Improving Hydrological Model Simulations with Combined Multi-Input and Multimodel Averaging Frameworks
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 4
Abstract
It is well known that multimodel averaging can considerably improve hydrological model simulation skill. However, the need to set up and run different models can be a time-consuming task. This work expands on the classic multimodel averaging approach by feeding models with different climate datasets and treating each version as a unique model in the ensemble. Three hydrological models and four climate datasets were combined to produce multimodel/multi-input, multimodel/monoinput and monomodel/multi-input combined flows using a weighting scheme that minimizes the root mean square error (RMSE) between the combined and observed hydrographs. The results show that model averaging improves performance significantly and that the proposed multi-input averaging provides higher skill than multimodel averaging. A combination of all models run with all datasets (12 members in total) produced the best results with the averaged hydrograph being more accurate than any single member on 70% of the catchments. The median Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) metric value increase was 0.07 overall in validation under the multimodel/multi-input framework, all while providing improved simulation reliability.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the four institutions who made their data available for this study. The datasets are available at ftp://hydrology.nws.noaa.gov/pub/gcip/mopex/ (MOPEX), http://hydro.engr.scu.edu/files/gridded_obs/daily/ (Santa Clara), http://daymet.ornl.gov (Daymet), and http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.unified.daily.conus.html/ (CPC). The authors would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their fruitful contributions to this paper.
References
Ajami, N. K., Duan, Q., and Sorooshian, S. (2006). “An integrated hydrological Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrological prediction.” Water Resour. Res., 43, .
Arsenault, R., and Brissette, F. P. (2014). “Continuous streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: The effects of equifinality and parameter set selection on uncertainty in regionalization approaches.” Water Resour. Res., 50(7), 6135–6153.
Arsenault, R., Gatien, P., Renaud, B., Brissette, F., and Martel, J. L. (2015). “A comparative analysis of 9 multimodel averaging approaches in hydrological continuous streamflow simulation.” J. Hydrol., 529(3), 754–767.
Arsenault, R., Malo, J., Brissette, F., Minville, M., and Leconte, R. (2013). “Structural and nonstructural climate change adaptation strategies for the Péribonka water resource system.” Water Resour. Manage., 27(7), 2075–2087.
Arsenault, R., Poulin, A., Côté, P., and Brissette, F. (2014). “Comparison of stochastic optimization algorithms in hydrological model calibration.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1374–1384.
Bohn, T. J., Sonessa, M. Y., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2010). “Seasonal hydrologic forecasting: Do multimodel ensemble averages always yield improvements in forecast skill?” J. Hydrometeor., 11(6), 1358–1372.
Bougeault, P., et al. (2010). “The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble.” Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91(8), 1059–1072.
Bowler, N. E., Arribas, A., and Mylne, K. R. (2008). “The benefits of multianalysis and poor man’s ensembles.” Mon. Weather Rev., 136(11), 4113–4129.
Chen, J., Brissette, F. P., Poulin, A., and Leconte, R. (2011). “Uncertainty of downscaling method in quantifying the impact of climate change on hydrology.” J. Hydrol., 401(3–4), 190–202.
Clark, M. P., Kavetski, D., and Fenicia, F. (2011). “Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling.” Water Resour. Res., 47, .
Cressman, G. P. (1959). “An operational objective analysis system.” Mon. Weather Rev., 87(10), 367–374.
Davolio, S., Miglietta, M. M., Diomede, T., Marsigli, C., Morgillo, A., and Moscatello, A. (2008). “A meteohydrological prediction system based on a multi-model approach for precipitation forecasting.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 8(1), 143–159.
Diks, C. G. H., and Vrugt, J. A. (2010). “Comparison of point forecast accuracy of model averaging methods in hydrologic applications.” Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk A, 24(6), 809–820.
Duan, Q., Ajami, N. K., Gao, X., and Sorooshian, S. (2007). “Multimodel ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging.” Adv. Water Resour., 30(5), 1371–1386.
Essou, G. R., Arsenault, R., and Brissette, F. P. (2016). “Comparison of climate datasets for lumped hydrological modeling over the continental United States.” J. Hydrol., 537, 334–345.
Fortin, V. (2000). Le modèle météo-apport HSAMI: Historique, théorie et application, Institut de Recherche d’Hydro-Québec, Varennes, QC, Canada, 68.
Fortin, V., and Turcotte, R. (2007). “Le modèle hydrologique MOHYSE (bases théoriques et manuel de l’usager).”, Département des sciences de la terre et de l’atmosphère, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal. 1–17.
