Technical Papers
Feb 13, 2018

Analysis of Tunnel Support Requirements Using Deterministic and Probabilistic Approaches in Average Quality Rock Mass

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 18, Issue 4

Abstract

The support design for rock tunnels involves a complex problem because of the various types of uncertainties present in rock mass properties; therefore, probabilistic approaches are used to consider these uncertainties systematically in the presented analysis. In earlier studies, uncertainties in peak strength parameters and deformation modulus were considered while uncertainty in residual strength parameters was neglected. Another important factor is the assumption regarding the postpeak behavior of the rock mass, which depends on the rock mass quality in the field. An average quality rock mass generally shows strain-softening behavior in a range from peak to residual strength, which generally has been neglected because of the assumption that the rock mass is elastic-perfectly plastic. However, it was observed that the yield zone depth and displacements around the tunnel are highly sensitive to residual strength parameters, and residual strength parameters can considerably influence the estimation of the support requirements of a tunnel. In this paper, a new computational approach, based on the geological strength index (GSI) and the use of deterministic and probabilistic methods, is described for the reinforcement design of a tunnel in an average quality rock mass. This approach considers the variability in residual strength parameters along with peak strength parameters and the deformation modulus. Moreover, the strength drop in the stress-strain behavior of the rock mass is also considered in the analysis. An underground powerhouse cavern from the Himalayan region of India is taken as the case study to show the methodology used in the research. The study brings out the advantages of the probabilistic over the deterministic approach for the support design of a tunnel. Another important conclusion from the study is that the support requirements for the tunnel are greatly influenced by residual strength parameters, and therefore, uncertainty and strength drop in the residual strength parameters should be properly considered when designing support for tunnels.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Akgün, H., Muralti, S., and Koçkar, M. K. (2014). “Geotechnical investigations and preliminary support design for the Geçilmez tunnel: A case study along the Black Sea coastal highway, Giresun, Northern Turkey.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 40(Feb), 277–299.
Alejano, L. R., Rodriguez-Dono, A., Alonso, E., and Fdez.-Manín, G. (2009). “Ground reaction curves for tunnels excavated in different quality rock masses showing several types of post-failure behavior.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 24(6), 689–705.
Barton, N., Bandis, S., and Bakhtar, K. (1985). “Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 22(3), 121–140.
Barton, N. R., Lien, R., and Lunde, J. (1977). “Estimation of support requirements for underground excavations.” Proc., 16th U.S. Symp., Rock Mechanics, Design Methods in Rock Mechanics, C. Fairhurst and S. L. Crouch, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA, 163–177.
Basarir, H. (2006). “Engineering geological studies and tunnel support design at Sulakyurt dam site, Turkey.” Eng. Geol., 86(4), 225–237.
Bhasin, R. K., Barton, N., Grimstad, E., Chryssanthakis, P., and Shende, F. P. (1996). “Comparison of predicted and measured performance of a large cavern in the Himalayas.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 33(6), 607–626.
Cai, M. (2011). “Rock mass characterization and rock property variability considerations for tunnel and cavern design.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 44(4), 379–399.
Cai, M., and Kaiser, P. K. (2006). “Visualization of rock mass classification systems.” Geotech. Geolog. Eng., 24(4), 1089–1102.
Cai, M., Kaiser, P. K., Tasaka, Y., and Minami, M. (2007). “Determination of residual strength parameters of jointed rock masses using the GSI system.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 44(2), 247–265.
Cai, M., Kaiser, P. K., Uno, H., and Tasaka, Y. (2000). “Comparative study of rock support system design practice for large-scale underground excavations.” Proc., 4th North American Rock Mechanics Symp., Pacific Rocks 2000: Rock around the Rim, J. Girard, ed., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1027–1034.
Cai, M., Kaiser, P. K., Uno, H., Tasaka, Y., and Minami, M. (2004). “Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus and strength of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41(1), 3–19.
