Abstract

Infrastructure systems such as water, electricity, gas, and so on are interdependent complex sociotechnical systems. As such, understanding the human or social component of these systems is critical for increasing resilience. Qualitative analyses, including cognitive task analyses conducted with utility systems personnel, suggested that the human or social part of these systems can be modeled as a multiteam system (MTS). The interdependent critical infrastructure systems (ICIs) that we examined were found to have all of the essential features of multiteam systems. Using the National Academy of Sciences resilience framework (plan, absorb, recover, adapt), we applied findings from the MTS literature to generate recommendations, cautions, and suggestions for future research in infrastructure systems design and practice.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Lists of the organizations contacted, general descriptions of respondents’ roles in those organizations, anonymized summaries of the cognitive task analyses, and lists of the supplementary materials examined are available upon reasonable request. Specific identities and identifying information of the respondents and the audio recordings of the CTA interviews (which contain proprietary information) are confidential and are not available.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under the award #1638321. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Our sincere thanks to the Charleston Water System and to South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) for their cooperation and support.

References

Alvarado, L. 2020. “Identifying thematic patterns of autonomy shifts and team boundary work for long duration spaceflight multiteam missions.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Psychology, Clemson Univ.
Bell, S. T., S. G. Brown, A. Colaneri, and N. Outland. 2018. “Team composition and the ABCs of teamwork.” Am. Psychologist 73 (4): 349. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000305.
Biernacki, P., and D. Waldorf. 1981. “Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling.” Sociological Methods Res. 10 (2): 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205.
Canas, A. J., J. W. Coffey, M. J. Carnot, P. Feltovich, R. Hoffman, J. Feltovich, and J. D. Novak. 2003. A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support. Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
Chandra, A., J. Acosta, S. Howard, L. Uscher-Pines, M. Williams, D. Yeung, J. Garnett, and L. S. Meredith. 2011. “Building community resilience to disasters: A way forward to enhance national health security.” Rand Health Q. 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.7249/TR915.
Clark, R. E., D. Feldon, J. van Merrienboer, K. Yates, S. Early, J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, and M. J. Bishop. 2008. “Cognitive task analysis for expert-based instruction in healthcare.” In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. London: Routledge.
Close, D., K. Babski-Reeves, N. Younan, and N. Schulz. 2009. “Cognitive task analysis of power grid monitors.” In Vol. 53 of Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 304–308. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Connelly, E. B., C. R. Allen, K. Hatfield, J. M. Palma-Oliveira, D. D. Woods, and I. Linkov. 2017. “Features of resilience.” Environ. Syst. Decis. 37 (1): 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9634-9.
Crandall, B., G. Klein, and R. R. Hoffman. 2006. Working minds: A practitioner’s guide to cognitive task analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Davison, R. B., and J. R. Hollenbeck. 2012. “Boundary spanning in the domain of multiteam systems.” In Multiteam systems, 335–374. London: Routledge.
De Bruijne, M., and M. Van Eeten. 2007. “Systems that should have failed: Critical infrastructure protection in an institutionally fragmented environment.” J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 15 (1): 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00501.x.
DeChurch, L. A., and S. J. Zaccaro. 2010. “Perspectives: Teams won’t solve this problem.” Hum. Factors 52 (2): 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810374736.
Faraj, S., and A. Yan. 2009. “Boundary work in knowledge teams.” J. Appl. Psychol. 94 (3): 604. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014367.
Gasser, P., P. Lustenberger, M. Cinelli, W. Kim, M. Spada, P. Burgherr, S. Hirschberg, B. Stojadinovic, and T. Y. Sun. 2021. “A review on resilience assessment of energy systems.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 6 (5): 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2019.1610600.
Gomes, K. D., I. Sánchez-Cardona, and B. A. Moore. 2021. “Team resilience: Practical implications for military service members.” In Military behavioral health, 1–12. London: Taylor and Francis.
Haberlin, R. J., Jr., and Y. Y. Haimes. 2018. “Regional infrastructures as complex systems of systems: Shared-state model for regional resilience.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 24 (3): 04018010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000421.
Hackman, J. R., and G. R. Oldham. 1975. “Development of the job diagnostic survey.” J. Appl. Psychol. 60 (2): 159. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546.
Heinimann, H. R., and K. Hatfield. 2017. “Infrastructure resilience assessment, management and governance—State and perspectives.” In Resilience and risk, 147–187. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Hickford, A. J., S. P. Blainey, A. Ortega Hortelano, and R. Pant. 2018. “Resilience engineering: Theory and practice in interdependent infrastructure systems.” Environ. Syst. Decis. 38 (3): 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9707-4.
