Technical Notes
Aug 1, 2022

Effect of Soil Particle Size on the Accuracy of Tactile Pressure Sensors

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 10

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of soil particle size on the measurement accuracy of single-point type tactile pressure sensors when used for measuring soil contact stresses. Sensors with two different diameters (Dsens) are integrated into an oedometer cell. Granular materials with a wide range of particle diameters (D50) and angularities (from rounded to irregular shaped) are evaluated, resulting in a wide range of ratios of Dsens/D50 from 2.6 to 105.8. The test results show that the soil particle size significantly affects and exponentially correlates with the measurement accuracy of the sensor. A threshold Dsens/D50 of 10.5 is identified for the sensor, beyond which the error is less than 5%. It is also shown that even for ratios of Dsens/D50 as large as 40, an error of approximately 2% can be observed, which is intrinsic to the sensor.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Collaborative Research Fund #C6006-20G funded by the Hong Kong Research Grant Council and Grant No. 51922112 provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

References

Al Atik, L., and N. Sitar. 2010. “Seismic earth pressures on cantilever retaining structures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (10): 1324–1333. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000351.
ASTM. 2000. Practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM D2487-00. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Barnett, N., M. M. Rahman, M. R. Karim, H. B. K. Nguyen, and J. A. H. Carraro. 2021. “Equivalent state theory for mixtures of sand with non-plastic fines: A DEM investigation.” Géotechnique 71 (5): 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.103.
Fu, R., M. R. Coop, and X. Q. Li. 2017. “Influence of particle type on the mechanics of sand–rubber mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001680.
Gade, V. K., and S. M. Dasaka. 2018. “Calibration of earth pressure sensors.” Ind. Geotech. J. 48 (1): 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0223-0.
Gao, Y., Y.-H. Wang, and J. K. Chow. 2017. “Application of film-like sensors for K0 and pore water pressure measurement in clay during 1D consolidation.” Geotech. Test. J. 40 (1): 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160008.
Gillis, K., S. Dashti, and Y. M. Hashash. 2015. “Dynamic calibration of tactile sensors for measurement of soil pressures in centrifuge.” Geotech. Test. J. 38 (3): 20140184–20140274. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140184.
Hashash, Y. M. A., S. Dashti, M. Musgrove, K. Gillis, M. Walker, K. Ellison, and Y. I. Basarah. 2018. “Influence of tall buildings on seismic response of shallow underground structures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (12): 04018097. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001963.
Ishihara, K. 1993. “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes.” Géotechnique 43 (3): 351–451. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351.
Kalantari, M., J. Dargahi, J. Kövecses, M. Ghanbari Mardasi, and S. Nouri. 2012. “A new approach for modeling piezoresistive force sensors based on semiconductive polymer composites.” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 17 (3): 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2011.2108664.
Kallstenius, T., and W. Bergau. 1956. Investigations of soil pressure measuring by means of cells. Royal Swedish Geotechnical Institute Proceedings No. 12. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Swedish Geotechnical Institute.
Kheiripour Langroudi, M., J. Sun, S. Sundaresan, and G. I. Tardos. 2010. “Transmission of stresses in static and sheared granular beds: The influence of particle size, shearing rate, layer thickness and sensor size.” Powder Technol. 203 (1): 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.03.028.
Komi, E. R., J. R. Roberts, and S. J. Rothberg. 2007. “Evaluation of thin, flexible sensors for time-resolved grip force measurement.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 221 (12): 1687–1699. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544062JMES700.
Landini, G. 2008. “Advanced shape analysis with ImageJ.” In Proc., 2nd Image J User and Developer Conf., 116–121. Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg: Centre de Recherche Public Henri Tudor.
Li, X., H. Zhang, J. Jin, D. Huang, X. Qi, Z. Zhang, and D. Yu. 2014. “Quantifying dispersion of nanoparticles in polymer nanocomposites through TEM micrographs.” J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 2 (2): 021008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027339.
