Technical Papers
Sep 5, 2022

Muskeg Soil Stabilization Using the Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation Technique by the Urease Active Bioslurry Approach

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 11

Abstract

Muskeg soil is widespread in Canada. It covers around 15% of the Canadian landscape. Its problematic nature is attributed to its high compressibility and low shear strength when subjected to loads because of its high initial void ratio and water content. Therefore, in this study, microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP), an emerging and potentially environmentally friendly technique for soil stabilization, is used for enhancing the compressibility and shear strength properties of muskeg soil. The urease active bioslurry approach is adopted in this study, which comprises the mechanical mixing of bioslurry with soil and the injection of cementation solutions in subsequent phases. Muskeg soil was collected from Bolivar Park, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada. Different bioslurry concentrations were tested for the compressibility properties to determine the optimum concentration. Afterward, the optimum concentration was used to check the effect of the bioslurry percentage by weight and the number of cementation solutions injected on the soil stiffness and strength. Microstructure analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were conducted for untreated and treated samples to check the change in the soil microstructure due to stabilization. The results showed that the 0.4  mol/L bioslurry concentration demonstrated the best compressibility properties.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This research work is supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Collaborative Research and Development Grant (Ref: NSERC-CRD Project No. CRDPJ 500977–16). The specific financial and in-kind support from T. C. Energy, Ledcor Construction Ltd., and Conetec Investigations Ltd. channeled through a partnership with the Pipeline Integrity Institute (PII) at the University of British Columbia (UBC) is deeply appreciated. Technical inputs provided by Dr. Bill Liu (T. C. Energy), Mr. T. Yu (Ledcor Construction Ltd.), and Mr. I. Weemees and Mr. J. Sharp (Conetec Investigations Ltd.) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Achal, V., and A. Mukherjee. 2015. “A review of microbial precipitation for sustainable construction.” Constr. Build. Mater. 93 (Sep): 1224–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.051.
Ajlouni, M. A. 2000. “Geotechnical properties of peat and related engineering problems.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Illinois.
Al Qabany, A., and K. Soga. 2013. “Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils.” Géotechnique 63 (4): 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.022.
Al Qabany, A., K. Soga, and C. Santamarina. 2012. “Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (8): 992–1001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000666.
ASTM. 2014a. Standard practice for estimating the degree of humification of peat and other organic soils (visual/manual method). ASTM D5715-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014b. Standard test method for rapid determination of carbonate content of soils. ASTM D4373-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014c. Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. ASTM D2974-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014d. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM D854-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test methods for bulk and dry density of peat and peat products. ASTM D4531-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard classification of peat samples by laboratory testing. ASTM D4427-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020a. Standard test method for laboratory determination of the fiber content of peat samples by dry mass. ASTM D1997-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020b. Standard test methods for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils using incremental loading. ASTM D2435/D2435M-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011. Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. ASTM D3080/D3080M-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bahmani, S. H., B. B. K. Huat, A. Asadi, and N. Farzadnia. 2014. “Stabilization of residual soil using SiO2 nanoparticles and cement.” Constr. Build. Mater. 64 (Aug): 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.086.
Benhelal, E., G. Zahedi, E. Shamsaei, and A. Bahadori. 2013. “Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry.” J. Cleaner Prod. 51 (Jul): 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.049.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 1990. Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. BS 1377: 1990. London: BSI.
Cheng, L., R. Cord-Ruwisch, and M. A. Shahin. 2013. “Cementation of sand soil by microbially induced calcite precipitation at various degrees of saturation.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (1): 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0023.
Cheng, L., and M. A. Shahin. 2016. “Urease active bio-slurry: A novel soil improvement approach based on microbially induced carbonate precipitation.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (9): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0635.
DeJong, J. T., M. B. Fritzges, and K. Nüsslein. 2006. “Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (11): 1381–1392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:11(1381).
DeJong, J. T., B. M. Mortensen, B. C. Martinez, and D. C. Nelson. 2010. “Biomediated soil improvement.” Ecol. Eng. 36 (2): 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.029.
