Technical Papers
Jun 24, 2024

Gowanus Canal Superfund Site. VII: Rapid Verification of Organoclay–Sand Capping Blends

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 28, Issue 4

Abstract

At the Gowanus Canal Superfund site in Brooklyn, New York, a multilayer reactive capping system is required as part of the approved remedy. The base reactive layer is an organoclay (OC)–sand layer containing a minimum of 25% by dry weight OC that is intended to block any upwelling mobile nonaqueous phase liquids (NAPLs). The construction quality assurance (CQA) method for verifying the OC content of the OC–sand stockpiles prior to placement in the canal consists of Loss on Ignition (LOI) testing performed at an offsite laboratory with a turnaround time of 3 days. To mitigate construction delays, rapid field testing methods to verify the OC content of the OC–sand blends were sought. Interestingly, electrical conductivity (EC) measurements on the as-is (not sieved or pulverized) OC, sand, and their blends provided several correlations with goodness of fit (R2) values >0.95 for a variety of sand-sized materials including: a commercial playground sand, beach sand, a limestone quarry sourced sand, and the sediment capping sand from the first Remedial Target Area (RTA-1) at the Gowanus Canal. The correlation curves and R2 values were relatively insensitive to change in the sand borrow source (silicate or karst geology or salinity). EC measurements were available in as little as 30 min and up to approximately 24 h using a tabletop pH/EC probe, distilled water, beaker, and magnetic stirrer. The EC approach and preliminary correlations presented here can greatly reduce CQA testing turnaround times to within hours (not days) in field settings. Lastly, similar findings were made when another commercially modified bentonite clay known as Fluorosorb-400™ was blended with playground sand.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This work was completed using internal funds provided by Jacobs, and with materials and research support by CETCO (Hoffman Estates, IL). The limestone sand was provided by Chad Biggs and Adam Cerepa of Ozinga (Mokena, IL) from the Thornton (IL) quarry. The Gowanus Canal CQA samples and data included in this paper were shared by USEPA under USACE contract number W912DQ-18-D-3009 (Task No. W912DQ-20-F-3042) while Christos Tsiamis was the EPA Region II Remedial Project Manager overseeing the Gowanus Canal remedial design and construction. Geosyntec (on behalf of the PRP Group) provided the CQA samples and their respective LOI data. Thanks to Drs. D. Himmelheber and D. Meric of Geosyntec for providing the background information on the OC reagent (over)dosing approach and calculations. SME (Kalamazoo, MI) completed all LOI testing included herein. The reference to any commercial product names is solely for identification purposes, no endorsement is implied by the authors. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jacobs, CETCO, USEPA, and/or USACE.

