Abstract

The relative importance of small-scale, intrajunction flow features such as shear layers, separation zones, and secondary flows on dispersion in a well-mixed tidal river junction is explored. A fully nonlinear, nonhydrostatic, and unstructured three-dimensional (3D) model is used to resolve supertidal dispersion via scalar transport at a well-mixed tidal river junction. Mass transport simulated in the junction is compared against predictions using a simple node-channel model to quantify the effects of small-scale, 3D intrajunction flow features on mixing and dispersion. The effects of three-dimensionality are demonstrated by quantifying the difference between two-dimensional (2D) and 3D model results. An intermediate 3D model that does not resolve the secondary circulation or the recirculating flow at the junction is also compared to the 3D model to quantify the relative sensitivity of mixing on intrajunction flow features. Resolution of complex flow features simulated by the full 3D model is not always necessary because mixing is primarily governed by bulk flow splitting due to the confluence–diffluence cycle. Results in 3D are comparable to the 2D case for many flow pathways simulated, suggesting that 2D modeling may be reasonable for nonstratified and predominantly hydrostatic flows through relatively straight junctions, but not necessarily for the full junction network.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Support for this research was provided by the Delta Science Program and by the Department of Defense through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG) Program. Special thanks to Jon Burau and the USGS California Water Science Center team for their help in the field. USGS/DWR discharge, stage, and bathymetry data was generously provided by Patricia Orlando (USGS), Brad J Sullivan (USGS), Joel Dudas (DWR), and Wyatt Pearsall (DWR). Advice of EMFL colleagues Sean Vitousek, Bobby Arthur, Matt Rayson, Joel Weitzman, and Ed Gross was invaluable in conducting this study. The authors also thank two anonymous reviewers, an anonymous Associate Editor, and Chief Editor Prof. Thanos Papanicolaou whose comments greatly improved the quality of the manuscript.

