Technical Papers
May 30, 2018

Consequences of Changes to the NRCS Rainfall-Runoff Relations on Hydrologic Design

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 8

Abstract

A proposed quantification of the fundamental concepts in the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) rainfall-runoff relation is examined to determine changes relevant to peak discharge estimation and drainage design. Changes to the NRCS curve number, storage, and initial abstraction relations result in different estimates of the runoff volume, timing of runoff, and peak discharge produced by long-established empirical equations that quantify event-based runoff. The ratio of existing-to-proposed runoff depth estimates is determined across a range of curve numbers and storm depths. Similarly, the ratio of existing to proposed peak discharge is determined as a function of curve number, storm depth, and design storm within the NRCS TR-55 model. Using an infrastructure design based on the existing equations as the baseline, that infrastructure is underdesigned (overdesigned) if the proposed NRCS equations produce larger (smaller) estimates of volumes or discharges than the existing equations for the same watershed conditions. This study shows that the proposed NRCS equations more likely identify existing infrastructure as being underdesigned for smaller storm events and lower curve numbers. Conditions and design storm produce large variation in the design ratios. Storms with return periods on the order of 2–10 years generally result in peak discharge underdesign ratios that span from 1 to as high as 2 or 3 depending on the watershed conditions, storm size, curve number, and design element in question. Existing infrastructure overdesign is more likely the case when return periods approach 25, 50, or 100 years, with typical overdesign ratios ranging downward from 1.0 to as small as 0.8. In most cases, required storage volumes, as prescribed by the NRCS TR-55 approach, are found to be smaller using the proposed equations, leading to both cost savings and reduced pond residence times. Three common design problems are provided only to illustrate typical underdesign and overdesign findings. The central focus is on the potentially negative consequences of proposed changes to a limited aspect of curve number hydrology.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work benefited from the constructive feedback of three anonymous reviewers and the editorial team at the ASCE Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. The authors gratefully acknowledge the input from these individuals.

Disclaimer

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities that require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C., 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

References

Bonnin, G. M., D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M. Yekta, and D. Riley. 2006. Precipitation-frequency atlas of the United States. Silver Spring, MD: National Weather Service.
Brown, W., and T. Schueler. 1997. The economics of stormwater BMPs in the mid-Atlantic region: Final report. Silver Spring, MD: Center for Watershed Protection.
D’Asaro, F., G. Grillone, and R. H. Hawkins. 2014. “Curve number: Empirical evaluation and comparison with curve number handbook tables in Sicily.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 19 (12): 04014035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000997.
EWRI Curve Number Hydrology Task Committee. 2017a. “Chapter 10: Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall (draft).” Accessed May 12, 2018. https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/41607.wba.
EWRI Curve Number Hydrology Task Committee. 2017b. “Chapter 9: Hydrologic soil-cover complexes (draft).” Accessed May 12, 2018. https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/41606.wba.
Fu, S., G. Zhang, N. Wang, and L. Luo. 2011. “Initial abstraction ratio in the SCS-CN method in the Loess Plateau of China.” Trans. ASABE 54 (1): 163–169. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.36271.
Hawkins, R. H., T. J. Ward, D. E. Woodward, and J. A. Van Mullem. 2009. Curve number hydrology—State of the practice, 110. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hawkins, R. H., D. E. Woodward, and R. Jiang. 2001. “Investigation of the runoff curve number abstraction ratio.” In Proc., USDA-NRCS Hydraulic Engineering Workshop. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
Houle, J. J., R. M. Roseen, T. P. Ballestero, T. A. Puls, and J. Sherrard, Jr. 2013. “Comparison of maintenance cost, labor demands, and system performance for LID and conventional stormwater management.” J. Environ. Eng. 139 (7): 932–938. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000698.
Jiang, R. 2001. “Investigation of runoff curve number initial abstraction ratio.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Arizona.
Lal, M., S. K. Mishra, A. Pandey, R. P. Pandey, P. K. Meena, A. Chaudhary, R. K. Jha, A. K. Shreevastava, and Y. Kumar. 2017. “Evaluation of the soil conservation service curve number methodology using data from agricultural plots.” J. Hydrogeol. 25 (1): 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1460-5.
Lim, K. J., B. A. Engel, S. Muthukrishnan, and J. Harbor. 2006. “Effects of initial abstraction and urbanization on estimated runoff using CN technology.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 42 (3): 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04481.
Maryland Department of Planning. 2010. “Land use/land cover.” Accessed October 1, 2017. http://planning.maryland.gov/OurWork/landuse.shtml.
Mateleska, K. 2016. “Methodology for developing cost estimates for opti-tool.” Accessed October 2, 2017. https://www3.epa.gov/region1/npdes/stormwater/ma/green-infrastructure-stormwater-bmp-cost-estimation.pdf.
Menberu, M. W., A. T. Haghighi, A. K. Ronkanen, J. Kværner, and B. Kløve. 2015. “Runoff curve numbers for peat-dominated watersheds.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (4): 04014058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001038.
Meyer, M. D. 2008. Design standards for U.S. transportation infrastructure: The implications of climate change. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Mockus, V. 1949. Estimate of total (and peak rates of) surface runoff for individual storms: Exhibit A. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.
Mockus, V. 1957. “Use of storm and watershed characteristics in synthetic hydrograph analysis and application.” In Proc., Annual meeting of AGU Pacific Southwest Region. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Mockus, V. 1961. Watershed lag. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2004. “Hydrologic soil-cover complexes.” Chap. 9 in National engineering handbook: Part 630—Hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2010. “Time of concentration.” Chap. 15 in National engineering handbook: Part 630—Hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2015. “WinTR-20 watershed hydrology.” Accessed October 2, 2017. http://go.usa.gov/cZeg9.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2017. “Description of SSURGO database.” Accessed October 14, 2017. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/survey/?cid=nrcs142p2_053627.
SCS (Soil Conservation Service). 1973. A method for estimating volume and rate of runoff in small watersheds. Washington, DC: SCS.
SCS (Soil Conservation Service). 1975. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. 1st ed. Washington, DC: SCS.
SCS (Soil Conservation Service). 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: SCS.
Yuan, Y., J. Nie, S. C. McCutcheon, and E. V. Taguas. 2014. “Initial abstraction and curve numbers for semiarid watersheds in south eastern Arizona.” Hydrol. Processes, 28 (3), 774–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9592.
Zevenbergen, L. W., L. A. Arneson, J. H. Hunt, and A. C. Miller. 2012. Hydraulic design of safe bridges. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 23Issue 8August 2018

History

Received: Oct 18, 2017
Accepted: Feb 5, 2018
Published online: May 30, 2018
Published in print: Aug 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

G. E. Moglen, F.ASCE [email protected]
Supervisory Research Hydrologist, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
R. H. McCuen, M.ASCE
The Ben Dyer Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
R. L. Moglen
Graduate Student, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share