Abstract
This paper presents observations on clear-water and live-bed contraction scour caused by subcritical flow along a large rectangular channel. Three contraction ratios (contraction width/approach–channel width) were used: 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75. Each ratio included a 45° transition linking the contraction to the approach channel. Contractions scour relates to three categories of contraction length: length shorter than flow-separation length at contraction entrance, length exceeds flow-separation length, and length is sufficiently long to develop uniform flow in contraction. Flow-choking was avoided. The experiments focused on the second category, herein termed intermediate-length contractions. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) scans showed that maximum scour depths occurred at a flow vena contracta (formed within the contraction entrance), the entrance corners, and the contraction exit. The observed sour depth in the vena contracta exceeded the depths estimated using the existing HEC-18 equations for contraction-scour. The deepest scour occurred at entrance corners except for the smallest ratio, which produced a step scour.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all of the data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data include bed profiles (LiDAR scans), water-surface profiles, and flow velocities.
Acknowledgments
The writers thank Pete Lagasse, Paul Clopper, Will DeRosset, and Scott Zey (all at Ayres Associates) and the Panel for Project 24-47 (Revised Clear-Water And Live-Bed Contraction Scour Analysis) of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program for suggestions about the experiments, which the writers conducted for Ayres.
References
Arneson, L. A., L. W. Zevenbergen, P. F. Lagasse, and P. E. Clopper. 2012. HEC 18: Evaluating scour at bridges. Washington, DC: Hydraulic Engineering Circular, Federal Highway Administration, USDOT.
ASCE. 2000. Hydraulic modeling: Concepts and practice. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ashida, K. 1963. Study on the stable channel through constrictions. Kyoto, Japan: Research Instituto, Kyoto Univ.
Benedict, S. T., and A. W. Caldwell. 2009. Development and evaluation of live-bed pier- and contraction-scour envelope curves in the coastal plain and piedmont provinces of South Carolina. Reston, VA: USGS, US Dept. of Interior.
Dey, S., and R. V. Raikar. 2005. “Scour in long contractions.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 131 (12): 1036–1049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:12(1036).
Fakhri, A. 2020. “Applications of large-scale particle velocimetry to entrance flows.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ.
French, R. H. 1985. Open-channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gill, M. A. 1981. “Bed erosion in rectangular long contractions.” J. Hydraulics Div. 107 (3): 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0005626.
Guy, H. P., D. B. Simons, and E. V. Richardson. 1966. Summary of alluvial channel data from flume experiments, 1956–61. Washington, DC: USGS.
Komura, S. 1966. “Equilibrium depth of scour in long contractions.” J. Hydraulics Div. 92 (5): 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0001504.
Lagasse, P., R. Ettema, W. DeRosset, A. Nowroozpour, and P. Clopper. 2020. Revised clear-water and live-bed contraction scour analysis. Washington, DC: National Transportation Board.
Laursen, E. M. 1960. “Scour at bridge crossings.” J. Hydraulics Div. 86 (2): 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0000426.
Laursen, E. M. 1963. “An analysis of relief bridge scour.” J. Hydraulics Div. 89 (3): 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0000896.
Laursen, E. M., and A. J. Alawi. 1989. “The effects of velocity on scour.” In Proc., of the Int. Symp.: Sediment Transport Modeling, 441–455. New York: ASCE.
Munson, B. R., D. Y. Young, T. H. Okiishi, and W. W. Huebsch. 2009. Fundamentals of fluid mechanics. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Nowroozpour, A. 2020. “Observations from a series of flume experiments on contraction scour along a rectangular channel.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ.
Rosgen, D. L., and H. L. Silvey. 1996. Applied river morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology.
Siefken, S., R. Ettema, A. Posner, D. Baird, N. Holste, D. Dombroski, and R. Padilla. 2021. “Optimal configuration of rock vanes and bendway weirs for river bends: Numerical-model insights.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 147 (4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001871.
Solan, B., R. Ettema, D. Ryan, G. Hamill. 2020. “Scour concerns at short-span masonry arch bridges.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 146 (2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001675.
Straub, L. G. 1934. “Effect of channel-contraction works upon regimen of movable bed-streams.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 15 (2): 454–463.
Sturm, T. W. 2001. Open channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sturm, T. W., I. Abid, B. W. Meville, X. Xiong, T. Stoesser, B. F. Bugllo, K. V. Chua, S. Abt, and S. Hong. 2018. Combining individual scour components to determine total scour. Washington, DC: National Transportation Board.
USACE. 1990. Hydraulic design of spillways. Washington, DC: USACE, US Dept. of the Army.
USBR (US Bureau of Reclamation). 1987. Design of small dams. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Reclamation, US Dept. of the Interior.
Webby, M. G. 1984. “General scour at a long contraction.” In Proc., Bridge Design and Research Seminar, 109–118. Wellington, New Zealand: Road Research Unit, Ministry of Works.
Weise, S. 2002. “Verifikation eines zweidimensionalen feststofftransportmodells anhand von hydraulischen versuchen.” Diplomarbeit, Fachhochschule für Technik, Wirtschaft und Kultur, Tiefbau Abteilung.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 30, 2020
Accepted: Mar 15, 2021
Published online: Jun 2, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 2, 2021
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Channel flow
- Channels (waterway)
- Computer vision and image processing
- Engineering fundamentals
- Flow (fluid dynamics)
- Flow separation
- Fluid dynamics
- Fluid mechanics
- Hydraulic contraction
- Hydraulic engineering
- Hydraulic properties
- Hydraulic structures
- Hydraulics
- Hydrologic engineering
- Methodology (by type)
- Open channel flow
- Scour
- Subcritical flow
- Uniform flow
- Water and water resources
- Waterways
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Alireza Nowroozpour, Robert Ettema, Alireza Fakhri, A Reassessment of Contraction Scour at Bridge Waterways, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0002031, 148, 12, (2022).