Technical Papers
Aug 12, 2021

Interpretation of Real-Time Hybrid Simulation as Neutral and Retarded Delay Systems for Its Stability Analysis

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

As an economical and effective testing method, real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) can be understood as a dynamic system with substructure feedback, where the time delay in feedback caused by servo-hydraulics may destabilize the system. Existing research does not realize that the time delay in each component has a different effect on stability. This study categorizes RTHS into neutral or retarded delay systems to differentiate their pole distribution and explore how time delay affects the stability. The analysis results show that (1) time delay introduces infinite pairs of conjugate characteristic roots into both neutral and retarded systems but results in different patterns of root distribution; (2) the characteristic roots approach based on the rational function approximation is only suitable for stability analysis of a retarded delay system, not for a neutral delay system; and (3) the definite integral stability analysis approach can directly determine the stability of both retarded and neutral delay systems without solving the transcendental equation. The computational simulation demonstrated the difference between retarded and neutral delay systems and the effectiveness of the new approach. This study provides fresh insights for the dynamic analysis of RTHS system with time delay.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research reported in this paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Projects 52008145 and 51478158), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant Nos. JZ2020HGQA0203 and PA2021GDSK0080).

References

Ahmadizadeh, M., G. Mosqueda, and A. M. Reinhorn. 2008. “Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real-time hybrid structural simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (1): 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.743.
Botelho, R. M., M. Avci, and R. Christenson. 2021. “Approximate and exact stability analysis of 1-DOF and 2-DOF single-actuator real-time hybrid substructuring.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 147 (Jan): 107115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107115.
Botelho, R. M., and R. E. Christenson. 2015. “Robust stability and performance analysis for multi-actuator real-time hybrid substructuring.” In Vol. 4 of Dynamics of coupled structures, 1–7. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15209-7_1.
Carrion, J. E., and B. F. Spencer Jr. 2007. Model-based strategies for real-time hybrid testing. Champaign, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Chen, C., and J. M. Ricles. 2008. “Stability analysis of SDOF real-time hybrid testing systems with explicit integration algorithms and actuator delay.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (4): 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.775.
Chen, C., J. M. Ricles, T. L. Karavasilis, Y. Chae, and R. Sause. 2012. “Evaluation of a real-time hybrid simulation system for performance evaluation of structures with rate dependent devices subjected to seismic loading.” Eng. Struct. 35 (Dec): 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.006.
Chi, F. D., J. Wang, and F. Jin. 2010. “Delay-dependent stability and added damping of SDOF real-time dynamic hybrid testing.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 9 (3): 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-010-0026-0.
Christenson, R., Y. Z. Lin, A. Emmons, and B. Bass. 2008. “Large-scale experimental verification of semiactive control through real-time hybrid simulation.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (4): 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(522).
Dion, C., N. Bouaanani, R. Tremblay, and C.-P. Lamarche. 2012. “Real-time dynamic substructuring testing of a bridge equipped with friction-based seismic isolators.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (1): 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000199.
Friedman, A., et al. 2015. “Large-scale real-time hybrid simulation for evaluation of advanced damping system performance.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (6): 04014150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001093.
Gao, X., N. Castaneda, and S. J. Dyke. 2014. “Experimental validation of a generalized procedure for MDOF real-time hybrid simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 140 (4): 04013006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000696.
Gao, X. S., and S. You. 2019. “Dynamical stability analysis of MDOF real-time hybrid system.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 133 (Nov): 106261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106261.
Gu, K., J. Chen, and V. L. Kharitonov. 2003. Stability of time-delay systems. New York: Springer.
Günay, S., and K. M. Mosalam. 2014. “Seismic performance evaluation of high-voltage disconnect switches using real-time hybrid simulation: II. Parametric study.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (8): 1223–1237. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2394.
Horiuchi, T., M. Inoue, T. Konno, and Y. Namita. 1999. “Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28 (10): 1121–1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199910)28:10%3C1121::AID-EQE858%3E3.0.CO;2-O.
Horiuchi, T., and T. Konno. 2001. “A new method for compensating actuator delay in real-time hybrid experiments.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 359 (1786): 1893–1909. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2001.0878.
Huang, L., C. Chen, M. H. Chen, and T. Guo. 2020. “Effect of time-varying delay on stability of real-time hybrid simulation with multiple experimental substructures.” J. Earthquake Eng. 146 (10): 04020109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1688735.
Huang, L., C. Chen, T. Guo, and M. Chen. 2019. “Stability analysis of real-time hybrid simulation for time-varying actuator delay using the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 145 (1): 04018124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001550.
Huang, L., W. J. Xu, and T. Guo. 2017. “Real-time hybrid simulation of parallel isolated building with novel sliding isolators.” [In Chinese.] J. Vibr. Shock 36 (20): 151–157. https://doi.org/10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.20.024.
Igarashi, A., H. Iemura, and T. Suwa. 2000. “Development of substructured shaking table test method.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Upper Hutt, NZ: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Kim, S. J., R. Christenson, B. Phillips, and B. F. Spencer Jr. 2012. “Geographically distributed real-time hybrid simulation of MR dampers for seismic hazard mitigation.” In Proc., of 20th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conf. 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412374.034.
Kuang, Y. 1993. Delay differential equations: With applications in population dynamics. Boston: Academic Press.
