Technical Papers
Oct 19, 2021

Effects of Imperfect Simple Shear Test Boundary Conditions on Monotonic and Cyclic Measurements in Sand

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 1

Abstract

The direct simple shear (DSS) test is commonly used to assess the shear strength of soil, estimate liquefaction resistance, or calibrate constitutive models under the assumption of idealized simple shear conditions even though this may not be necessarily achieved in the test. Near-frictionless vertical boundaries cannot develop the complementary shear stresses necessary for equilibrium. Difficulties in maintaining constant height during equivalent-undrained tests may violate the constant volume assumption. The cap holding the top of the specimen may tilt during shear, violating the assumed perfect simple shear strain conditions. These boundary effects on constant-volume monotonic and cyclic DSS test results were parametrically studied by simulating a DSS device using an advanced plasticity model. For practical purposes, near-frictionless vertical boundaries can be used to approximate simple shear conditions, and the effect of top-cap tilting is negligible in well-designed devices. However, vertical compliance can greatly affect the stress-strain response.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (i.e., simulation and experimental data).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Rocscience Inc. and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (Grant Nos. 529193/2018 and 401267058) for supporting this study. We would also like to thank fellow research group members Sartaj Gill and Wei Liu for contributing to the experimental data that is used in this study. Feedback and comments provided by Dr. Alex Sy and Professor Jason DeJong have immensely improved this work. We also appreciate the cooperation of Dr. Kaveh Zehtab of GeoComp.

