Theoretical Analysis of the Joint Leakage in Shield Tunnel Considering the Typical Deformation Mode
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 20, Issue 12
Abstract
The joint leakage in a shield tunnel is a common defect and difficult to be accurately quantified due to the complex deformation mode and stress state, which seriously threatens the service performance of the tunnel lining. The waterproofing of the joint is divided into two stages, which are separately provided by the sealing gaskets in the joint and the normal stress on the joint interface. Combined with the two-stage characteristics of the joint waterproofing, an analytical leakage model is proposed to deal with the joint leakage. In this model, the maximum water head loss or critical water head flowing through the sealing gaskets is calculated by a general formula, in which the parameters are determined by indoor tests. The proposed analytical model for the joint leakage in the shield tunnel not only considers the joint deformation modes, including joint opening and joint dislocation, but also considers the stress state of the joint interface. The joint leakage analysis of a typical shield tunnel in Shanghai indicates that both the high external water head and the joint dislocation can reduce the critical joint opening of the initial leakage, and the critical joint opening of the waist joint is much smaller than that of the top joint. The average hydraulic pressure acting on the joint interface can be negligible, because it is less than 5% of the concrete stress at the joint. Based on the proposed joint leakage model, the waterproofing capacity of the tunnel-lining ring can be optimized by moving the sealing gaskets along the joint interface.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
This study was substantially supported by the Natural Science Foundation Committee Program of China (Nos. 51538009 and 51778474). The first author would also like to appreciate the China Scholarship Council (No. 201906260200) for funding his study at the University of Lille. All the aforementioned supports are gratefully acknowledged.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- cosh
- hyperbolic cosine function;
- d
- effective hydraulic aperture;
- Eg
- secant modulus of the sealing gasket;
- g
- gravitational acceleration;
- Hwc
- critical water head;
- Hwe
- external water head;
- kx
- permeability coefficient;
- L
- thickness of the tunnel segment;
- Pc
- confining pressure;
- Pge
- contact stress of the sealing gaskets;
- Pw
- water pressure;
- p
- amendment fluid pressure;
- qx
- flow rate into the tunnel;
- Rg
- ratio of the sealing gasket net area;
- s
- joint dislocation;
- sinh
- hyperbolic sine function;
- sg
- offset of the sealing gasket;
- wg
- width of the sealing gasket;
- α, β, η
- material parameters of the hyperelastic sealing gasket;
- γw
- unit weight of water;
- δ
- joint opening;
- δg
- opening of the sealing gasket;
- δg0
- precompression of the sealing gasket;
- ɛ
- strain of the sealing gasket;
- μ
- dynamic viscosity coefficient;
- ∇
- Hamiltonian operator;
- ∇2
- Laplace operator;
- ξ
- sealing coefficient;
- ζ, κ, λ
- parameters in the sealing function;
- ρ
- density of water;
- σn
- normal stress of the joint interface;
- υ
- velocity vector;
- υx
- flow velocity into the tunnel; and
- ω
- unit width of the joint.
References
Arnau, O., and C. Molins. 2012. “Three dimensional structural response of segmental tunnel linings.” Eng. Struct. 44 (6): 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.001.
Banthia, N., and A. Bhargava. 2007. “Permeability of stressed concrete and role of fiber reinforcement.” ACI Mater. J. 104 (1): 70–76.
Boussinesq, J. 1891. “Sur la maniere don’t les vitesses, dans un tube cylindrique de section circulaire, evase a son entrée, se distribuent depuis entrée jusqu’aux endroits ou se trouve etabli un regime uniforme.” [In French.] Compt. Rend. 113: 49–51.
Brown, S. R. 1987. “Fluid flow through rock joints: The effect of surface roughness.” J. Geophys. Res. 92 (B2): 1337–1347. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB092iB02p01337.
Choi, S., B. Jeon, S. Lee, and S. Jeon. 2019. “Experimental study on hydromechanical behavior of an artificial rock joint with controlled roughness.” Sustainability 11 (4): 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041014.
Gong, C., W. Ding, K. Soga, K. M. Mosalam, and Y. Tuo. 2018. “Sealant behavior of gasketed segmental joints in shield tunnels: An experimental and numerical study.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 77: 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.029.
Hearn, N. 1999. “Effect of shrinkage and load-induced cracking on water permeability of concrete.” ACI Mater. J. 96 (2): 234–241.
