Technical Papers
Mar 5, 2021

New Frequency Domain–Based Inverse Ground Response Analysis Framework for the Determination of Dynamic Soil Properties

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21, Issue 5

Abstract

Dynamic soil properties curves (DSPCs) [that consist of modulus reduction (G/Gmax) and damping ratio (β) curves] are important input parameters for ground response analysis (GRA). However, due to the nonavailability of regional DSPCs, in most cases, regional GRA is carried out based on globally established DSPCs. It is noted that the issue of spatial variability in the previously established DSPCs has been raised in numerous studies. In addition, for most of the cases where GRA is based on previously established DSPC’s from other regions, whether their outcome for surface seismic hazard applies to the region under consideration is debatable. Although the determination of regional DSPCs based on laboratory tests can be carried out, this method is flawed due to sample disturbances and equipment compliance. Under these circumstances, inverse GRA performed on downhole seismic array records can be used to determine in situ DSPCs. However, existing inverse GRA frameworks have limitations, one of them being the estimation of DSPCs for combined layers that only exist between successive accelerometers and not for individual soil layers or type. In addition, although frameworks do exist to determine G/Gmax for a combined layer, to date there is no consistent approach that can be carried out to estimate β from inverse GRA in the frequency domain. This study proposes a new framework to estimate G/Gmax, β, and shear strain (γ) that follows frequency domain methodology. The proposed framework will be applied to records from a downhole array located in Lotung in the central part of Yilan County, Taiwan and IWTH27 from the Kiban Kyoshin network (KiK-net) array in Japan following which G/Gmax, β, and γ for the surficial layer will be determined. It is noted that the proposed methodology could be used to determine the DSPCs for recorded ground motions that exist at the top and bottom of a layer as well as for a surface layer that is underlain by rock with ground motions available at the surface and within the rock medium.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

It is noted that the data used during this study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Kik-NET (https://www.doi.org/10.17598/NIED.0004) for sharing the data related to the ground motions considered in this study as well as lithology properties at the IWTH27 site. The Lotung dataset at http://soilquake.net/Downholearray/Lotung/ was originally provided by the US Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), under the direction of H. T. Tang, and J. Carl Stepp.

