Technical Papers
Dec 31, 2021

Hydrogen Peroxide Quenching with Mineral Catalysts after UV/H2O2 Advanced Oxidation

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 3

Abstract

This study explored mineral catalysts for H2O2 quenching after UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation as an alternative to granular activated carbon or chlorine (two of the most common methods). The following mineral catalysts were evaluated in batch reactors: activated alumina, aluminum oxide, iron (III) oxide, titanium dioxide, titanium, silver, zinc, and magnesium oxide. Of these, aluminum oxide and iron (III) oxide were the most promising catalysts and were further tested in column studies and compared with granular activated carbon (GAC). Aluminum oxide performance in column studies was inferior to the results obtained from GAC and iron (III) oxide, possibly due to the hygroscopic nature of the material. Additional rapid small-scale column tests (RSSCTs) were conducted with iron (III) oxide to mimic a three-year full-scale column operation and achieved 90%–99% removal of H2O2. The decomposition of H2O2 on the catalytic surface appears to generate hydroxyl radicals, although not at a sufficient level to provide considerable additional contaminant destruction after advanced oxidation. The process did not elevate iron concentration in the treated water to a level above the secondary USEPA standard of 0.3  mg/L (0.12  mg/L maximum, 0.03  mg/L average). Longer-term pilot-scale study is necessary to determine operational requirements, such as backwashing, and to determine whether the observed loss of activity over time can be regenerated. Overall, the process appears to be a viable option for H2O2 quenching, making application of UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation more practical for drinking water treatment where residual H2O2 can interfere with chlorination.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge free samples of Bayoxide E 33 HC granular iron oxide provided by Jeffrey Immel of LanXess/Sybron Chemicals Inc. This project was partially funded by a University of North Carolina at Charlotte Faculty research grant and an Office of Technology Transfer seed grant.

Disclaimer

This technology is included in pending Patent Publication Nos. WO 2017/100335 A1 and US 2018/0354832 A1 filed by the University of North Carolina at Charlotte and is available for licensing via the university’s Charlotte Office of Research Commercialization and Development.

