Technical Notes
Aug 3, 2021

Influence of Material Strength on the Apparent Cohesion of Unbounded Gravity Dam Joints under Low Normal Stress

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

International gravity dam design guidelines consider that the different joints of a dam or its foundation (rock–rock, rock–concrete, and concrete–concrete joints) are unbounded and recommend using the Mohr–Coulomb criterion to evaluate their shear strength. By implementing these considerations into the calculations, it appears that an apparent cohesion value (CAPP) can be used, even at low normal stress levels. It has been suggested that both the mechanical properties of the material forming the unbounded joint and the type of joint (uniform or composite) may influence the apparent cohesion. An experimental protocol comprising 24 shear tests on natural rock joint replicas was developed in this study. Replicas of the same granite joint were made with three types of mortars, exhibiting very different mechanical properties. These replicas were used to reproduce both rock–rock and concrete–concrete lift joints (uniform joints) and the rock–concrete foundation contact (composite joint). Tests were conducted under normal stresses of 100–1,000 kPa, corresponding to those found in gravity dam foundations. The results showed that the joint shear strength and apparent cohesion were not strongly influenced by the type of joint or joint material strength.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Hydro-Québec and INRAE (France) for funding the project. We thank Danick Charbonneau and Ghislaine Luc for their technical help during the experimental project. We are also grateful to Claude Bacconnet (Université Clermont Auvergne), Claudio Carvajal, Jérôme Duriez (INRAE), and Marco Quirion (Hydro-Québec) for their involvement in the project. Prof. Arezki-Tagnit-Hamou from the Groupe Ciment et Béton (Université de Sherbrooke) is acknowledged for his advice on the fabrication of high-strength mortar.

