Case Studies
Dec 29, 2020

Effects of Sampling and Interpolation Methods on Accuracy of Extracted Watershed Features

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 3

Abstract

High-accuracy watershed features can be used as hydrological parameters of a distributed hydrological model and a nonpoint source pollution model. A total of 3,863 elevation points in Haizi Watershed, China, are collected to produce a basic digital elevation model (DEM). Spline, kriging, and inverse distance weighting methods are selected to interpolate different sample sizes obtained by different sampling methods. A total of 105 DEMs are constructed to extract river networks, outfalls, and watersheds. The accuracies of watershed features are evaluated by using root-mean-square error, and the errors of outfall position, river network closure (crossings of the actual and the extracted river networks), river network density, and watershed area. The results show that the accuracies of DEMs and watershed features increase with an increase in sample size. Sample size, sampling method, and interpolation method have significant impacts on the accuracies of DEMs, outfall position, river network closure, and watershed area. Sample size is most important for deriving watershed features. The optimal combinations of sample size, sampling method, and interpolation method can improve the accuracies of watershed features.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data or models generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request (DEMs and sampling points in Haizi Watershed, data of river networks, outfalls, and watershed).

Acknowledgments

This project (2020AAC03055) was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia in China. The authors appreciate the Weijiang Zhang’ team of the School of Civil Engineering and Hydraulic Engineering in Ningxia University for providing the elevation mapping data. Appreciation is also expressed to the three anonymous reviewers and Holly Koppel for comments that led to significant improvements to the paper.

