Abstract

This study compared output from mobile inventory data collection vehicles to manually collected data techniques with a focus on two-way communications primarily through the submission of a sample data set to be analyzed prior to the submission of a full data set. The interim submittal and feedback to the vendors based on that resulted in a marked improvement in data quality for 5 of the 28 assets studied. After feedback, it is apparent that highway data collection vendors can accurately locate the vast majority of assets, with the primary exception being those that are occluded by vehicles or surrounding landscaping, such as those assets in the median. Along with the locations of assets, vendors showed promise at collecting many of the feature descriptions such as asset type and condition. Many of the elements (location, type, etc.) for a particular asset type that created collection difficulty were only problematic for a particular vendor, which suggests that further improvements may be achieved through additional communication and more explicit definitions and examples by the contracting agency. Using measurement tolerances, the research team determined that measurements of height, grade, and azimuth were generally accurately obtained; however, measurements parallel to the direction of travel, such as offset and width, posed problems with accurate measurements. Last, the accuracy of data location was acceptable for finding assets in the field; however, many specific point features such as drop inlets or attenuators were not geo-located, but instead located from the vehicles position in the roadway. This appears to be standard practice for some vendors; therefore, if a specific location outside the roadway is desired, it should be clearly indicated in the instructions. Although mobile data collection is sufficient for most efforts, there is still room for improvement if more detailed location is necessary.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research team acknowledges the North Carolina Department of Transportation for supporting and funding this project. The opinions and findings expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not the NCDOT. We extend our thanks to the project Steering and Implementation Committee, which was chaired by Jennifer Brandenburg, P.E. The authors especially thank those who were instrumental in assisting with the project. Matthew Hilderbran of the State Road Management Unit provided database instruction for the current GIS implementation program conducted by NCDOT and conducted a pilot data collection effort.

