Technical Notes
Oct 21, 2021

Energy-Based Assessment of Liquefaction Resistance of Rooted Soil

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 1

Abstract

Plant roots have been shown to improve the soil resistance to liquefaction upon cyclic loading. However, the effect of roots and their orientations on any changes in soil anisotropy and the mechanisms of dissipated energy involved at liquefaction state are not clear. This study applied the energy-based method to evaluate the liquefaction behavior of rooted soils of varying root volume ratios (RVRs). Results of 12 undrained cyclic triaxial tests on rooted soils published in the literature were reinterpreted under this energy framework. The assessment showed that the normalized cumulative dissipated energy (ΔW/σc, where σc is the effective confining pressure) of rooted soil at liquefaction state can be related to the cyclic resistance ratio at 15 cycles (CRR15). It was discovered that roots that were predominantly orientated in the direction perpendicular to the major principal stress of extension path reduced soil anisotropy. Additionally, the ΔW/σc was linearly correlated with the normalized cumulative strain energy (4W/σc) with a gradient of approximately 2, which implies that any recycling and recovering of strain energy was minimal in rooted soils.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the General Research Fund (GRF) #16212818 by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council as well as Grant No. 51922112 provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC).

References

Dobry, R., R. S. Ladd, F. Y. Yokel, R. M. Chung, and D. Powell. 1982. Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method: Building science series. Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards.
El Shamy, U., and C. Denissen. 2010. “Microscale characterization of energy dissipation mechanisms in liquefiable granular soils.” Comput. Geotech. 37 (7–8): 846–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.07.004.
Fardad Amini, P., and R. Noorzad. 2018. “Energy-based evaluation of liquefaction of fiber-reinforced sand using cyclic triaxial testing.” Soil Dyn. Earth. Eng. 104 (Jan): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.026.
Karimzadeh, A. A., A. K. Leung, S. Hosseinpour, Z. Wu, and P. Fardad Amini. 2021. “Monotonic and cyclic behaviour of root-reinforced sand.” Can. Geotech. J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0626.
Kokusho, T. 2013. “Liquefaction potential evaluations: Energy-based method versus stress-based method.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (10): 1088–1099. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0456.
Kokusho, T. 2017. “Liquefaction potential evaluations by energy-based method and stress-based method for various ground motions: Supplement.” Soil Dyn. Earth Eng. 95: 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.033.
Kokusho, T. 2021. “Energy-based liquefaction evaluation for induced strain and surface settlement—Evaluation steps and case studies.” Soil Dyn. Earth Eng. 143: 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106552.
Kokusho, T., and S. Tanimoto. 2021. “Energy capacity versus liquefaction strength investigated by cyclic triaxial tests on intact soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (4): 04021006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002484.
Liang, T., J. A. Knappett, A. K. Leung, and A. G. Bengough. 2020. “Modelling the seismic performance of root-reinforced slopes using the finite-element method.” Géotechnique 70 (5): 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.128.
Mickovski, S. B., and L. P. H. van Beek. 2009. “Root morphology and effects on soil reinforcement and slope stability of young vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides) plants grown in semi-arid climate.” Plant Soil 324 (1): 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0130-y.
Ng, C. W. W., A. K. Leung, and J. J. Ni. 2019. Plant–soil slope interaction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Noorzad, R., and P. Fardad Amini. 2014. “Liquefaction resistance of Babolsar sand reinforced with randomly distributed fibers under cyclic loading.” Soil Dyn. Earth Eng. 66 (Nov): 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.07.011.
Polito, C. P., R. A. Green, and J. Lee. 2008. “Pore pressure generation models for sands and silty soils subjected to cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (10): 1490–1500. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1490).
Sarma, S. K. 1971. “Energy flux of strong earthquakes.” Tectonophysics 11 (3): 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(71)90028-X.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1971. “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 97 (9): 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
Stokes, A., et al. 2014. “Ecological mitigation of hillslope instability: Ten key issues facing researchers and practitioners.” Plant Soil 377 (1–2): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2044-6.
Wang, K., A. J. Brennan, J. A. Knappett, S. Robinson, and A. Bengough. 2018. “Centrifuge modelling of remediation of liquefaction-induced pipeline uplift using model root systems.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Physical Modelling in Geoetchnics, 1265–1270. London: CRC Press.
Wu, Z., A. K. Leung, D. Boldrin, and S. P. Ganesan. 2021. “Variability in root biomechanics of Chrysopogon zizanioides for soil eco-engineering solutions.” Sci. Total Environ. 776: 145943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145943.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148Issue 1January 2022

History

Received: Mar 24, 2021
Accepted: Sep 14, 2021
Published online: Oct 21, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 21, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5463-9171
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5192-5033. Email: [email protected]
Pedram Fardad Amini, Aff.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-7542
Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4977-7542

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Effect of Barley Straw Fiber as a Reinforcement on the Mechanical Behavior of Babolsar Sand, Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 10.1007/s40515-023-00281-7, (2023).
  • Shear strength anisotropy of rooted soils, Géotechnique, 10.1680/jgeot.22.00103, (1-14), (2022).
  • Shearing behaviour of vegetated soils with growing and decaying roots, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 10.1139/cgj-2021-0695, 59, 12, (2067-2084), (2022).
  • Experimental investigation of the mechanical behavior and engineering properties of sand reinforced with hemp fiber, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10.1007/s12517-022-10966-x, 15, 22, (2022).
  • Reinforcement losses in soil stabilisation due to decomposing roots of Chrysopogon zizanioides and Chrysopogon nemoralis , Land Degradation & Development, 10.1002/ldr.4517, 34, 4, (1080-1096), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share