References

Abhishek, K., H. Suman, and B. Olympa. 2018. “Approximation of equivalent linear ground response analysis at low strain by strain dependent linear ground response analysis for typical site at Delhi, India.” In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V: Seismic Hazard Analysis, Earthquake Ground Motions, and Regional-Scale Assessment, Geotechnical Special Publication 291, edited by S. J. Brandenberg and M. T. Manzari. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Alemu, B. E., A. Worku, G. M. Wassie, and G. T. Habtesellasie. 2018. “Ground response analysis of representative sites of Hawassa city.” In Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics V: Seismic hazard analysis, earthquake ground motions, and regional-scale assessment, Geotechnical Special Publication 291, edited by S. J. Brandenberg and M. T. Manzari, 422–434. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ameri, G., A. Oth, M. Pilz, D. Bindi, S. Parolai, L. Luzi, M. Mucciarelli, and G. Cultrera. 2011. “Separation of source and site effects by generalized inversion technique using the aftershock recordings of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 9 (3): 717–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9248-4.
Anbazhagan, P., T. G. Sitharam, and C. Divya. 2007. “Site response analysis based on site specific soil properties using geotechnical and geophysical tests: Correlation between Gmax and N60.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geo. Engineering, Paper No. 1286, 1–12. The Netherlands: Springer.
Anderson, D. G., and Y. K. Tang. 1989. Vol. 2 of Summary of soil characterization program for the Lotung large-scale seismic experiment. Rep. No. NP-6I54. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
Archuleta, R. J., S. H. Seale, P. V. Sangas, L. M. Baker, and S. T. Swain. 1992. “Garner Valley downhole array of accelerometers: Instrumentation and preliminary data analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82 (4): 1592–1621.
Archuleta, R. J., J. H. Steidl, and L. F. Bonilla. 2000. “Engineering insights from data recorded on vertical arrays.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. in Earthquake Engineering, 1–7. Silverstream, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Baise, L. G., and S. D. Glaser. 2000. “Consistency of ground-motion estimates made using system identification.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90 (4): 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119980169.
Bajaj, K., and P. Anbazhagan. 2019. “Identification of shear modulus reduction and damping curve for deep and shallow sites: Kik-Net data.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1643807.
Bayat, M., and A. Ghalandarzadeh. 2020. “Modified models for predicting dynamic properties of granular soil under anisotropic consolidation.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (3): 04019197. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001607.
Beresnev, I. A., G. M. Atkinson, P. A. Johnson, and E. H. Field. 1998. “Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. II. Widespread nonlinear response at soil sites.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88 (6): 1402–1406.
Bindi, D., F. Pacor, L. Luzi, M. Massa, and G. Ameri. 2009. “The Mw6.3, 2009 L’Aquila earthquake: Source, path and site effects from spectral analysis of strong motion data.” Geophys. J. Int. 179 (3): 1573–1579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04392.x.
Boore, D. M. 2007. “Some thoughts on relating density to velocity.” Accessed September 2019. http://www.ce.memphis.edu/7137/PDFs/Boore/daves_notes_on_relating_density_to_velocity_v1.2.pdf.
Boore, D. M., and J. J. Bommer. 2005. “Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: Needs, options and consequences.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 25 (2): 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.10.007.
Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). 2003. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures (FEMA 450). Washington, DC: Building Seismic Safety Council.
Campillo, M., J. C. Gariel, K. Aki, and F. J. Sánchez-Sesma. 1989. “Destructive strong ground motion in Mexico city: Source, path, and site effects during great 1985 Michoacán earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 79: 1718–1735.
Carlton, B., and K. Tokimatsu. 2016. “Comparison of equivalent linear and nonlinear site response analysis results and model to estimate maximum shear strain.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (3): 1867–1887. https://doi.org/10.1193/021215EQS029MR1.
Chandra, J., P. Guéguen, J. H. Steidl, and L. F. Bonilla. 2015. “In situ assessment of the gγ curve for characterizing the nonlinear response of soil: Application to the garner valley downhole array and the wildlife liquefaction array.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 105 (2): 993–1010. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140209.
Chang, C.-Y., C. M. Mok, and H.-T. Tang. 1996. “Inference of dynamic shear modulus from Lotung downhole data.” J. Geotech. Eng. 122 (8): 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:8(657).
Chang, C.-Y., K. Tang, C. M. Mok, H. T. Tang, and M. S. Power. 1991. “Development of shear modulus reduction curves based on Lotung downhole ground motion data.” In Vol. 16 of Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering & Soil Dynamics, 111–118. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Chin, B.-H., and K. Aki. 1991. “Simultaneous study of the source, path, and site effects on strong ground motion during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: A preliminary result on pervasive nonlinear site effects.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 81 (5): 1859–1884.
Darendeli, M. B. 2001. “Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves.” Ph.D. thesis, Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). 1993. “Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions. Vol I: method and guidclincs forestimating earthquake ground motion in castern North America.” Rep. No. TR-I02293s. Pal Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
Elgamal, A., T. Lai, Z. Yang, L. He, and S. Prakash. 2001. “Dynamic soil properties, seismic downhole arrays and applications in practice (CD-ROM).” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 26–31. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Elgamal, A.-W., M. Zeghal, H. T. Tang, and J. C. Stepp. 1995. “Lotung downhole array. I: Evaluation of site dynamic properties.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (4): 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(350).
Eseller-Bayat, E. E., and M. Ada. 2019. “A methodology for estimation of site-specific nonlinear dynamic soil behaviour using vertical downhole arrays.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 16: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2019.1603122.
Ghayamghamian, M. R., and H. Kawakami. 1996. “On the characteristics of non-linear soil response and dynamic soil properties using vertical array data in Japan.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25 (8): 857–870.https://doi.org/1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199608)25:8<857::AID-EQE592>3.0.CO;2-R.