Granger, C. W. J., and Ramanathan, R. (1984). “Improved methods of combining forecasts.” J. Forecasting, 3(2), 197–204.
Hansen, N., and Ostermeier, A. (1996). “Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: The covariance matrix adaptation.” Proc., 1996 IEEE Int. Conf. on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 312–317.
Higgins, R. W., Shi, W., Yarosh, E., and Joyce, R. (2000). “Improved United States precipitation quality control system and analysis.” NCEP/Climate Prediction Center, Camp Springs, MD.
Hsu, K. L., Moradkhani, H., and Sorooshian, S. (2009). “A sequential Bayesian approach for hydrologic model selection and prediction.” Water Resour. Res., 45(12), .
Kruskal, W. H., and Wallis, W. A. (1952). “Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 47(260), 583–621.
Leta, O. T., Nossent, J., Velez, C., Shrestha, N. K., van Griensven, A., and Bauwens, W. (2015). “Assessment of the different sources of uncertainty in a SWAT model of the River Senne (Belgium).” Environ. Modell. Software, 68, 129–146.
Liu, Y., and Gupta, H. V. (2007). “Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework.” Water Resour. Res., 43, .
Madadgar, S., and Moradkhani, H. (2014). “Improved Bayesian multimodeling: Integration of copulas and Bayesian model averaging.” Water Resour. Res., 50(12), 9586–9603.
Minville, M., Krau, S., Brissette, F., and Leconte, R. (2010). “Behavior and performance of a water resource system in Québec (Canada) under adapted operating policies in a climate change context.” Water Resour. Manage., 24(7), 1333–1352.
Mylne, K. R., Evans, R. E., and Clark, R. T. (2002). “Multimodel multianalysis ensembles in quasi-operational medium-range forecasting.” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 128(579), 361–384.
Najafi, M. R., and Moradkhani, H. (2015). “Multimodel ensemble analysis of runoff extremes for climate change impact assessments.” J. Hydrol., 525, 352–361.
Najafi, M. R., and Moradkhani, H. (2016). “Ensemble combination of seasonal streamflow forecasts.” J. Hydrol. Eng., .
Najafi, M. R., Moradkhani, H., and Jung, I. W. (2011). “Assessing the uncertainties of hydrologic model selection in climate change impact studies.” Hydrol. Process., 25(18), 2814–2826.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, W. H. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Oudin, L., et al. (2005). “Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall-runoff model? Part 2—Towards a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall-runoff modelling.” J. Hydrol., 303(1–4), 290–306.
Poulin, A., Brissette, F., Leconte, R., Arsenault, R., and Malo, J. S. (2011). “Uncertainty of hydrological modelling in climate change impact studies in a Canadian, snow-dominated river basin.” J. Hydrol., 409(3–4), 626–636.
Salamon, P., and Feyen, L. (2009). “Assessing parameter, precipitation, and predictive uncertainty in a distributed hydrological model using sequential data assimilation with the particle filter.” J. Hydrol., 376(3–4), 428–442.
Schaake, J., Cong, S., and Duan, Q. (2006). “The U. S. MOPEX data set.” IAHS Publ., 307, 9–28.
See, L., and Openshaw, S. (2000). “A hybrid multi-model approach to river level forecasting.” Hydrolog. Sci. J., 45(4), 523–536.
Shamseldin, A., O’Connor, K., and Liang, G. (1997). “Methods for combining the output of different rainfall-runoff models.” J. Hydrol., 197(1–4), 203–229.
Shepard, D. S. (1984). Computer mapping: The SYMAP interpolation algorithm, spatial statistics and models, G. L. Gaile and C. J. Willmott, eds., D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 133–145.
Thornton, P. E., Running, S. W., and White, M. A. (1997). “Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain.” J. Hydrol., 190(3–4), 214–251.
Thornton, P. E., Thornton, M. M., Mayer, B. W., Wilhelmi, N., Wei, Y., and Cook, R. B. (2012). “Daymet: Daily surface weather on a 1 km grid for North America, 1980–2012.” ⟨http://daymet.ornl.gov/⟩ (Nov. 15, 2014).
Velazquez, J. A., Anctil, F., and Perrin, C. (2010). “Performance and reliability of multi-model hydrological ensemble simulations based on seventeen lumped models and a thousand catchments.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14(11), 2303–2317.
Widmann, M., and Bretherton, C. S. (2000). “Validation of mesoscale precipitation in the NCEP reanalysis using a new gridcell dataset for the northwestern United States.” J. Clim., 13(11), 1936–1950.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 29, 2015
Accepted: Sep 22, 2016
Published online: Nov 30, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Apr 30, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.