Technical Papers
Aug 5, 2021

Nonlinear Inelastic-Degrading Structural Modeling Approach to Assess the Seismic Soil–Structure Interaction Response of Tall Buildings

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

Oversimplifying structural modeling in the analysis of the seismic performance of tall buildings introduces variability and biases in the computed seismic response. Engineering demand parameters (EDPs) from coupled soil–structure interaction (SSI) systems can only be realistically determined when nonlinear constitutive soil and structural behaviors are adopted in the numerical formulation. Large-magnitude earthquakes mobilize soil and structural demands that are beyond the elastic response of both materials. This paper aims at evaluating the influence of the structural modeling assumptions in the computed soil response due to seismic excitations using a direct fully coupled nonlinear SSI approach. Numerical analyses are conducted on elastic and nonlinear inelastic-degrading tall building models supported on a mat foundation-to-soil continuum domain using a multiple-yield surface plane-strain constitutive model. The models were subjected to multiple ground motion scenarios representative of broadband frequency content. Large discrepancies occur between linear and nonlinear inelastic tall buildings in terms of interstory drifts, peak horizontal accelerations, structural displacements, hysteretic energy, foundation rotation, and soil settlements. The results show how using nonlinear inelastic-degrading structural models of tall buildings largely affect the computed seismic response of the entire SSI system relative to linear elastic structural modeling approaches. More realistic responses are obtained using nonlinear degrading building models including SSI effects, because energy distribution and tradeoff among both the supporting soils and structure vary significantly as the seismic demands induce stresses and strains in the building beyond the onset of structural yielding.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation Grant No. CMMI-1563428. The support of Dr. Joy Pauschke, program director at the National Science Foundation, is greatly appreciated.