Ghayamghamian, M. R., and H. Kawakami. 2000. “On-site nonlinear hysteretic curves and dynamic soil properties.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126: 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:6(543).
Ghayamghamian, M. R., and M. Matosaka. 2001. “Identification of dynamic soil properties using vertical array recordings.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 1–7. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Ghayoomi, M., G. Suprunenko, and M. Mirshekari. 2017. “Cyclic triaxial test to measure strain-dependent shear modulus of unsaturated sand.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (9): 04017043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000917.
Ghodrati, A., and A. A. Araei. 2017. “Artificial neural networks for modeling shear modulus and damping behavior of gravelly materials.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (2): 04016060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000660.
Glaser, S. D., and L. G. Baise. 2000. “System identification estimation of soil properties at the Lotung site.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 19 (7): 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00026-9.
Glaser, S. D., and A. L. Leeds. 1996. Estimation of system damping at the lotung site by application of system identification. Rep. No. NIST GCR 96-700. Golden, CO: Colorado School of Mines.
Haldar, S., J. K. Mondal, and A. Kumar. 2019. “Empirical correlations for strain dependent linear 1D ground response analysis for Guwahati, India based on detailed analyses.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. of Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 2779–2786. Rome, Italy: Associazione Geotecnica Italiana.
Hanumantharao, C., and G. V. Ramana. 2008. “Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India.” J. Earth Syst. Sci. 117 (S2): 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0066-2.
Hardin, B. O., and V. P. Drnevich. 1972. “Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equation and curves.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98 (6): 667–691. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001760.
Harinarayan, N. H. 2020. “Ground motion prediction equation for parts of North India.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology.
Honjo, Y., S. Iwamoto, M. Sugimoto, S. Onimaru, and M. Yoshizawa. 1998. “Inverse analysis of dynamic soil properties based on seismometer array records using the extended Bayesian method.” Soils Found. 38 (1): 131–143. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.131.
Huang, H.-C., C.-S. Shieh, and H.-C. Chiu. 2001. “Linear and nonlinear behaviors of soft soil layers using Lotung downhole array in Taiwan.” Terr. Atmos. Oceanic Sci. 12 (3): 503–524. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2001.12.3.503(T).
Kaklamanos, J., L. G. Baise, E. M. Thompson, and L. Dorfmann. 2015. “Comparison of 1D linear, equivalent-linear, and nonlinear site response models at six KiK-net validation sites.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 69: 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.016.
Kaklamanos, J., B. A. Bradley, E. M. Thompson, and L. G. Baise. 2013. “Critical parameters affecting bias and variability in site-response analyses using KiK-net downhole array data.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103 (3): 1733–1749. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120166.
Kim, B., and Y. M. A. Hashash. 2013. “Site response analysis using downhole array recordings during the March 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and the effect of long-duration ground motions.” Earthquake Spectra 29 (Suppl. 1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000114.
Kim, B., Y. M. A. Hashash, J. P. Stewart, E. M. Rathje, J. A. Harmon, M. I. Musgrove, K. W. Campbell, and W. J. Silva. 2016. “Relative differences between nonlinear and equivalent-linear 1-D site response analyses.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (3): 1845–1865. https://doi.org/10.1193/051215EQS068M.
Koga, Y., and O. Matsuo. 1990. “Shaking table tests of embankments resting on liquefiable sandy ground.” Soils Found. 30: 162–174. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.30.4_162.
Kokusho, T. 1980. “Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range.” Soils Found. 20 (2): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.20.2_45.
Kokusho, T., T. Aoyagi, and A. Wakunami. 2005. “In situ soil-specific nonlinear properties back-calculated from vertical array records during 1995 Kobe earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (12): 1509–1521. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1509).
Kokusho, T., K. Sato, and M. Matsumoto. 1996. “Nonlinear dynamic soil properties back-calculated from strong seismic motions during Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake.” In Proc., 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Paper No 2080, 1–12. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake Engineering Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kumar, A., O. Baro, and N. H. Harinarayan. 2016. “Obtaining the surface PGA from site response analyses based on globally recorded ground motions and matching with the codal values.” Nat. Hazard. 81 (1): 543–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2095-x.
Kumar, A., and J. K. Mondal. 2017. “Newly developed MATLAB based code for equivalent linear site response analysis.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 35 (5): 2303–2325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0246-4.
Lee, C.-J., and S.-F. Sheu. 2007. “The stiffness degradation and damping ratio evolution of Taipei silty clay under cyclic straining.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27: 730–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.12.008.
Lin, J.-S. 1994. “Extraction of dynamic soil properties using extended Kalman filter.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (12): 2100–2117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2100).
Madera, G. A. 1970. Fundamental period and amplification of peak acceleration in layered systems. Research Rep. R70-37. Cambridge, MA: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Martínez-Carvajal, H., V. M. Taboada-Urtuzuástegui, and M. P. Romo. 2001. “Analysis of some downhole acceleration records from “Central De Abasto Oficinas” site at Mexico city.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Midorikawa, S., and H. Miura. 2008. “Nonlinear behavior of soil response observed in strong-motion records from recent Japanese earthquakes.” In Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo, Japan: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Mondal, J. K., and A. Kumar. 2017. “Impact of higher frequency content of input motion upon equivalent linear site response analysis for the study area of Delhi.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 35 (3): 959–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0153-0.
Nihon. 2011. Liquefaction induced damages caused by the M 9.0 East Japan mega earthquake on March 11, 2011, Tokyo Metropolitan Univ., Hisataka Tano, Nihon Univ., Koriyama Japan, with cooperation of save Earth co. and Waseda Univ.
Okur, D. V., and A. Ansal. 2007. “Stiffness degradation of natural fine grained soils during cyclic loading.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27: 843–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.01.005.
