Technical Papers
Nov 22, 2017

Bayesian Two-Phase Gamma Process Model for Damage Detection and Prognosis

Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 144, Issue 2

Abstract

This paper presents a data-driven approach to damage detection and prognosis in the context of structural health monitoring. One of the main issues in dealing with structural damage and degradation is its hidden stochastic nature, which could be gradual or accompanied by sudden changes resulting from shock events. Although gradual degradation could be related to age and operating conditions, shocks could arise from loss of stiffness/connectivity or from impact, resulting in a subsequent change in degradation path. In this paper, a unified degradation modeling approach is presented based on a gamma process, where both gradual degradation and change points caused by shock events are identified in a unified formulation. Because the exact degradation path depends upon both operating and loading conditions, the model parameters are estimated directly from the sensory data using Bayesian inference. In the first step, a degradation indicator is calculated based on time-series modeling, which is then used together with a multivariate Hotelling’s p control chart for damage detection. In the next step, the degradation indicator forms an input to a gamma process degradation model (single- or two-phase gamma process), which enables damage prognosis using time-series model parameters as surrogates. The advantage of this approach is the ability to detect change points and changes to the degradation path using a purely data-driven approach without the need for experimental failure data. The model parameters and prognosis estimates can be updated with the availability of monitoring data, which makes it a powerful tool for damage detection and prognosis in long-term condition-monitoring settings. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the overall process using simulated vibration data and highlight the potential advantages of using this methodology.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the associate editor, managing editor, and anonymous referees for their invaluable comments and suggestions. Funding support through the Natural Sciences Engineering Research Council of Canada through their Collaborative Research and Development Grants is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Bornn, L., Farrar, C. R., Park, G., and Farinholt, K. (2009). “Structural health monitoring with autoregressive support vector machines.” J. Vibr. Acoust., 131(2), 021004.
Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., and Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Brownjohn, J. M., De Stefano, A., Xu, Y.-L., Wenzel, H., and Aktan, A. E. (2011). “Vibration-based monitoring of civil infrastructure: Challenges and successes.” J. Civil Struct. Health Monit., 1(3–4), 79–95.
Comanducci, G., Magalhães, F., Ubertini, F., and Cunha, Á. (2016). “On vibration-based damage detection by multivariate statistical techniques: Application to a long-span arch bridge.” Struct. Health Monit., 15(5), 505–524.
Doebling, S. W., Farrar, C. R., and Prime, M. B. (1998). “A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods.” Shock Vibr. Digest, 30(2), 91–105.
Dong, M., and He, D. (2007). “A segmental hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM)-based diagnostics and prognostics framework and methodology.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 21(5), 2248–2266.
Edirisinghe, R., Setunge, S., and Zhang, G. (2013). “Application of gamma process for building deterioration prediction.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 763–773.
Fan, W., and Qiao, P. (2010). “Vibration-based damage identification methods: A review and comparative study.” Struct. Health Monit., 10(1), 83–111.
Fang, X., Luo, H., and Tang, J. (2005). “Structural damage detection using neural network with learning rate improvement.” Comput. Struct., 83(25), 2150–2161.
Farrar, C. R., and Lieven, N. A. (2007). “Damage prognosis: The future of structural health monitoring.” Philos. Transact. Roy. Soc. London A, 365(1851), 623–632.
Farrar, C. R., and Worden, K. (2012). Structural health monitoring: A machine learning perspective, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Figueiredo, E., Park, G., Farrar, C. R., Worden, K., and Figueiras, J. (2011). “Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability.” Struct. Health Monit., 10(6), 559–572.
Hipel, K. W., and McLeod, A. I. (1994). Time series modelling of water resources and environmental systems, Vol. 45, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Huang, X., and Chen, J. (2014). “Time-dependent reliability model of deteriorating structures based on stochastic processes and Bayesian inference methods.” J. Eng. Mech., 04014123.
Killick, R., and Eckley, I. (2014). “Changepoint: An R package for changepoint analysis.” J. Stat. Software, 58(3), 1–19.
Lawless, J., and Crowder, M. (2004). “Covariates and random effects in a gamma process model with application to degradation and failure.” Lifetime Data Anal., 10(3), 213–227.
Le, T. T., Chatelain, F., and Bérenguer, C. (2016). “Multi-branch hidden Markov models for remaining useful life estimation of systems under multiple deterioration modes.” J. Risk Reliab., 230(5), 473–484.
Le Son, K., Fouladirad, M., Barros, A., Levrat, E., and Iung, B. (2013). “Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models: A comparative study.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 112(1), 165–175.
Lu, C. J., and Meeker, W. O. (1993). “Using degradation measures to estimate a time-to-failure distribution.” Technometrics, 35(2), 161–174.
Manson, G., Worden, K., Holford, K., and Pullin, R. (2001). “Visualisation and dimension reduction of acoustic emission data for damage detection.” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 12(8), 529–536.
Masri, S., Nakamura, M., Chassiakos, A., and Caughey, T. (1996). “Neural network approach to detection of changes in structural parameters.” J. Eng. Mech., 350–360.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Mollineaux, M., and Rajagopal, R. (2015). “Structural health monitoring of progressive damage.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(4), 583–600.