Li, T. F., L. Ma, Y. Sui, M. Su, and Y. Qiang. 2020. “Soft real-time hybrid simulation based on a space steel frame.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 18 (6): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00798-z.
Li, T. F., M. Z. Su, Y. Sui, L. Ma, and D. Han. 2019. “Hybrid test on the seismic behavior of high strength steel composite K-eccentrically braced steel frames.” [In Chinese.] Eng. Mech. 36 (4): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2018.01.0060.
Maghareh, A., S. Dyke, S. Rabieniaharatbar, and A. Prakash. 2017. “Predictive stability indicator: A novel approach to configuring a real-time hybrid simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (1): 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2775.
Maghareh, A., S. J. Dyke, A. Prakash, and J. F. Rhoads. 2014. “Establishing a stability switch criterion for effective implementation of real-time hybrid simulation.” Smart Struct. Syst. 14 (6): 1221–1245. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.14.6.1221.
Maghareh, A., C. E. Silva, and S. J. Dyke. 2018. “Servo-hydraulic actuator in controllable canonical form: Identification and experimental validation.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 100 (Feb): 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.022.
Mahin, S. A., and P.-S. B. Shing. 1985. “Pseudodynamic method for seismic testing.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (7): 1482–1503. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:7(1482).
Mercan, O., and J. M. Ricles. 2007. “Stability and accuracy analysis of outer loop dynamics in real-time pseudodynamic testing of SDOF systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (11): 1523–1543. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.701.
Mercan, O., and J. M. Ricles. 2008. “Stability analysis for real-time pseudodynamic and hybrid pseudodynamic testing with multiple sources of delay.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (10): 1269–1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.814.
Mirza Hessabi, R., A. Ashasi-Sorkhabi, and O. Mercan. 2016. “A new tracking error-based adaptive controller for servo-hydraulic actuator control.” J. Vib. Control 22 (12): 2824–2840. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546314548205.
Mosalam, K. M., and S. Günay. 2014. “Seismic performance evaluation of high voltage disconnect switches using real-time hybrid simulation: I. System development and validation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (8): 1205–1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2395.
Nakashima, M., H. Kato, and E. Takaoka. 1992. “Development of real-time pseudodynamic testing.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 21 (1): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210106.
Ogata, K. 1997. Modern control engineering. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pan, P., M. Nakashima, and H. Tomofuji. 2005. “Online test using displacement-force mixed control.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (8): 869–888. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.457.
Poley, R. 2005. DSP control of electro-hydraulic servo actuators. Dallas, TX: Texas Instruments.
Qin, Y. X., Y. Q. Liu, and L. Wang. 1963. The motion stability of dynamic system with time delay. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Science Press.
Sajeeb, R., D. Roy, and C. S. Manohar. 2007. “Numerical aspects of a real-time sub-structuring technique in structural dynamics.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 72 (11): 1261–1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2038.
Silva, C. E., D. Gomez, A. Maghareh, S. J. Dyke, and B. F. Spencer Jr. 2020. “Benchmark control problem for real-time hybrid simulation.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 135 (Jan): 106381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106381.
Thewalt, C., and M. Roman. 1994. “Performance parameters for pseudodynamic tests.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (9): 2768–2781. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:9(2768).
Wallace, M. I., J. Sieber, S. A. Neild, D. J. Wagg, and B. Krauskopf. 2005. “Stability analysis of real-time dynamic substructuring using delay differential equation models.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (15): 1817–1832. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.513.
Wang, Z. H. 2008. “Numerical stability test of neutral delay differential equations.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2008 (698043): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/698043.
Xu, Q., G. Stepan, and Z. Wang. 2016. “Delay-dependent stability analysis by using delay-independent integral evaluation.” Automatica 70 (Feb): 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.03.028.
Xu, Q., G. Stepan, and Z. Wang. 2017. “Numerical stability test of linear time-delay systems of neutral type.” In Vol. 7 of Time delay systems: Advances in delays and dynamics, edited by T. Insperger, T. Ersal, and G. Orosz. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53426-8_6.
Zhang, Z., B. Basu, and S. R. Nielsen. 2016. “Real-time hybrid simulation technique for performance evaluation of full-scale sloshing dampers in wind turbines.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 753 (8): 082021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/753/8/082021.
Zhu, F., J. T. Wang, F. Jin, F. D. Chi, and Y. Gui. 2015. “Stability analysis of MDOF real-time dynamic hybrid testing systems using the discrete-time root locus technique.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (2): 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2467.
Zhu, F., J. T. Wang, F. Jin, and L. Q. Lu. 2019. “Control performance comparison between tuned liquid damper and tuned liquid column damper using real-time hybrid simulation.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 18 (3): 695–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0530-9.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Jan 4, 2021
Accepted: May 7, 2021
Published online: Aug 12, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 12, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, College of Civil Engineering, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Hefei 230009, China; Lecturer, Anhui Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Structures and Materials, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Hefei 230009, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3921-3671. Email: [email protected]
Cheng Chen, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, School of Engineering, San Francisco State Univ., San Francisco, CA 94132. Email: [email protected]
Jingfeng Wang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Hefei 230009, China; Professor, Anhui Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Structures and Materials, Hefei Univ. of Technology, Hefei 230009, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Stability analysis of real time hybrid simulation under coupled actuator delay and nonlinear behavior, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 10.1002/eqe.3667, 51, 10, (2357-2377), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share