Labyrinth Weirs with Angled Approach Flow
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 12
Abstract
Current design methods and research have primarily investigated the hydraulic characteristics of labyrinth weirs when the approach flow is perpendicular to the weir axis, a condition consistent with most in-channel and in-reservoir applications where the approach velocity is negligible. In some cases, a perpendicular approach flow and weir axis alignment may not be possible. The head–discharge characteristics of a four-cycle, 15° labyrinth weir with a channelized approach flow were evaluated with three different approach flow angles (0°, 15°, and 45°) using laboratory-scale physical models. Although the data presented are specific to the geometry of the weir and channels tested, they provide a general indication of variations in discharge efficiency as a function of approach flow angle. The experimental data were also compared with the head–discharge characteristics of a prototype labyrinth weir model study that featured significant approach flow angles. For approach flow angles under 15°, no measurable loss in discharge efficiency occurred, relative to an approach flow angle of 0°. The discharge efficiency reduced by as much as 11% for the 45° approach flow angle case. Flow instability was observed downstream of the weir, producing unique flow patterns in the labyrinth cycles and on the spillway apron.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Amanian, N. 1987. “Performance and design of labyrinth spillways.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ.
Carollo, F., V. Ferro, and V. Pampalone. 2012. “Experimental investigation of the outflow process over a triangular labyrinth weir.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 138 (1): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000366.
Crookston, B. M. 2010. “Labyrinth weirs.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ.
Crookston, B. M., and B. P. Tullis. 2012a. “Arced labyrinth weirs.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 138 (6): 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000553.
Crookston, B. M., and B. P. Tullis. 2012b. “Discharge efficiency of reservoir-application-specific labyrinth weirs.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 138 (6): 564–568. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000451.
Crookston, B. M., and B. P. Tullis. 2013a. “Hydraulic design and analysis of labyrinth weirs. 1: Discharge relationships.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 139 (5): 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000558.
Crookston, B. M., and B. P. Tullis. 2013b. “Hydraulic design and analysis of labyrinth weirs. 2: Nappe aeration, instability, and vibration.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 139 (5): 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000553.
Dabling, M. R. 2014. “Nonlinear weir hydraulics.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2189.
Erpicum, S., B. P. Tullis, M. Lodomez, P. Archambeau, J. Benjamin, B. Dewals, and M. Pirotton. 2016. “Scale effects in physical piano key weirs models.” J. Hydraul. Res. 54 (6): 692–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2016.1211562.
Falvey, H. 2003. Hydraulic design of labyrinth weirs. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hay, N., and G. Taylor. 1970. “Performance and design of labyrinth weirs.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 96 (11): 2337–2357.
Henderson, F. M. 1966. “Channel controls.” Open channel flow, 174–175. Gene Nordby, New York: Macmillan.
Khode, B., A. Tembhurkar, P. Porey, and R. Ingles. 2012. “Experimental studies on flow over labyrinth weir.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 138 (6): 548–552. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000336.
Pfister, M., G. Battisacco, D. Cesare, and A. Schleiss. 2013. “Scale effects related to the rating curve of cylindrically crested piano key weirs.” Labyrinth and piano key weirs II, 73–82. London: CRC Press.
Sangsefili, Y., M. Mehraein, M. Ghodsian, and M. Motalebizadeh. 2017. “Evaluation and analysis of flow over arced weirs using traditional and response surface methodologies.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 143 (11): 04017048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001377.
Savage, B. M., B. M. Crookston, and G. S. Paxson. 2016. “Physical and numerical modeling of large headwater ratios for a 15° labyrinth spillway.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 142 (11): 04016046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001186.
Tullis, P., N. Amanian, and D. Waldron. 1995. “Design of labyrinth weir spillways.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 121 (3): 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1995)121:3(247).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 1, 2018
Accepted: Jun 15, 2018
Published online: Oct 8, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Mar 8, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.