Technical Papers
Jan 19, 2023

Probabilistic Conditioning and Recalibration of an Event-Based Flood Forecasting Model Using Real-Time Streamflow Observations

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 4

Abstract

Flood warnings provide information about the timing and magnitude of impending floods, which can help mitigate the adverse impacts of flooding. Flood forecasts are highly influenced by uncertainty associated with rainfall forecasts as well as initial catchment wetness. Event-based models are simple and parsimonious and are widely favored by practitioners for flood estimation. However, these models require loss parameters to be manually specified for each simulated event, and this represents an additional source of uncertainty that needs to be considered along with errors in observations and rainfall forecasts. Little attention has been given to the coupling of updating techniques with event-based models to reduce the uncertainty associated with catchment wetness. To this end, we devised a sequential recalibration scheme to characterize uncertainty in ensemble forecasts derived using an event-based flood model. This scheme uses information on both observation and model errors to filter and update catchment loss estimates to improve the accuracy of the forecasts. Analysis of flood forecasts for 22 events showed that although initially, there was low skill in forecasts derived solely from external estimates of catchment wetness, the reliability and accuracy of the forecasts improved rapidly once the flood event commenced and the flood model was coupled with an updating scheme. Compared with forecasts made without any updating scheme, the conditioning and recalibration steps progressively improved the accuracy of the forecasts as measured by Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency from 0.14 to 0.88, bias was reduced by 78%, and root-mean square error reduced by 67%. The use of such schemes thus reinforces the advantages of using parsimonious models that have long been favored by practitioners for design and other purposes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciatively acknowledge the financial support provided by the Australian Research Training Program (RTP) to fund the first author’s Ph.D. scholarship. Also, the authors acknowledge the availability of rainfall and streamflow data provided by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. The daily and pluviograph rainfall data may be freely downloaded from http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/, and the streamflow data from http://www.bom.gov.au/waterdata/. Forecast data are freely available to registered users by contacting [email protected].

