Technical Papers
Sep 17, 2021

Near-Fault Forward Directivity Effect on the Estimation of Ground Motion Amplification Factors

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 12

Abstract

Near-fault forward directivity (NFFD) ground motions cause significant potential damage to civil infrastructure. Buildings at soil sites at which NFFD motions are expected might need probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) for soil sites considering the NFFD effect. In the analysis, ground motion amplification factors (GMAFs) considering the NFFD effect are required. Thus, investigating the characteristics of GMAFs due to the NFFD effect is important. To achieve this objective, this paper performs probabilistic ground response analyses for two typical soil sites subjected to three ground motion suites, that is, NFFD motions, far-fault motions, and near-fault motions without pulses. The results indicate that pulse periods of NFFD motions significantly affect the characteristics of GMAFs, rendering mean GMAFs remarkably lower or higher than those of ordinary ground motions. This study also reveals that standard deviations of GMAFs are insensitive to types of input motions. By further investigating the influences of soil deposit on pulse periods, this study observes that the pulse periods tend to approach 1.5 times the fundamental period of the soil deposit after pulselike ground motions propagate through the soil deposit. This observation provides a useful clue to pulselike ground motion selection for soil sites.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data on the probabilistic ground response analysis and analysis results are available from the corresponding author on request.

Acknowledgments

The research for this study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC0705604) and partially supported by Shenzhen University Stability Support Plan (GXWD20201230155427003-20200823204913001), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. YJ201824 and 19XJ0077). We are also very thankful to Dr. Mladen Vucetic from the University of California, Los Angeles, for providing us with the results of soil parameter testing on the La Cienega site.