References

Bach, A., and R. Semiat. 2011. “The role of activated carbon as a catalyst in GAC/iron oxide/H2O2 oxidation process.” Desalination 273 (1): 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.020.
Beltrán, F. J., J. F. García-Araya, P. M. Álvarez, and J. Rivas. 1998. “Aqueous degradation of atrazine and some of its main by-products with ozone/hydrogen peroxide.” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 71 (4): 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199804)71:4%3C345::AID-JCTB869%3E3.0.CO;2-C.
Buxton, G. V., C. L. Greenstock, W. P. Helman, and A. B. Ross. 1988. “Critical review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals (·OH/·O) in aqueous solution.” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 17 (2): 513–886. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555805.
Chu, X., Y. Xiao, J. Hu, E. Quek, R. Xie, T. Pang, and Y. Xing. 2016. “Pilot-scale UV/H2O2 study for emerging organic contaminants decomposition.” Rev. Environ. Health 31 (1): 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2016-0008.
Crittenden, J. C., J. K. Berrigan, and D. W. Hand. 1986. “Design of rapid small-scale adsorption tests for a constant diffusivity.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 58 (4): 312–319.
Crittenden, J. C., P. S. Reddy, H. Arora, J. Trynoski, D. W. Hand, D. L. Perram, and R. S. Summers. 1991. “Predicting GAC performance with rapid small-scale column tests.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 83 (1): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1991.tb07088.x.
Culp, R. L., J. A. Faisst, and C. E. Smith. 1981. Granular activated carbon installations. Cincinnati: USEPA, Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory.
Garwig, P. L. 1966. Heterogeneous decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by inorganic catalysts: A literature survey. Princeton, NJ: FMC Corporation, Chemical Research and Development Center.
Gibert, O., B. Lefèvre, M. Fernández, X. Bernat, M. Paraira, M. Calderer, and X. Martínez-Lladó. 2013. “Characterising biofilm development on granular activated carbon used for drinking water production.” Water Res. 47 (3): 1101–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.026.
He, X., M. Pelaez, J. A. Westrick, K. E. O’Shea, A. Hiskia, T. Triantis, T. Kaloudis, M. I. Stefan, A. A. de la Cruz, and D. D. Dionysiou. 2012. “Efficient removal of microcystin-LR by UV-C/H2O2 in synthetic and natural water samples.” Water Res. 46 (5): 1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.009.
Hofman-Caris, C. H. M., and E. Beerendonk. 2011. New concepts of UV/H2O2 oxidation. Nieuwegein, Netherlands: KWR WaterRF.
Keen, O., A. Dotson, and K. Linden. 2013. “Evaluation of hydrogen peroxide chemical quenching agents following an advanced oxidation process.” J. Environ. Eng. 139 (1): 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000619.
Khalil, L. B., B. S. Girgis, and T. A. M. Tawfik. 2001. “Decomposition of H2O2 on activated carbon obtained from olive stones.” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 76 (11): 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.481.
Klassen, N. V., D. Marchington, and H. C. E. McGowan. 1994. “H2O2 determination by the I3- method and by KMnO4 titration.” Anal. Chem. 66 (18): 2921–2925. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00090a020.
Li, J. 2013. Quenching H2O2 residuals after UV/H2O2 drinking water treatement using granular activated carbon. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto.
Linden, K. G., E. J. Rosenfeldt, and S. W. Kullman. 2007. “UV/H2O2 degradation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in water evaluated via toxicity assays.” Water Sci. Technol. 55 (12): 313–319. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.423.
Liu, W., S. A. Andrews, M. I. Stefan, and J. R. Bolton. 2003. “Optimal methods for quenching H2O2 residuals prior to UFC testing.” Water Res. 37 (15): 3697–3703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00264-1.
McKay, G., B. Sjelin, M. Chagnon, K. P. Ishida, and S. P. Mezyk. 2013. “Kinetic study of the reactions between chloramine disinfectants and hydrogen peroxide: Temperature dependence and reaction mechanism.” Chemosphere 92 (11): 1417–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.03.045.
Rey, A., J. A. Zazo, J. A. Casas, A. Bahamonde, and J. J. Rodriguez. 2011. “Influence of the structural and surface characteristics of activated carbon on the catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide.” Appl. Catal., A 402 (1–2): 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.05.040.
Rosenfeldt, E. J. 2011. UV advanced oxidation for treatment of taste and odor and algal toxins. New York: Hazen and Sawyer.
Rosenfeldt, E. J., P. J. Chen, S. Kullman, and K. G. Linden. 2007. “Destruction of estrogenic activity in water using UV advanced oxidation.” Sci. Total Environ. 377 (1): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.096.
Rosenfeldt, E. J., B. Melcher, and K. G. Linden. 2005. “UV and UV/H2O2 treatment of methylisoborneol (MIB) and geosmin in water.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 54 (7): 423–434. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2005.0040.
Sarathy, S. R., and M. Mohseni. 2006. “An overview of UV-based advanced oxidation processes for drinking water treatment.” IUVA News 8 (2): 16–27.
Swaim, P., A. Royce, T. Smith, T. Maloney, D. Ehlen, and B. Carter. 2008. “Effectiveness of UV advanced oxidation for destruction of micro-pollutants.” Ozone: Sci. Eng. 30 (1): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01919510701753390.
Velten, S., M. Boller, O. Köster, J. Helbing, H.-U. Weilenmann, and F. Hammes. 2011. “Development of biomass in a drinking water granular active carbon (GAC) filter.” Water Res. 45 (19): 6347–6354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.09.017.
Wang, C., M. Hofmann, A. Safari, I. Viole, S. Andrews, and R. Hofmann. 2019. “Chlorine is preferred over bisulfite for H2O2 quenching following UV-AOP drinking water treatment.” Water Res. 165 (Nov): 115000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115000.
Watts, M. J., R. Hofmann, and E. J. Rosenfeldt. 2012. “Low-pressure UV/Cl 2 for advanced oxidation of taste and odor.” J. Am. Water Works Assn. 104 (1): E58–E65. https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2012.104.0006.
Wols, B. A., and C. H. M. Hofman-Caris. 2012. “Review of photochemical reaction constants of organic micropollutants required for UV advanced oxidation processes in water.” Water Res. 46 (9): 2815–2827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.036.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 148Issue 3March 2022

History

Received: Aug 31, 2021
Accepted: Oct 27, 2021
Published online: Dec 31, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 31, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Justine E. Gleason
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223.
Daniel Burbes
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-4255. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share