References

Amiri Hossaini, K., N. Babanouri, and S. Karimi Nasab. 2014. “The influence of asperity deformability on the mechanical behavior of rock joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 70 (Sep): 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.009.
Amitrano, D., and J. Schmittbuhl. 2002. “Fracture roughness and gouge distribution of a granite shear band.” J. Geophys. Res. 107 (B12): 1–16.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test methods for compressive strength and elastic moduli of intact rock core specimens under varying states of stress and temperatures. ASTM D7012-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C496/C496M-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bandis, S., A. C. Lumsden, and N. R. Barton. 1981. “Experimental studies of scale effects on the shear behaviour of rock joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 18 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(81)90262-X.
Barton, N. 2013. “Shear strength criteria for rock, rock joints, rockfill and rock masses: Problems and some solutions.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 5 (4): 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.05.008.
Barton, N., and V. Choubey. 1977. “The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice.” Rock Mech. 10 (1–2): 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261801.
Buzzi, O., and D. Casagrande. 2018. “A step towards the end of the scale effect conundrum when predicting the shear strength of large in situ discontinuities.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 105 (May): 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.01.027.
CEA (Canadian Electricity Association). 1996. Sliding stability of concrete dams. Montreal, QC: CEA.
CFBR (Comité Français des Barrages et Réservoirs). 2012. Recommandations pour la justification de la stabilité des barrages-poids. [In French.] Le Bourget du Lac, France: CFBR.
Coubard, G., et al. 2018. “Amélioration de la détermination des propriétés de résistance de l’interface béton-rocher et des discontinuités des fondations rocheuses des barrages poids.” [In French.] In Proc., ICOLD 2018, 26th Int. Congress on Large Dams. Paris: International Commission on Large Dams.
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 1990. Uplift pressures, shear strengths, and tensile strengths for stability analysis of concrete gravity dams. Washington, DC: EPRI.
Fathi, A., Z. Moradian, P. Rivard, and G. Ballivy. 2016. “Shear mechanism of rock joints under pre-peak cyclic loading condition.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 83 (Mar): 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.01.009.
FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission). 2016. “Gravity dams.” In Engineering guidelines for the evaluation of hydropower projects, 3.1–3.39. Washington, DC: FERC.
Ghazvinian, A. H., M. J. Azinfar, and R. Geranmayeh Vaneghi. 2012. “Importance of tensile strength on the shear behavior of discontinuities.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 45 (3): 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0207-9.
Ghazvinian, A. H., A. Taghichian, M. Hashemi, and S. A. Mar’ashi. 2010. “The shear behavior of bedding planes of weakness between two different rock types with high strength difference.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 43 (1): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0030-8.
Grasselli, G., and P. Egger. 2003. “Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40 (1): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00101-6.
Hydro-Québec. 2003. Évaluation de la stabilité des barrages-poids en béton. [In French.]. Montreal, QC: Hydro-Québec.
Indraratna, B., W. Premadasa, and E. T. Brown. 2013. “Shear behaviour of rock joints with unsaturated infill.” Géotechnique 63 (15): 1356–1360. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.065.
ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics). 1978. “International society for rock mechanics commission on standardization of laboratory and field tests: Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 15 (6): 319–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)91472-9.
Jacobsson, L., M. Flansbjer, and L. Andersson. 2016. Normal loading and shear tests on rock joints from Olkiluoto. Eurajoki, Finland: Posiva.
Jafari, M. K., K. Amini Hosseini, F. Pellet, M. Boulon, and O. Buzzi. 2003. “Evaluation of shear strength of rock joints subjected to cyclic loading.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 23 (7): 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00063-0.
Koupouli, N. J., T. Belem, P. Rivard, and H. Effenguet. 2016. “Direct shear tests on cemented paste backfill–rock wall and cemented paste backfill–backfill interfaces.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 8 (4): 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.02.001.
Krounis, A., F. Johansson, and S. Larsson. 2016. “Shear strength of partially bonded concrete–rock interfaces for application in dam stability analyses.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (7): 2711–2722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0962-8.
Lama, R. D. 1978. “Influence of clay fillings on shear behaviour of joints.” In Proc., Int. Conf. Int. Association of Engineering Geology. Madrid, Spain: International Association of Engineering Geology.
Li, Y., and Y. Zhang. 2015. “Quantitative estimation of joint roughness coefficient using statistical parameters.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 77 (Jul): 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.03.016.
Maerz, N. H., J. A. Franklin, and C. P. Bennett. 1990. “Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 27 (5): 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(90)92708-M.
Maksimovic, M. 1996. “The shear strength components of a rough rock joint.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 33 (8): 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)00005-4.
Mouzannar, H., M. Bost, M. Leroux, and D. Virely. 2017. “Experimental study of the shear strength of bonded concrete—Rock interfaces: Surface morphology and scale effect.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 50 (10): 2601–2625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1259-2.
Muralha, J., G. Grasselli, B. Tatone, M. Blümel, P. Chryssanthakis, and J. Yujing. 2014. “ISRM suggested method for laboratory determination of the shear strength of rock joints: Revised version.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47 (1): 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0519-z.
Myers, M. O. 1962. “Characterization of surface roughness.” Wear 5 (3): 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(62)90002-9.
Patton, F. D. 1966 “Multiple modes of shear failure in rock.” In Proc., 1st ISRM Congress. Lisbon, Portugal: International Society for Rock Mechanics.
Peerun, M. I., D. E. L. Ong, C. S. Choo, and W. C. Cheng. 2016. “Effect of interparticle behavior on the development of soil arching in soil-structure interaction.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 106 (Dec): 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103610.
Peyras, L., P. Royet, L. Derou, R. Albert, J. P. Becue, S. Aigouy, E. Bourdarot, D. Loudiere, and J. B. Ko-varik. 2008. “French recommendations for limit-state analytical review of gravity dam stability.” Rev. Européenne Génie Civ. 12 (9–10): 1137–1164. https://doi.org/10.3166/ejece.12.1137-1164.
Richards, L. R. 1975. “The shear strength of joints in weathered rock.” Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College of Science and Technology, Univ. of London.
Rulliere, A., P. Rivard, L. Peyras, and P. Breul. 2020. “Influence of roughness on the apparent cohesion of rock joints at low normal stresses.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (3): 04020003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002200.
Sow, D., C. Caravjal, P. Breul, L. Peyras, P. Rivard, C. Bacconnet, and G. Ballivy. 2017. “Modeling the spatial variability of the shear strength of discontinuities of rock masses: Application to a dam rock mass.” Eng. Geol. 220 (Mar): 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.01.023.
Tang, Z., L. Jiao, L. Wong, and X. Wang. 2016. “Choosing appropriate parameters for developin empirical shear strength criterion of rock joints: Review and new insights.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (11): 4479–4490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1014-0.
Tatone, B. S. A., and G. Grasselli. 2013. “An investigation of discontinuity roughness scale dependency using high-resolution surface measurements.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 46 (4): 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0294-2.
Tian, Y., Q. Liu, H. Ma, Q. Liu, and P. Deng. 2018. “New peak shear strength model for cement filled rock joints.” Eng. Geol. 233 (Jan): 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.12.021.
Tse, R., and D. M. Cruden. 1979. “Estimating joint roughness coefficients.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 16 (5): 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)90241-9.
USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers). 1995. “Gravity dam design.” In USACE engineer manual. 1st ed. Washington, DC: USACE.
USBR (US Bureau of Reclamation). 1987. Design of small dams. 3rd ed. Denver: USBR.
Wyllie, D. C., and C. W. Mah. 2004. Rock slope engineering—Civil and mining. 4th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Yu, X. B., and B. Vayssade. 1991. “Joint profiles and their roughness parameters.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 28 (4): 333–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(91)90598-G.
Zandarin, M. T., E. Alonso, and S. Olivella. 2013. “A constitutive law for rock joints considering the effects of suction and roughness on strength parameters.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 60 (Jun): 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.007.
Zhao, J. 1997a. “Joint surface matching and shear strength part A: Joint matching coefficient (JMC).” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34 (2): 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(96)00062-9.
Zhao, J. 1997b. “Joint surface matching and shear strength part B: JRC-JMC shear strength criterion.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34 (2): 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(96)00063-0.
Zhao, Z., H. Peng, W. Wu, and Y. F. Chen. 2018. “Characteristics of shear-induced asperity degradation of rock fractures and implications for solute retardation.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 105 (May): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.03.012.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Nov 26, 2020
Accepted: May 14, 2021
Published online: Aug 3, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 3, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K2R1; Aix-Marseille Université, INRAE Risques, Écosystèmes, Vulnérabilité, Environnement, Résilience, Aix-en-Provence 13100, France (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-8390. Email: [email protected]
P. Rivard
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K2R1.
L. Peyras
Aix-Marseille Université, INRAE Risques, Écosystèmes, Vulnérabilité, Environnement, Résilience, Aix-en-Provence 13100, France.
P. Breul
Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand 63000, France.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Integration of rock joint roughness into the Mohr-Coulomb shear behaviour model – application to dam safety analysis, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 10.1080/19648189.2023.2172083, (1-22), (2023).
  • New Empirical Criterion for Evaluating Peak Shear Strength of Unmatched Discontinuity with Different Joint Wall Compressive Strengths, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 10.1007/s00603-022-02939-z, 55, 9, (5323-5343), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share