Technical Papers
Apr 11, 2014

Evaluation of the Liquefaction Potential Index for Assessing Liquefaction Hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 7

Abstract

While the liquefaction potential index (LPI) has been used to characterize liquefaction hazards worldwide, calibration of LPI to observed liquefaction severity is limited, and the efficacy of the LPI framework and accuracy of derivative liquefaction hazard maps are thus uncertain. Herein, utilizing cone penetration test soundings from nearly 1,200 sites, in conjunction with field observations following the Darfield and Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquakes, this study evaluates the performance of LPI in predicting the occurrence and severity of surficial liquefaction manifestations. It was found that LPI is generally effective in predicting moderate-to-severe liquefaction manifestations, but its utility diminishes for predicting less severe manifestations. Additionally, it was found that LPI should be used with caution in locations susceptible to lateral spreading, because LPI may inconsistently predict its occurrence. A relationship between overpredictions of liquefaction severity and profiles having soils with high inferred fines-content was also investigated. It was determined that the LPI procedure might be improved if it accounted for the characteristics of soils in the crust and interbedded nonliquefiable layers, as well as the characteristics of the soils predicted to liquefy. Further research is needed in this regard. Finally, it was found that for the in situ conditions in Christchurch, the computed LPI values were relatively sensitive to estimates of groundwater depth because of the proximity of liquefiable strata to the ground surface.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The study presented herein is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. OISE 1209494, CMMI 1030564, and CMMI 1306261. The third and fourth authors would like to acknowledge the continuous financial support provided by the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and Natural Hazards Research Platform (NHRP), New Zealand, of the research and investigations related to the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes. The authors also acknowledge the New Zealand GeoNet project and its sponsors EQC, GNS Science, and LINZ for providing the earthquake occurrence data and the Canterbury Geotechnical Database and its sponsor EQC for providing the CPT soundings, lateral spread observations, and aerial imagery used in this study. However, any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, EQC, NHRP, or LINZ.