Hoseini, M., V. Bindiganavile, and N. Banthia. 2009. “The effect of mechanical stress on permeability of concrete: A review.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 31 (4): 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.02.003.
Huang, H., H. Shao, D. Zhang, and F. Wang. 2017. “Deformational responses of operated shield tunnel to extreme surcharge: A case study.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (3): 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1170156.
Iwai, K. 1976. “Fundamental studies of fluid flow through a single fracture.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Engineering Geology, Univ. of California.
Lee, W. F., and K. Ishihara. 2010. “Forensic diagnosis of a shield tunnel failure.” Eng. Struct. 32 (7): 1830–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.012.
Lei, G., N. Cao, and Q. Wen. 2019. “Permeability prediction in roughened fractures under stress condition using fractal model.” Fractals 27 (3): 1950030). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X19500300.
Li, X., Z. Yan, Z. Wang, and H. Zhu. 2015a. “Experimental and analytical study on longitudinal joint opening of concrete segmental lining.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 46: 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.11.002.
Li, X., Z. Yan, Z. Wang, and H. Zhu. 2015b. “A progressive model to simulate the full mechanical behavior of concrete segmental lining longitudinal joints.” Eng. Struct. 93: 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.011.
Liao, S. M., F. L. Peng, and S. L. Shen. 2008. “Analysis of shearing effect on tunnel induced by load transfer along longitudinal direction.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 23 (4): 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.07.001.
Robin, P. Y. F. 1973. “Note on effective pressure.” J. Geophys. Res. 78 (14): 2434–2437. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB078i014p02434.
Selvadurai, A. P. S. 2015. “Normal stress-induced permeability hysteresis of a fracture in a granite cylinder.” Geofluids 15 (1–2): 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfl.12107.
Shao, H. 2018. “Analysis of deformation mechanism and wireless sensing method of shield tunnel for Shanghai metro.” [In Chinese.] Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ.
Shi, C., C. Cao, M. Lei, L. Peng, and H. Ai. 2016. “Effects of lateral unloading on the mechanical and deformation performance of shield tunnel segment joints.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 51: 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.033.
Su, B., M. Zhan, and Y. Wan. 1997. “Experimental study on the coupling characteristics of seepage and stress in fracture.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 19 (4): 73–77.
Walsh, J. B. 1981. “Effect of pore pressure and confining pressure on fracture permeability.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 18 (5): 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(81)90006-1.
Wang, F. Y., M. L. Zhou, D. M. Zhang, H. W. Huang, and D. Chapman. 2019. “Random evolution of multiple cracks and associated mechanical behaviors of segmental tunnel linings using a multiscale modeling method.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 90: 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.05.008.
Wang, Z., L. Wang, L. Li, and J. Wang. 2014. “Failure mechanism of tunnel lining joints and bolts with uneven longitudinal ground settlement.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 40: 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.007.
Wu, H. N., S. L. Shen, R. P. Chen, and A. N. Zhou. 2020. “Three-dimensional numerical modelling on localised leakage in segmental lining of shield tunnels.” Comput. Geotech. 122: 1–12.
Wu, H.-N., S.-L. Shen, S.-M. Liao, and Z.-Y. Yin. 2015. “Longitudinal structural modelling of shield tunnels considering shearing dislocation between segmental rings.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 50: 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.001.
Yuan, Y., X. Jiang, and C. Lee. 2000. “Tunnel waterproofing practices in China.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 15 (2): 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00048-1.
Zhang, D., L. Ma, H. Huang, and J. Zhang. 2012. “Predicting leakage-induced settlement of shield tunnels in saturated clay.” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 89 (3): 163–188.
Zhang, J., W. Standifird, J.-C. Roegiers, and Y. Zhang. 2007. “Stress-dependent fluid flow and permeability in fractured media: From lab experiments to engineering applications.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 40 (1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-006-0103-x.
Zhang, J.-L., C. Vida, Y. Yuan, C. Hellmich, H. A. Mang, and B. Pichler. 2017. “A hybrid analysis method for displacement-monitored segmented circular tunnel rings.” Eng. Struct. 148: 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.049.
Zimmerman, R. W., and G. S. Bodvarsson. 1996. “Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures.” Transp. Porous Media 23 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145263.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 15, 2020
Accepted: Jul 22, 2020
Published online: Sep 17, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 17, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.