Technical Papers
Dec 20, 2021

Active Earth Pressure of Finite Width Soil Considering Intermediate Principal Stress and Soil Arching Effects

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 22, Issue 3

Abstract

Traditional earth pressure theories are based on the assumption of semi-infinite space. The existence of intermediate principal stress and soil arching effects is ignored, which will cause significant errors in the application of finite width soil. This study introduced the intermediate principal stress based on the twin-shear unified strength theory; the stress deflection caused by soil arching and the uniform surcharge on the retained soil surface were also considered. An improved calculation method for cohesive soil’s lateral earth pressure coefficient, an analytical solution for active earth pressure of finite width soil, the resultant force, and its action point were proposed. The lateral earth pressure distribution of finite width cohesive soil was studied by calculation examples. In addition, relevant parameters were also analyzed. The results indicate that due to the influence of the intermediate principal stress and soil arching effects, the resultant active earth pressure is lower than the traditional method. The lateral earth pressure coefficient gradually increases with the depth, but it is always lower than the traditional one. As the soil width increases, the resultant force action point presents a nonlinear trend that first decreases, then rises, and stabilizes. The proposed method was compared with the previous studies and got better results; it can provide a new idea for estimating the active earth pressure of finite width soil.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express sincere thanks to Xiaolei Li, Bingjie Wang, and Wensong Gan for their help during the article modification process.

