Technical Papers
Dec 1, 2016

Ensemble Averaging Methods for Quantifying Uncertainty Sources in Modeling Climate Change Impact on Runoff Projection

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 4

Abstract

The study discusses future runoff projection and uncertainty arising from different choices of global circulation models (GCMs), different scenarios of future emission, and different statistical downscaling methods for two watersheds in south Arkansas and north Louisiana. Three ensemble averaging methods, simple model averaging (SMA), reliability ensemble averaging (REA), and hierarchical Bayesian model averaging (HBMA), are used to compare the projected ensemble average and variance of future runoff derived from hydroclimate models. Contributions of individual sources of uncertainty are quantified by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) method and the HBMA method. An ensemble of 78 climate change projections, derived from 13 GCMs from the coupled model intercomparison project phase 5 (CMIP5), two representative concentration pathways (RCPs), and three statistical downscaling methods, are used as the forcing input to the hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance model version 3 (HELP3) to project future runoff. The result shows that HBMA performs slightly better than SMA and REA in reproducing the historical mean annual cycle of runoff. Fall runoff would increase and winter and spring runoff would decrease toward the late century. Uncertainty analysis by both ANOVA and HBMA concludes that GCMs are the major source of uncertainty, followed by the downscaling methods and then the emission scenarios. GCM uncertainty is more significant in spring and summer than other seasons. Downscaling method uncertainty shows increases in fall and winter. Emission scenario uncertainty is shown to be significant only in winter and spring for the late century.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported in part by the Louisiana Board of Regents, RCS, under award number LEQSF(2012-15)-RD-A-03 and by the U.S. Geological Survey under Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. G11AP20082 (through LWRRI). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Geological Survey. LSU Center for Computation and Technology (CCT) and High Performance Computing (HPC) are acknowledged for providing computing resources (SuperMike-II) and technical assistance. The authors acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for providing constructive comments. Frank Tsai can be contacted for the data presented in the figures.

