Lohne, and O. Laedre. 2016. “Defects at handover in Norwegian construction projects.” Social Behav. Sci. 226: 3–11.
Tazelaar, F., and C. Snijders. 2010. “Dispute resolution and litigation in the construction industry. Evidence on conflicts and conflict resolution in the Netherlands and Germany.” J. Purchasing Supply Manage. 16 (4): 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2010.08.003.
VanDemark, L., and C. M. Clevenger. 2018. “Risk mitigation for the design and installation of underdrain systems.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 10 (4): 03718001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000268.
VanDemark, L., and C. M. Clevenger. 2020a. “Common disputes in eminent domain cases.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 05019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000358.
VanDemark, L., and C. M. Clevenger. 2020b. “Site civil issues within construction defect litigation.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (3): 05020009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000418.
VanDemark, L., C. M. Clevenger, and E. Brogan. 2019. “Designating responsible parties for drainage within 1.5 m of a building.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 03719001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000298.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 13Issue 4November 2021

History

Received: Aug 24, 2020
Accepted: Mar 15, 2021
Published online: Jul 20, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 20, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Construction Engineering and Management, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Denver, 1200 Larimer, Denver, CO 80204 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9167-0522. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Caroline M. Clevenger, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-8447 [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Construction Engineering and Management, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Denver, 1200 Larimer, Denver, CO 80204. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-8447. Email: [email protected]
Matthew Click [email protected]
Vice President, Vertex Companies, Inc., 2420 W. 26th Ave., Denver, CO 80211. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • 2020 LADR International Workshop, Cyprus, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000518, 14, 1, (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share