Case Studies
May 28, 2011

Automated Linear and Nonlinear Reservoir Approaches for Estimating Annual Base Flow

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 4

Abstract

Three automated base flow separation techniques based on linear and nonlinear reservoir approaches are used to identify the seasonal variation of base flow and to quantify the annual base flow for three subwatersheds of the Essex region in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Significant differences in annual base flow estimated by linear and nonlinear reservoir algorithms are observed. In the nonlinear reservoir approach, the recession parameter is considered to be a seasonally variable parameter. The nonlinear reservoir approach fits streamflow recession better than the linear reservoir approach. The steeper slopes of seasonal flow duration curves in the 90% to 100% flow exceedance range show that the groundwater contribution to streamflow is relatively small in the study area. The precipitation-streamflow relationships show faster response of base flow during the period of high recharge. All of the methods show similar base flow estimation during the period of high evapotranspiration losses. The nonlinear reservoir approach represents the base flow response to precipitation better than the other methods. Therefore, the annual base flow estimated by the nonlinear reservoir approach is considered as the most reasonable estimation for the formulation of water budget of the study area. The method quantifies the occurrence of average annual baseflow as 34% of average annual streamflow.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express special thanks to Dr. Hartmut Wittenberg for the source codes of BNLP.

References

Aksoy, H., Kurt, I., and Eris, E. (2009). “Filtered smoothed minima baseflow separation method.” J. Hydrol., 372(1–4), 94–101.JHYDA7
Aksoy, H., Unal, N. E., and Pektas, A. E. (2008). “Smoothed minima baseflow separation tool for perennial and intermittent streams.” Hydrol. Processes, 22(22), 4467–4476.HYPRE3
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). “Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Irrigation and Drainage Paper no. 56, Rome, Italy.
Arnold, J. G., and Allen, P. M. (1999). “Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 35(2), 411–424.JWRAF5
Boussinesq, J. (1877). “Essai sur la théorie des eaux courantes.” MeÂm. preÂs. par divers savants aÁ l'Acad. des Sci. de l'Inst. Nat. de France, 23(1), 1–680 (in French).
Chapman, T. G. (1999). “A comparison of algorithms for stream flow recession and baseflow separation.” Hydrol. Processes, 13(5), 701–714.HYPRE3
Chapman, T. G. (2003). “Modelling stream recession flows.” Environ. Modell. Software, 18(8–9), 683–692.EMSOFT
Chen, L., Zheng, H., Chen, Y. D., and Liu, C. (2008). “Base-flow separation in the source region of the yellow river.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(7), 541–548.JHYEFF
Chen, X., Chen, D. Y., and Chen, X.-H. (2006). “Simulation of baseflow accounting for the effect of bank storage and its implication in baseflow separation.” J. Hydrol., 327(3–4), 539–549.JHYDA7
Dewandel, B., Lachassagne, P., Bakalowiczc, M., Weng, Ph., and Al-Malki, A. (2003). “Evaluation of aquifer thickness by analysing recession hydrographs. Application to the oman ophiolite hard-rock aquifer.” J. Hydrol., 274(1–4), 248–269.JHYDA7
Eckhardt, K. (2005). “How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation.” Hydrol. Processes, 19(2), 507–515.HYPRE3
Essex Region Conservation Authority (ERCA). (2007). “Draft conceptual water budget assessment report.” Essex, ON, Canada.
Ferket, B. V.A., Samain, B., and Pauwels, V. R. N. (2010). “Internal validation of conceptual rainfall-runoff models using baseflow separation.” J. Hydrol., 381(1–2), 158–173.JHYDA7
Fleming, R., and Ford, R. (2006). “Relationship of NMAN output to tile drain water nutrient levels—Field study.” Final Rep., Univ. of Guelph, Ridgetown, On, Canada, 2–5.
Gutiérrez-Magness, A. L., and McCuen, R. H. (2005). “Effect of flow proportions on HSF model calibration accuracy.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 10(5), 343–352.JHYEFF
Griffiths, G. A., and Clausen, B. (1997). “Streamflow recession in basins with multiple water storages.” J. Hydrol., 190(1–2), 60–74.JHYDA7
Hammond, M., and Han, D. (2006). “Recession curve estimation for storm event separations.” J. Hydrol., 330(3–4), 573–585.JHYDA7
Hewlett, J. D., and Hibbert, A. R. (1967). “Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas.” Int. Symp. on Forest Hydrology, Sopper, W. E. and Lull, H. W., eds., Pergamon: New York, 275–290.