References

Chen, J. J., M. G. Li, and J. H. Wang. 2016. “Active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls subjected to confined cohesionless soil.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (6): 06016041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000855.
Frydman, S., and I. Keissar. 1987. “Earth pressure on retaining walls near rock faces.” J. Geotech. Eng. 113 (6): 586–599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:6(586).
Fan, C. C., and Y. S. Fang. 2010. “Numerical solution of active earth pressures on rigid retaining walls built near rock faces.” Comput. Geotech. 37 (7): 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.08.004.
Goel, S., and N. R. Patra. 2008. “Effect of arching on active earth pressure for rigid retaining walls considering translation mode.” Int. J. Geomech. 8 (2): 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:2(123).
Greco, V. 2013. “Active thrust on retaining walls of narrow backfill width.” Comput. Geotech. 50: 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.12.007.
Handy, R. L. 1985. “The arch in soil arching.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (3): 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:3(302).
He, Z. M., Z. F. Liu, X. H. Liu, and H. B. Bian. 2020. “Improved method for determining active earth pressure considering arching effect and actual slip surface.” J. Cent. South Univ. 27 (7): 2032–2042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-020-4428-5.
Hu, W. D., X. N. Zhu, X. H. Liu, Y. Q. Zeng, and X. Y. Zhou. 2020. “Active earth pressure against cantilever retaining wall adjacent to existing basement exterior wall.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (11): 04020207. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001853.
Janssen, H. A. 1895. “Versuche uber getreidedruck in silozellen.” Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing. 39 (35): 1045–1049.
Jiao, Y. Y., Y. Zhang, and F. Tan. 2020. “Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering soil arching effects and intermediate principal stress.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (11): 04020217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001865.
Khosravi, M. H., A. R. Kargar, and M. Amini. 2018. “Active earth pressures for non-planar to planar slip surfaces considering soil arching.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 14 (7): 730–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1503439.
Khosravi, M. H., T. Pipatpongsa, and J. Takemura. 2016. “Theoretical analysis of earth pressure against rigid retaining walls under translation mode.” Soils Found. 56 (4): 664–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.07.007.
Liu, S. H., X. H. Xue, K. W. Fan, and S. Y. Xu. 2014. “Earth pressure and deformation mode of a retaining wall constructed with soilbags.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 36 (12): 2267–2273. https://doi.org/10.11779/CJGE201412015.
Li, Z. W., X. L. Yang, and Y. X. Li. 2019. “Active earth pressure coefficients based on a 3D rotational mechanism.” Comput. Geotech. 112: 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.05.005.
Li, X. C., D. J. Xu, S. H. Liu, and M. An. 1994. “The experimental research of the strength, deformation and failure properties of Laxiwa granite under the status of true triaxial stresses.” In Proc., 3rd Conf. of Chinese Society for Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 153–159. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press.
Lu, C. S. 1995. “Method of application of the generalized twin shear strength theory.” [In Chinese.] China Civ. Eng. J. 28 (4): 73–77. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.1995.04.010.
Park, B. S., J. Lee, and S. D. Lee. 2018. “Experimental investigation of three-dimensional earth pressure according to aspect ratio of retaining wall.” Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 36 (2): 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2017.1292334.
Pan, X. M., J. Kong, Z. Yang, and C. Liu. 2010. “Secondary development and application of unified elastoplastic constitutive model to ABAQUS.” [In Chinese.] Rock Soil Mech. 31 (4): 1092–1098. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2010.04.002.
Paik, K. H., and R. Salgado. 2003. “Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects.” Géotechnique 53 (7): 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.7.643.
Patel, S., and K. Deb. 2020. “Study of active earth pressure behind a vertical retaining wall subjected to rotation about the base.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (4): 04020028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001639.
Sanjay, K. S. 2011. “Dynamic active thrust from cφ soil backfills.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (3): 526–529. https://doi.org/10.1016./j.soildyn.2010.10.001.
Tsagareli, Z. V. 1965. “Experimental investigation of the pressure of a loose medium on retaining walls with vertical back face and horizontal backfill surface.” Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 2 (4): 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01706095.
Terzaghi, K. 1943. Theoretical soil mechanics. New York: Wiley.
Take, W. A., and A. J. Valsangkar. 2001. “Earth pressures on unyielding retaining walls of narrow backfill width.” Can. Geotech. J. 38 (6): 1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-063.
Tang, Y., and J. Chen. 2018. “A computational method of active earth pressure from finite soil body.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2018: 9892376. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9892376.
Wang, Y. Z. 2000. “Distribution of earth pressure on a retaining wall.” Géotechnique 50 (1): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.83.
Xie, M. X., J. J. Zheng, R. J. Zhang, L. Lan, and C. X. Miao. 2020. “Active earth pressure on rigid retaining walls built near rock faces.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (6): 04020061. https://doi.org/10.1061./(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001675.
Yu, M. H. 2002. “Advances in strength theories for materials under complex stress state in the 20th century.” Appl. Mech. Rev. 55 (3): 169–218. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1472455.
Yu, M. H. 2018. Unified strength theory and its applications. Singapore: Springer.
Yu, M. H., L. N. He, and L. Y. Song. 1985. “Twin shear stress theory and its generalization.” Sci. Sin. Ser. A 28 (11): 1174–1183.
Yu, M. H., Y. W. Zan, J. Zhao, and M. Yoshimine. 2002. “A unified strength criterion for rock material.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. 39 (8): 975–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00097-7.
Yang, M. H., and X. C. Tang. 2017. “Rigid retaining walls with narrow cohesionless backfills under various wall movement modes.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (11): 04017098. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001007.
Yang, M. H., Z. H. Yong, and M. H. Zhao. 2020. “Soil arch effect analysis and earth pressure calculating method for finite width soil behind retaining wall.” [In Chinese.] J. Hunan Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 47 (3): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2020.03.003.
Ying, H. W., W. Zhu, D. Huang, X. Y. Xie, and B. H. Li. 2012. “Active earth pressures against rigid retaining walls with narrow cohesive backfill.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 34 (Suppl.): 13–18.
Zhang, C. G., W. Fan, and J. H. Zhao. 2015. “Unified strength theory of unsaturated soils and verification with true triaxial test.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 34 (8): 1702–1711. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.1335.
Zhang, C. Q., H. Zhou, and X. T. Feng. 2008. “Numerical format of elastoplastic constitutive model based on the unified strength theory in FLAC3D.” [In Chinese.] Rock Soil Mech. 29 (3): 596–602. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2008.03.038.
Zhang, J., R. L. Hu, H. B. Liu, and S. S. Wang. 2010. “Calculation study of Rankine earth pressure based on unified strength theory.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 29 (Suppl. 1): 3169–3176.
Zhao, J. H., W. B. Liang, C. G. Zhang, and Y. Li. 2016. “Unified solution of Coulomb’s active earth pressure for unsaturated soils.” [In Chinese.] Rock Soil Mech. 34 (3): 609–614. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2013.03.002.
Zhao, Q., and J. M. Zhu. 2014. “Research on active earth pressure behind retaining wall adjacent to existing basements exterior wall considering soil arching effects.” [In Chinese.] Rock Soil Mech. 35 (3): 723–728. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2014.03.007.
Zhou, Y. T. 2018. “Active earth pressure against rigid retaining wall considering effects of wall–soil friction and inclinations.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 22 (12): 4901–4908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1984-4.
Zhou, Y. T., Q. S. Chen, F. Q. Chen, X. H. Xue, and S. Basack. 2018. “Active earth pressure on translating rigid retaining structures considering soil arching effect.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 22 (8): 910–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1229225.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 22Issue 3March 2022

History

Received: May 9, 2021
Accepted: Nov 2, 2021
Published online: Dec 20, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 20, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Master’s Student, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan Univ., Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2636-8762. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan Univ., Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Estimation of Active Earth Pressure for Narrow Unsaturated Backfills Considering Soil Arching Effect and Interlayer Shear Stress, Sustainability, 10.3390/su141912699, 14, 19, (12699), (2022).
  • Inclined Layer Method-Based Theoretical Calculation of Active Earth Pressure of a Finite-Width Soil for a Rotating-Base Retaining Wall, Sustainability, 10.3390/su14159772, 14, 15, (9772), (2022).
  • Calculation of Nonlimit Active Earth Pressure against Rigid Retaining Wall Rotating about Base, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app12199638, 12, 19, (9638), (2022).
  • DEM Analysis and Simplified Calculation of Passive Earth Pressure on Retaining Walls Backfilled with Sand Considering Strain-Softening Behavior, Geofluids, 10.1155/2022/1880502, 2022, (1-12), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share