References

Best, J., and Roy, A. (1991). “Mixing-layer distortion at the confluence of channels of different depth.” Nature, 350(6317), 411–413.
Biron, P. M., Ramamurthy, A. S., and Han, S. (2004). “Three-dimensional numerical modeling of mixing at river confluences.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 243–253.
Bradbrook, K., Lane, S., Richards, K., Biron, P., and Roy, A. (2001). “Role of bed discordance at asymmetrical river confluences.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 351–368.
CA DWR (California Department of Water Resources) (1998). “Delta simulation model II-DSM2.” 〈http://baydeltaoffice.water.ca.gov/modeling/ deltamodeling/models/dsm2/dsm2.cfm〉 (Feb. 1, 2016).
CA DWR (California Department of Water Resources). (2012). “Methodology for flow and salinity estimates in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta and Suisun Marsh.”, Bay-Delta Office, Delta Modeling Section, Sacramento, CA.
Casulli, V., and Walters, R. (2000). “An unstructured grid, three-dimensional model based on the shallow water equations.” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 32(3), 331–348.
Casulli, V., and Zanolli, P. (2002). “Semi-implicit numerical modeling of nonhydrostatic free-surface flows for environmental problems.” Math. Comput. Modell., 36(9), 1131–1149.
Chua, V., and Fringer, O. (2011). “Sensitivity analysis of three-dimensional salinity simulations in North San Francisco Bay using the unstructured-grid SUNTANS model.” Ocean Modell., 39(3–4), 332–350.
Crow, E. L., Davis, F. A., and Maxfield, M. W. (1960). Statistics manual, Dover, New York.
Fischer, H. (1973). “Longitudinal dispersion and turbulent mixing in open-channel flow.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 5(1), 59–78.
Fringer, O., Gerritsen, M., and Street, R. (2006). “An unstructured-grid, finite-volume, nonhydrostatic, parallel coastal ocean simulator.” Ocean Modell., 14(3), 139–173.
Fringer, O. B. (2006). “SUNTANS source code.” 〈https://github.com/ofringer/suntans〉 (Feb. 1, 2016).
Gleichauf, K., Wolfram, P., Monsen, N. E., Fringer, O., and Monismith, S. (2014). “Dispersion mechanisms of a tidal river junction in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta, California.” San Francisco Estuary Watershed Sci., 12(1–23), in press.
Gross, E. S., Koseff, J. R., and Monismith, S. G. (1999). “Three-dimensional salinity simulations of South San Francisco Bay.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 1199–1209.
Kalkwijk, J., and Booij, R. (1986). “Adaptation of secondary flow in nearly-horizontal flow.” J. Hydraul. Res., 24(1), 19–37.
Kimmerer, W., and Nobriga, M. (2008). “Investigating particle transport and fate in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta using a particle tracking model.” San Francisco Estuary Watershed Sci., 6(1), 1–26.
Lacy, J., and Monismith, S. (2001). “Secondary currents in a curved, stratified, estuarine channel.” J. Geophys. Res., 106(C12), 31283.
MacWilliams, M. L., Bever, A. J., Gross, E. S., Ketefian, G. S., and Kimmerer, W. J. (2015). “Three-dimensional modeling of hydro dynamics and salinity in the San Francisco estuary: An evaluation of model accuracy, X2, and the low-salinity zone.” San Francisco Estuary Watershed Sci., 13(1), 1–37.
Mellor, G. L., and Yamada, T. (1982). “Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems.” Rev. Geophys., 20(4), 851–875.
Monismith, S. G., et al. (2009). “Thermal variability in a tidal river.” Estuaries Coasts, 32(1), 100–110.
Murphy, A., and Epstein, E. (1989). “Skill scores and correlation coefficients in model verification.” Mon. Weather Rev., 117(3), 572–582.
Murphy, A. H. (1988). “Skill scores based on the mean square error and their relationships to the correlation coefficient.” Mon. Weather Rev., 116(12), 2417–2424.
Navidi, W. (2006). Statistics for engineers and scientists, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Neary, V., and Sotiropoulos, F. (1996). “Numerical investigation of laminar flows through 90-degree diversions of rectangular cross-section.” Comput. Fluids, 25(2), 95–118.
Nidzieko, N. J., Hench, J. L., and Monismith, S. G. (2009). “Lateral circulation in well-mixed and stratified estuarine flows with curvature.” J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39(4), 831–851.
Ralston, D. K., Geyer, W. R., and Lerczak, J. A. (2010). “Structure, variability, and salt flux in a strongly forced salt wedge estuary.” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 115(C6).
Ramamurthy, A., Qu, J., and Vo, D. (2007). “Numerical and experimental study of dividing open-channel flows.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 1135–1144.
Signell, R. P., and Butman, B. (1992). “Modeling tidal exchange and dispersion in Boston Harbor.” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 97(C10), 15591–15606.
Smith, R., and Daish, N. (1991). “Dispersion far downstream of a river junction.” Phys. Fluids A, 3(5), 1102.
Wang, B., Fringer, O., Giddings, S., and Fong, D. (2009). “High-resolution simulations of a macrotidal estuary using SUNTANS.” Ocean Modell., 28(1–3), 167–192.
Wang, B., Giddings, S., Fringer, O., Gross, E., Fong, D., and Monismith, S. (2011). “Modeling and understanding turbulent mixing in a macrotidal salt wedge estuary.” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 116(C2), in press.
Warner, J. C., Sherwood, C. R., Arango, H. G., and Signell, R. P. (2005). “Performance of four turbulence closure models implemented using a generic length scale method.” Ocean Modell., 8(1), 81–113.
Weber, L., Schumate, E., and Mawer, N. (2001). “Experiments on flow at a 90-degree open-channel junction.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 340–350.
Wolfram, P., and Fringer, O. (2013). “Mitigating horizontal divergence “checker-board” oscillations on unstructured triangular C-grids for nonlinear hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic flows.” Ocean Modell., 69, 64–78.
Wolfram, P. J. (2013). “Secondary flows and dispersion in channel junctions.” Ph.D. thesis, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 142Issue 8August 2016

History

Received: Nov 3, 2014
Accepted: Sep 16, 2015
Published online: Apr 6, 2016
Published in print: Aug 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Sep 6, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Phillip J. Wolfram [email protected]
Research Assistant, Bob and Norma Street Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory (EFML), Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305; Postdoctoral Research Associate, Climate, Ocean and Sea Ice Modeling (T-3), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87544 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Oliver B. Fringer [email protected]
Associate Professor, Bob and Norma Street Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory (EFML), Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: [email protected]
Nancy E. Monsen [email protected]
Research Associate, Bob and Norma Street Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: [email protected]
Karla T. Gleichauf [email protected]
Research Assistant, Bob and Norma Street Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory (EFML), Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: [email protected]
Derek A. Fong, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Senior Research Engineer and Lecturer, Bob and Norma Street Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory (EFML), Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: [email protected]
Stephen G. Monismith, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Bob and Norma Street Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory (EFML), Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share