References

Abrahamson, N. A., and Youngs, R. R. (1992). “A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 82(1), 505–510.
Allen, J., et al. (2010). “Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake.” M. Cubrinovski and R. A. Green, eds., Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng., 43(4), 243–320.
Anselin, L. (1995). “Local indicators of spatial association—LISA.” Geogr. Anal., 27(2), 93–115.
Baise, L. G., Higgins, R. B., and Brankman, C. M. (2006). “Liquefaction hazard mapping—Statistical and spatial characterization of susceptible units.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 705–715.
Begg, J., and Jones, K. (2012). “20,000 years of time in Christchurch.” Presentation to New Zealand Geotechnical Society, Canterbury Branch, June 28, 2012, New Zealand Geotechnical Society, Wellington, New Zealand.
Bradley, B. A. (2010). NZ-specific pseudo-spectral acceleration ground motion prediction equations based on foreign models, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Bradley, B. A. (2012a). “Ground motions observed in the Darfield and Christchurch earthquakes and the importance of local site response effects.” N.Z. J. Geol. Geophys., 55(3), 279–286.
Bradley, B. A. (2012b). “Strong ground motion characteristics observed in the 4 September 2010 Darfield, New Zealand earthquake.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 42(Nov), 32–46.
Bradley, B. A. (2013a). “A New Zealand-specific pseudo spectral acceleration ground-motion prediction equation for active shallow crustal earthquakes based on foreign models.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 103(3), 1801–1822.
Bradley, B. A. (2013b). “Site-specific and spatially distributed estimation of ground motion intensity in the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 61–62(Jun–Jul), 83–91.
Bradley, B. A., and Cubrinovski, M. (2011). “Near-source strong ground motions observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 82(6), 853–865.
Brown, L. J., Beetham, R. D., Paterson, B. R., and Weeber, J. H. (1995). “Geology of Christchurch, New Zealand.” Environ. Eng. Geosci., 1(4), 427–488.
Canterbury Geotechnical Database (CGD). (2012a) “Aerial photography.” Map layer CGD0100, June 1, 2012. 〈https://canterburygeotechnicaldatabase.projectorbit.com〉 (Dec. 1, 2012).
Canterbury Geotechnical Database (CGD). (2012b) “Groundwater surface elevations.” Map layer CGD0800, Aug. 16, 2012. 〈https://canterburygeotechnicaldatabase.projectorbit.com〉 (Dec. 1, 2012).
Canterbury Geotechnical Database (CGD). (2012c) “Observed ground crack locations.” Map layer CGD0400, July 23, 2012. 〈https://canterburygeotechnicaldatabase.projectorbit.com〉 (Dec. 1, 2012).
Carter, W. L., Green, R. A., Bradley, B. A., and Cubrinovski, M. (2013). “The influence of near-fault motions on liquefaction triggering during the Canterbury earthquake sequence.” Proc., New Zealand-Japan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction during Recent Large-Scale Earthquakes, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 51–61.
Chung, J.-W., and Rogers, J. D. (2011). “Simplified method for spatial evaluation of liquefaction potential in the St. Louis area.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 505–515.
Cramer, C. H., Rix, G. J., and Tucker, K. (2008). “Probabilistic liquefaction hazard maps for Memphis, Tennessee.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 79(3), 416–423.
Cubrinovski, M., et al. (2011a). “Geotechnical aspects of the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake.” Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng., 43(4), 205–226.
Cubrinovski, M., et al. (2011b). “Soil liquefaction effects in the central business district during the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 82(6), 893–904.
Cubrinovski, M., Robinson, K., Taylor, M., Hughes, M., and Orense, R. (2012). “Lateral spreading and its impacts in urban areas in the 2010–2011 Christchurch earthquakes.” N.Z. J. Geol. Geophys., 55(3), 255–269.
Dixit, J., Dewaikar, D. M., and Jangid, R. S. (2012). “Assessment of liquefaction potential index for Mumbai City.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12(9), 2759–2768.
GeoNet. (2012). “New Zealand earthquake occurrence data: felt quakes.” 〈http://geonet.org.nz/〉 (Mar. 26, 2014).
Goda, K., and Hong, H. P. (2008). “Spatial correlation of peak ground motions and response spectra.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98(1), 354–365.
Green, R. A., et al. (2011a). “Performance of levees (stopbanks) during the 4 September Mw7.1 Darfield and 22 February 2011 Mw6.2 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquakes.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 82(6), 939–949.
Green, R. A., et al. (2011b). “Use of DCP and SASW tests to evaluate liquefaction potential: Predictions vs. observations during the recent New Zealand earthquakes.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 82(6), 927–938.
Green, R. A., et al. (2013). “Select liquefaction case histories from the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence.” Earthquake Spectra in press.
Hayati, H., and Andrus, R. D. (2008). “Liquefaction potential map of Charleston, South Carolina based on the 1886 earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 815–828.