Carranza-Torres, C., and Fairhurst, C. (2000). “Application of the convergence confinement method of tunnel design to rock masses that satisfy the Hoek–Brown failure criteria.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 15(2), 187–213.
Duzgun, H. S. B., Yucemen, M. S., and Karpuz, C. (2002). “A probabilistic model for the assessment of uncertainties in the shear strength of rock discontinuities.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 39(6), 743–754.
Goel, R. K., Swarup, A., and Sheorey, P. R. (2007). “Bolt length requirement in underground openings.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 44(5), 802–811.
Hamby, D. M. (1994). “A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 32(2), 135–154.
Hoek, E., and Brown, E. T. (1997). “Practical estimates of rock mass strength.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 34(8), 1165–1186.
Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C., and Corkum, B. (2002). “Hoek–Brown failure criterion—2002 edition.” Proc., 5th North American Rock Mechanics Symp., 17th Tunnelling Association of Canada Conf., NARMS-TAC 2002: Mining and Tunnelling Innovation and Opportunity, R. Hammah, ed., Vol. 1, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 267–273.
Hoek, E., and Diederichs, M. S. (2006). “Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 43(2), 203–215.
Hustrulid, W. A., and Bullock, R. L., eds. (2001). Underground mining methods: Engineering fundamentals and international case studies, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Littleton, CO.
Koyama, T., Nanbu, S., and Komatsuzaki, Y. (1997). “Large-scale cavern at a depth of 500 m.” Tunnel Underground, 28(1), 37–45 (in Japanese).
Langford, J. C., and Diederichs, M. S. (2013). “Reliability based approach to tunnel lining design using a modified point estimate method.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 60(Jun), 263–276.
Lichtenstein, S., and Newman, J. R. (1967). “Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities.” Psychon. Sci., 9(10), 563–564.
MATLAB 2013a [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Özsan, A., Başarir, H., Yüceel, S., and Cücen, O. (2009). “Engineering geological evaluation and preliminary support design for the metro extension tunnel, Ankara, Turkey.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 68(3), 397–408.
Palmstrom, A. (2005). “Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD).” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 20(4), 362–377.
Pells, P. J. N. (2002). “Developments in the design of tunnels and caverns in the Triassic rocks of the Sydney region.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 39(5), 569–587.
Phase2 8.020 [Computer software]. Rocscience, Toronto.
Roclab 1.033 [Computer software]. Rocscience, Toronto.
Sakurai, S. (1981). “Direct strain evaluation technique in construction of underground opening.” Proc., 22th U.S. Symp. Rock Mech., MIT, Cambridge, MA, 278–282.
Singh, B., and Goel, R. K. (1999). Rock mass classification: A practical approach in civil engineering, Elsevier Science, Oxford, U.K.
Sjöberg, J. (1997). “Estimating rock mass strength using the Hoek-Brown failure criterion and rock mass classification—A review and application to the Aznalcollar open pit.” BM 1997:02, Div. of Rock Mechanics, Dept. of Civil and Mining Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Song, L., Li, H.-Z., Chan, C. L., and Low, B. K. (2016). “Reliability analysis of underground excavation in elastic-strain-softening rock mass.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 60(Nov), 66–79.
Tiwari, G., and Latha, G. M. (2016). “Design of rock slope reinforcement: An Himalayan case study.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 49(6), 2075–2097.
Wang, G., Zhang, X., Jiang, Y., Wu, X., and Wang, S. (2016). “Rate-dependent mechanical behavior of rough rock joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 83(Mar), 231–240.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 18Issue 4April 2018

History

Received: Feb 22, 2017
Accepted: Oct 17, 2017
Published online: Feb 13, 2018
Published in print: Apr 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jul 13, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gaurav Tiwari [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Bhardwaj Pandit [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Madhavi Latha Gali [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India. E-mail: [email protected]
G. L. Sivakumar Babu, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share