References

Barcena, R., and Speir, R. (2006). “Asset inventory system: Pilot study.”, Applied Research Associates, Incorporated, Maryland State Highway Administration.
Blaine, T., Braden, C., and Komogorova, T. (1999). “Integration of GIS and GPS technologies for automated maintenance of traffic control signs.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Findley, D., Cunningham, C., and Hummer, J. (2011). “Comparison of mobile and manual data collection for roadway components.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol., 19(3), 521–540.
Findley, D. J., Hummer, J. E., Rasdorf, W., and Laton, B. T. (2013). “Collecting horizontal curve data: Mobile asset vehicles and other techniques.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 74–84.
Fugro Roadware. (2013). “ARAN automated road analyzer vehicle picture obtained from Fugro on February 14, 2013 via email.”
Harkey, D. L., Yi, C., and Feaganes, J. (2004). “Evaluation and validation of automated in-vehicle data collection system for developing roadway alignments.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 164–172.
Hawkins, N., Smadi, O., Hans, Z., and Resler, J. (2007). “Sign inventory: Legacy versus new technology.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Hummer, J. E., Karimi, H. A., and Khattak, A. J. (2000). “New and existing roadway inventory data acquisition methods.” J. Transp. Stat., 3(3), 33–46.
Immaneni, V. P., Rasdorf, W., Hummer, J. E., and Yeom, C. (2006). “Field investigation of sign damage rates and inspection accuracy.” Public Works Manage. Policy, 11(4), 266–278.
Johnson, R. A. (1994). Miller and Freund’s probability and statistics for engineers, 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Jones, F. E., Jr. (2004). “GPS-based sign inventory and inspection program.” IMSA J., 42(2), 30–35.
Karimi, H. A., Khattak, A. J., and Hummer, J. E. (2000). “Evaluation of mobile mapping systems for roadway data collection.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 168–173.
Khattak, A. J., Hummer, J. E., and Karimi, H. A. (2001). “Evaluation of roadway infrastructure data collection technologies.” Public Works Manage. Policy, 6(1), 18–31.
Kingston, T., and Laflamme, C. (2007). “Advances in asset management: Automated road sign detection and recognition.” IMSA J., 45(1), 46–49.
Lumia, J. J. (1989). “Mobile system for measuring the retroreflectance of traffic signs.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 69–78.
Maerz, N. H., and McKenna, S. (1999). “SURVEYOR: Mobile highway inventory and measurement system.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 135–142.
Maerz, N. H., and Niu, Q. (2003a). “Automated mobile highway sign retroreflectivity measurement.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Maerz, N. H., and Niu, Q. (2003b). “Automated mobile highway sign visibility measurement system.” Transportation Research Board 82nd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
MUTCD. (2009). “Manual on uniform traffic control devices.” Federal Highway Administration, USDOT.
NCDOT (North Carolina Department of Transportation). (2012). NCDOT maintenance condition assessment manual, Raleigh, NC.
NC OneMap. (2012). “NC orthoimagery program.” 〈www.nconemap.com/OrthoimageryforNorthCarolina.aspx〉 (Jan. 17, 2013).
Pardillo-Mayora, J. M., and Hatzi, P. J. (1996). “Laserlux mobile retroreflectometer operational testing results.”, Federal Highway Administration.
Pathway Services. (2013). “PathRunner vehicle picture obtained from pathway services on February 14, 2013 via email.”
Schwarz, K. P., Martell, H. E., El-Sheimy, N., Li, R., Chapman, M. A., and Cosandier, D. (1993). “VIASATA mobile highway survey system of high accuracy.” Proc., Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conf., IEEE-IEE, IEEE, Ottawa, 476–481.
Shahin, M. Y., and Collins, F. (2007). “Roughness measurement and analysis.” Pavement management for airports, roads, and parking lots, Springer, New York.
Shamayleh, H., and Khattak, A. (2003). “Utilization of LiDAR technology for highway inventory.” Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symp., Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
Sitzabee, W. E. (2008). “A longitudinal asset management study through an analysis of pavement marking performance.” Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC.
Smith, K., and Fletcher, A. (2001). “Evaluation of the FHWA’s sign management and retroreflectivity tracking system (SMARTS) van.”, Alaska Dept. of Transportation, Juneau, AK.
Stratakos, J., Gikas, V., and Fragos, K. (2009). “A multi-scale curve matching technique for the assessment of road alignments using GPS/INS data.” 6th Int. Symp. on Mobile Mapping Technology, National Technical School of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Toth, C., and Grejner-Brzezinska, D. A. (2004). “Redefining the paradigm of modern mobile mapping: An automated high-precision road centerline mapping system.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 70(6), 685–694.
Underwood, B. S., Kim, Y. R., and Corley-Lay, J. (2011). “Assessment of use of automated distress survey methods for network-level pavement management.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 250–258.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 22Issue 1March 2016

History

Received: Mar 12, 2014
Accepted: Apr 28, 2015
Published online: Aug 21, 2015
Discussion open until: Jan 21, 2016
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christopher M. Cunningham [email protected]
P.E.
Program Manager, Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State Univ., Centennial Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Daniel J. Findley, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Senior Research Associate, Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State Univ., Centennial Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601. E-mail: [email protected]
Kyle Hovey, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student Teaching Assistant & E.I., Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State Univ., Centennial Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601. E-mail: [email protected]
Paul “Burke” Foley [email protected]
Research Associate, Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State Univ., Centennial Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601. E-mail: [email protected]
Jessica Smith, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Communications and Public Involvement Director, CRW Engineering Group, LLC, 3940 Arctic Blvd. #300, Anchorage, AK 99503. E-mail: [email protected]
Tyler Fowler, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Transportation Engineer & E.I., Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State Univ., Centennial Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601. E-mail: [email protected]
Technical Specialist, Parsons Brinckerhoff, 434 Fayetteville St., Raleigh, NC 27601. E-mail: [email protected]
Jonathan Arnold [email protected]
P.E.
Operations and Maintenance Manager, North Carolina Dept. of Transportation, Raleigh, NC 27695. E-mail: [email protected]
Joseph E. Hummer, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor & Chair, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State Univ., Detroit, MI 48202. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share