DeJong, J. T., K. Soga, E. Kavazanjian, S. Burns, L. A. van Paassen, and A. Al Qabany. 2013. “Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: Progress, opportunities and challenges.” Géotechnique 63 (4): 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.
Di Sante, M., E. Fratalocchi, F. Mazzieri, and V. Brianzoni. 2015. “Influence of delayed compaction on the compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of soil–lime mixtures.” Eng. Geol. 185 (Feb): 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.12.005.
El Mountassir, G., J. M. Minto, L. A. van Paassen, E. Salifu, and R. J. Lunn. 2018. “Applications of microbial processes in geotechnical engineering.” Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 104 (Jan): 39–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aambs.2018.05.001.
Feng, K., and B. M. Montoya. 2015. “Influence of confinement and cementation level on the behavior of microbial-induced calcite precipitated sands under monotonic drained loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (1): 04015057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001379.
Harkes, M. P., J. L. Booster, L. A. van Paassen, and M. C. M. van Loosdrecht. 2008. “Microbial induced carbonate precipitation as ground improvement method—Bacterial fixation and empirical correlation CaCO3 vs. strength.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Bio-Geo-Civil Engineering, 37–41. Delft, Netherlands: TU Delft en Deltares.
Martinez, B. C., J. T. DeJong, T. R. Ginn, B. M. Montoya, T. H. Barkouki, C. Hunt, B. Tanyu, and D. Major. 2013. “Experimental optimization of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (4): 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000787.
Mitchell, J. K., and J. C. Santamarina. 2005. “Biological considerations in geotechnical engineering.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (10): 1222–1233. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:10(1222).
Mortensen, B. M., M. J. Haber, J. T. DeJong, L. F. Caslake, and D. C. Nelson. 2011. “Effects of environmental factors on microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation.” J. Appl. Microbiol. 111 (2): 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05065.x.
Ng, W. S., M. L. Lee, and S. L. Hii. 2012. “An overview of the factors affecting microbial-induced calcite precipitation and its potential application in soil improvement.” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 6 (2): 723–729. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1084674.
O’Kelly, B. C. 2016. “Briefing: Atterberg limits and peat.” Environ. Geotech. 3 (6): 359–363. https://doi.org/10.1680/envgeo.15.00003.
Rietveld, H. M. 1969. “A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures.” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2 (2): 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889869006558.
Terzis, D., and L. Laloui. 2019. “A decade of progress and turning points in the understanding of bio-improved soils: A review.” Geomech. Energy Environ. 19 (Sep): 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2019.03.001.
van Paassen, L. A., C. M. Daza, M. Stall, D. Y. Sorokin, and M. C. M. van Loosdrecht. 2008. “In situ soil reinforcement by microbial denitrification.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Bio-Geo-Civil Engineering, 124–133. Delft, Netherlands: TU Delft en Deltares.
Whiffin, V. S., L. A. van Paassen, and M. P. Harkes. 2007. “Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique.” Geomicrobiol. J. 24 (5): 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490450701436505.
Xiao, P., H. Liu, A. W. Stuedlein, T. M. Evans, and Y. Xiao. 2019. “Effect of relative density and biocementation on cyclic response of calcareous sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 56 (12): 1849–1862. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0573.
Zhu, T., and M. Dittrich. 2016. “Carbonate precipitation through microbial activities in natural environment, and their potential in biotechnology: A review.” Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 4 (Jan): 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148Issue 11November 2022

History

Received: Mar 31, 2021
Accepted: Jun 24, 2022
Published online: Sep 5, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 5, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

P.Eng.
Researcher, School of Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Univ. of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4272-6753
Associate Professor, School of Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Univ. of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7; Associate Director of Graduate Studies, Geomaterials Research Group, School of Engineering Okanagan Campus, 1137 Alumni Ave., Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3808-0670. Email: [email protected]
Emmanuel Salifu, Ph.D., M.ASCE
CEng.
Presidential Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Bio-mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics, School of Sustainable Engineering for the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287.
Dharma Wijewickreme, Ph.D., M.ASCE
P.Eng.
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Assessing Water Erosion Improvement in Beach Sand Treated with Bioslurry Using a Surface Percolation Technique, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12083, 150, 8, (2024).
  • Strength and Kaolin Nucleation in Biotreated Coarse Sand, International Journal of Geomechanics, 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-9138, 24, 5, (2024).
  • Use of Bioslurry for Stabilization of Florida Soils, Geo-Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485330.026, (246-256), (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share