CASE STUDIES
Oct 1, 2009

Hydrologic-Economic Analysis of Best Management Practices for Sediment Control in the Santa Fe Watershed, New Mexico

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 4

Abstract

The Santa Fe River Watershed in Santa Fe County, New Mexico was identified as one of the top five high risk nonpoint source pollution areas out in the Rio Grande Basin. This watershed was selected to demonstrate the use of hydrologic modeling as a powerful tool for assessing the impacts of land management practices on erosion and sediment control at the watershed level. A method based on the Hydrologic Simulation Program-Fortran was used to address the local nonpoint sediment pollution concerns. The model was modified to reflect predicted future land uses related to expected urban expansion in the watershed. Six scenarios were created and the costs and benefits of each were weighed. The total estimated costs ranged from under $1 million to over $66 million. Total average annual sediment yields at the watershed outlet ranged from 3,441 to 4,111 tonnes/year, depending on management practices employed. These results indicate the magnitude of expected sediment reductions under various management strategies. Additionally, they provide an indication of the magnitude of expected sediment reductions in the Santa Fe Watershed and the estimated cost of each management practice.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to gratefully acknowledge Mr. Darwin Ockerman from the USGS Texas Water Science Center, Dr. Chad Smith and Dr. Paula Williamson from Texas State University-San Marcos, and Dr. Vladimir Novotny from Northeastern University for their contributions to this study.

