Technical Notes
May 31, 2017

Effect of River Network Geometry on Flood Frequency: A Tale of Two Watersheds in Iowa

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 8

Abstract

Although numerous studies conducted over the past four decades have shown the significant role that drainage network geometry plays in determining the streamflow response and hence the peak flood magnitude, a review of regional flood frequency equations established for various hydrologic regions in the United States shows that drainage network geometry is largely excluded from regional regression equations. This study demonstrates how river network geometry affects flood frequency using two catchments located in the same hydrologic region and have the same drainage area, but with different drainage network geometry. The results from the analysis of historical peak discharge data obtained from streamflow gauging stations located at the outlet of the watersheds and the systematic numerical simulation of the watersheds show that the apparent difference in the drainage network geometry of the two watersheds accounts for the observed difference in the flood frequency. By showing the significant effects of drainage network geometry on flood frequency, the results highlight the need for a revision of the current approach to regional flood frequency equations to improve the accuracy of flood quantile estimation in ungauged basins.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Iowa Flood Center at the University of Iowa for the financial support of this study. The authors also would like to thank Radoslaw Goska and Marcela Rojas Oliveros for their help with some of the figures.

References

Ayalew, T. B., Krajewski, W. F., and Mantilla, R. (2014). “Connecting the power-law scaling structure of peak-discharges to spatially variable rainfall and catchment physical properties.” Adv. Water Resour., 71, 32–43.
Ayalew, T. B., Krajewski, W. F., and Mantilla, R. (2015). “Analyzing the effects of excess rainfall properties on the scaling structure of peak discharges: Insights from a mesoscale river basin.” Water Resour. Res., 51(6), 3900–3921.
Ayalew, T. B., Krajewski, W. F., Mantilla, R., and Small, S. J. (2014). “Exploring the effects of hillslope-channel link dynamics and excess rainfall properties on the scaling structure of peak-discharge.” Adv. Water Resour., 64, 9–20.
Black, P. E. (1972). “Hydrograph responses to geomorphic model watershed characteristics and precipitation variables.” J. Hydrol., 17(4), 309–329.
Blazkova, S., and Beven, K. (1997). “Flood frequency prediction for data limited catchments in the Czech Republic using a stochastic rainfall model and TOPMODEL.” J. Hydrol., 195(1–4), 256–278.
Botter, G., and Rinaldo, A. (2003). “Scale effect on geomorphologic and kinematic dispersion.” Water Resour. Res., 39(10), 1286.
Chorley, R. J., Malm, D. E. G., and Pogorzelski, H. A. (1957). “A new standard for estimating drainage basin shape.” Am. J. Sci., 255(2), 138–141.
Cowpertwait, P., Isham, V., and Onof, C. (2007). “Point process models of rainfall: Developments for fine-scale structure.” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 463(2086), 2569–2587.
Dawdy, D. R., Griffis, V. W., and Gupta, V. K. (2012). “Regional flood-frequency analysis: How we got here and where we are going.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 953–959.
Di Lazzaro, M., and Volpi, E. (2011). “Effects of hillslope dynamics and network geometry on the scaling properties of the hydrologic response.” Adv. Water Resour., 34(11), 1496–1507.
D’Odorico, P., and Rigon, R. (2003). “Hillslope and channel contributions to the hydrologic response.” Water Resour. Res., 39(5), 1113.
Eash, D. A., Barnes, K. K., and Veilleux, A. G. (2013). “Methods for estimating annual exceedance-probability discharges for streams in Iowa, based on data through water year 2010.”, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 63.
Furey, P., Troutman, B., Gupta, V., and Krajewski, W. (2016). “Connecting event-based scaling of flood peaks to regional flood frequency relationships.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 04016037.
Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., Alonso, G., and Nardi, F. (2010). “Flow time estimation with spatially variable hillslope velocity in ungauged basins.” Adv. Water Resour., 33(10), 1216–1223.
Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., and Serinaldi, F. (2012). “A continuous simulation model for design-hydrograph estimation in small and ungauged watersheds.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 57(6), 1035–1051.
Gupta, V., Waymire, E., and Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. (1986). “On scales, gravity and network structure in basin runoff.” Scale problems hydrology, V. K. Gupta, I. Rodríguez-Iturbe, and E. F. Wood, eds., Springer, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 159–184.
Gupta, V. K., Ayalew, T. B., Mantilla, R., and Krajewski, W. F. (2015). “Classical and generalized Horton laws for peak flows in rainfall-runoff events.” Chaos, 25(7), 075408.