Montgomery, D. C. (2007). Introduction to statistical quality control, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Mujica, L., Rodellar, J., Fernandez, A., and Guemes, A. (2010). “Q-statistic and T2-statistic PCA-based measures for damage assessment in structures.” Struct. Health Monit., 10(5), 539–553.
Mujica, L. E., Vehi, J., Ruiz, M., Verleysen, M., Staszewski, W., and Worden, K. (2008). “Multivariate statistics process control for dimensionality reduction in structural assessment.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 22(1), 155–171.
Mutlib, N. K., Baharom, S. B., El-Shafie, A., and Nuawi, M. Z. (2016). “Ultrasonic health monitoring in structural engineering: Buildings and bridges.” Struct. Control Health Monit., 23(3), 409–422.
Nair, K. K., and Kiremidjian, A. S. (2007). “Time series based structural damage detection algorithm using Gaussian mixtures modeling.” J. Dyn Syst. Meas. Control, 129(3), 285–293.
Nair, K. K., Kiremidjian, A. S., and Law, K. H. (2006). “Time series-based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure.” J. Sound Vib., 291(1), 349–368.
Nigro, M., Pakzad, S., and Dorvash, S. (2014). “Localized structural damage detection: A change point analysis.” Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng., 29(6), 416–432.
Noh, H., Rajagopal, R., and Kiremidjian, A. (2013). “Sequential structural damage diagnosis algorithm using a change point detection method.” J. Sound Vib., 332(24), 6419–6433.
Omenzetter, P., and Brownjohn, J. M. W. (2006). “Application of time series analysis for bridge monitoring.” Smart Mater. Struct., 15(1), 129–138.
Pandey, A., Biswas, M., and Samman, M. (1991). “Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes.” J. Sound Vib., 145(2), 321–332.
Pandey, M., Yuan, X.-X., and van Noortwijk, J. (2009). “The influence of temporal uncertainty of deterioration on life-cycle management of structures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 5(2), 145–156.
Park, C., and Padgett, W. (2005). “Accelerated degradation models for failure based on geometric Brownian motion and gamma processes.” Lifetime Data Anal., 11(4), 511–527.
Sbarufatti, C., Manes, A., and Giglio, M. (2014). “Application of sensor technologies for local and distributed structural health monitoring.” Struct. Control Health Monit., 21(7), 1057–1083.
Shi, Z., Law, S., and Zhang, L. (2000). “Structural damage detection from modal strain energy change.” J. Eng. Mech., 1216–1223.
Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Chen, M.-Y., Hu, C.-H., and Zhou, D.-H. (2013). “A degradation path-dependent approach for remaining useful life estimation with an exact and closed-form solution.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 226(1), 53–66.
Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., and Zhou, D.-H. (2011). “Remaining useful life estimation—A review on the statistical data driven approaches.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 213(1), 1–14.
Singpurwalla, N. (1997). “Gamma processes and their generalizations: An overview.” Engineering probabilistic design and maintenance for flood protection, Springer, Boston, 67–75.
Siringoringo, D. M., and Fujino, Y. (2008). “System identification of suspension bridge from ambient vibration response.” Eng. Struct., 30(2), 462–477.
Sohn, H., Czarnecki, J. A., and Farrar, C. R. (2000). “Structural health monitoring using statistical process control.” J. Struct. Eng., 1356–1363.
Sohn, H., and Farrar, C. R. (2001). “Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals.” Smart Mater. Struct., 10(3), 446–451.
Sun, Y., Liu, S., Li, R., Ye, Z., Kang, Y., and Chen, S. (2015). “A new magnetic flux leakage sensor based on open magnetizing method and its on-line automated structural health monitoring methodology.” Struct. Health Monit., 14(6), 583–603.
Tibaduiza, D.-A., Torres-Arredondo, M.-A., Mujica, L., Rodellar, J., and Fritzen, C.-P. (2013). “A study of two unsupervised data driven statistical methodologies for detecting and classifying damages in structural health monitoring.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 41(1), 467–484.
Ubertini, F., Comanducci, G., and Cavalagli, N. (2016). “Vibration-based structural health monitoring of a historic bell-tower using output-only measurements and multivariate statistical analysis.” Struct. Health Monit., 15(4), 438–457.
van Noortwijk, J. (2009). “A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 94(1), 2–21.
van Noortwijk, J., Kallen, M., and Pandey, M. (2005). “Gamma processes for time-dependent reliability of structures.” Advances in safety and reliability, K. Kolowrocki, ed., Taylor & Francis Group, London, 1457–1464.
Wang, H., Xu, T., and Yang, J. (2014). “Lifetime prediction based on degradation data analysis with a change point.” Proc., First Symp. on Aviation Maintenance and Management—Volume II, Springer, Berlin, 527–534.
Wang, Z., and Ong, K. (2008). “Autoregressive coefficients based Hotelling’s T2 control chart for structural health monitoring.” Comput. Struct., 86(19), 1918–1935.
Wang, Z., and Ong, K. (2009). “Structural damage detection using autoregressive-model-incorporating multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart.” Eng. Struct., 31(5), 1265–1275.
Wang, Z., and Ong, K. (2010). “Multivariate statistical approach to structural damage detection.” J. Eng. Mech., 12–22.
Worden, K., and Lane, A. (2001). “Damage identification using support vector machines.” Smart Mater. Struct., 10(3), 540–547.
Yao, R., and Pakzad, S. N. (2012). “Autoregressive statistical pattern recognition algorithms for damage detection in civil structures.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 31(1), 355–368.
Yuan, X.-X., Pandey, M., and Bickel, G. (2008). “A probabilistic model of wall thinning in CANDU feeders due to flow-accelerated corrosion.” Nuclear Eng. Des., 238(1), 16–24.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 144Issue 2February 2018

History

Received: Oct 22, 2016
Accepted: Jul 7, 2017
Published online: Nov 22, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 22, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0884-709X. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
S. Narasimhan, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share