Oskay, C., and M. Zeghal. 2011. “A survey of geotechnical system identification techniques.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (4): 568–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.11.011.
Phanikanth, V. S., D. Choudhury, and G. R. Reddy. 2011. “Equivalent-linear seismic ground response analysis of some typical sites in Mumbai.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 29 (6): 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9443-8.
Pyke, R. 1979. “Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loadings.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 105: 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001066.
Ramberg, W., and W. R. Osgood. 1943. Description of stress strain curves by three parameters. NACA Technical Note No. 902. Washington, DC: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics/National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Ranjan, R. 2005. Seismic response analysis of Dehradun. Enschede, Netherlands: International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observations.
Schnabel, P. B. 1973. Effects of local geology and distance from source on earthquake ground motions. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Seed, H., and I. Idriss. 1970. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Technical Rep. NTIS Issue No 197109. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Seismosoft. 2020. “SeismoSignal - A computer program for signal processing of time-histories.” www.seismosoft.com.
Shen, C. K., Z. Wang, and X. S. Li. 1991. “Pore pressure response during 1986 Lotung earthquakes.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Soilquake.net. 2020. Lotung Downhole Array Data. Accessed March 4, 2020. http://soilquake.net/Downholearray/Lotung/.
Stanko, D., Z. Gülerce, S. Markušić, and R. Šalić. 2019. “Evaluation of the site amplification factors estimated by equivalent linear site response analysis using time series and random vibration theory based approaches.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 117: 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.11.007.
Stanko, D., S. Markušić, S. Strelec, and M. Gazdek. 2017. “Equivalent-linear site response analysis on the site of the historical Trakošćan Castle, Croatia, using HVSR method.” Environ. Earth Sci. 76 (18): 642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6971-4.
Sun, J. I., R. Golesorkhi, and H. B. Seed. 1988. Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils. Rep. No EERC 88-15. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Taboada-Urtuzuastegui, V., H. Martinez, M. Romo, and C. Ardila. 2000. “Identification of Mexico city clay dynamic properties.” In Proc. 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Paper No. 1220. Upper Hutt, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Tang, H. T., Y. K. Tang, J. C. Stepp, I. B. Wall, E. Lin, S. C. Cheng, and S. K. Lee. 1989. “A large-scale soil-structure interaction experiment: Design and construction.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 111 (3): 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(89)90248-3.
Thompson, E. M., L. G. Baise, Y. Tanaka, and R. E. Kayen. 2012. “A taxonomy of site response complexity.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 41: 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.04.005.
Tokimatsu, K., and S. Midorikawa. 1981. “Nonlinear soil properties estimated from strong motion accelerograms.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 117–122. Rolla, MO: Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology.
Tokimatsu, K., S. Midorikawa, and Y. Yoshimi. 1989. “Dynamic soil properties obtained from strong motion records.” In Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2015–2018. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Tokimatsu, K., T. Sekiguchi, H. Miura, and S. Midorikawa. 2006. “Nonlinear dynamic properties of surface soils estimated from strong motion accelerograms at K-NET and JMA stations in Ojiya.” J. Struct. Constr. Eng. (Trans. AIJ) 71: 43–49. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.71.43_2.
Tsai, C., and Y. M. A. Hashash. 2007. “An inverse analysis approach to extract dynamic nonlinear soil behavior from downhole array data.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake and Geotechnical Engineering. 1–11, The Netherlands: Springer.
Tsai, C.-C., and Y. M. A. Hashash. 2009. “Learning of dynamic soil behavior from downhole arrays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (6): 745–757. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000050.
Uthayakumar, U. M., and E. Naesgaard. 2004. “Ground response analysis for seismic design in Fraser River Delta, British Columbia.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Paper No. 2104, 1–10. Vancouver, Canada: WCEE Secretariat.
Vucetic, M. 1994. “Cyclic threshold shear strains in soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (12): 2208–2228. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2208).
Vucetic, M., and R. Dobry. 1991. “Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (1): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89).
Wang, G. X., and J. Kuwano. 1999. “Modeling of strain dependency of shear modulus and damping of clayey sand.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 18 (6): 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(99)00010-X.
Wang, H.-Y., W.-P. Jiang, S.-Y. Wang, and Y. Miao. 2019. “In situ assessment of soil dynamic parameters for characterizing nonlinear seismic site response using KiK-net vertical array data.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (5): 2331–2360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00539-3.
Wen, K-L. 1994. “Non-linear soil response in ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 23 (6): 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230603.
Yamada, S., M. Hyodo, R. P. Orense, S. V. Dinesh, and T. Hyodo. 2008. “Strain-dependent dynamic properties of remolded sand-clay mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (7): 972–981. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:7(972).
Yanagisawa, E., and M. Kazama. 1996. “Nonlinear dynamic behavior of the ground inferred from strong motion array records at Kobe Port Island during the 1995 Hygo-Ken Nanbu earthquake.” In Proc., 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Paper No. 2152, 1–8. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Zeghal, M., A.-W. Elgamal, H. T. Tang, and J. C. Stepp. 1995. “Lotung downhole array. II: Evaluation of soil nonlinear properties.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (4): 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(363).
Zhang, J., R. D. Andrus, and C. H. Juang. 2005. “Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (4): 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:4(453).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21Issue 5May 2021

History

Received: Jun 3, 2020
Accepted: Nov 15, 2020
Published online: Mar 5, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 5, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Joy K. Mondal
Research scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, India.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3718-5654. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share