References

Ajmal, M., M. Waseem, J. H. Ahn, and T. W. Kim. 2015. “Improved runoff estimation using event-based rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Manage. 29 (6): 1995–2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0924-z.
Bahramian, K., R. Nathan, A. W. Western, and D. Ryu. 2021. “Towards an ensemble-based short-term flood forecasting using an event-based flood model-incorporating catchment-average estimates of soil moisture.” J. Hydrol. 593 (Dec): 125828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125828.
Berezowski, T., and A. Chybicki. 2018. “High-resolution discharge forecasting for snowmelt and rainfall mixed events.” Water 10 (1): 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010056.
Bergeron, J. M., M. Trudel, and R. Leconte. 2016. “Combined assimilation of streamflow and snow water equivalent for mid-term ensemble streamflow forecasts in snow-dominated regions.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20 (10): 4375–4389. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4375-2016.
Berthet, L., V. Andréassian, C. Perrin, and P. Javelle. 2009. “How crucial is it to account for the Antecedent Moisture Conditions in flood forecasting? Comparison of event-based and continuous approaches on 178 catchments.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 6 (2): 1707–1736. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-819-2009.
Box, G. E. P., and D. R. Cox. 1964. “An analysis of transformations.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 26 (2): 211–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x.
Calvo, B., and F. Savi. 2009. “Real-time flood forecasting of the Tiber river in Rome.” Nat. Hazard. 50 (3): 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9312-9.
Candille, G., and O. Talagrand. 2005. “Evaluation of probabilistic prediction systems for a scalar variable.” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131 (609): 2131–2150. https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.71.
Chifflard, P., J. Kranl, G. Strassen, and H. Zepp. 2018. “The significance of soil moisture in forecasting characteristics of flood events. A statistical analysis in two nested catchments.” J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 66 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2017-0037.
Clark, M. P., D. E. Rupp, R. A. Woods, X. Zheng, R. P. Ibbitt, A. G. Slater, J. Schmidt, and M. J. Uddstrom. 2008. “Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model.” Adv. Water Resour. 31 (10): 1309–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.06.005.
Coustau, M., S. Ricci, V. Borrell-Estupina, C. Bouvier, M. Coustau, S. Ricci, V. Borrell-estupina, C. Bouvier, and O. T. Bene. 2013. “Benefits and limitations of data assimilation for discharge forecasting using an event-based rainfall-runoff model.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (5): 583–596. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-583-2013.
Da Ros, D., and M. Borga. 1997. “Adaptive use of a conceptual model for real time flood forecasting.” Nord. Hydrol. 28 (3): 169–188. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.1997.0010.
Dechant, C., and H. Moradkhani. 2011. “Radiance data assimilation for operational snow and streamflow forecasting.” Adv. Water Resour. 34 (3): 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.12.009.
Dechant, C. M., and H. Moradkhani. 2012. “Examining the effectiveness and robustness of sequential data assimilation methods for quantification of uncertainty in hydrologic forecasting.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (Apr): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011011.
Evensen, G. 1994. “Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics.” J. Geophys. Res. 99 (5): 10143–10162. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC00572.
Frost, A. J., A. Ramchurn, and A. Smith. 2018. The Australian landscape water balance model (AWRA-L v6). Melbourne, Australia: Bureau of Meteorology.
Harader, E., V. Borrell Estupina, S. Ricci, M. Coustau, O. Thual, A. Piacentini, and C. Bouvier. 2012. “Correcting the radar rainfall forcing of a hydrological model with data assimilation: Application to flood forecasting in the Lez catchment in Southern France.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012 (1): 4247–4264. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4247-2012.
Huang, J., Y. Chan, and K. T. Lee. 2016. “Real-time flood forecasting system: Case study of Hsia-Yun Watershed, Taiwan.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 21 (4): 05015031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001322.
Jones, D., W. Wang, and R. Fawcett. 2009. “High-quality spatial climate data-sets for Australia.” Aust. Meteorol. Oceanogr. J. 58 (Sep): 233–248. https://doi.org/10.22499/2.5804.003.
Komma, J., G. Blöschl, and C. Reszler. 2008. “Soil moisture updating by Ensemble Kalman Filtering in real-time flood forecasting.” J. Hydrol. 357 (3–4): 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.020.
Laio, F., and S. Tamea. 2007. “Verification tools for probabilistic forecasts of continuous hydrological variables.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 3 (4): 2145–2173. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1267-2007.
Laurenson, E., R. Mein, and R. Nathan. 2010. “RORB Version 6 runoff routing program user manual. Melbourne, Australia: Monash Univ.
Lee, H., D. J. Seo, and V. Koren. 2011. “Assimilation of streamflow and in situ soil moisture data into operational distributed hydrologic models: Effects of uncertainties in the data and initial model soil moisture states.” Adv. Water Resour. 34 (12): 1597–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.08.012.
Li, Y., D. Ryu, A. W. Western, and Q. J. Wang. 2013. “Assimilation of stream discharge for flood forecasting: The benefits of accounting for routing time lags.” Water Resour. Res. 49 (4): 1887–1900. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20169.
Li, Y., D. Ryu, A. W. Western, Q. J. Wang, D. E. Robertson, and W. T. Crow. 2014. “An integrated error parameter estimation and lag-aware data assimilation scheme for real-time flood forecasting.” J. Hydrol. 519 (8): 2722–2736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.009.
Liu, Y., and H. V. Gupta. 2007. “Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework.” Water Resour. Res. 43 (Jul): 085201. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005756.
Liu, Z., S. Guo, H. Zhang, D. Liu, and G. Yang. 2016. “Comparative study of three updating procedures for real-time flood forecasting.” Water Resour. Manage. 30 (7): 2111–2126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1275-0.
Madsen, H., and C. Skotner. 2005. “Adaptive state updating in real-time river flow forecasting—A combined filtering and error forecasting procedure.” J. Hydrol. 308 (1–4): 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.030.
McMillan, H., B. Jackson, M. Clark, D. Kavetski, and R. Woods. 2011. “Rainfall uncertainty in hydrological modelling: An evaluation of multiplicative error models.” J. Hydrol. 400 (1–2): 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.026.
McMillan, H. K., E. Ö. Hreinsson, M. P. Clark, S. K. Singh, C. Zammit, and M. J. Uddstrom. 2013. “Operational hydrological data assimilation with the recursive ensemble Kalman filter.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-21-2013.
Mein, R. G., E. M. Laurenson, and T. A. McMahon. 1974. “Simple nonlinear model for flood estimation.” J. Hydraul. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 100 (11): 1507–1518. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0004101.
