Hydraulic Fracture Completion Optimization in Fayetteville Shale: Case Study
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 17, Issue 2
Abstract
In November 2014, a hydraulic fracture completion optimization study was designed and executed in the Fayetteville Shale. The well with the optimized completion is the #3 well, which is an unconventional dry gas well located in Conway County, Arkansas. This well is a 13-stage horizontal well landed in Lower Fayetteville (FL2) completed with slickwater carrying 100 mesh and 30/70 proppant, using a plug-and-perf approach. The objective of the hydraulic fracture completion optimization was to minimize the differences in rock breakdown stress between clusters within each stage. The intent of minimizing the differences in stress is to ensure that each perforation cluster has an equal fracture initiation pressure, resulting in an equal fracture propagation from each cluster. Successful fracture propagation in every cluster of each stage then hopefully results in improved hydrocarbon production. The results of this hydraulic fracture completion optimization are intriguing because the optimized well, #3, is the westernmost well on a 6-well pad and had by far the highest production per foot of completed lateral, and per pound of proppant, of all wells on that pad. The production from the #3 well in the first month was approximately 56 cubic meters per day-meter (m3/d-m) [604 cubic feet per day per completed foot of lateral (cfd/ft)], compared with 45 m3/d-m (486 cfd/ft) for the adjacent well to the east, compared with approximately 27 m3/d-m (286 cfd/ft) for the easternmost four wells. Additionally, the #3 well had a substantially lower average treating pressure than the other five wells on the pad, which may suggest that more fractures were propagated in it than in the other wells. Extensive postfracture testing has not been conducted on this well pad to clarify exactly how much hydraulic fracture completion optimization contributed to the success of the #3 well. However, existing research and data can help inform theories about hydraulic fracture completion optimization. A “no impact” theory suggests that a regional geologic trend is responsible for the production uplift of the westernmost two wells. An “extreme impact” theory suggests that hydraulic fracture completion optimization is primarily responsible for the production uplift of both wells (and the wells are in hydraulic communication through their fracture stimulations).
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the management of Southwestern Energy Company and Baker Hughes for permission to publish this paper. The authors also acknowledge the project team, especially Mark Roseland, David Ball, Kim Hall, and Aaron Rever, for their contributions.
References
Ashton, T., Ly, C. V., Spence, G., and Oliver, G. (2013). “Application of real-time well-site tools for enhanced geosteering, reservoir and completions characterization.” Proc., SPE Reservoir Characteristic Simulation Conf. and Exhibition, Vol. 1, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Bol, G. M., Wong, S.-W., Davidson, C. J., and Woodland, D. C. (1994). “Borehole stability in shales.” Proc., SPE Drilling and Completion, Vol. 9, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Briggs, K., Hill, A. D., Zhu, D., and Olson, K. (2014). “The relationship between rock properties and fracture conductivity in the Fayetteville Shale.” SPE paper 170790-MS prepared for presentation at the SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition, 27–29, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Cipolla, C., Weng, X., Onda, H., Nadaraja, T., Ganguly, U., and Malpani, R. (2011). “New algorithms and integrated workflow for tight gas and shale completions.” Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Cipolla, C., Williams, M., Weng, X., Mack, M., and Maxwell, S. (2010). “Reducing exploration and appraisal risk in low permeability reservoirs using microseismic fracture mapping—Part 2.” Proc., SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conf., Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Desroches, J., Lecampion, B., Ramakrishnan, H., Prioul, R., and Brown, E. (2014). “Benefits of controlled hydraulic fracture placement: Theory and field experiment.” Proc., SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conf., Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Dohmen, T., Zhang, J., and Blangy, J. P. (2014). “Measurement and analysis of 3D stress shadowing related to the spacing of hydraulic fracturing in unconventional reservoirs.” Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Economides, M., and Martin, T. (2007). Modern fracturing—Enhancing natural gas production, BJ Services, Houston, TX, 363–377.
Franquet, J. A. and Rodriguez, E. F. (2012). “Orthotropic horizontal stress characterization from logging and core-derived acoustic anisotropies.” Proc., 46th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symp., American Rock Mechanics Association, Overland Park, KS.
Harpel, J., Barker, L., Fontenot, J., Carroll, C., Thomson, S., and Olson, K. (2012). “Case history of the Fayetteville Shale completions.” Proc., SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conf., Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Mays, L. W. (2005). “Hydraulic processes: Pressurized pipe flow.” Water resources engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 60–63.
Olson, J. E. (2008). “Multi-fracture propagation modeling: Applications to hydraulic fracturing in shales and tight gas sands.” Proc., 42nd U.S. Rock Mechanics Symp. (USRMS), American Rock Mechanics Association, Overland Park, KS.
Patterson, D., Mekic, N., Boshakov, A., Rajappa, B., and Tang, X. (2011). “Unconventional reservoir fracture evaluation utilizing deep shear-wave imaging.” Proc., SPWLA 52nd Annual Logging Symp., Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts, Houston, TX.
Ravensbergen, J. E. (2011). “Cased-hole multistage fracturing: a new coiled-tubing-enabled completion.” Proc., SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubin and Well Intervention Conf. and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Rickman, R., Mullen, M., Petre, E., Grieser, B., and Kundert, D. (2008). “A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: All shale plays are not clones of the Barnett Shale.” Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Roegiers, J. C., and Thiercelin, M. C. (1987). “Formation characterization: rock mechanics.” Reservoir stimulation, 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 3.1–3.11.
Salimzadeh, S., and Khalili, N. (2015). “A three-phase XFEM model for hydraulic fracturing with cohesive crack propagation.” Comput. Geotech., 69, 82–92.
Tang, X., Patterson, D., and Hinds, M. (2001). “Evaluating hydraulic fracturing in cased holes with cross-dipole acoustic technology.” SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Waters, G., Heinze, J., Jackson, R., Ketter, A., Daniels, J., and Bentley, D. (2006). “Use of horizontal well image tools to optimize Barnett Shale reservoir exploitation.” Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Weng, X. (1993). “Fracture initiation and propagation from deviated wellbores.” Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 17 • Issue 2 • February 2017
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 18, 2015
Accepted: Apr 6, 2016
Published online: May 23, 2016
Discussion open until: Oct 23, 2016
Published in print: Feb 1, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.