References

Bao, Y., Clapp, R. B., Brenkert, A. L., Moore, T. D., and Fontaine, T. A. (1996). “Simulation of contaminated sediment transport in White Oak Creek Basin.” Proc., 6th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conf., Subcommittee on Sedimentation of the Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Las Vegas, VIII-1–VIII-6.
Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle, J. L., Donigian, A. S., and Johanson, R. C. (1993). “Hydrological simulation program-FORTRAN user’s manual for release 10.” Rep. No. EPA/600/R-93/174, Environmental Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Ga.
Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle, J. L., Jobes, T. H., and Donigian, A. S. (2001). Hydrological simulation program-Fortran (HSPF) version 12 user’s manual, Aqua Terra Consultants, Mountain View, Calif., 873, ⟨http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/bsnsdocs.html⟩.
Brun, S. E., and Band, L. E. (2000). “Simulating runoff behavior in an urbanizing watershed.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 24, 5–22.
Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling Subcommittee. (1998). Chesapeake Bay watershed model application and calculation of nutrient and sediment loadings, U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Md.
Collins, A. L., and Anthony, S. G. (2008). “Predicting sediment inputs to aquatic ecosystems across England and Wales under current environmental conditions.” Appl. Geogr., 28(4), 281–294.
DeVries, B. (2007). “American Rivers announces ten rivers at risk.” American rivers, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://www.americanrivers.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=10199⟩.
Donigian, A. S., Jr. (1995). “Hydrological simulation program-Fortran (HSPF).” Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, Colo., 442.
Donigian, A. S., Jr. (2002). “Watershed model calibration and validation—the HSPF experience.” Specialty Conf. Proc.: Water Environment Foundation, National TMDL Science and Policy 2002, Phoenix, 30.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1999). “Preliminary data summary of urban storm water Best Management Practices.” Rep. No. EPA-821-R-99-021, EPA Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2000). “Estimating hydrology and hydraulic parameters for HSPF.” BASINS Technical Note 6, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., 32.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2006). “Sediment parameter and calibration guidance for HSPF.” BASINS Technical Note 8, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., 46.
Fontaine, T. A., and Jacomino, V. M. F. (1997). “Sensitivity analysis of simulated contaminated sediment transport.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 33(2), 313–326.
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., and Arnold, J. G. (2007). The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State Univ., Ames, Iowa, 102.
GIS Department. (2008). “Future land use map.” Adopted by city council resolution No. 1999-45, Santa Fe, N.M.
Grant, P. (2002). “Santa Fe Restoration Action Strategy (WRAS).” Prepared pursuant to the Clean Water Action Plan and Unified Assessment of New Mexico watersheds, New Mexico Environment Department Surface Water Quality Bureau, Santa Fe, N.M., 57.
Harmel, R. D., and Smith, P. K. (2007). “Consideration of measurement uncertainty in the evaluation of goodness-of-fit in hydrologic and water quality modeling.” J. Hydrol., 337(3–4), 326–336.
Hayashi, S., Murakami, S., Watanabe, M., and Bao-Hua, X. (2004). “HSPF simulation of runoff and sediment loads in the Upper Changjiang River Basin, China.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(7), 801–815.
Hummel, P. R., Imhoff, J. C., Dusenbury, R., and Gray, M. (2000). TMDL USLE: A practical tool for estimating diffuse sediment source loads within a watershed context, U.S. EPA National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, Ga.
Lumb, A. M., McCammon, R. B., and Kittle, J. L. (1994). “Users manual for an Expert System (HSPEXP) for calibration of the Hydrological Simulation Program: Fortran.” Rep. No. 94-4168, United States Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations, Reston, Va., 102.
Macleod, C. J. A., Scholefield, D., and Haygarth, P. M. (2007). “Integration for sustainable catchment management.” Sci. Total Environ., 373(2–3), 591–602.
Minville, M., Brissette, F., and Leconte, R. (2008). “Uncertainty of the impact of climate change on the hydrology of a Nordic watershed.” J. Hydrol., 358(1–2), 70–83.
Morgan, R. P. C. (1995). Soil erosion and conservation, Longman Limited, Essex, U.K.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290.
Novotny, V., and Olem, H. (1994). Water quality: Prevention, identification, and management of diffuse pollution, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Ockerman, D. J. (2007). “Simulation of streamflow and estimation of ground-water recharge in the Upper Cibolo Creek Watershed, South-Central Texas, 1992–2004.” Rep. No. 2007-5202, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigation, Reston, Va., 34.
Ortiz, D., Lang, K., and Beal, L. (1998). “Water resources data for New Mexico, water year 1997.” Rep. No. NM-97-1, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data, Reston, Va., 574.
Owens, P. N. (2008). “Sediment behaviour, functions, and management in river basins.” Sustainable management of sediment resources: Sediment management at the river basin scale, P. N. Owens, ed., Vol. 4, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pimentel, D. et al. (1995). “Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits.” Science, 267(5201), 1117–1123.
Rode, M., and Suhr, U. (2006). “Uncertainties in selected surface water quality data.” Hydrology Earth Syst. Sci., 3, 2991–3021.
Schoonover, J. E., Lockaby, B. G., and Shaw, J. N. (2007). “Channel morphology and sediment origin in streams draining the Georgia Piedmont.” J. Hydrol., 342(1–2), 110–123.
Semmens, D., Hernandez, M., Goodrich, D. C., and Kepner, W. G. (2006). “A retrospective analysis of model uncertainty for forecasting hydrologic change.” Proc., iEMSs 3rd Biennial Meeting: Summit on Environmental Modeling and Software, International Environmental Modeling and Software Society, Burlington, Vt.
Slob, A. F. L., Ellen, G. J., and Gerrits, L. (2008). “Sediment management and stakeholder involvement.” Sustainable management of sediment resources: Sediment management at the river basin scale, P. N. Owens, ed., Vol. 4, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stephens and Associates, Inc. (2003). “Jemez y Sangre regional water plan, Volume 1.” Rep. Prepared for Jemez y Sangre Water Planning Council, Albuquerque, N.M., 234.
Thomas, C. L., Stewart, A. E., and Constantz, J. E. (2000). “Determination of infiltration and percolation rates along a reach of the Santa Fe River near La Bajada, New Mexico.” Rep. No. 00-4141, U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations, Reston, Va., 65.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). “Santa Fe County, New Mexico.” State and county quick facts, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15Issue 4April 2010
Pages: 308 - 317

History

Received: Jan 2, 2009
Accepted: Sep 20, 2009
Published online: Oct 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Heidi L. N. Moltz [email protected]
Senior Water Resources Scientist, Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, 51 Monroe St. PE-08, Rockville, MD 20850 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Vicente L. Lopes
Professor, Aquatic Resources Program, Texas State Univ., 601 Univ. Dr., San Marcos, TX 78666.
Walter Rast
Professor, Aquatic Resources Program, Texas State Univ., 601 Univ. Dr., San Marcos, TX 78666.
Stephen J. Ventura
Professor, and Chair, Dept. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, 439 Soils, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share