References

Abu-Hassanein, Z. S., C. H. Benson, X. Wang, and L. R. Blotz. 1996. “Determining bentonite content in soil-bentonite mixtures using electrical conductivity.” Geotech. Test. J. 19 (1): 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11407J.
Akbulut, S., Z. N. Kurt, and S. Arasan. 2010. “Electrokinetic properties of surfactant modified clays.” Int. J. Civ. Struct. Eng. 1 (3): 354–361.
Amente, G., J. M. Baker, and C. F. Reece. 2000. “Estimation of soil solution electrical conductivity from bulk soil electrical conductivity in sandy soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64 (6): 1931–1939. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6461931x.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. ASTM D2216-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test methods for moisture, Ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. ASTM D2974-20e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
B&B Engineers & Geologists. 2020. RTA1 100% remedial design report, Gowanus Canal Superfund Site, Brooklyn, New York. Project No. HPH106A. Kennesaw, GA: B&B Engineers & Geologists.
Choo, H., J. Park, T. T. Do, and C. Lee. 2022. “Estimating the electrical conductivity of clayey soils with varying mineralogy using the index properties of soils.” Appl. Clay Sci. 217: 106388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2021.106388.
Choo, H., J. Song, W. Lee, and C. Lee. 2016. “Effects of clay fraction and pore water conductivity on electrical conductivity of sand-kaolinite mixed soils.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 147: 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.009.
CETCO (Colloidal Environmental Technologies Company). 2023a. Data sheet: Organoclay PM-200: Organic adsorption media. Form TDS_ORGANOCLAY_PM—200_AM_EN-201903_V3. Hoffman Estates, IL: CETCO.
CETCO (Colloidal Environmental Technologies Company). 2023b. Data sheet: Fluoro-sorb™ 200 & 400 adsorbents: Adsorption media for the remediation and removal of PFAS. Form technical data sheet FLUORO-SORB™ 200 & 400 adsorbents_ adsorption media for the remediation and removal of PFAS_NA_EN_03202023_V1. Hoffman Estates, IL: CETCO.
Gee, G. L., D. G. Grubb, J. L. Gentry, C. D. Tsiamis, and J. Hess. 2022. “Gowanus canal superfund site. IV: Delineation of potentially migrating NAPL layers for ISS treatment.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 26 (3): 04022020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000707.
Gentry, J. L., M. R. Niemet, D. G. Grubb, M. Bruno, D. R. Berggren, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2014. “Gowanus canal superfund site. II: Stabilization/solidification of MGP-impacted sediments.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 19 (1): C4014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000252.
Grubb, D. G., T. M. Himmer, J. L. Gentry, A. J. Salter-Blanc, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2020. “Gowanus canal superfund site. III: Leaching of in situ stabilization/solidification mix designs.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 24 (4): 04020045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000532.
Grubb, D. G., D. R. Berggren, R. W. Shannon, B. K. Schroth, C. D. Tsiamis, and J. Hess. 2023. “Gowanus canal superfund site. V: Evaluation of ISS cylinder sample crusts formed during EPA 1315M testing.” J. Hazardous Toxic Radioact. Waste 27 (3): 04023015. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1208.
Gürses, A., S. Karaca, M. Açikyildiz, and M. Ejder. 2009. “Thermodynamics and mechanism of cetyltrimethylammonium adsorption onto clayey soil from aqueous solutions.” Chem. Eng. J. 147 (2–3): 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.07.001.
Hamdan, N., D. G. Grubb, D. L. Adams, A. B. Judd, C. D. Tsiamis, and J. Hess. 2024a. “Gowanus canal superfund site. VI: Rapid field screening techniques to verify sediment capping blends.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 28 (1): 04023045. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1282.
Hamdan, N., D. G. Grubb, D. L. Adams, A. B. Judd, C. D. Tsiamis, and J. Hess. 2024b. Erratum for “Gowanus canal superfund site. VI: Rapid field screening techniques to verify sediment capping blends.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 28 (4): 08224001.
Heil, K., and U. Schmidhalter. 2012. “Characterisation of soil texture variability using the apparent soil electrical conductivity at a highly variable site.” Comput. Geosci. 39: 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.06.017.
Kaufhold, S., R. Dohrmann, M. Klinkenberg, and U. Noell. 2015. “Electrical conductivity of bentonites.” Appl. Clay Sci. 114: 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.05.032.
Lee, S., A. H. Ören, C. H. Benson, and K. Dovantzis. 2012. “Organoclays as variably permeable reactive barrier media to manage NAPLs in ground water.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (2): 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000572.
Liu, S. Y., Y. J. Du, L. H. Han, and M. F. Gu. 2008. “Experimental study on the electrical resistivity of soil–cement admixtures.” Environ. Geol. 54 (6): 1227–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0905-5.
Lund, E. D., C. D. Christy, and P. E. Drummond. 1999. “Practical applications of soil electrical conductivity mapping.” Precis. Agric. 99: 771–779.
Niemet, M. R., Gentry, J. L., Bruno, M., Berggren, D. R., and C.D. Tsiamis. 2014. “Gowanus canal superfund site. I: NAPL mobility testing of MGP-impacted sediments.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 19(1), C4014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000251.
Ng, Y. C., H. Y. Kek, X. Hu, L. N. Wong, S. Teo, T. Ku, and F. H. Lee. 2022. “An approach for characterising electrical conductivity of cement-admixed clays.” Soils Found. 62 (2): 101127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101127.
Olean, T. J., J. L. Gentry, A. J. Salter-Blanc, T. M. Himmer, M. Bruno, and C. D. Tsiamis. 2016. “In-canal stabilization/solidification of NAPL-impacted sediments.” Rem. J. 26 (3): 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21467.
Revil, A., et al. 2017. “Complex conductivity of soils.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (8): 7121–7147. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020655.
Reyes, J., O. Wendroth, C. Matocha, J. Zhu, W. Ren, and A. D. Karathanasis. 2018. “Reliably mapping clay content coregionalized with electrical conductivity.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 82 (3): 578–592. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.09.0327.
USEPA. 2013. Record of decision, Gowanus Canal Superfund Site, Brooklyn, Kings, County. New York: USEPA.
USEPA. 2017a. SW-846 test method 1313: Liquid–solid partitioning as a function of extract pH using a parallel batch extraction procedure. Test methods for evaluating solid waste: Physical/chemical methods SW-846 method 1313, version 1. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2017b. SW-846 test method 1316: Liquid-solid partitioning as a function of liquid-to-solid ratio in solid materials using a parallel batch procedure. Test methods for evaluating solid waste: Physical/chemical methods SW-846 method 1316, version 1. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Yoo, D. J., M. Oh, Y. S. Kim, and J. Park. 2009. “Influences of solution and mixed soil on estimating bentonite content in slurry using electrical conductivity.” Appl. Clay Sci. 43 (3-4): 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2008.12.004.
Zhao, Q., H. Choo, A. Bhatt, S. E. Burns, and B. Bate. 2017. “Review of the fundamental geochemical and physical behaviors of organoclays in barrier applications.” Appl. Clay Sci. 142: 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.11.024.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 28Issue 4October 2024

History

Received: Feb 6, 2024
Accepted: Apr 22, 2024
Published online: Jun 24, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 24, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alyssa B. Lampi
Environmental Scientist, Technologist, Jacobs Engineering, Inc., 1100 NE Circle Blvd., Suite 300, Corvallis, OR 97330.
Dennis G. Grubb, F.ASCE [email protected]
Technology Fellow, Jacobs Engineering, Inc., 2001 Market St., Suite 900, Philadelphia, PA 19103 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Senior Consultant, Jacobs Engineering, Inc., 1501 W. Fountainhead Parkway, Suite 401, Tempe, AZ 85282. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-9514.
Dusty R. V. Berggren
Technologist, Jacobs Engineering, Inc., 1100 NE Circle Blvd., Suite 300, Corvallis, OR 97330.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share