Liu, K. Y., C. S. Xu, and X. Zhang. 2021. “Measurement performance evaluation of tactile pressure sensor with different particle sizes and sensor curvatures.” Geotech. Test. J. 44 (4): 1036–1054. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20200028.
Mikola, R. G., G. Candia, and N. Sitar. 2016. “Seismic earth pressures on retaining structures and basement walls in cohesionless soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (10): 04016047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001507.
Miura, K., N. Otsuka, E. Kohama, C. Supachawarote, and T. Hirabayashi. 2003. “The size effects of earth pressure cells on measurement in granular materials.” Soils Found. 43 (5): 133–147. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.43.5_133.
Muszynski, M. R., S. M. Olson, Y. M. A. Hashash, and C. Phillips. 2016. “Earth pressure measurements using tactile pressure sensors in a saturated sand during static and dynamic centrifuge testing.” Geotech. Test. J. 39 (3): 20150049. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20150049.
Olson, S. M., Y. M. A. Hashash, M. R. Muszynski, and C. Phillips. 2017. “Passive wedge formation and limiting lateral pressures on large foundations during lateral spreading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (7): 04017027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001663.
Paikowsky, S. G., C. J. Palmer, and L. E. Rolwes. 2006. “The use of tactile sensor technology for measuring soil stress distribution.” In GeoCongress 2006, 1–6. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40803(187)79.
Palmer, M. C., T. D. O’Rourke, N. A. Olson, T. Abdoun, D. Ha, and M. J. O’Rourke. 2009. “Tactile pressure sensors for soil-structure interaction assessment.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (11): 1638–1645. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000143.
Rahman, M. M., S. R. Lo, and C. T. Gnanendran. 2009. “Reply to the discussion by Wanatowski and Chu on ‘On equivalent granular void ratio and steady state behaviour of loose sand with fines.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (4): 483–486. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-025.
Rusinek, R., M. Molenda, and J. Horabik. 2009. “Performance of membrane pressure transducers in granular materials of various particle sizes.” Powder Technol. 190 (3): 410–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2008.08.024.
Talesnick, M. 2013. “Measuring soil pressure within a soil mass.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (7): 716–722. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0347.
Talesnick, M. L., M. Ringel, and R. Avraham. 2014. “Measurement of contact soil pressure in physical modelling of soil–structure interaction.” Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech. 14 (1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.13.00008.
Tekscan. 2015. FlexiForce quickstart board (Rev B). South Boston, MA: Tekscan Inc.
Tekscan. 2019. ELF & WELF 2 user manual, Version 4.3x (Rev P). South Boston, MA: Tekscan Inc.
Tekscan. 2020. Best practices in mechanical integration of the FlexiForce sensor. South Boston, MA: Tekscan Inc.
Tory, A. C., and R. W. Sparrow. 1967. “The influence of diaphragm flexibility on the performance of an earth pressure cell.” J. Sci. Instrum. 44 (9): 781–785. https://doi.org/10.1088/0950-7671/44/9/333.
Weiler, W. A., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1982. “Factors affecting stress cell measurements in soil.” J. Geotech. Eng. 108 (12): 1529–1548. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001393.
Woo, K., D. L. Zignego, and C. H. Jenkins. 2015. “Tearing of thin polymer sheets with wrinkling.” J. Spacecraft Rockets 52 (6): 1680–1690. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33283.
Xiao, Y., L. Long, T. M. Evans, H. Zhou, H. Liu, and A. W. Stuedlein. 2019. “Effect of particle shape on stress-dilatancy responses of medium-dense sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (2): 04018105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001994.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148Issue 10October 2022

History

Received: Oct 27, 2021
Accepted: Jun 2, 2022
Published online: Aug 1, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 1, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2236-6161
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5192-5033. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Modified value stabilization methodology (MVSM) to efficiently determine the sample size required for particle morphology quantification, Powder Technology, 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118396, (118396), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share