Moore, R. J. 2007. “The PDM rainfall-runoff model.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11 (1): 483–499. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-483-2007.
Moradkhani, H., C. M. Dechant, and S. Sorooshian. 2012. “Evolution of ensemble data assimilation for uncertainty quantification using the particle filter-Markov chain Monte Carlo method.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (12): 12144. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012144.
Nathan, R., and F. L. N. Ling. 2016. “Types of simulation approaches event–Based approaches Chapter 3 Book 4 in Australian rainfall and runoff—A guide to flood estimation, commonwealth of Australia.” Aust. Rainfall Runoff 2016 (1): 1–21.
Nijssen, B. 2004. “Effect of precipitation sampling error on simulated hydrological fluxes and states: Anticipating the global precipitation measurement satellites.” J. Geophys. Res. 109 (2): D02103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003497.
O’Shea, D., R. Nathan, C. Wasko, and P. Hill. 2021. “Implications of event-based loss model structure on simulating large floods.” J. Hydrol. 595 (May): 126008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126008.
Peel, V., and A. Steen. 2007. “Victims, hooligans and cash-cows: Media representations of the international backpacker in Australia.” Tourism Manage. 28 (4): 1057–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.08.012.
Pilgrim, D. H., and I. Cordery. 1993. “Handbook of hydrology.” In Flood runoff. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Prakash, V., and V. Mishra. 2022. “Soil moisture and streamflow data assimilation for streamflow prediction in the Narmada River Basin.” J. Hydrometeorol. 2022 (Jul): 22. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-21-0139.1.
Refsgaard, J. C. 1997. “Validation and intercomparison of different updating procedures for real-time forecasting.” Hydrol. Res. 28 (2): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.1997.0005.
Reichle, R. H., J. P. Walker, R. D. Koster, and P. R. Houser. 2002. “Extended versus ensemble Kalman filtering for land data assimilation.” J. Hydrometeorol. 3 (6): 728–740. https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003%3C0728:EVEKFF%3E2.0.CO;2.
Renard, B., D. Kavetski, G. Kuczera, M. Thyer, and S. W. Franks. 2010. “Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (5): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008328.
Robertson, D. E., D. L. Shrestha, and Q. J. Wang. 2013. “Post-processing rainfall forecasts from numerical weather prediction models for short-term streamflow forecasting.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (9): 3587–3603. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3587-2013.
Ryu, D., W. T. Crow, X. W. Zhan, and T. J. Jackson. 2009. “Correcting unintended perturbation biases in hydrologic data assimilation.” J. Hydrometeorol. 10 (3): 734–750. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1038.1.
Seo, D.-J., L. Cajina, R. Corby, and T. Howieson. 2009. “Automatic state updating for operational streamflow forecasting via variational data assimilation.” J. Hydrol. 367 (3–4): 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.019.
Shirisha, P., K. V. Reddy, and D. Pratap. 2019. “Real-time flow forecasting in a watershed using rainfall forecasting model and updating model.” Water Resour. Manage. 33 (14): 4799–4820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02398-2.
Silvestro, F., and N. Rebora. 2014. “Impact of precipitation forecast uncertainties and initial soil moisture conditions on a probabilistic flood forecasting chain.” J. Hydrol. 519 (Apr): 1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.042.
Thiboult, A., and F. Anctil. 2015. “On the difficulty to optimally implement the ensemble Kalman filter: An experiment based on many hydrological models and catchments.” J. Hydrol. 529 (Mar): 1147–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.036.
Thirel, G., E. Martin, J. F. Mahfouf, S. Massart, S. Ricci, and F. Habets. 2010. “A past discharges assimilation system for ensemble streamflow forecasts over France—Part 1: Description and validation of the assimilation system.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 14 (8): 1623–1637. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1623-2010.
Tramblay, Y., R. Bouaicha, L. Brocca, W. Dorigo, C. Bouvier, S. Camici, and E. Servat. 2012. “Estimation of antecedent wetness conditions for flood modelling in Northern Morocco.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 9 (8): 9361–9390. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4375-2012.
Tramblay, Y., C. Bouvier, C. Martin, J. F. Didon-Lescot, D. Todorovik, and J. M. Domergue. 2010. “Assessment of initial soil moisture conditions for event-based rainfall-runoff modelling.” J. Hydrol. 387 (3–4): 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.006.
Tucci, C. E. M., R. T. Clarke, and P. Alegre. 1980. “Adaptive forecasting with a conceptual rainfall—Runoff model.” In Proc., Hydrological Forecasting, 445–454. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences.
Weerts, A. H., and G. Y. H. El Serafy. 2006. “Particle filtering and ensemble Kalman filtering for state updating with hydrological conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res. 42 (9): 4093. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004093.
Weimin, B., S. Wei, and Q. Simin. 2014. “Flow updating in real-time flood forecasting based on runoff correction by a dynamic system response curve.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 19 (4): 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000848.
Wilks, D. S. 2011. “Forecast Verification.” In Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, 301–394. New York: Elsevier.
WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 1992. Simulated real-time intercomparison of hydrological models, WMO operational hydrology. Geneva: WMO.
Yang, X., and C. Michel. 2000. “Flood forecasting with a watershed model: A new method of parameter updating.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 45 (4): 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660009492355.
Yatheendradas, S., T. Wagener, H. Gupta, C. Unkrich, D. Goodrich, M. Schaffner, and A. Stewart. 2008. “Understanding uncertainty in distributed flash flood forecasting for semiarid regions.” Water Resour. Res. 44 (5): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR005940.
Zhang, J., L. Chen, V. P. Singh, H. Cao, and D. Wang. 2015. “Determination of the distribution of flood forecasting error.” Nat. Hazard. 75 (2): 1389–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1385-z.
Zhang, X., P. Liu, L. Cheng, Z. Liu, and Y. Zhao. 2018. “A back-fitting algorithm to improve real-time flood forecasting.” J. Hydrol. 562 (Dec): 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.051.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 28Issue 4April 2023

History

Received: Jan 11, 2022
Accepted: Aug 30, 2022
Published online: Jan 19, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 19, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Infrastructure Engineering, Univ. of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6278-5518. Email: [email protected]
Rory Nathan [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Infrastructure Engineering, Univ. of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Infrastructure Engineering, Univ. of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4982-146X. Email: [email protected]
Dongryeol Ryu [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Infrastructure Engineering, Univ. of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share