References

Aguilar, F. J., F. Agüera, M. A. Agullar, and F. Carvajal. 2005. “Effects of terrain morphology, sampling density, and interpolation method on grid DEM accuracy.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 71 (7): 805–816. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.71.7.805.
Arun, P. V. 2013. “A comparative analysis of different DEM interpolation methods.” Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space. Sci. 16 (2): 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2013.09.001.
Barnali, D., and E. Julie. 2009. “Resample or not?! Effects of resolution of DEMs in watershed modeling.” Hydrol. Process. 23 (12): 1714–1724. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7306.
Brus, D. J., and J. J. De Gruijter. 1997. “Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion).” Geoderma 80 (1–2): 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00072-4.
Chang, Y. C., G. S. Song, and S. K. Hsu. 1998. “Automatic extraction of ridge and valley axes using the profile recognition and polygon breaking algorithm.” Comput. Geosci. 24 (1): 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00078-2.
Chaplot, V., F. Darboux, H. Bourennane, S. Leguédois, N. Silvera, and K. Phachomphon. 2006. “Accuracy of interpolation techniques for the derivation of digital elevation models in relation to landform types and data density.” Geomorphology 77 (1–2): 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.12.010.
Franke, R. 1982. “Smooth of scattered data by local thin plate splines.” Comput. Math. Appl. 8 (4): 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(82)90009-8.
Gao, J. 1998. “Impact of sampling intervals on the reliability of topographic variables mapped from grid DEMs at a micro-scale.” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 12 (8): 875–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/136588198241545.
Godone, D., and G. Garnero. 2013. “The role of morphometric parameters in digital terrain models interpolation accuracy: A case study.” Eur. J. Remote Sens. 46 (1): 198–214. https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20134611.
Goulden, T., C. Hopkinson, R. Jamieson, and S. Sterling. 2014. “Sensitivity of watershed attributes to spatial resolution and interpolation method of Lidar DEMs in three distinct landscapes.” Water Resour. Res. 50 (3): 1908–1927. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013846.
Guo, J. H., and W. M. Luh. 2009. “Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.” Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 62 (2): 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711007X267289.
Gyasi-Agyei, Y., G. Willgoose, and F. P. D. Troch. 1995. “Effects of vertical resolution and map scale of digital elevation models on geomorphological parameters used in hydrology.” Hydrol. Processes 9 (3–4): 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090310.
Hoffmann, E., and F. Winde. 2010. “Generating high-resolution digital elevation models for wetland research using Google Earth imagery-an example from South Africa.” Water SA 36 (1): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007939.
Jonas, M., L. M. V. Etiënne, and H. Juliane. 2019. “Passive sampling of organic contaminants across the water-sediment interface of an urban stream.” Water Res. 165 (Nov): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.114966.
Kumar, H. 1988. “World geodetic system 1984: A modern and accurate global reference frame.” Mar. Geodesy 12 (2): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210608809379580.
Li, H., and J. Y. Zhao. 2018. “Evaluation of the newly released worldwide AW3D30 DEM over typical landforms of China using two global DEMs and ICESat/GLAS data.” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 11 (11): 4430–4440. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2874361.
Li, J. Y., and J. M. Wang. 2019. “Optimal sampling design for reclaimed land management in mining area: An improved simulated annealing approach.” J. Cleaner Prod. 231 (Sep): 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.230.
Li, L., and X. Kuai. 2014. “An efficient dichotomizing interpolation algorithm for the refinement of TIN-based terrain surface from contour maps.” Comput. Geosci. 72 (Nov): 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.07.001.
Li, Z. L. 1992. “Variation of the accuracy of digital terrain models with sampling interval.” Photogramm. Rec. 14 (79): 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.1992.tb00211.x.
Luo, S. Z., J. M. Chen, C. Wang, X. H. Xi, H. C. Zeng, D. L. Peng, and D. Li. 2016. “Effects of LiDAR point density, sampling size and height threshold on estimation accuracy of crop biophysical parameters.” Opt. Express 24 (11): 11578–11593. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.011578.
Ma, J., Y. X. Ding, J. C. P. Cheng, F. F. Jiang, and Z. W. Wan. 2019. “A temporal-spatial interpolation and extrapolation method based on geographic Long Short-Term Memory neural network for PM2.5.” J. Cleaner Prod. 237 (Nov): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117729.
McMaster, K. J. 2002. “Effects of digital elevation model resolution on derived stream network positions.” Water Resour. Res. 38 (4): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR000150.
Oliver, M. A. 1990. “Kriging: A method of geographical information systems.” Int. J. Geog. Inf. Syst. 4(3): 313–332.
Paiva, R. C. D., M. T. Durand, and F. Hossain. 2015. “Spatiotemporal interpolation of discharge across a river network by using synthetic SWOT satellite data.” Water Resour. Res. 51 (1): 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015618.
Rao, J. N. K., and J. Shao. 1996. “On balanced half-sample variance estimation in stratified random sampling.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91 (433): 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476694.
Selva, J. 2015. “FFT Interpolation from nonuniform samples lying in a regular grid.” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 63 (11): 2826–2834. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2015.2419178.
Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2011. “Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).” In International encyclopedia of statistical science, edited by M. Lovric. Berlin: Springer.
Tweedy, P. J., M. K. Moriarty, J. D. Bailey, and C. W. Epps. 2019. “Using fine scale resolution vegetation data from LiDAR and ground-based sampling to predict Pacific marten resting habitat at multiple spatial scales.” For. Ecol. Manage. 452 (Nov): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117556.
Vanem, E., O. Gramstad, and E. M. Bitner-Gregersen. 2019. “A simulation study on the uncertainty of environmental contours due to sampling variability for different estimation methods.” Appl. Ocean Res. 91 (Oct): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.101870.
Wang, B., W. Shi, and E. Liu. 2015. “Robust methods for assessing the accuracy of linear interpolated DEM.” Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geo-Inf. 34 (Feb): 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2014.08.012.
Wen, W., Y. Wang, L. Yang, D. Liang, L. D. Chen, J. Liu, and A. X. Zhu. 2015. “Mapping soil organic carbon using auxiliary environmental covariates in a typical watershed in the loess plateau of China: A comparative study based on three Kriging methods and a soil land inference model (SoLIM).” Environ. Earth Sci. 73 (1): 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3518-9.
Westoby, M. J., J. Brasington, N. F. Glasser, M. J. Hambrey, and J. M. Reynolds. 2012. “‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications.” Geomorphology 179 (Dec): 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021.
Xu, T., Z. D. Cao, and G. Q. Yang. 2012. “An isoline smooth algorithm and its application based on cubic B-spline interpolation.” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Technol. 4 (14): 43–50. https://doi.org/10.4156/ijact.vol4.issue14.6.
Yan, Z., L. Gottschalk, I. Krasovskaia, and J. Xia. 2012. “To the problem of uncertainty in interpolation of annual runoff.” Hydrol. Res. 43 (6): 833. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2012.073.
Yu, W. J., Z. T. Nan, S. Li, and C. G. Li. 2012. “Average slope length calculation and runoff simulation.” [In Chinese.] Geo-Inf. Sci. 14 (1): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1047.2012.00041.
Zhan, L. 2008. Evaluation of SRTM DEMs’ accuracy and investigation on its applicability: A case study in Shaanxi Province. [In Chinese.] Nanjing, China: Nanjing Normal Univ.
Zhang, W., and D. R. Montgomery. 1994. “Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations.” Water Resour. Res. 30 (4): 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR03553.
Zimmerman, D., C. Pavlik, A. Ruggles, and M. P. Armstrong. 1999. “An experimental comparison of ordinary and universal kriging and inverse distance weighting.” Math. Geol. 31 (4): 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007586507433.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 26Issue 3March 2021

History

Received: Apr 22, 2020
Accepted: Nov 16, 2020
Published online: Dec 29, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 29, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Ningxia Univ., Yinchuan 750021, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5308-3204. Email: [email protected]
Meiyan Zheng [email protected]
M.S. Candidate, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China. Email: [email protected]
M.S. Candidate, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Ningxia Univ., Yinchuan 750021, China. Email: [email protected]
Yanjuan Wang [email protected]
M.S. Candidate, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Ningxia Univ., Yinchuan 750021, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share