Institute of Hydrology. (1980). “Low flow studies.” Research Rep., Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Lin, K., Guo, S., Zhang, W., and Liu, P. (2007). “A new baseflow separation method based on analytical solutions of the horton infiltration capacity curve.” Hydrol. Processes, 21(13), 1719–1736.HYPRE3
Linsley, R. K., Jr., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H. (1982). Hydrology for engineers, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, NY, 508.
McLean, R. K., and Watt, W. E. (2005). “Regional low flow frequency relations for central ontario.” Can. Water Resour. J., 30(3), 179–196.
Nejadhashemi, A. P., Sheridan, J. M., Shirmohammadi, A., and Montas, H. J. (2007). “Hydrograph separation by incorporating climatological factors: Application to small experimental watersheds.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(3), 744–756.JWRAF5
Nejadhashemi, A. P., Shirmohammadi, A., Montas, H. J., Sheridan, J. M., and Bosch, D. D. (2008). “Watershed physical and hydrological effects on baseflow separation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(10), 971–980.JHYEFF
Nejadhashemi, A. P., Shirmohammadi, A., Sheridan, J. M., Montas, H. J., and Mankin, K. R. (2009). “Case study: Evaluation of streamflow partitioning methods.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 135(6), 791–801.JIDEDH
Piggott, A. R., Moin, S., and Southam, C. (2005). “A revised approach to the UKIH method for the calculation of baseflow.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 50(5), 911–920.HSJODN
Risser, D. W., Gburek, W. J., and Folmar, G. J. (2005). “Comparison of methods for estimating ground-water recharge and base flow at a small watershed underlain by fractured bedrock in the eastern united states.” Scientific Investigations Rep. 2005-5038, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 2.
Rutledge, A. T. (1998). “Computer programs for describing the recession of ground-water discharge and for estimating mean ground-water recharge and discharge from streamflow data.” U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Rep. 98-4148, 34–40.
Schilling, K. E., and Helmers, M. (2008). “Effects of subsurface drainage tiles on streamflow in Iowa agricultural watersheds: Exploratory hydrograph analysis.” Hydrol. Processes, 22(23), 4497–4506.HYPRE3
Schwartz, S. S. (2007). “Automated algorithms for heuristic base-flow separation.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(6), 1583–1594.JWRAF5
Smakhtin, V. U. (2001). “Low flow hydrology: A review.” J. Hydrol., 240(3–4), 147–186.JHYDA7
Stewart, M., Cimino, J., and Ross, M. (2007). “Calibration of base flow separation methods with streamflow conductivity.” Ground Water, 45(1), 17–27.GRWAAP
Tallaksen, L. M. (1995). “A review of baseflow recession analysis.” J. Hydrol., 165(1–4), 349–370.JHYDA7
Tan, C. S., Drury, C. F., Gaynor, J. D., Welacky, T. W., and Reynolds, W. D. (2002). “Effect of tillage and water table control on evapotranspiration, surface runoff, tile drainage and soil water content under maize on a clay loam soil.” Agric. Water Manage., 54(3), 173–188.AWMADF
Tan, S. B. K., Lo, E. Y., Shuy, E. B., Chua, L. H., and Lim, W. H. (2009). “Hydrograph separation and development of empirical relationships using single-parameter digital filters.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(3), 271–279.JHYEFF
Waterloo Hydrogeologic. (2004). Six Conservation Authorities FEFLOW groundwater model, conceptual model report, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, London, ON, Canada.
Wittenberg, H. (1999). “Baseflow recession and recharge as nonlinear storage processes.” Hydrol. Processes, 13(5), 715–726.HYPRE3
Wittenberg, H. (2003). “Effects of season and man-made changes on baseflow and flow recession: Case studies.” Hydrol. Processes, 17(11), 2113–2123.HYPRE3
Wittenberg, H., and Sivapalan, M. (1999). “Watershed groundwater balance estimation using streamflow recession analysis and baseflow separation.” J. Hydrol., 219(1–2), 20–33.JHYDA7

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17Issue 4April 2012
Pages: 554 - 564

History

Received: Oct 11, 2010
Accepted: May 26, 2011
Published online: May 28, 2011
Published in print: Apr 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Arpana Rani Datta [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada, N9B 3P4. E-mail: [email protected]
Tirupati Bolisetti [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada, N9B 3P4 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Ram Balachandar [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada, N9B 3P4. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share