Gupta, V. K., Castro, S. L., and Over, T. M. (1996). “On scaling exponents of spatial peak flows from rainfall and river network geometry.” J. Hydrol., 187(1–2), 81–104.
Gupta, V. K., Mantilla, R., Troutman, B. M., Dawdy, D., and Krajewski, W. F. (2010). “Generalizing a nonlinear geophysical flood theory to medium-sized river networks.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 37(11), L11402–L11402.
Gupta, V. K., and Waymire, E. (1998). “Spatial variability and scale invariance in hydrologic regionalization.” Scale dependence and scale invariance in hydrology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 88–135.
Gupta, V. K., Waymire, E., and Wang, C. T. (1980). “A representation of an instantaneous unit hydrograph from geomorphology.” Water Res. Res., 16(5), 855–862.
Horton, R. E. (1932). “Drainage-basin characteristics.” Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 13(1), 350–361.
Horton, R. E. (1945). “Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins—Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology.” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 56(3), 275–370.
Huff, D. D., O’Neill, R. V., Emanuel, W. R., Elwood, J. W., and Newbold, J. D. (1982). “Flow variability and hillslope hydrology.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 7(1), 91–94.
IACWD (Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data). (1982). “Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency.” Bulletin 17B, U.S. Water Resources Council, Washington, DC.
Kirkby, M. J. (1976). “Tests of the random network model, and its application to basin hydrology.” Earth Surf. Processes, 1(3), 197–212.
Lee, M. T., and Delleur, J. W. (1976). “A variable source area model of the rainfall-runoff process based on the watershed stream network.” Water Resour. Res., 12(5), 1029–1036.
Mantilla, R., Gupta, V. K., and Mesa, O. J. (2006). “Role of coupled flow dynamics and real network structures on Hortonian scaling of peak flows.” J. Hydrol., 322(1–4), 155–167.
Menabde, M., and Sivapalan, M. (2001). “Linking space-time variability of river runoff and rainfall fields: A dynamic approach.” Adv. Water Resour., 24(9–10), 1001–1014.
Morisawa, M. (1958). “Measurement of drainage-basin outline form.” J. Geol., 66(5), 587–591.
PeakFQ version 7.1 [Computer software]. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
Perica, S., et al. (2013). “Precipitation-frequency atlas of the United States, midwestern states.”, Vol. 8, NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, MD.
Rinaldo, A., Marani, A., and Rigon, R. (1991). “Geomorphological dispersion.” Water Resour. Res., 27(4), 513–525.
Rinaldo, A., Vogel, G. K., Rigon, R., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1995). “Can one gauge the shape of a basin?” Water Resour. Res., 31(4), 1119–1127.
Robinson, J. S., Sivapalan, M., and Snell, J. D. (1995). “On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 31(12), 3089–3101.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Cox, D. R., and Isham, V. (1987). “Some models for rainfall based on stochastic point-processes.” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 410(1839), 269–288.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Cox, D. R., and Isham, V. (1988). “A point process model for rainfall: Further developments.” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 417(1853), 283–298.
Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., and Valdés, J. B. (1979). “The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response.” Water Resour. Res., 15(6), 1409–1420.
Saco, P. M., and Kumar, P. (2002). “Kinematic dispersion in stream networks. 2: Scale issues and self-similar network organization.” Water Resour. Res., 38(11), 1245.
Sherman, L. K. (1932). “The relation of hydrographs of runoff to size and character of drainage-basins.” Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 13(1), 332–339.
Strahler, A. N. (1964). “Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks.” Handbook of applied hydrology, V. T. Chow, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 34–76.
Taylor, A. B., and Schwarz, H. E. (1952). “Unit-hydrograph lag and peak flow related to basin characteristics.” Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 33(2), 235–246.
USDA-NRCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service). (2014). “Gridded soil survey geographic (GSSURGO) database for the United States of America and the territories, commonwealths, and island nations served by the USDA-NRCS.” Washington, DC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22Issue 8August 2017

History

Received: Sep 18, 2016
Accepted: Mar 8, 2017
Published online: May 31, 2017
Published in print: Aug 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Oct 31, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Senior Hydrologist, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance, 2633 Camino Ramon—Suite 325, San Ramon, CA 94583 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7280-8100. E-mail: [email protected]
Witold F. Krajewski [email protected]
Professor, IIHR-Hydroscience and Engineering, Univ. of Iowa, C. Maxwell Stanley Hydraulics Laboratory, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share