Holzer, T. L., Bennett, M. J., Noce, T. E., Padovani, A. C., and Tinsley, J. C., III. (2006a). “Liquefaction hazard mapping with LPI in the greater Oakland, California, area.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(3), 693–708.
Holzer, T. L., Blair, J. L., Noce, T. E., and Bennett, M. J. (2006b). “Predicted liquefaction of East Bay fills during a repeat of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(S2), 261–277.
Holzer, T. L., Noce, T. E., and Bennett, M. J. (2011). “Liquefaction probability curves for surficial geologic units.” Environ. Eng. Geosci., 17(1), 1–21.
Holzer, T. L., Noce, T. E., Bennett, M. J., Tinsley, J. C., III, and Rosenburg, L. I. (2005). “Liquefaction at Oceano, California, during the 2003 San Simeon earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 95(6), 2396–2411.
Idriss, I. M., and Boulanger, R. W. (2006). “Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 26(2–4), 115–130.
Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F., Tokida, K., and Yasuda, S. (1978). “A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Microzonation, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
Jha, S. K., and Suzuki, K. (2009). “Liquefaction potential index considering parameter uncertainties.” Eng. Geol., 107(1–2), 55–60.
Johnson, R. A., and Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Juang, C. H., Yuan, H., Lee, D.-H., and Lin, P.-S. (2003). “Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 66–80.
Lee, D.-H., Ku, C.-S., and Yuan, H. (2004). “A study of liquefaction risk potential at Yuanlin, Taiwan.” Eng. Geol., 71(1–2), 97–117.
Lenz, A. J., and Baise, L. G. (2007). “Spatial variability of liquefaction potential in regional mapping using CPT and SPT data.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 27(7), 690–702.
Moss, R. E., Seed, R. B., Kayen, R. E., Stewart, J. P., Der Kiureghian, A., and Cetin, K. O. (2006). “CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1032–1051.
Murahidy, K. M., Soutar, C. M., Phillips, R. A., and Fairclough, A. (2012). “Post earthquake recovery—Development of a geotechnical database for Christchurch central city.” Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Int. Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, 10.
Orense, R. P., et al. (2011). “Comparison of liquefaction features observed during the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 82(6), 905–918.
Ozutsumi, O., Sawada, S., Iai, S., Takeshima, Y., Sugiyama, W., and Shimazu, T. (2002). “Effective stress analyses of liquefaction-induced deformation in river dikes.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 22(9–12), 1075–1082.
Papathanassiou, G. (2008). “LPI-based approach for calibrating the severity of liquefaction-induced failures and for assessing the probability of liquefaction surface evidence.” Eng. Geol., 96(1–2), 94–104.
Papathanassiou, G., Pavlides, S., and Ganas, A. (2005). “The 2003 Lefkada earthquake: Field observation and preliminary microzonation map based on liquefaction potential index for the town of Lefkada.” Eng. Geol., 82(1), 12–31.
Pinheiro, J., and Bates, D. M., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., and the R Core Team. (2008). NLME: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models, R Core package, Ver. 3.1,http://www.r-project.org/〉 (Mar. 26, 2014).
Robertson, P. K., and Cabal, K. L. (2010). “Estimating soil unit weight from CPT.” Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, Int. Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE), London, Paper No. 2-40.
Robertson, P. K., and Wride, C. E. (1998). “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J., 35(3), 442–459.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1971). “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 97(9), 1249–1273.
Sonmez, H. (2003). “Modification of the liquefaction potential index and liquefaction severity mapping for a liquefaction-prone area (Inegol, Turkey).” Eng. Geol., 44(7), 862–871.
Sonmez, H., and Gokceoglu, C. (2005). “A liquefaction severity index suggested for engineering practice.” Environ. Geol., 48(1), 81–91.
Toprak, S., and Holzer, T. L. (2003). “Liquefaction potential index: Field assessment.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 315–322.
Whitman, R. V. (1971). “Resistance of soil to liquefaction and settlement.” Soils Found., 11(4), 59–68.
Yalcin, A., Gokceoglu, C., and Sönmez, H. (2008). “Liquefaction severity map for Aksaray city center (Central Anatolia, Turkey).” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 8(4), 641–649.
Youd, T. L., Hansen, C. M., and Bartlett, S. (2002). “Revised multilinear regression equations for prediction of lateral spread displacement.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1007–1017.
Youd, T. L., and Iddriss, I. M. (2001). “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 297–313.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 140Issue 7July 2014

History

Received: May 12, 2013
Accepted: Feb 18, 2014
Published online: Apr 11, 2014
Published in print: Jul 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Sep 11, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Brett W. Maurer, S.M.ASCE
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Russell A. Green, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Misko Cubrinovski
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand.
Brendon A. Bradley
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share