References

Abatzoglou, J. T., and Brown, T. J. (2012). “A comparison of statistical downscaling methods suited for wildfire applications.” Int. J. Climatol., 32(5), 772–780.
Bae, D. H., Jung, I. W., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2011). “Hydrologic uncertainties in climate change from IPCC AR4 GCM simulations of the Chungju Basin, Korea.” J. Hydrol., 401(1), 90–105.
Bastola, S., Murphy, C., and Sweeney, J. (2011). “The role of hydrological modelling uncertainties in climate change impact assessments of Irish river catchments.” Adv. Water Resour., 34(5), 562–576.
Beigi, E., and Tsai, F. T.-C. (2014). “GIS-based water budget framework for high-resolution groundwater recharge estimation of large-scale humid regions.” J. Hydrol. Eng., .
Bosshard, T., et al. (2013). “Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections.” Water Resour. Res., 49(3), 1523–1536.
Buser, C. M., Künsch, H. R., Lüthi, D., Wild, M., and Schär, C. (2009). “Bayesian multi-model projection of climate: Bias assumptions and interannual variability.” Clim. Dyn., 33(6), 849–868.
Calderhead, A. I., Martel, R., Garfias, J., Rivera, A., and Therrien, R. (2012). “Pumping dry: An increasing groundwater budget deficit induced by urbanization, industrialization, and climate change in an over-exploited volcanic aquifer.” Environ. Earth Sci., 66(7):1753–1767.
Chen, J., Brissette, F. P., and Leconte, R. (2011). “Uncertainty of downscaling method in quantifying the impact of climate change on hydrology.” J. Hydrol., 401(3–4), 190–202.
Chiew, F. H. S., et al. (2009). “Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia: Method, results, and implications of the modeling method.” Water Resour. Res., 45(10), W10414.
Christensen, N. S., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2007). “A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 11(4), 1417–1434.
Giorgi, F., and Mearns, L. O. (2002). “Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the reliability ensemble averaging (REA) method.” J. Clim., 15(10), 1141–1158.
Hansen, N., Müller, S. D., and Koumoutsakos, P. (2003). “Reducing the time complexity of the derandomized evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation (CMA-ES).” Evol. Comput., 11(1), 1–18.
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., and Volinsky, C. T. (1999). “Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial.” Stat. Sci., 14(4), 382–417.
Homer, C. G., et al. (2015). “Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States—Representing a decade of land cover change information.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 81(5), 345–354.
Jyrkama, M. I., and Sykes, J. F. (2007). “The impact of climate change on spatially varying groundwater recharge in the grand river watershed (Ontario).” J. Hydrol., 338(3–4), 237–250.
Kay, A. L., Davies, H. N., Bell, V. A., and Jones, R. G. (2009). “Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: Flood frequency in England.” Clim. Change, 92(1), 41–63.
Maurer, E. P., Brekke, L., Pruitt, T., and Duffy, P. B. (2007). “Fine-resolution climate projections enhance regional climate change impact studies.” Eos Trans. Am. Geophy. Union, 88(47), 504.
McKee, P. W., Clark, B. R., and Czarnecki, J. B. (2004). “Conjunctive-use optimization model and sustainable-yield estimation for the Sparta aquifer of southeastern Arkansas and north-central Louisiana.”, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Annapolis, MD.
Miao, C., et al. (2014). “Assessment of CMIP5 climate models and projected temperature changes over northern Eurasia.” Environ. Res. Lett., 9(5), 055007.
Milly, P. C., Dunne, K. A., and Vecchia, A. V., 2005. “Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate.” Nature, 438(7066), 347–350.
Min, S. K., Simonis, D., and Hense, A. (2007). “Probabilistic climate change predictions applying Bayesian model averaging.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 365(1857), 2103–2116.
Mulholland, P. J., et al. (1997). “Effects of climate change on freshwater ecosystems of the south-eastern United States and the Gulf Coast of Mexico.” Hydrol. Processes, 11(8), 949–970.
Murphy, J. M., et al. (2004). “Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations.” Nature, 430(7001), 768–772.
Najafi, M. R., Moradkhani, H., and Jung, I. W. (2011). “Assessing the uncertainties of hydrologic model selection in climate change impact studies.” Hydrol. Processes, 25(18), 2814–2826.
NRCS. (2016a). “Watershed boundary dataset (WBD) facts.” ⟨http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/water/watersheds/dataset/?cid=nrcs143_021617⟩ (Feb. 8, 2016).
NRCS. (2016b). “Web soil survey.” ⟨http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov⟩ (Feb. 8, 2016).
Prudhomme, C., and Davies, H. (2009a). “Assessing uncertainties in climate change impact analyses on the river flow regimes in the UK. Part 1: Baseline climate.” Clim. Change, 93(1–2), 177–195.
Prudhomme, C., and Davies, H. (2009b). “Assessing uncertainties in climate change impact analyses on the river flow regimes in the UK. Part 2: Future climate.” Clim. Change, 93(1–2), 197–222.
Räisänen, J. (2007). “How reliable are climate models?” Tellus, 59, 2–29.
Richardson, C. W., and Wright, D. A. (1984).” WGEN: A model for generating daily weather variables.”, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC.
Robbins, K. (2013). “Southern Regional Climate Center, Louisiana State University.” ⟨http://www.srcc.lsu.edu/⟩ (Nov. 2, 2015).
Rowell, D. P. (2006). “A demonstration of the uncertainty in projections of UK climate change resulting from regional model formulation.” Clim. Change, 79(3), 243–257.
Schroeder, P. R., Dozier, T. S., Zappi, P. A., McEnroe, B. M., Sjostrom, J. W., and Peyton, R. L. (1994). “The hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) model: Engineering documentation for version 3.”, USEPA, Washington, DC.
Schwarz, G. (1978). “Estimating the dimension of a model.” Ann. Stat., 6(2), 461–464.
Scibek, J., Allen, D. M., Cannon, A. J., and Whitfield, P. H. (2007). “Groundwater–surface water interaction under scenarios of climate change using a high-resolution transient groundwater model.” J. Hydrol., 333(2–4), 165–181.
Seager, R., et al. (2013). “Projections of declining surface-water availability for the southwestern United States.” Nature Clim. Change, 3(5), 482–486.
Tebaldi, C., Smith, R. L., Nychka, D., and Mearns, L. O. (2005). “Quantifying uncertainty in projections of regional climate change: A Bayesian approach to the analysis of multimodel ensembles.” J. Clim., 18(10), 1524–1540.
Teng, J., Vaze, J., Chiew, F. H., Wang, B., and Perraud, J. M. (2012). “Estimating the relative uncertainties sourced from GCMs and hydrological models in modeling climate change impact on runoff.” J. Hydrometeorol., 13(1), 122–139.
Thornton, P. E., Running, S. W., and White, M. A. (1997). “Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain.” J. Hydrol., 190(3), 214–251.
Toews, M. W., and Allen, D. M. (2009). “Evaluating different GCMs for predicting spatial recharge in an irrigated arid region.” J. Hydrol., 374(3), 265–281.
Tsai, F. T.-C, and Elshall, A. S. (2013). “Hierarchical Bayesian model averaging for hydrostratigraphic modeling: Uncertainty segregation and comparative evaluation.” Water Resour. Res., 49(9), 5520–5536.
Tsai, F. T.-C., and Li, X. (2008). “Inverse groundwater modeling for hydraulic conductivity estimation using Bayesian model averaging and variance window.” Water Resour. Res., 44(9), W09434.
USBR. (2013). “Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate and hydrology projections: Release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs.” U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Services Center, Denver.
USGS. (2016). “WaterWatch, U.S. geological survey.” ⟨http://waterwatch.usgs.gov⟩ (Apr. 5, 2016).
Van Roosmalen, L., Christensen, J. H., Butts, M. B., Jensen, K. H., and Refsgaard, J. C. (2010). “An intercomparison of regional climate model data for hydrological impact studies in Denmark.” J. Hydrol., 380(3), 406–419.
Velázquez, J. A., et al. (2013). “An ensemble approach to assess hydrological models’ contribution to uncertainties in the analysis of climate change impact on water resources.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17(2), 565–578.
Weiland, F. S., Van Beek, L. P. H., Weerts, A. H., and Bierkens, M. F. P. (2012). “Extracting information from an ensemble of GCMs to reliably assess future global runoff change.” J. Hydrol., 412–413, 66–75.
Wilby, R. L., and Harris, I. (2006). “A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK.” Water Resour. Res., 42(2), W02419.
Yip, S., Ferro, C. A., Stephenson, D. B., and Hawkins, E. (2011). “A simple, coherent framework for partitioning uncertainty in climate predictions.” J. Clim., 24(17), 4634–4643.
Yuan, H., Dai, Y., Xiao, Z., Ji, D., and Shangguan, W. (2011). “Reprocessing the MODIS leaf area index products for land surface and climate modelling.” Remote Sens. Environ., 115(5), 1171–1187.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 22Issue 4April 2017

History

Received: Apr 5, 2016
Accepted: Sep 20, 2016
Published online: Dec 1, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2017
Discussion open until: May 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Amir Mani, Ph.D., S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Formerly, Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803. E-mail: [email protected]
Frank T.-C. Tsai, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State Univ., 3330B Patrick F. Taylor Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share