References

Arboleda-Monsalve, L. G., J. A. Mercado, V. Terzic, and K. R. Mackie. 2020. “Soil–structure interaction effects on seismic performance and earthquake-induced losses in tall buildings.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (5): 04020028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002248.
ASCE. 2017a. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2017b. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE 41/17. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Biot, M. A. 1962. “Generalized theory of acoustic propagation in porous dissipative media.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34 (9A): 1254–1264. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918315.
Blume, J. A. 1968. “Dynamic characteristics of multistory buildings.” J. Struct. Div. 94 (2): 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0001880.
Bullock, Z., S. Dashti, Z. Karimi, A. Liel, K. Porter, and K. Franke. 2019. “Probabilistic models for residual and peak transient tilt of mat-founded structures on liquefiable soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (2): 04018108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002002.
Chopra, A. K., and F. McKenna. 2016. “Modeling viscous damping in nonlinear response history analysis of buildings for earthquake excitation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45 (2): 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2622.
Dashti, S., J. Bray, J. Pestana, M. Riemer, and D. Wilson. 2010a. “Centrifuge testing to evaluate and mitigate liquefaction-induced building settlement mechanisms.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (7): 918–929. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000306.
Dashti, S., J. Bray, J. Pestana, M. Riemer, and D. Wilson. 2010b. “Mechanisms of seismically induced settlement of buildings with shallow foundations on liquefiable soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (1): 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000179.
Dashti, S., and J. D. Bray. 2013. “Numerical simulation of building response on liquefiable sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (8): 1235–1249. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000853.
Elgamal, A., Z. Yang, and E. Parra. 2002. “Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 22 (4): 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00022-2.
Givens, M. J. 2013. “Dynamic soil-structure interaction of instrumented buildings and test structures.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
Howell, R., E. M. Rathje, and R. W. Boulanger. 2015. “Evaluation of simulation models of lateral spread sites treated with prefabricated vertical drains.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 141 (1): 04014076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001185.
Hutabarat, D., and J. D. Bray. 2021. “Effective stress analysis of liquefiable sites to estimate the severity of sediment ejecta.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (5): 04021024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002503.
Jardine, R. J. 1992. “Some observations on the kinematic nature of soil stiffness.” Soils Found. 32 (2): 111–124. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.2_111.
Johnson, L. D. 1989. Design and construction of mat foundation. Washington, DC: USACE.
Karapetrou, S. T., S. D. Fotopoulou, and K. D. Pitilakis. 2015. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of high-rise non-ductile RC buildings considering soil–structure interaction effects.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 73 (Apr): 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.016.
Karimi, Z., and S. Dashti. 2015. “Numerical and centrifuge modeling of seismic soil–foundation–structure interaction on liquefiable ground.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (1): 04015061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001346.
Karimi, Z., and S. Dashti. 2016. “Seismic performance of shallow founded structures on liquefiable ground: Validation of numerical simulations using centrifuge experiments.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (6): 04016011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001479.
Karimi, Z., S. Dashti, Z. Bullock, K. Porter, and A. Liel. 2018. “Key predictors of structure settlement on liquefiable ground: A numerical parametric study.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Mar): 286–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.001.
Katsanos, E. I., and A. G. Sextos. 2015. “Inelastic spectra to predict period elongation of structures under earthquake loading.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (11): 1765–1782. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2554.
Khosravifar, A., R. W. Boulanger, and S. K. Kunnath. 2014. “Effects of liquefaction on inelastic demands on extended pile shafts.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (4): 1749–1773. https://doi.org/10.1193/032412EQS105M.
Khosravifar, A., A. Elgamal, J. Lu, and J. Li. 2018. “A 3D model for earthquake-induced liquefaction triggering and post-liquefaction response.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 110 (Apr): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.008.
Lignos, D. G., C. Putman, and H. Krawinkler. 2015. “Application of simplified analysis procedures for performance-based earthquake evaluation of steel special moment frames.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (4): 1949–1968. https://doi.org/10.1193/081413EQS230M.
Liu, L., and R. Dobry. 1997. “Seismic response of shallow foundation on liquefiable sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (6): 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:6(557).
Lysmer, J., and R. L. Kuhlemeyer. 1969. “Finite dynamic model for infinite media.” Eng. Mech. Div. 95 (1882): 167–188.
McKenna, F., G. L. Fenves, M. H. Scott, and B. Jeremic. 2000. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
Mercado, J. A. 2016. “Simulation of liquefaction-induced damage of the port of Long Beach, California using the UBC3D-PLM model.” M.Sc. thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín.
Mercado, J. A., and L. G. Arboleda-Monsalve. 2021. “Influence of substructure levels on the computed seismic performance of low-rise structures.” J. Earthquake Eng. 25 (5): 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1568928.
Mercado, J. A., K. R. Mackie, and L. G. Arboleda-Monsalve. 2021. “Modeling nonlinear-inelastic seismic response of tall buildings with soil-structure interaction.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (7), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003054.
Molina Hutt, C., I. Almufti, M. Willford, and G. Deierlein. 2016. “Seismic loss and downtime assessment of existing tall steel-framed buildings and strategies for increased resilience.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001314.
Mylonakis, G., and G. Gazetas. 2000. “Seismic soil-structure interaction: Beneficial or detrimental?” J. Earthquake Eng. 4 (3): 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460009350372.
NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program). 2010. Nonlinear structural analysis for seismic design. Gaithersburg, MD: NEHRP.
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2012. Soil-structure interaction for building structures. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2017. Guidelines for nonlinear structural analysis and design of buildings. Part I—General.. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Okur, D. V., and A. Ansal. 2007. “Stiffness degradation of natural fine grained soils during cyclic loading.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (9): 843–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.01.005.
PEER/ATC (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center/Applied Technology Council). 2010. Modeling and acceptance criteria for seismic design and analysis of tall building. PEER/ATC 72-1. Redwood City, CA: PEER/ATC.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2017. Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings. Berkeley, CA: PEER.
Ramirez, C. M., and E. Miranda. 2009. Building-specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering. Standford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center.
Ramirez, C. M., and E. Miranda. 2012. “Significance of residual drifts in building earthquake loss estimation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (11): 1477–1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2217.
Sancio, R., J. D. Bray, T. Durgunoglu, and A. Onalp. 2004. “Performance of buildings over liquefiable ground in Adapazari, Turkey.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290180114.
Santamarina, J. C. 2001. Soils and waves: Particulate materials behavior, characterization and process monitoring. New York: Wiley.
Stewart, J. P., G. L. Fenves, and R. B. Seed. 1999. “Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. I: Analytical methods.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 125 (1): 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:1(26).
Taranath, B. S. 2012. Structural analysis and design of tall buildings. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
Tavakoli, R., R. Kamgar, and R. Rahgozar. 2019. “Seismic performance of outrigger–belt truss system considering soil–structure interaction.” Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 11 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-019-0215-7.
Tileylioglu, S. 2008. “Evaluation of soil-structure interaction effects from field performance data.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
Tomeo, R., D. Pitilakis, A. Bilotta, and E. Nigro. 2018. “SSI effects on seismic demand of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames.” Eng. Struct. 173 (Aug): 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.104.
Trifunac, M. D., S. S. Ivanović, and M. I. Todorovska. 2001a. “Apparent periods of a building. I: Fourier analysis.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (5): 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:5(517).
Trifunac, M. D., S. S. Ivanović, and M. I. Todorovska. 2001b. “Apparent periods of a building. II: Time-frequency analysis.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (5): 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:5(527).
Udwadia, F. E., and M. D. Trifunac. 1973. “Time and amplitude dependent response of structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2 (4): 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290020406.
Vucetic, M. 1994. “Cyclic threshold shear strains in soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (12): 2208–2228. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2208).
Yang, Z., A. Elgamal, and E. Parra. 2003. “Computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (12): 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1119).
Yang, Z., J. Lu, and A. Elgamal. 2008. OpenSees soil models and solid-fluid fully coupled elements: User’s manual. San Diego: Univ. of California.
Yoshimi, Y., and K. Tokimatsu. 1977. “Settlement of buildings on saturated sand during earthquakes.” Soils Foundations 17 (1): 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.17.23.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Nov 17, 2020
Accepted: Jun 3, 2021
Published online: Aug 5, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jaime A. Mercado, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Geotechnical Engineer, Geosyntec Consultants Inc., Johnson City, TN 37604. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2977-2544. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1287-6520. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Sustainable Building: The Role of the Soil Parameters on Earthquake Safety, Environmental Challenges in Civil Engineering II, 10.1007/978-3-031-26879-3_3, (32-47), (2023).
  • Soil and Structural Nonlinear Inelastic Effects on the Seismic Response of Tall Buildings, Geo-Congress 2022, 10.1061/9780784484043.033, (339-348), (2022).
  • The role of soil in structure response of a building damaged by the 26 December 2018 earthquake in Italy, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.06.010, (2022).
  • Modeling Nonlinear-Inelastic Seismic Response of Tall Buildings with Soil–Structure Interaction, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003054, 147, 7, (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share