References

Akkar, S., U. Yazgan, and P. Gülkan. 2005. “Drift estimates in frame buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (7): 1014–1024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:7(1014).
ASCE. 2016a. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, standard. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2016b. Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures, standard. ASCE 4-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Astroza, R., C. Pastén, and F. Ochoa-Cornejo. 2017. “Site response analysis using one-dimensional equivalent-linear method and Bayesian filtering.” Comput. Geotech. 89 (Sep): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.04.004.
Baltzopoulos, G., E. Chioccarelli, and I. Iervolino. 2015. “The displacement coefficient method in near-source conditions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (7): 1015–1033. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2497.
Baltzopoulos, G., D. Vamvatsikos, and I. Iervolino. 2016. “Analytical modelling of near-source pulse-like seismic demand for multi-linear backbone oscillators.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (11): 1797–1815. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2729.
Barani, S., and D. Spallarossa. 2017. “Soil amplification in probabilistic ground motion hazard analysis.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15 (6): 2525–2545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9971-y.
Bhagat, S., A. C. Wijeyewickrema, and N. Subedi. 2021. “Influence of near-fault ground motions with fling-step and forward-directivity characteristics on seismic response of base-isolated buildings.” J. Earthquake Eng. 25 (3): 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1520759.
Boore, D. M., J. F. Gibbs, and W. B. Joyner. 2003. “Estimated ground motion from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake at the site of interstate 10 and La Cienega Boulevard bridge collapse, West Los Angeles, California.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 (6): 2737–2751. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020197.
Chang, Z., F. De Luca, and K. Goda. 2019. “Near-fault acceleration pulses and non-acceleration pulses: Effects on the inelastic displacement ratio.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (11): 1256–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3184.
Chang, Z., X. Sun, C. Zhai, J. X. Zhao, and L. Xie. 2018. “An empirical approach of accounting for the amplification effects induced by near-fault directivity.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16 (5): 1871–1885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0275-7.
Chen, L., and E. Faccioli. 2013. “Single-station standard deviation analysis of 2010–2012 strong-motion data from the Canterbury region, New Zealand.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 11 (5): 1617–1632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9454-3.
Chen, Z., and Z. Liu. 2019. “Effects of pulse-like earthquake motions on a typical subway station structure obtained in shaking-table tests.” Eng. Struct. 198 (Nov): 109557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109557.
Chioccarelli, E., and I. Iervolino. 2013. “Near-source seismic hazard and design scenarios.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (4): 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2232.
Darendeli, M. B. 2001. “Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Davoodi, M., M. Jafari, and N. Hadiani. 2013. “Seismic response of embankment dams under near-fault and far-field ground motion excitation.” Eng. Geol. 158 (May): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.02.008.
Gazi, H., and C. Alhan. 2019. “Reliability of elastomeric-isolated buildings under historical earthquakes with/without forward-directivity effects.” Eng. Struct. 195 (Sep): 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.081.
Hashash, Y. M. A., M. I. Musgrove, and J. A. Harmon. 2017. DEEPSOIL 7.0: User manual. Champaign, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Iervolino, I., E. Chioccarelli, and G. Baltzopoulos. 2012. “Inelastic displacement ratio of near-source pulse-like ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (15): 2351–2357. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2167.
Jampole, E., E. Miranda, and G. Deierlein. 2018. “Effective incremental ground velocity for estimating the peak sliding displacement of rigid structures to pulse-like earthquake ground motions.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (12): 04018113. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001539.
Kottke, A., and E. M. Rathje. 2008. “A semi-automated procedure for selecting and scaling recorded earthquake motions for dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 24 (4): 911–932. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2985772.
Li, B., Z. Cai, W.-C. Xie, and M. D. Pandey. 2018. “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis considering site-specific soil effects.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 105 (10): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.11.029.
Li, B., M. D. Pandy, and K.-S. Dai. 2019. “Effects of soil parameter variabilities on the estimation of ground-motion amplification factors.” Earthquake Spectra 35 (2): 907–928. https://doi.org/10.1193/053118EQS131M.
Lu, Y., I. Hajirasouliha, and A. M. Marshall. 2018. “Direct displacement-based seismic design of flexible-base structures subjected to pulse-like ground motions.” Eng. Struct. 168 (Aug): 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.079.
Mavroeidis, G., G. Dong, and A. Papageorgiou. 2004. “Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33 (9): 1023–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.391.
Repapis, C. C., P. P. Mimoglou, V. V. Dimakopoulou, I. N. Psycharis, and I. M. Taflampas. 2020. “Efficient strong motion duration of pulse-like records for nonlinear structural analyses.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 49 (5): 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3249.
Rodriguez-Marek, A., and J. D. Bray. 2006. “Seismic site response for near-fault forward directivity ground motions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (12): 1611–1620. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:12(1611).
Sehhati, R., A. Rodriguez-Marek, M. ElGawady, and W. F. Cofer. 2011. “Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on multi-story structures.” Eng. Struct. 33 (3): 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.032.
Seyhan, E., and J. P. Stewart. 2014. “Semi-empirical nonlinear site amplification from NGA-West2 data and simulations.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1241–1256. https://doi.org/10.1193/063013EQS181M.
Sha, B., T. Tao, C. Xing, H. Wang, and A. Li. 2020. “Pounding analysis of isolated girder bridge under nonpulse and pulse-like earthquakes.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (4): 04020062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001468.
Shahi, S. K., and J. W. Baker. 2011. “An empirically calibrated framework for including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101 (2): 742–755. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100090.
Shahi, S. K., and J. W. Baker. 2014. “An efficient algorithm to identify strong-velocity pulses in multicomponent ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 104 (5): 2456–2466. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130191.
Stewart, J. P., K. Afshari, and C. A. Goulet. 2017. “Non-ergodic site response in seismic hazard analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 33 (4): 1385–1414. https://doi.org/10.1193/081716eqs135m.
Stewart, J. P., K. Afshari, and Y. M. Hashash. 2014. Guidelines for performing hazard-consistent one-dimensional ground response analysis for ground motion prediction. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Stewart, J. P., A. O. L. Kwok, and Y. M. A. Hashash. 2008. Benchmarking of nonlinear geotechnical ground response analysis procedures. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Tarbali, K., B. A. Bradley, and J. W. Baker. 2019. “Ground motion selection in the near-fault region considering directivity-induced pulse effects.” Earthquake Spectra 35 (2): 759–786. https://doi.org/10.1193/102517EQS223M.
Tian, L., S. Yi, and B. Qu. 2018. “Orienting ground motion inputs to achieve maximum seismic displacement demands on electricity transmission towers in near-fault regions.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (4): 04018017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002000.
Toro, G. R. 1995. Probabilistic models of site velocity profiles for generic and site-specific ground-motion amplification studies. New York: Brookhaven National Laboratory.
UNS (UniStar Nuclear Services). 2007. Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant unit 3, combined license application, part 2: Final safety analysis. Paris: UNS.
USNRC (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission). 2014. Design response spectra for seismic design of nuclear power plants. Washington, DC: USNRC.
Vafaei, D., and R. Eskandari. 2015. “Seismic response of mega buckling-restrained braces subjected to fling-step and forward-directivity near-fault ground motions.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 24 (9): 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1205.
Vucetic, M., C.-C. Hsu, and M. Doroudian. 1998. Results of cyclic and dynamic simple shear tests on soils from La Cienega Site, conducted for ROSRINE Project and other research purposes. Los Angeles: UCLA School of Engineering and Applied Science.
Yazdani, Y., and M. Alembagheri. 2017. “Nonlinear seismic response of a gravity dam under near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92 (1): 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 12December 2021

History

Received: May 16, 2020
Accepted: Aug 4, 2021
Published online: Sep 17, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 17, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7658-6034. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610065, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6091-1231
Zhongdong Duan
Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Zhen Cai
Research Officer, National Research Council Canada, 1200 Montreal Rd., Ottawa, Canada K1A 0R6.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Seismic collapse probability and life cycle cost assessment of isolated structures subjected to pounding with smart hybrid isolation system using a modified fuzzy based controller, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.085, 44, (30-41), (2022).
  • Assessment of spectrum-matched time histories for floor response spectra generation, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.073, 38, (123-138), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share