Hoffman, R. R., B. Crandall, and N. Shadbolt. 1998. “Use of the critical decision method to elicit expert knowledge: A case study in the methodology of cognitive task analysis.” Hum. Factors 40 (2): 254–276. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779480442.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., and B. S. Bell. 2003. “Work groups and teams in organizations.” In Vol. 12 of Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, edited by W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, and R. J. Klimoski, 333–375. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Linkov, I., B. Trump, and G. Kiker. 2022. “Diversity and inclusiveness are necessary components of resilient international teams.” Humanities Social Sci. Commun. 9 (1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01117-4.
Linkov, I., and B. D. Trump. 2019. The science and practice of resilience. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Luciano, M. M., L. A. DeChurch, and J. E. Mathieu. 2018. “Multiteam systems: A structural framework and meso-theory of system functioning.” J. Manage. 44 (3): 1065–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315601184.
Mathieu, J. E., M. A. Marks, and S. J. Zaccaro. 2001. “Multi-team systems.” In Organizational psychology: Vol. 2. Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, edited by N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, and C. Viswesvaran, 289–313. London: SAGE.
Momeni, A., V. Prasad, K. Piratla, H. Dharmawardena, K. Venayagamoorthy, J. Ligato, F. Switzer, and I. Safro. 2018. “Modeling and adaptive control of interdependent infrastructure systems.” In Proc., NSF CRISP Grantees Workshop. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Nielsen, T. M., D. G. Bachrach, E. Sundstrom, and T. R. Halfhill. 2012. “Utility of OCB: Organizational citizenship behavior and group performance in a resource allocation framework.” J. Manage. 38 (2): 668–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309356326.
NRC (National Research Council). 2012. Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Power, N. 2018. “Extreme teams: Toward a greater understanding of multiagency teamwork during major emergencies and disasters.” Am. Psychol. 73 (4): 478. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000248.
Puuska, S., L. Rummukainen, J. Timonen, L. Lääperi, M. Klemetti, L. Oksama, and J. Vankka. 2018. “Nationwide critical infrastructure monitoring using a common operating picture framework.” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 20 (Mar): 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2017.11.005.
Richter, A. W., J. F. Dawson, and M. A. West. 2011. “The effectiveness of teams in organizations: A meta-analysis.” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 22 (13): 2749–2769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.573971.
Rosenzweig, P. M., and J. V. Singh. 1991. “Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 16 (2): 340–361. https://doi.org/10.2307/258865.
Salas, E., N. J. Cooke, and M. A. Rosen. 2008. “On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments.” Hum. Factors 50 (3): 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457.
Salas, E., D. E. Sims, and C. S. Burke. 2005. “Is there a ‘big five’ in teamwork?” Small Group Res. 36 (5): 555–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134.
Shuffler, M. L., and D. R. Carter. 2018. “Teamwork situated in multiteam systems: Key lessons learned and future opportunities.” Am. Psychologist 73 (4): 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000322.
Thomas, J. E., D. A. Eisenberg, T. P. Seager, and E. Fisher. 2019. “A resilience engineering approach to integrating human and socio-technical system capacities and processes for national infrastructure resilience.” J. Homeland Secur. Emergency Manage. 16 (2): 20170019. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2017-0019.
Thompson, W. L. 2016. Living on the grid. The fundamentals of the North American electric grids in simple language. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.
Wang, Z., H. Xu, and Y. Liu. 2018. “Servant leadership as a driver of employee service performance: Test of a trickle-down model and its boundary conditions.” Hum. Relat. 71 (9): 1179–1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717738320.
Wood, M. D., E. M. Wells, G. Rice, and I. Linkov. 2019. “Quantifying and mapping resilience within large organizations.” Omega 87 (Sep): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.08.012.
Zemba, V., E. M. Wells, M. D. Wood, B. D. Trump, B. Boyle, S. Blue, C. Cato, and I. Linkov. 2019. “Defining, measuring, and enhancing resilience for small groups.” Saf. Sci. 120 (Dec): 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.042.
Zhang, P., and S. Peeta. 2011. “A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 45 (3): 553–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2010.10.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28Issue 4December 2022

History

Received: Sep 2, 2021
Accepted: May 16, 2022
Published online: Jul 21, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 21, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Psychology, Clemson Univ., 418 Brackett Hall, Clemson, SC 29678 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3538-3959. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor of Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Dept. of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Florida Southern College, Lakeland, FL 33801. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-1411. Email: [email protected]
Kalyan Piratla, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Liles Associate Professor, Glenn Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Navigating Diverse Agency Priorities in Emergency Management: A Framework for Hazard Mitigation, Natural Hazards Review, 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1970, 25, 4, (2024).
  • A Framework for Transitions in the Built Environment: Insights from Compound Hazards in the COVID-19 Era, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2285, 30, 1, (2024).
  • Analysis of the Capital Structure in Sustainable Infrastructure Systems: A Methodological Approach, Sustainability, 10.3390/su141912662, 14, 19, (12662), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share