References

Airey, D. W., M. Budhu, and D. M. Wood. 1985. “Some aspects of the behaviour of soils in simple shear.” In Developments in soil mechanics and foundation engineering: Vol. 2: Stress-strain modelling of soils, edited by P. K. Banerjee and R. Butterfield, 185–213. London: Elsevier.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for consolidated undrained direct simple shear testing of fine grain soils. ASTM D6528-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bernhardt, M. L., G. Biscontin, and C. O’Sullivan. 2016. “Experimental validation study of 3D direct simple shear DEM simulations.” Soils Found. 56 (3): 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.04.002.
Bjerrum, L., and A. Landva. 1966. “Direct simple-shear tests on a Norwegian quick clay.” Géotechnique 16 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1966.16.1.1.
Boulanger, R. W., C. K. Chan, H. B. Seed, R. B. Seed, and J. B. Sousa. 1993. “A low-compliance bi-directional cyclic simple shear apparatus.” Geotech. Test. J. 16 (1): 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10265J.
Boulanger, R. W., and K. Ziotopoulou. 2017. PM4Sand (version 3.1): A sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications.. Davis, CA: Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Bro, A. D., J. P. Stewart, and D. E. Pradel. 2013. “Estimating undrained strength of clays from direct shear testing at fast displacement rates.” In Proc., Geocongress 2013: Stability and Performance of Slopes and Embankments III, edited by C. L. Meehan, D. Pradel, M. A. Pando, and J. F. Labuz, 106–119. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412787.012.
Budhu, M. 1984. “Nonuniformities imposed by simple shear apparatus.” Can. Geotech. J. 21 (1): 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1139/t84-010.
Dafalias, Y. F., and M. T. Manzari. 2004. “Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (6): 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:6(622).
DeGroot, D. J., J. T. Germaine, and C. C. Ladd. 1994. “Effect of nonuniform stresses on measured DSS stress-strain behaviour.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (5): 892–912. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:5(892).
Doherty, J., and M. Fahey. 2011. “Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the direct simple shear test.” Comput. Geotech. 38 (7): 917–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.05.005.
Dyvik, R., and Y. Suzuki. 2019. “Effect of volume change in undrained direct simple shear tests.” Geotech. Test. J. 42 (4): 1075–1082. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170287.
Gill, S. S. 2019. “Geotechnical properties of tailings effect of fines content.” M.A.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto.
Gudehus, G., et al. 2008. “The soilmodels.info project.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 32 (12): 1571–1572. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.675.
Ishihara, K., and F. Yamazaki. 1980. “Cyclic simple shear tests on saturated sand in multi-directional loading.” Soils Found. 20 (1): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.20.45.
Kjellman, W. 1951. “Testing the shear strength of clay in Sweden.” Géotechnique 2 (3): 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1951.2.3.225.
Kwan, W. S., and C. S. El Mohtar. 2014. “Comparison between shear strength of dry sand measured in CSS device using wire-reinforced membranes and stacked rings.” In Proc., Geo-Congress 2014 Geo-Characterization and Modeling for Sustainability, 1111–1119. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kwan, W. S., S. S. Sideras, C. S. El Mohtar, and S. L. Kramer. 2014. “Pore pressure generation under different transient loading histories.” In Proc., 10th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering: Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering. Anchorage, AK: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Kwan, W. S., S. S. Sideras, S. L. Kramer, and C. S. El Mohtar. 2017. “Experimental database of cyclic simple shear tests under transient loadings.” Earthquake Spectra 33 (3): 1219–1239. https://doi.org/10.1193/093016eqs167dp.
Lucks, A. S., J. T. Christian, G. E. Brandow, and K. Höeg. 1972. “Stress conditions in NGI simple shear test.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98 (1): 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001729.
Masin, D., M. Martinelli, C. Miriano, and C. Tamagnini. 2018. “SoilModels project—SANISAND Abaqus UMAT and Plaxis implementations.” Accessed May 29, 2018. https://soilmodels.com/download/plaxis-umat-sanisand/.
Niemunis, A. 2017. “SoilModels project—Incremental driver.” Accessed May 29, 2018. https://soilmodels.com/idriver/.
Roscoe, K. H. 1953. “An apparatus for the application of simple shear to soil samples.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 186–191. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Saada, A. S., and F. C. Townsend. 1981. “State of the art: Laboratory strength testing of soils.” In STP740-EB laboratory shear strength of soil, edited by R. N. Yong and F. C. Townsend, 7–77. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Shafiee, A. 2016. “Cyclic and post-cyclic behavior of Sherman island peat.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California at Los Angeles.
Shen, C. K., K. Sadigh, and L. R. Herrmann. 1978. “An analysis of NGI simple shear apparatus for cyclic soil testing.” In STP654-EB dynamic geotechnical testing, edited by M. Silver and D. Tiedemann, 148–162. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Taiebat, M., and Y. F. Dafalias. 2008. “SANISAND: Simple anisotropic sand plasticity model.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 32 (8): 915–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.651.
Tatsuoka, F., and O. Haibara. 1985. “Shear resistance between sand and smooth or lubricated surfaces.” Soils Found. 25 (1): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.25.89.
Taylor, D. W. 1953. “A direct shear test with drainage control.” In Symposium on direct shear testing of soils, edited by G. Tschebotarioff, 63–74. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP47725S.
Vucetic, M., and S. Lacasse. 1982. “Specimen size effect in simple shear test.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 108 (12): 1567–1585. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001395.
Wai, M. H. D. 2019. “Effect of imperfect direct simple shear test boundary conditions on monotonic and cyclic measurements.” M.A.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto.
Wijewickreme, D., A. Dabeet, and P. Byrne. 2013. “Some observations on the state of stress in the direct simple shear test using 3D discrete element analysis.” Geotech. Test. J. 36 (2): 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20120066.
Zekkos, D., A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, J. Hubler, X. Fei, K. H. Zehtab, and W. A. Marr. 2018. “Development of a large-size cyclic direct simple shear device for characterization of ground materials with oversized particles.” Geotech. Test. J. 41 (2): 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160271.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148Issue 1January 2022

History

Received: Jul 1, 2020
Accepted: Jul 23, 2021
Published online: Oct 19, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 19, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Geotechnical Software Developer, Rocscience Inc., 54 Patrick St., Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 1V1; formerly, Master Student, Univ. of Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4. Email: [email protected]
Mathan V. Manmatharajan [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A4 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-8291. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • The full state of stress in monotonic simple shear tests on sand, Géotechnique, 10.1680/jgeot.21.00210, (1-12), (2023).
  • Stress-strain behavior of Ottawa sand in cyclic direct simple shear and modeling of cyclic strength using Artificial Neural Networks, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107585, 164, (107585), (2023).
  • Influence of specimen nonuniformity and end restraint conditions on drained triaxial compression test results in sand, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 10.1139/cgj-2021-0505, 59, 8, (1414-1426), (2022).
  • On reliability of inferring liquefied shear strengths from simple shear testing, Soils and Foundations, 10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101151, 62, 3, (101151), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share